More and more people recognise that the so-called climate emergency is not about the Earth’s climate but is a vehicle for wealth redistribution, central planning and eroding national borders in favour of supranational governance.

So the UN is trying to muscle in, take control and force its climate scam on all nations.  The Globalist organisation has taken it upon itself to declare that its climate decrees are “international law” and nations must obey or face the consequences.

Irrespective of what the UN or any of its puppets say or do, we must never lose sight of the facts: CO₂, the gas of life, is not the enemy; centralised power pretending to save the planet at the expense of liberty is.

United Nations Claims All Must Fight “Climate Change”

By Alex Newman, as published by Liberty Sentinel on 22 July 2026

Table of Contents

1. Introduction
2. Trump Opposition to the UN Climate Play
3. The World Court and Its Climate Ruling
4. Critics Ridicule It All as Narrative Implodes
5. Trump and Experts Pushing Back
6. Roots in Globalist Ideology
7. Implications for Sovereignty and Economy
8. Historical Parallels and the Path Forward
9. About the Author

Introduction

Reports about the death of climate alarmism have been greatly exaggerated. In fact, obeying United Nations climate decrees is now officially “international law.” At least that is what two key UN entities and more than 140 national governments would like humanity to believe.

In one of the most consequential developments yet for the global climate movement, the UN General Assembly voted to formally endorse and “operationalise” a 2025 ruling by the International Court of Justice (“ICJ”) declaring that governments are legally obligated to combat climate change.

Supporters hailed the move as a historic victory for “climate justice.” Critics blasted it as a brazen assault on national sovereignty, self-government, affordable energy and constitutional government.

The major UN move came even as US President Donald Trump and his administration were stepping up their war on the “climate change” machine. But the US government’s vigorous opposition was not enough to stop the UN’s power grab.

In one of its most breathtaking rulings, the ICJ – also known as the “World Court” or “World Supreme Court” – ruled on 23 July 2025 that all governments have a legal duty to protect “human rights” and fight “global warming” by restricting emissions of carbon dioxide (CO₂). Officially, it was “advisory.” But on 20 May this year, the governments of the world, acting through the UN, voted to give it real force.

Among other elements, the new resolution charges the UN boss with advancing “compliance” with the court’s controversial decision. It also purports to interfere with the sovereign authority of governments to set their own policies on issues such as energy, the environment and even immigration, multiple governments warned.

The UN chief was enthusiastic about it, though. “The world’s highest court has spoken,” gushed UN Secretary-General António Guterres, a longtime Socialist Party operative. “Today, the General Assembly has answered.”

In a 20 May statement welcoming the General Assembly vote, Guterres described its resolution as “a powerful affirmation of international law, climate justice, science and the responsibility of states to protect people from the escalating climate crisis.”

Critics argued that the vote, which passed with 141 governments and tyrants in favour versus eight against and 28 abstentions, represents yet another brazen power grab by globalist forces. The UN General Assembly, or UNGA, has been described by top UN officials as the “Parliament of Humanity.”

The UN resolution seeks to transform the opinion of the so-called World Supreme Court into a de facto legal weapon against national sovereignty, hydrocarbon energy, economic freedom and, ultimately, human prosperity, opponents argued.

Trump Opposition to the UN Climate Play

Multiple critics have pointed out that this goes far beyond environmental policy. Instead, it is a frontal assault on self-government dressed up in the language of international law and human rights.

The legal foundation to criminally prosecute those who refuse to play along with the climate narrative is being laid down rapidly through these measures. Indeed, the resolution treats the ICJ opinion as “irrefutably authoritative and as setting out binding obligations on States,” warned US officials.

Among those forcefully opposing the UN General Assembly measure was the Trump administration on behalf of the American people. US taxpayers are by far the largest financiers of the UN, even though the outfit consistently works against the rights and interests of Americans.

