A recent announcement of a “mandatory” digital ID is not unique to the UK.  New digital ID laws have been implemented across the world in recent months, suggesting a broader effort to establish a global system of control.

For years, Aman Jabbi, a Silicon Valley technology veteran, has been warning about the creation of a “digital prison” through the integration of advanced surveillance technologies – including facial recognition, artificial intelligence and a network of surveillance devices – which will enable continuous monitoring and individual identification.

The long-term plan is that “facial recognition will be used to unlock your digital identity,” he said.

A recent article published by Paul Cudenec began:

In 2025, the British state announced it was about to impose a “mandatory” digital ID on the population, without which they would not be able to work.

The arrogant duplicity behind the roll-out has been jaw-dropping.

The name “Britcard,” for instance, is meant to resonate with feelings of national pride and suggest that it is all about proving how British you are in the face of all those illegal immigrants that somehow keep sneaking into the country.

But the authorities are laughing in the faces of what they consider to be a hopelessly gullible public – the “Brit” in fact stands for “Biometric Registration Identification Tracking”.

And it is not the specific British response to a specific British problem that it is being sold as.

As Jason Bassler points out, new digital ID laws have been lined up and pushed through all across the world in the last three months, from Mexico to Thailand, from Switzerland to Papua New Guinea.

Digital tyranny at the door, Paul Cudenec, 9 October 2025

So, what is happening?  As Cudenec surmised: “When we also consider that digital ID forms a central plank of the WEF’s global control agenda, it becomes all too clear what is happening here.”

However, Cudenec only named one half of the global partnership; the other is the United Nations.

Note: If you read Cudenec’s full article, you will note that he goes on to conflate “the Zionists” with the Globalists and then focuses all the blame on the undefined, unidentified “Zionists” as the masterminds behind the Globalists’ plan.

Anti-Zionist propaganda is a red herring being widely disseminated to throw the public off the scent of the perpetrators and lose sight of the overall plan.  In the first instance, we should ask ourselves: Why use identity politics, a left-wing ideology used as a tool by the Globalists, to identify who the Globalists are?  For a deeper understanding of how socialist and communist ideology is used for propaganda purposes, please read ‘Islamists have used left-wing ideology to propagate anti-Zionist beliefs in the West’.  We should bear in mind that Islamists are not working alone.  For some insight into who is working with or using Islamism and Islamists as a tool to further their agenda, please read ‘Who controls the Muslim Brotherhood?’ and ‘Gaza: Have you been tricked into following their agenda?’.

Digital Prison

Aman Jabbi, a Silicon Valley technology veteran with over 25 years of experience in video and camera technology, has co-founded two video camera technology startups and played a role in the development of camera technology used in smartphones, video streaming and movie production.

He has been a prominent speaker on the topic of facial recognition, digital identity and surveillance systems, warning about the creation of a “digital prison” through the integration of advanced surveillance technologies.

Jabbi has presented extensively on how facial recognition technology is being deployed as part of smart city infrastructure, with applications in public spaces, supermarkets and schools. He argues that the widespread use of facial recognition, combined with artificial intelligence and a network of surveillance devices – potentially numbering in the tens of billions – is enabling a system of continuous monitoring and individual identification.  He links this development to broader concepts such as the social credit system, digital real estate, the metaverse and the World Economic Forum’s “Fourth Industrial Revolution,” suggesting these technologies are part of a coordinated effort to establish a fully integrated command and control system.

We have included some resources where Jabbi has discussed the creation of the digital prison later in this article, but for this article, we highlight his warnings to the world as summarised in a recent documentary.

On 4 June 2025, Oracle Films released its documentary ‘The Agenda: Their Vision – Your Future’ which examines the digital prison which awaits us if we do not push back right now.

