Do We Have the Energy to Change the World? – Andrew Johnson

A huge thank you to Andrew Johnson for sending me this article of his to post on the HopeGirl Blog. I have always highly respected his work and perspective.  At the end you’ll find a link to one of the latest interviews he did with and amazing presentation given by Dr. Judy Wood.

Do We Have the Energy to Change the World?
Andrew Johnson – Originally Posted November 2012 at – http://tinyurl.com/enchwld
Updated Oct 2015

Most people realise that our ability to access energy sources safely, responsibly and cheaply is fundamental to our (technological) progress as a society. Outside of publications and events like those being developed and organised by groups like the Breakthrough Energy Movement (BEM), a rather limited mindset is present. It is assumed that energy supplies are limited by certain factors – primarily the availability of fuel, or where energy is said to be “renewable”, then  it is limited by environmental factors such as the amount of solar radiation, amount of wind, water flow etc.

 

In my own lifetime, I have seen the various factors played off against each other – all set in what I call a “paradigm of scarcity”. A great many doom-laden forecasts have suggested that our technological progress will be arrested quite abruptly. In the period of about 2003-2005, for example, it again became fashionable to talk about “peak oil” – but talk of this seems to have “faded out” over the last few years.

 

A study of how the WTC was destroyed – revealed in the evidence that has been uncovered by Dr Judy Wood  – forces us to reconsider at least 3 issues of global importance – the so-called issue of “terrorists and terrorism,” the production and use of energy and the truth about global warming and climate change. As we will see, the events on 911 involved the use of an advanced energy weapon technology, which we do know something about. This technology has the ability to produce vast energy changes without generating heat – and appears to be related to a phenomenon mis-named Cold Fusion or Low Energy Nuclear Reactions. Also, it appears that a Hurricane – named Erin was manipulated in certain ways, so that its movements were coincident with certain events.

 

The issues of energy and the environment are now fully woven together in the public mindset – because it has been “programmed” into people that the only way to get the majority of our energy is – essentially – by destroying the environment in some way. This then “causes” the existence of an environmental movement which at one time was just vocal in criticising the way energy is derived from fuel-based sources. Now, however, it sets government policy in many countries and forces certain controls to be placed on energy usage. However, behind this “green mask” lies a darker agenda – one of control of our freedom. Without a complete view of the “energy picture”, the “control agenda” appears sensible and benign, but when more obscure histories from the last 100 years or so are studied in depth, an insidious cover up can be observed.

free-energy-9-11 Do We Have the Energy to Change the World? - Andrew JohnsonMany people have discussed aspects of this cover up, but only a very small number of people, including myself, have connected this cover up to what has become known as “The War On Terror”. Indeed, others have appropriately re-used this cliché to describe that what we are involved in is a “A War on Terra” – i.e. that some group somewhere has co-opted us into helping us to destroy our own environment. In my presentation at BEM, I hope to illustrate clearly how this energy cover up is more far-reaching than most will discuss or acknowledge. In the 6 years (arguably longer) since Dr Judy Wood (www.drjudywood.com) first connected the evidence seen in the aftermath of the events of 9/11 to energy phenomena, the number of people openly discussing this evidence is small. The number of people wishing to cover up knowledge of this (now obvious) link is much larger than I would have expected – and it seems that a comprehensive programme has been underway, for some time, which seemingly “rolls out” new personnel to help manage the cover up.

 

In 2003, I discovered the “Disclosure Project” (www.disclosureproject.org) and it confirmed 2 things or me. Firstly, the UFO cover up was real and secondly that there was a clear link between the UFO phenomenon and “breakthrough free energy”. The evidence indicates some groups appear to have access to advanced propulsion technology – which uses an “unconventional” energy source. Nick Cook’s book “The Hunt for Zero Point” discusses the links between free energy and anti-gravity through the work of people like Thomas Townsend Brown. In 2006, I became familiar with Dr Judy Wood’s investigation into the destruction of the World Trade Centre on 9/11 and this proved that some type of energy weapon was used to destroy most of the WTC complex on 9/11.  In late 2007 and early 2008, more information was discovered showing the connection between the effects seen in the WTC evidence and the work of Canadian Experimental Researcher John Hutchison (see www.thehutchisoneffect.com). This resulted in a ongoing character attacks against John Hutchison, Dr Judy Wood and to a lesser extent, myself. Weeks later, Dr Wood began to document the peculiarly synchronous presence and movement of Hurricane Erin near NYC with the events of 9/11 as they unfolded. So now, climate data were linked to the energy effects seen on 9/11 – primarily at the WTC.