“Throughout the negotiation of this resolution, the United States has been consistent in conveying our opposition to this initiative,” argued Ambassador Tammy Bruce, deputy US representative to the UN. “The United States did not support seeking an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on climate change and has many concerns about the Court’s opinion.”

The ICJ’s July 2025 ruling, spanning hundreds of pages, declared that governments have a “legal duty” under international law to prevent “environmental harm” by slashing CO₂ emissions. Failure to do so, the court warned, could constitute an “internationally wrongful act.”

ICJ President Yuji Iwasawa painted an apocalyptic picture: Man-made global warming is supposedly an “existential problem of planetary proportions” imperilling “all forms of life.” States must “cooperate” to meet emission targets, phase out fossil fuels and provide “climate justice” reparations to poorer nations, Iwasawa and other members of the court declared.

In comments delivered ahead of the General Assembly vote, Ambassador Bruce highlighted some of the problems the US government saw with the resolution and the World Court ruling.

“In brief, this resolution is highly problematic in calling on States to comply with so-called ‘obligations’ that are based on non-binding conclusions of the Court on which UN Member States’ views diverge,” she said. “The resolution includes inappropriate political demands relating to fossil fuels and on other climate topics, and we believe there is no basis for the resolution’s mandate to the Secretary-General to report on the complex and nuanced legal issues addressed by the Court.”

Several other governments expressed similar concerns, Bruce said.

Specifically, the UN resolution and the ICJ ruling claim that all governments have obligations that would “impermissibly interfere with each States’ [sic] sovereign rights to regulate and manage its own energy policy,” Bruce continued. The UN resolution also pretends that “peoples,” rather than individuals, have “human rights,” she noted.

The World Court and Its Climate Ruling

The ICJ climate case – pushed by Pacific Island governments such as Vanuatu with heavy UN backing – was billed as the most significant ever before the court. One analyst said it was tantamount to putting the entire industrialised world on trial.

The ruling was designed from the outset to provide legal cover for the entire UN climate regime, including the 2015 Paris Agreement, and to arm activists, non-governmental organisations and foreign governments with tools to harass energy producers and sovereign nations, analysts observed.

“Failure of a state [government] to take appropriate action to protect the climate system … may constitute an internationally wrongful act,” ICJ President Iwasawa said, making clear that the climate movement ultimately intends to use global “authorities” to impose its agenda on humanity by force.

The court echoed that view in its unanimous, 500-page opinion. “Failure of the state to take appropriate action to protect the climate system from [greenhouse gas] emissions including through fossil fuel production, fossil fuel consumption, the granting of fossil fuel exploration licenses, or the provision of fossil fuel subsidies may constitute an internationally wrongful act,” the court warned, a clear threat.

The International Court of Justice, headquartered in The Hague, Netherlands, is considered the principal judicial body of the UN. Its 15 judges are elected by the UN General Assembly and Security Council – bodies in which tyrannical regimes often hold equal sway with free nations.

Along with the International Criminal Court, critics have long derided the ICJ as a “kangaroo” court. Among other concerns, analysts have noted its politicised rulings that advance globalist agendas over genuine justice. Key principles from the US Constitution are notably absent.

In its climate ruling, the court leaned heavily on “customary international law,” the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (“UNFCCC”), the Paris Agreement, and even nebulous “human rights” obligations. Trump has announced the US withdrawal from many of those schemes, but globalist legal experts believe the ruling still applies under human rights.

Indeed, the UN’s top court asserted that a “clean, healthy, and sustainable environment” is a human right, a view echoed in the General Assembly resolution adopted on 20 May. As such, states must curb emissions to comply with their supposed international human-rights obligations. Critics have long noted that the UN rejects the traditional US and Christian understanding of God-given rights, instead promoting a Soviet-style view of revokable “rights” to government “services.”  

The ruling has especially significant implications for Western nations. Wealthy nations, the ICJ suggested, bear heightened responsibilities for dealing with climate change. That should include taxpayer-funded financial support and potential liability for what it described as “transboundary harm.”