Related: ‘The Agenda: their Vision, Your Future’: The digital prison that awaits us all

Beginning at timestamp 13:20, Jabbi explains how facial recognition works and the ultimate aim.  Facial recognition is a technique that is used to uniquely identify the biometrics of any face, he said.  He continued:

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2025/10/11/facial-recognition-will-unlock-your-digital-identity/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Facial recognition will be used to unlock your digital identity; what has this got to do with climate change? appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

In 2011, a Swiss study on the global corporate control network found that 147 companies in Europe controlled 40% of the world’s wealth.  A large portion of that control flows into a small, tightly-knit core of financial institutions.  The most concentrated control emanated from the British financial multinational Barclays.

To put this study into a broader context, we also briefly describe the network of people and organisations responsible for the covid scam, the climate scam and the handful of corporations controlling the world’s food supply.

Table of Contents

Network of People and Organisations Responsible for the Covid Scam

In 2021, the German Club Der Klaren Worte (Club of Clear Words) published their deep dive into the network of people and organisations responsible for the covid scam.

Their 170-page document detailed more than 7,200 links between 6,500 entities and objects, including payment flows and investments.  The document is mostly in English.  It’s incredibly comprehensive in scope, detailing a global network that is working behind the scenes to influence global health, finance and governance.

According to the anonymous IT specialist who created the document, the core of this covid criminal network, around whom most everything revolves, is no larger than 20 or 30 people. Several of these criminals appear on page 36 as shown below (with some minor edits):

• Hermann Gröhe, German politician, Vice Chairman of Labour and Social Affairs, Economic Cooperation and Development, Workers.
• Ralph Brinkhaus, German politician, Chairman of the Digital and State Modernisation Working Group.
• Dr. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany.
• Prof. Ilona Kickbusch, PhD, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva.
• Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organisation.
• Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten, Institute of Virology Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
• Prof. Dr. Clarissa Prazeres da Costa, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technical University of Munich.
• Joe Cerrell, Managing Director Global Politics, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
• Prof. Jeremy Farrar, Director Wellcome Trust.
• Dr. Georg Kippels, German lawyer.
• Jens Spahn, German politician, Group leader.
• Dr. Gerd Müller, German politician, Federal Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development.
• Anja Karliczek, German politician.
• Dr. Georg Nüßlein, German politician.

Key organisations, whose networking connections are detailed, include: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (“BMGF”); World Health Organisation; World Bank Group; GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance founded by BMGF; The Global Fund; FIND, the global alliance for diagnostics; Johns Hopkins University; Robert Koch Institute; UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”); The German Global Health Hub; Wellcome Trust; Rockefeller Foundation; World Economic Forum (“WEF”); Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations; WEF’s Forum of Young Global Leaders; Big Pharma; Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin; European Commission; and, Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation appears to be near the top, or the centre, of the covid plandemic network. Gates is also a major funder of corporate media, and his network extends into global food and climate change policy.  Additionally, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, through its funding of WEF, also plays an important role in ‘The Great Reset’.

Related:

• Covid Criminal Network Leads to the Gates of Hell
• The Names of The Bilderbergers Who’ve Played a Role in The Covid Event
• COVID-19/Perpetrators/WEF, Wikispooks
• COVID-19/Perpetrators/Others, Wikispooks
• Dr. David Martin Exposes the Names and Faces of the People Who Are Killing Humanity, Red Pill Expo, 19 November 2021, read HERE and watch the video on BitChute HERE and UGETube HERE.

Network of People and Organisations Responsible for the Climate Scam

In 2012, Mark Carney was appointed the first non-British Governor of the Bank of England.  He has been on WEF’s Foundation Board, head of Canada’s central bank, United Nations Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance, chair of the Group of Thirty, chair of Bloomberg’s board of directors and chair of Brookfield Asset Management.

As the Edmonton Journal noted: “Carney has become a key player at the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, Brookfield and Bloomberg because he’s brilliant at one thing – getting governments and private businesses to fall in line with [Greta] Thunberg’s climate change agenda.”