 

At this point, the reason for the implementation of Steven E Jones as a “figure head” in the 9/11 Research Community had already become clear. However, with certain effects – such as transmutation of elements – being observed both in John Hutchison’s research and what Jones called “Cold Fusion” (more correctly called Chemically Assisted Nuclear Reactions – CANR, or Low Energy Nuclear Reactions  – LENR), it became even clearer – the cover up needed to be carefully managed.

eisenhower-free-energy-hopegirl-blog Do We Have the Energy to Change the World? - Andrew JohnsonSo here we are, almost 8 years after all those links were all clearly established – and who is talking about them? I wonder if President Dwight Eisenhower tried to warn people about the likelihood of something like 9/11 being perpetrated. Grant Cameron’s archival Research at www.presidentialufo.com shows that it is extremely likely that  Ike was briefed on the UFO issue – at a high level. The USA’s secrecy apparatus was well established by the time Eisenhower left office in 1961 and so perhaps it was his fears about this which caused him to state

 

“The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes”.

 

He also said

 

Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.

 

Who were the members of this “scientific-technological elite” he referred to? Perhaps some of them work for ARA and SAIC – two companies that were defendants in Dr Judy Wood’s Qui Tam case in 2007.

 

One would hope that the “Peer Review” process in science would help expose the obvious problems with the Official 911 Hijackers Fable not being supported by available scientific evidence. The fact that this has not happened shows that the Peer Review is not “pure” – but it is driven by vested interests and the traumatised psyche of those unable to accept the deeply troubling truths that are revealed in the evidence we will discuss today. Forces at work in the scientific community work in very similar ways to those in politics, for example.

 

bruce-depalma-free-energy-hopegirl-blog Do We Have the Energy to Change the World? - Andrew JohnsonI have argued and pointed out that one of the main reasons that we do not have Free Energy technology in general use is because such technology has already been weaponised. However, few people will look at the evidence and even fewer will talk about it. For example, I have never heard Dr Steven Greer – who, as described earlier, was instrumental in linking together the energy cover up and UFO cover up speak or write, in any meaningful way about 9/11. Further, his own Free Energy initiatives (SEAS Power, AERO 2012 and Project Orion) when scrutinised carefully do not appear to “do what they say on the tin”. I found it very interesting to hear what Bruce De Palma – an inventor of another Free Energy Device – called the N-Machine, had to say about Free Energy and New Age Movements, before his death in 1997 (see: http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/brucedepalma.htm )

 

The CIA operates through various innocent looking fronts – to find out what people are thinking and what they’re inventing. Now, what’s more innocent than a benign institute – founded on transcendental principles to help New Age inventors bring free energy into the world?

 

In this case, he seems to be referring to the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS) due to his experiences with the sixth man not to walk on the Moon, Edgar Mitchell.

 

So if we want widespread use of free energy, we must first realise the obstacles in our way. Some of these obstacles can only be discovered by careful analysis and documentation. As well as solving engineering problems, it must be realised there is some type of “system” or “programme” in operation which is influencing people in subtle and not so subtle ways. Can this system be circumvented?  (This is what “Fix the World” and the QEG initiatives are all about).

 

Sometimes, it seems like knowing the truth is a curse. I have described this feeling as a feeling of a sort of isolation. It is like you become an “intellectual leper.” Most people live with deception on a far deeper level than they seem consciously aware and some just don’t seem to care what the truth is. Others seem, on the surface, to care but when they are confronted with certain evidence and truth, they are seemingly unable to process it. It’s like the “paper jams in the printer” and no information can be “placed on the paper” – the paper has become crumpled and no new information can be printed on it.

 

So, do we have the energy to change the world? Yes, we do – and that has been demonstrated thousands of times in the last 100 years. It was most clearly demonstrated, however, in the destruction of the WTC on 9/11. So do we have the energy to make sure that everyone in the world knows this? At this point, it’s up to you and me to make sure “the job gets done”.

Open Disclosure with Dr Judy Wood & Andrew Johnson – 28 September 2016

share-medium Do We Have the Energy to Change the World? - Andrew Johnson

3 thoughts on “Do We Have the Energy to Change the World? – Andrew Johnson

Comments are closed.

Subscribe to the HopeGirl Blog!
Get the latest content first.
100% Privacy. We don't spam.