The opinion’s “advisory” nature is a fig leaf. While the ICJ lacks its own army, its rulings carry “moral authority” and are routinely weaponised in domestic courts, international negotiations and activist litigation, as multiple UN officials pointed out before and after it was handed down.

The UNGA resolution amplifies this by welcoming the opinion and going even further, calling on states to “take all possible steps” to avoid climate harm, and keeping it on the agenda for future action. It also reinforces purported obligations under the Paris Agreement and paves the way for lawsuits, reparations claims and pressure on holdouts such as the Trump administration.

Critics Ridicule It All as Narrative Implodes

Ironically, the General Assembly decision came amid more and more bad news for proponents of the increasingly embattled man-made global-warming hypothesis. Polling shows most Americans reject the whole narrative, and even Democrats and the establishment media admit that talking about climate is a non-starter with US voters.

A stunning new poll released just days after the UN vote showed most Americans reject the UN’s climate hypothesis altogether. According to the survey by Pew Research, only 48 per cent of Americans even believe human emissions of carbon dioxide are causing climate change. About 22 per cent believe the warming is natural, 17 per cent are not sure what is causing it and 12 per cent do not even believe the planet is warming at all.

Among Republicans, just one in five believe human activities are causing global warming, Pew revealed. Almost 40 per cent believe the warming is natural, and one in four do not even believe the globe is heating up. About three out of four Democrats, by contrast, believe human emissions of CO₂ are to blame for observed warming.

This partisan divide underscores a deeper truth, analysts said. The “climate crisis” narrative is less about science and more about ideology, power and control. Republicans and sceptics, informed by decades of failed doomsday predictions – from the 1970s global-cooling scare to Al Gore’s ice-free Arctic prophecies – recognise the narrative for what it is. Democrats and globalists cling to it as a vehicle for wealth redistribution, central planning and eroding national borders in favour of supranational governance.

But even Democrats and leftists are recognising the political danger of peddling the alarmism. Indeed, The New York Times, among the most alarmist “news” outfits in America, recently ran an op-ed headlined ‘Democrats Don’t Have to Campaign on Climate Change Anymore’.

The piece, written by Syracuse University Environment Professor Matthew Huber, urged Democrats to stop talking about climate change if they want to win elections. While he encouraged them to keep pursuing climate policies, he said they must focus on regaining credibility with the working class to win elections – and the working class is apparently not buying the UN’s climate narrative.

Just weeks before the General Assembly vote, even the hyper-alarmist UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) was forced to concede that its most alarmist scenarios were not grounded in reality. The outfit, long criticised for politicising science, revised its modelling that had suggested temperature increases of 4 to 5 degrees Celsius by the end of the century. Those scenarios are now gone.

President Trump responded to the news on Truth Social with his characteristic style. “GOOD RIDDANCE! After 15 years of Dumocrats promising that ‘Climate Change’ is going to destroy the Planet, the United Nations TOP Climate Committee just admitted that its own projections (RCP8.5) were WRONG! WRONG! WRONG!” he said.

Trump and Experts Pushing Back

The Trump administration has been a wrecking ball to the climate movement. Indeed, it has withdrawn from numerous UN climate agreements, including the 1992 treaty, the aforementioned UNFCCC, which underpins the whole UN climate regime. Speaking to the UN, the president himself ridiculed the climate narrative as the greatest “con job” in human history.

The administration is also ending the domestic assault on CO₂, including many of the regulations on energy production. Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency is even reversing the Obama-era “endangerment finding” claiming that CO₂ – the gas exhaled by all living creatures – is “pollution” that must be regulated.

Legal experts and sceptics immediately pushed back on the UN’s climate ruling, too. Astrophysicist Dr. Willie Soon, a leading voice debunking climate alarmism, called the decision “a joke at a cosmic proportion.”