Shortly after he became Canada’s Prime Minister, Dan Fournier noted that Carney’s involvement with the Rothschild and Rockefeller families and organisations, such as the Group of Thirty, suggests there will be a push for the globalist climate agenda that will benefit the elite at the expense of the middle class. “Carney’s ties and obsequious subservience to global banking elites, headed by the secretive Bank for International Settlements, should leave little doubt as to the dire economic plight of Canada,” Fournier said.

The Group of Thirty, or G-30 or Group of 30, is a “club” in the transnational policy community, Eleni Tsingou wrote.  “Clubs are held together by elite peer recognition, common and mutually reinforcing interests and an ambition to provide global goods in line with values its members consider honourable.  This notion of a ‘club’ explains how the actors who write the rules for global governance work together.”

In 2015, Mark Carney led the creation of the UK Financial Stability Board’s ‘Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure’ (“TCFD”), with billionaire  Michael Bloomberg as its chairman.  Here, Carney and Bloomberg were already starting a power grab by central banks.  The TCFD disbanded in October 2023.

From the TCFD came the Green Finance Initiative (“GFI”), which was established in January 2016 by the City of London Corporation in partnership with the UK government.

In 2017, the Central Banks and Supervisors Network for Greening the Financial System (“NGFS”) was established as an initiative of La Banque de France at the Paris “One Planet Summit.”  In September 2019, the International Monetary Fund joined as an observer.  In December 2020, the US Federal Reserve joined NGFS. As of  11 March 2025, the NGFS consisted of 145 members across over 90 countries and 23 observers.

During a 2021 interview, Paul Gallagher, of Executive Intelligence Review, said: “In August of 2019, central bankers met at the Federal Reserve’s annual Jackson Hole Wyoming conference and discussed a proposal by former central bank leaders from four countries, now all executives at BlackRock. They called it ‘Regime Change.’  It was time, they said, for central banks to take control of spending powers from governments.”

Also in 2019, as a direct response to a 2018 recommendation made by GFI, the Green Finance Institute was established.  Its funders include the UK government and the City of London.

In April 2021, the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (“GFANZ”) was launched by John Kerry, US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Change; Janet Yellen, former US Secretary of the Treasury, former chair of the Federal Reserve and emeritus member of the Group of Thirty; and, Mark Carney, as the UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance.  At the time, Carney, who was also the UK prime minister’s Finance Advisor for the COP26 conference, co-chaired the GFANZ with Michael Bloomberg.

GFANZ reports periodically to the G20’s Financial Stability Board.  And all GFANZ member alliances must be accredited by the UN Race to Zero campaign, the United Nations Environment Programme (“UNEP”) stated.  Adding that the then UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson described GFANZ as “uniting the world’s banks and financial institutions behind the global transition to net zero.”

Principals of GFANZ included BlackRock’s Larry Fink, who was and still is also on WEF’s Board of Trustees.  These Principles had long been enthusiastic about the prospects of Natural Asset Corporations and other related efforts to financialise the natural world.

At the same time that GFANZ was launched, Net-Zero Banking Alliance (“NZBA”) was launched by the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (“UNEP FI”) and the Financial Services Taskforce (“FSTF”) of the Prince of Wales’ Sustainable Markets Initiative (“SMI”).  At its launch, NZBA boasted a membership of 43 banks from 23 countries (with assets of US$28.5 trillion). It now boasts that its membership has tripled to 128 banks in 44 countries (with assets of US$47 trillion).

At WEF’s annual meeting in Davos in January 2020, Charles III launched his SMI.  At the same time, he launched his Sustainable Markets Council, which had been established a few months earlier. A third instrument that Charles “The Great Reset King” launched at Davos 2020 was his Terra Carta, a perverse, anti-rights inversion of the legendary Magna Carta signed by King John at Runnymede in 1215.  The Terra Carta asserts that the “fundamental rights and values of nature” must be placed at the core of the global economy.  At the time, Charles aimed to raise and invest $10 billion (£7.3 billion) over the next decade. A few years later, in 2023, Charles III was at COP28 demanding $4.5 to $5 trillion per year to drive the transformation that was “needed” because of “climate change.”