The court, he told The New American, demonstrates “zero understanding of climate science” while threatening America First policies under President Trump. “Since when has ICJ or the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change proved that rising gas of life can cause all the computer model-produced imaginary disasters?” asked Soon, who has published multiple peer-reviewed studies debunking the narrative on CO₂.

Climate Depot publisher Marc Morano, often dubbed the top enemy of “climate action,” was equally blunt. “Facing the insurmountable collapse of their global climate agenda … the UN ‘high court’ has ruled nations are compelled … to comply or pay ‘reparations’ and fund ‘climate justice’ programmes,” he told TNA. “Thank God for Donald Trump leading the global collapse of the UN climate bullcrap!”

Roots in Globalist Ideology

This push for a global “climate regime” to dictate policy to nations goes back decades. The UN’s climate apparatus – rooted in the 1992 Rio Earth Summit and subsequent frameworks – has always been about more than temperature. It is a vehicle for socialist dreams of world government, wealth transfers from developed to developing nations and control over energy, the lifeblood of modern economies.

By demonising human emissions of CO₂ as pollution, the UN and governments are able to regulate the “gas of life” (essential for plant photosynthesis) and literally all human activity. Of course, CO₂ comprises a tiny fraction of the atmosphere, with human contributions even smaller. Indeed, human emissions of CO₂ make up a fraction of one per cent of all the “greenhouse” gases in the atmosphere.

The ICJ case itself originated from a UNGA request, with broad participation from nearly 100 governments and various organisations. Joe Biden’s administration, true to form, urged a strong ruling, framing climate change as a “gravest challenge” requiring global coordination.

Now, with Trump back in office dismantling these schemes domestically and eyeing exits from international entanglements, the globalists are doubling down through global judicial and assembly manoeuvres.

Critics rightly point out the selective outrage. Communist China, the world’s top emitter by far, faces little real pressure as it continues building coal-fired power plants. Governments and tyrants ruling “developing nations” are still demanding trillions in “loss and damage” funding while building coal plants, too.

Meanwhile, Western nations are pressured to deindustrialise, accepting energy poverty in the name of climate virtue as jobs and production are shipped to China and other nations ruled by hostile tyrants. Clearly, this is not about “science,” experts say. Instead, it has all the characteristics of a scam.

Implications for Sovereignty and Economy

Despite being based on largely discredited pseudoscience and models producing endless debunked predictions, the ICJ ruling and the subsequent UNGA resolution threaten profound consequences.

Among other measures, they could justify lawsuits against US companies, increase pressure for phasing out reliable energy in the West and even justify demands for “climate reparations” from Third World dictatorships.

Self-government and individual liberty are also under threat. Without serious action from US authorities, domestic courts may cite the ruling and the UNGA resolution, eroding the US Constitution’s supremacy. The same will happen across what was once known as “Christendom” and the “Free World.”

Trump’s agenda of pursuing American energy dominance, withdrawing from UN climate schemes, and slashing regulations directly counters this – for now. But, obviously, Trump will not be in office forever. Few of his climate policies have been enshrined in law. As such, a future president can and almost certainly will embrace the UN agenda going forward, at least if Congress does not act now.

Globally, the ICJ ruling and the UNGA resolution bolster support for upcoming UN climate summits. They are also likely to fuel ever-more-draconian “Nationally Determined Contributions” under the Paris Agreement, framing them as binding obligations. Just last year, the UN climate summit adopted an agreement claiming humanity had already burned through four-fifths of its “carbon budget.”

Historical Parallels and the Path Forward

From the League of Nations to the United Nations, internationalist bodies have sought to subordinate nations and people to international law. Supposed man-made climate change serves as the perfect pretext: invisible, global, urgent, never-ending and requiring endless sacrifice from the productive West.

At least on this issue, President Trump appears to understand the stakes. What is left of the movement he built has clearly rejected the false choice between environmental stewardship and prosperity.

As even a brief overview of the evidence shows, true environmental protection flows from property rights, innovation and human ingenuity – not top-down edicts from The Hague or the UN headquarters in New York City.

Trump’s actions are not enough to stop this global agenda. Americans must demand that Congress reject any implementation of the ICJ ruling or the UNGA’s resolution. The US government should reaffirm non-recognition of ICJ jurisdiction, defund related UN programmes, expose the faulty science behind the scheme and ultimately abandon the UN entirely. States can and should lead the way by prioritising affordable energy and rejecting the abuse.

The UNGA vote and ICJ opinion are symptoms of a much deeper problem: the erosion of national sovereignty in favour of unaccountable global governance. This latest salvo should serve as a powerful reminder of why vigilance against the climate-industrial complex and the forces of globalism remains essential. The gas of life is not the enemy; centralised power pretending to save the planet at the expense of liberty is.

It is true that the climate movement is under tremendous pressure. But the battle is far from over, as the ICJ and UNGA made clear with their latest moves. With public scepticism rising and a resolute president in office, the globalists’ “legal” manoeuvres may ultimately backfire, accelerating the very collapse of their narrative. But that will take work. Sovereignty, science and sanity can still prevail – if Americans insist on it and get busy.

Source: https://expose-news.com/2026/07/23/un-declares-every-nation-has-a-legal-duty/

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

HopeGirl Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@hopegirlblog
HopeGirl Telegram Channel Chat and Groups: https://t.me/Hopegirl587 
Get Our Free EMF Survival Guide : https://bit.ly/FTWEMF
10 Percent Off our EMF Protection Products with this Link: https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/tenoff

The post UN declares every nation has a legal duty to obey its climate decrees – or face the consequences appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Britain’s top military officer is openly warning the public to prepare for the unthinkable sacrifice of losing their “sons and daughters” in World War III, as the “whole of [the] nation” must be ready to “fight” in direct conflict with Russia.

The alarming remarks mark one of the most explicit acknowledgments yet that Western governments are bracing their populations for large-scale war.

Air Chief Marshal Sir. Richard Knighton, the UK Chief of Defence Staff, delivered the stark prediction during a lecture at London’s RUSI think tank, insisting that “More families will know what sacrifice for our nation means.”

Knighton said the likelihood of Vladimir Putin launching an assault on Britain is “slim” but growing steadily, a familiar refrain from Western leaders who continue escalating military commitments abroad while warning of impending conflict at home.

“The situation is more dangerous than I have known during my career, and the price of peace is rising,” the British defense chief said.

“Our response needs to go beyond simply strengthening our armed forces.

“It needs a whole-of-nation response that builds our defense industrial capacity, grows the skills we need, harnesses the power of the institutions we will need in wartime, and ensures and increases the resilience of society and the infrastructure that supports it.”

His comments echoed recent remarks from French General Fabien Mandon.

As Slay News reported, Gen. Mandon caused political uproar last month when he declared that the French public must accept that the nation will “lose its children” in a war with Russia.

Mandon warned: “If our country falters because it is not prepared to accept – let’s be honest – to lose its children, to suffer economically because defense production will take precedence, then we are at risk.”

Knighton agreed, saying, “Fabien Mandon was right.

“More people being ready to fight for their country.”

He added that “Sons and daughters. Colleagues. Veterans. …will all have a role to play.

“To build. To serve. And if necessary, to fight.

“And more families will know what sacrifice for our nation means.”

The message was unmistakable: the British public must prepare for mobilization against a nuclear powerhouse.

Britain Falling Behind Germany, France, and Poland in War Preparations, Knighton Says

The military chief suggested Britain faces the same threat as Germany.

However, he noted that Germany is taking more aggressive steps to prepare its population for conflict, including reintroducing elements of national service and ramping up defense spending.

Knighton pointed to Berlin’s pledge to reach 3.5 percent of GDP on defense by 2029 and Poland’s already staggering 4.2 percent.