On 3 June 2020, Charles III launched ‘The Great Reset’.  On the same day, WEF released a video of a speech made by Charles III and published the article ‘Now is the time for a ‘great reset’’ to mark its launch.

Related:

• The transition from using Covid to using Climate Change as the justification for implementing the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the “digital transformation” of the economy and society is well underway” – Whitney Webb
• A Destructive Plan to Transform the Global Financial System Under the Guise Of “Climate Change”
• Eco-Fascist Mark Carney is Trying to Control the World Through Green Finance
• Meet The Great Reset King – Charles III
• Meet the world’s largest landowners topped by the British royal family
• UN-sponsored climate cartel has suspended its activities after being abandoned by BlackRock
• UN’s unprecedented effort to reduce CO2 is really about “green finance” which will be devastating to societies if we don’t stop it
• Organisations that make up the UN World Government System
• 2019 open letter condemning WEF-UN strategic partnership

A Handful of Corporations Taking Control of the World’s Food Supply

In 2022, the ETC Group published their report ‘Food Barons 2022 – Crisis Profiteering, Digitalisation and Shifting Power’.  Their findings showed that “many agrifood sectors are now so ‘top heavy’ they are controlled by just four to six dominant firms, enabling these companies to wield enormous influence over markets, agricultural research and policy development, which undermines food sovereignty.”

When publishing their Food Barons 2022 report, ETC Group said:

We identify seven key aspects of the global Industrial Food Chain, which we have conceptualised in terms of power: The Food Barons aim to hold on to, naturalise and expand their power, despite their many failings – failings that became especially obvious during the global pandemic.

We also bring attention to three critical, multi-sectoral trends that increase the ability of the Food Barons – Big Ag, together with Big Tech and Big Finance – to maintain control over the Industrial Food Chain. The first of these is the digitalisation of food and agriculture across the chain. The second is the rising power of Asian (especially Chinese) Food Barons. The third is horizontal integration, including the increasing involvement of asset management companies in food and agriculture sectors – which creates the semblance of competition, but diminishes actual competition.

Food Barons 2022 – Crisis Profiteering, Digitalisation and Shifting Power, ETC Group, 7 September 2022

Read more: Report details how a handful of Corporations are taking control of the World’s Food Supply

The Network of Global Corporate Control

The 2011 study titled ‘The network of global corporate control’ by Stefania Vitali, James B. Glattfelder and Stefano Battiston investigated the structure of the control network of transnational corporations and its implications for global market competition and financial stability. The study aimed to track control relationships rather than patrimonial relationships.

Related:

• 147 Group Controls The Economy, Neutral Zeitung Schweiz, 2 November 2014 (German, online translator available)
• 17 inter-connected organisations are determining global financial policy

The concept of control in corporate finance literature refers to the ability of a shareholder to influence a firm’s strategic decisions, but for the 2011 study, control means the extent to which a shareholder can influence the economic value of a company.

The study analysed the global corporate control network using a 2007 database containing 37 million economic actors and 13 million directed and weighted ownership links.  Within the database, the researchers identified a network of 43,060 transnational corporations located in 116 different countries and constructed a network of 600,508 nodes (economic entities) and 1,006,987 corporate relations.

The analysis of the database revealed that the largest connected component contains all the top transnational corporations by economic value, accounting for 94.2% of the total transnational corporations’ operating revenue.  And the global network of corporate control has a bow-tie structure, with a small, densely connected core of 147 transnational corporations that hold a significant amount of control over the network.  A large portion of the control flows into a small, tightly-knit core of financial institutions, which can be seen as an economic “super-entity.”

Structure of the Global Corporate Control Network

The core of the network is composed mostly of financial institutions, which can facilitate the formation of blocs and hamper market competition.

Furthermore, a small group of top holders, including transnational corporations and shareholders, accumulate a large fraction of the total network control, with the top 737 holders controlling 80% of the network’s value.