The UK’s ruling socialist Labour Party has promised to hit 2.5 percent by 2027, but Knighton hinted that this is nowhere near enough.

He also noted that “France and Germany [have] return[ed] to a form of national service.”

Then came the pointed jab at the Treasury:

“The threat in the UK isn’t really any different to the threat in Germany, for example.”

MI6 Chief Announces Britain Is Already in a Shadow War

The warnings come just days after MI6 Chief Blaise Metreweli declared that Britain is operating “in a space between peace and war.”

She vowed covert retaliation against Putin’s sabotage campaigns, stating her operatives must “seek to outplay them.

“In every domain. In every way.”

Invoking the spirit of the World War II Special Operations Executive, she said Britain’s wartime Prime Minister Winston Churchill’s famous call to “set Europe ablaze” serves as an inspiration to modern British intelligence.

Metreweli warned: “It is not enough to understand the world. We must shape it too.”

WATCH:

Her remarks, paired with Knighton’s, paint a picture of a government openly preparing the British public for both visible and covert conflict with a nuclear power.

NATO’s New Warning: “Conflict Is at Our Door”

As Slay News previously reported, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte has been sounding similar alarms, telling European leaders that they must prepare for war “like our grandparents endured.”

He warned that the UK and other NATO countries are next in Russia’s sights, insisting:

“We are Russia‘s next target… Conflict is at our door.

“Russia has brought war back to Europe. And we must be prepared.”

Rutte said too many Western nations are “quietly complacent” and failing to understand the urgency of the moment.

WATCH:

The coordinated messaging coming from Britain, France, Germany, and NATO is unmistakable.

Western governments are normalizing the expectation of large-scale conflict and conditioning their citizens to accept casualties, even among the young.

Knighton’s blunt statement that Britain must be ready to “lose its sons and daughters” is not a minor policy comment.

It marks a dramatic escalation in rhetoric, signaling that the political class is preparing the public for sacrifice rather than pursuing de-escalation or diplomatic peace efforts.

Source:  https://slaynews.com/news/uk-defense-chief-warns-public-whole-nation-must-prepare-fight-russia-ww3/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post UK Defense Chief Warns Public: ‘Whole of Nation’ Must Prepare to ‘Fight’ Russia in WW3 appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Courtenay Joins InfoWars host Harrison Smith, to Expose the Government’s AI-Driven Monitoring of Citizens

Courtenay Turner is back with a bombshell episode that has already set the internet on fire! Originally aired on American Journal—hosted by Harrison Smith on Infowars.com and Banned.video—this electrifying segment exposes the hidden AI revolution and surveillance state rapidly transforming America from within.

What’s really behind the AI.gov launch? Who are the shadowy tech moguls and military insiders pulling the strings? And how is Palantir—the secretive Silicon Valley giant—building a vast, real-time surveillance empire for the Trump administration?

Courtenay dives deep into the jaw-dropping leak that revealed the government’s July 4th AI.gov launch, the alarming rise of techno-fascism, and the shocking role of figures like Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, and Palantir’s Shyam Sankar in shaping America’s digital future. Discover how Detachment 201 is embedding Silicon Valley executives into the military, and why Palantir’s Foundry and Gotham platforms are consolidating your data—from finances to medical records—into a single, all-seeing system.

This is not just another conspiracy theory—it’s a documented, unfolding reality that could redefine democracy, privacy, and freedom in America.

Source: https://rumble.com/v6ve0ab-surveillance-nation-the-ai.gov-leak-and-the-rise-of-the-digital-panopticon.html?e9s=src_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_upp_a

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Surveillance Nation: The AI.gov Leak and the Rise of the Digital Panopticon appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Weight-loss transformation drugs like Ozempic are wreaking havoc on bodies across the world. Once the standard for beauty and sexuality, Hollywood celebrities now look like Auschwitz inmates on the verge of dying from typhus. Kelly Hatch joins Stew to discuss using X39, a clean way to get healthy and cure ailments, including vision impairments.