The researchers found that the network of global corporate control consists of 600,508 nodes and 1,006,987 links, with three types of economic actors: shareholders, transnational corporations and portfolio companies.

Analysis of the Network of Global Corporate Control

The network consists of 23,825 connected components, with the largest connected component (“LCC”) containing 463,006 economic actors and 889,601 relations, and including companies from 191 countries.

The LCC has a bow-tie structure, with a core of 1,318 companies in 26 countries, and the majority of nodes belonging to the LCC, indicating a high level of concentration of ownership and control.

The study found that financial institutions, such as banks and mutual funds, can exert control over companies despite not seeking active involvement in their strategies, often through informal discussions and bargaining.

The paper provides a ranking of the top 50 economic actors by global control (see below), with many of the top actors belonging to the financial sector – including companies like Barclays, Capital Group, AXA, State Street and Vanguard – and being part of an extremely entangled web of control.

Related: Building an Empire – The Vanguard Group and Corey Lynn: Who is “they”?

Note from The Exposé: Notably, BlackRock is not listed in the study’s top 50 economic actors.  The study analysed data in a 2007 database, before the global financial crisis.  During the 2008 financial crash, BlackRock and its risk capabilities was called upon by governments around the world “to help them navigate the financial crisis.”

According to The Naeth, “During the 2008 financial crash, BlackRock used their powerful connections to become the go-to people called upon by various Washington and Wall Street figures to help them recover from the mess they created.  They offered low-risk exchange trade funds to organisations hit hardest by the crash, and by the recession a year later, they became the number one asset manager in the world. They purchased R3 Capital Management and part of Barclays, adding $15 billion to their assets.

Related: Mark-to-market: A BIS scheme that helped to set up the 2008 Global Financial Crisis

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2025/06/23/the-global-control-network/

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post People and organisations in the global network controlling corporations, covid, climate change and food supply appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

In 2011, a Swiss study on the global corporate control network found that 147 companies in Europe controlled 40% of the world’s wealth.  A large portion of that control flows into a small, tightly-knit core of financial institutions.  The most concentrated control emanated from the British financial multinational Barclays.

To put this study into a broader context, we also briefly describe the network of people and organisations responsible for the covid scam, the climate scam and the handful of corporations controlling the world’s food supply.

Table of Contents

Network of People and Organisations Responsible for the Covid Scam

In 2021, the German Club Der Klaren Worte (Club of Clear Words) published their deep dive into the network of people and organisations responsible for the covid scam.

Their 170-page document detailed more than 7,200 links between 6,500 entities and objects, including payment flows and investments.  The document is mostly in English.  It’s incredibly comprehensive in scope, detailing a global network that is working behind the scenes to influence global health, finance and governance.

According to the anonymous IT specialist who created the document, the core of this covid criminal network, around whom most everything revolves, is no larger than 20 or 30 people. Several of these criminals appear on page 36 as shown below (with some minor edits):

• Hermann Gröhe, German politician, Vice Chairman of Labour and Social Affairs, Economic Cooperation and Development, Workers.
• Ralph Brinkhaus, German politician, Chairman of the Digital and State Modernisation Working Group.
• Dr. Angela Merkel, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany.
• Prof. Ilona Kickbusch, PhD, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies Geneva.
• Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director General of the World Health Organisation.
• Prof. Dr. Christian Drosten, Institute of Virology Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin.
• Prof. Dr. Clarissa Prazeres da Costa, Institute for Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Hygiene, Technical University of Munich.
• Joe Cerrell, Managing Director Global Politics, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
• Prof. Jeremy Farrar, Director Wellcome Trust.
• Dr. Georg Kippels, German lawyer.
• Jens Spahn, German politician, Group leader.
• Dr. Gerd Müller, German politician, Federal Minister for Economic Cooperation and Development.
• Anja Karliczek, German politician.
• Dr. Georg Nüßlein, German politician.

Key organisations, whose networking connections are detailed, include: The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (“BMGF”); World Health Organisation; World Bank Group; GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance founded by BMGF; The Global Fund; FIND, the global alliance for diagnostics; Johns Hopkins University; Robert Koch Institute; UK’s Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”); The German Global Health Hub; Wellcome Trust; Rockefeller Foundation; World Economic Forum (“WEF”); Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations; WEF’s Forum of Young Global Leaders; Big Pharma; Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin; European Commission; and, Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation appears to be near the top, or the centre, of the covid plandemic network. Gates is also a major funder of corporate media, and his network extends into global food and climate change policy.  Additionally, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, through its funding of WEF, also plays an important role in ‘The Great Reset’.

Related:

• Covid Criminal Network Leads to the Gates of Hell
• The Names of The Bilderbergers Who’ve Played a Role in The Covid Event
• COVID-19/Perpetrators/WEF, Wikispooks
• COVID-19/Perpetrators/Others, Wikispooks
• Dr. David Martin Exposes the Names and Faces of the People Who Are Killing Humanity, Red Pill Expo, 19 November 2021, read HERE and watch the video on BitChute HERE and UGETube HERE.

Network of People and Organisations Responsible for the Climate Scam

In 2012, Mark Carney was appointed the first non-British Governor of the Bank of England.  He has been on WEF’s Foundation Board, head of Canada’s central bank, United Nations Special Envoy for Climate Action and Finance, chair of the Group of Thirty, chair of Bloomberg’s board of directors and chair of Brookfield Asset Management.

As the Edmonton Journal noted: “Carney has become a key player at the United Nations, the World Economic Forum, Brookfield and Bloomberg because he’s brilliant at one thing – getting governments and private businesses to fall in line with [Greta] Thunberg’s climate change agenda.”

Shortly after he became Canada’s Prime Minister, Dan Fournier noted that Carney’s involvement with the Rothschild and Rockefeller families and organisations, such as the Group of Thirty, suggests there will be a push for the globalist climate agenda that will benefit the elite at the expense of the middle class. “Carney’s ties and obsequious subservience to global banking elites, headed by the secretive Bank for International Settlements, should leave little doubt as to the dire economic plight of Canada,” Fournier said.

The Group of Thirty, or G-30 or Group of 30, is a “club” in the transnational policy community, Eleni Tsingou wrote.  “Clubs are held together by elite peer recognition, common and mutually reinforcing interests and an ambition to provide global goods in line with values its members consider honourable.  This notion of a ‘club’ explains how the actors who write the rules for global governance work together.”

In 2015, Mark Carney led the creation of the UK Financial Stability Board’s ‘Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosure’ (“TCFD”), with billionaire  Michael Bloomberg as its chairman.  Here, Carney and Bloomberg were already starting a power grab by central banks.  The TCFD disbanded in October 2023.

From the TCFD came the Green Finance Initiative (“GFI”), which was established in January 2016 by the City of London Corporation in partnership with the UK government.

In 2017, the Central Banks and Supervisors Network for Greening the Financial System (“NGFS”) was established as an initiative of La Banque de France at the Paris “One Planet Summit.”  In September 2019, the International Monetary Fund joined as an observer.  In December 2020, the US Federal Reserve joined NGFS. As of  11 March 2025, the NGFS consisted of 145 members across over 90 countries and 23 observers.

During a 2021 interview, Paul Gallagher, of Executive Intelligence Review, said: “In August of 2019, central bankers met at the Federal Reserve’s annual Jackson Hole Wyoming conference and discussed a proposal by former central bank leaders from four countries, now all executives at BlackRock. They called it ‘Regime Change.’  It was time, they said, for central banks to take control of spending powers from governments.”

Also in 2019, as a direct response to a 2018 recommendation made by GFI, the Green Finance Institute was established.  Its funders include the UK government and the City of London.