Source:  https://rumble.com/v6ugbc1-medical-industry-slaves-america-a-nation-of-the-walking-wounded.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post MEDICAL INDUSTRY SLAVES: America – A Nation of the Walking Wounded appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres says the quiet part out loud: All speech contrary to established narratives must be reined in.

Don’t look now but your First Amendment rights are up for negotiation at the United Nations, just as they are at the World Economic Forum and other globalist organizations that are aligned with the burgeoning one-world system.

On June 18, in recognition of International Day for Countering Hate Speech – yes, they actually have a day for that – the United Nations Secretary-General called for the eradication of “hate speech” around the world.

While that may sound nice in today’s world, where it tickles the ears of the naive Western liberals, keep in mind that “hate speech” is in the eye of the beholder.

This U.N. statement should be seen as a harbinger, a clear signal, that the U.N. and its many globalist allies are getting ready to clamp down even harder on what we the people are allowed to say or write online. The intent of the globalists is to criminalize all speech with which they disagree.

In a prepared speech published on June 17, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres had a lot to say about why the nations of the world need to regulate speech even more tightly than they already do. He said:

“Hate speech is a marker of discrimination, abuse, violence, conflict and even crimes against humanity.  We have seen this play out from Nazi Germany to Rwanda, Bosnia and beyond.  There is no acceptable level of hate speech; we must all work to eradicate it completely.”

He added that:

“Hate speech today targets a broad range of groups, often based on grounds of race, ethnicity, religion, belief or political affiliation. Recent months have seen an upsurge in both antisemitic and anti-Muslim hate speech online and in public comments by influential leaders. Hate speech may be used against women, refugees, migrants, gender-diverse and trans people, and minorities. It is massively amplified by the power of digital platforms and tools that enable it to spread across borders and cultures.”

And here’s the kicker. He noted:

“States have an obligation under international law to prevent and combat incitement to hatred and to promote diversity, mutual understanding and solidarity. They must step up and implement these commitments, while ensuring that the measures they take preserve freedom of speech and protect minorities and other communities.”

From the text of these comments it’s clear that in the eyes of the globalists, they are very concerned about protecting the ever-so-sensitive feelings of sexual minorities, illegal aliens and other minorities.

However,, if you are not included among one or more of the globalists’ most-favored groups singled out for special rights and privileges, you have no rights, certainly no right to free speech or freedom of the press. If you have an opinion, you’d better keep it to yourself or you could face a fine or even imprisonment.

Nothing could be more anti-American, as the founders of our nation were not concerned about protecting people’s right to say what is popular. Rather, it was the right to voice one’s opinion that might be unpopular or controversial that they were most concerned about. This tends to be speech that is political or religious in nature.

The globalist elites don’t see it that way. They want to set the tone and the agenda and chill all other speech through threats and actual criminal punishments.

That’s the type of Brave New World to which the globalists want to take us. We already see it happening in the U.K., Canada, Germany and other formerly free nations. There’s a faction within the U.S. that wants to go down this same road and they have been using arcane laws to throw pro-life Americans in jail for long prison terms, and they did the same to protesters who did nothing more than walk peacefully through the Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Guterres added that “the United Nations Strategy and Plan of Action on Hate Speech provides a framework to tackle both the causes and impacts of this scourge.  And the United Nations is currently preparing Global Principles for Information Integrity to guide decision-makers around these issues.”

Yes, the U.N. actually has a “Plan of Action” to curtail our speech (you can read the entire plan HERE). That an unelected global body would even have such a plan, let alone be pushing it on the nations of the world, should scare the heck out of every freedom-loving American, Canadian, or European.

Source:  https://substack.com/home/post/p-145927589

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post U.N. has ‘plan of action’ to curtail free speech in every nation of the world appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.