In April 2021, the Glasgow Financial Alliance for Net Zero (“GFANZ”) was launched by John Kerry, US Special Presidential Envoy for Climate Change; Janet Yellen, former US Secretary of the Treasury, former chair of the Federal Reserve and emeritus member of the Group of Thirty; and, Mark Carney, as the UN Special Envoy on Climate Action and Finance.  At the time, Carney, who was also the UK prime minister’s Finance Advisor for the COP26 conference, co-chaired the GFANZ with Michael Bloomberg.

GFANZ reports periodically to the G20’s Financial Stability Board.  And all GFANZ member alliances must be accredited by the UN Race to Zero campaign, the United Nations Environment Programme (“UNEP”) stated.  Adding that the then UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson described GFANZ as “uniting the world’s banks and financial institutions behind the global transition to net zero.”

Principals of GFANZ included BlackRock’s Larry Fink, who was and still is also on WEF’s Board of Trustees.  These Principles had long been enthusiastic about the prospects of Natural Asset Corporations and other related efforts to financialise the natural world.

At the same time that GFANZ was launched, Net-Zero Banking Alliance (“NZBA”) was launched by the United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (“UNEP FI”) and the Financial Services Taskforce (“FSTF”) of the Prince of Wales’ Sustainable Markets Initiative (“SMI”).  At its launch, NZBA boasted a membership of 43 banks from 23 countries (with assets of US$28.5 trillion). It now boasts that its membership has tripled to 128 banks in 44 countries (with assets of US$47 trillion).

At WEF’s annual meeting in Davos in January 2020, Charles III launched his SMI.  At the same time, he launched his Sustainable Markets Council, which had been established a few months earlier. A third instrument that Charles “The Great Reset King” launched at Davos 2020 was his Terra Carta, a perverse, anti-rights inversion of the legendary Magna Carta signed by King John at Runnymede in 1215.  The Terra Carta asserts that the “fundamental rights and values of nature” must be placed at the core of the global economy.  At the time, Charles aimed to raise and invest $10 billion (£7.3 billion) over the next decade. A few years later, in 2023, Charles III was at COP28 demanding $4.5 to $5 trillion per year to drive the transformation that was “needed” because of “climate change.”

On 3 June 2020, Charles III launched ‘The Great Reset’.  On the same day, WEF released a video of a speech made by Charles III and published the article ‘Now is the time for a ‘great reset’’ to mark its launch.

Related:

• The transition from using Covid to using Climate Change as the justification for implementing the Fourth Industrial Revolution and the “digital transformation” of the economy and society is well underway” – Whitney Webb
• A Destructive Plan to Transform the Global Financial System Under the Guise Of “Climate Change”
• Eco-Fascist Mark Carney is Trying to Control the World Through Green Finance
• Meet The Great Reset King – Charles III
• Meet the world’s largest landowners topped by the British royal family
• UN-sponsored climate cartel has suspended its activities after being abandoned by BlackRock
• UN’s unprecedented effort to reduce CO2 is really about “green finance” which will be devastating to societies if we don’t stop it
• Organisations that make up the UN World Government System
• 2019 open letter condemning WEF-UN strategic partnership

A Handful of Corporations Taking Control of the World’s Food Supply

In 2022, the ETC Group published their report ‘Food Barons 2022 – Crisis Profiteering, Digitalisation and Shifting Power’.  Their findings showed that “many agrifood sectors are now so ‘top heavy’ they are controlled by just four to six dominant firms, enabling these companies to wield enormous influence over markets, agricultural research and policy development, which undermines food sovereignty.”

When publishing their Food Barons 2022 report, ETC Group said:

We identify seven key aspects of the global Industrial Food Chain, which we have conceptualised in terms of power: The Food Barons aim to hold on to, naturalise and expand their power, despite their many failings – failings that became especially obvious during the global pandemic.

We also bring attention to three critical, multi-sectoral trends that increase the ability of the Food Barons – Big Ag, together with Big Tech and Big Finance – to maintain control over the Industrial Food Chain. The first of these is the digitalisation of food and agriculture across the chain. The second is the rising power of Asian (especially Chinese) Food Barons. The third is horizontal integration, including the increasing involvement of asset management companies in food and agriculture sectors – which creates the semblance of competition, but diminishes actual competition.

Food Barons 2022 – Crisis Profiteering, Digitalisation and Shifting Power, ETC Group, 7 September 2022

Read more: Report details how a handful of Corporations are taking control of the World’s Food Supply

The Network of Global Corporate Control

The 2011 study titled ‘The network of global corporate control’ by Stefania Vitali, James B. Glattfelder and Stefano Battiston investigated the structure of the control network of transnational corporations and its implications for global market competition and financial stability. The study aimed to track control relationships rather than patrimonial relationships.

Related:

• 147 Group Controls The Economy, Neutral Zeitung Schweiz, 2 November 2014 (German, online translator available)
• 17 inter-connected organisations are determining global financial policy

The concept of control in corporate finance literature refers to the ability of a shareholder to influence a firm’s strategic decisions, but for the 2011 study, control means the extent to which a shareholder can influence the economic value of a company.

The study analysed the global corporate control network using a 2007 database containing 37 million economic actors and 13 million directed and weighted ownership links.  Within the database, the researchers identified a network of 43,060 transnational corporations located in 116 different countries and constructed a network of 600,508 nodes (economic entities) and 1,006,987 corporate relations.

The analysis of the database revealed that the largest connected component contains all the top transnational corporations by economic value, accounting for 94.2% of the total transnational corporations’ operating revenue.  And the global network of corporate control has a bow-tie structure, with a small, densely connected core of 147 transnational corporations that hold a significant amount of control over the network.  A large portion of the control flows into a small, tightly-knit core of financial institutions, which can be seen as an economic “super-entity.”

Structure of the Global Corporate Control Network

The core of the network is composed mostly of financial institutions, which can facilitate the formation of blocs and hamper market competition.

Furthermore, a small group of top holders, including transnational corporations and shareholders, accumulate a large fraction of the total network control, with the top 737 holders controlling 80% of the network’s value.

The researchers found that the network of global corporate control consists of 600,508 nodes and 1,006,987 links, with three types of economic actors: shareholders, transnational corporations and portfolio companies.

Analysis of the Network of Global Corporate Control

The network consists of 23,825 connected components, with the largest connected component (“LCC”) containing 463,006 economic actors and 889,601 relations, and including companies from 191 countries.

The LCC has a bow-tie structure, with a core of 1,318 companies in 26 countries, and the majority of nodes belonging to the LCC, indicating a high level of concentration of ownership and control.

The study found that financial institutions, such as banks and mutual funds, can exert control over companies despite not seeking active involvement in their strategies, often through informal discussions and bargaining.

The paper provides a ranking of the top 50 economic actors by global control (see below), with many of the top actors belonging to the financial sector – including companies like Barclays, Capital Group, AXA, State Street and Vanguard – and being part of an extremely entangled web of control.

Related: Building an Empire – The Vanguard Group and Corey Lynn: Who is “they”?

Note from The Exposé: Notably, BlackRock is not listed in the study’s top 50 economic actors.  The study analysed data in a 2007 database, before the global financial crisis.  During the 2008 financial crash, BlackRock and its risk capabilities was called upon by governments around the world “to help them navigate the financial crisis.”

According to The Naeth, “During the 2008 financial crash, BlackRock used their powerful connections to become the go-to people called upon by various Washington and Wall Street figures to help them recover from the mess they created.  They offered low-risk exchange trade funds to organisations hit hardest by the crash, and by the recession a year later, they became the number one asset manager in the world. They purchased R3 Capital Management and part of Barclays, adding $15 billion to their assets.

Related: Mark-to-market: A BIS scheme that helped to set up the 2008 Global Financial Crisis

Source: https://expose-news.com/2025/06/23/the-global-control-network/

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post People and organisations in the global network controlling corporations, covid, climate change and food supply appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Billionaire eugenicist Bill Gates has devised a ‘radical’ plan to ‘permanently address climate change’: the destruction of billions of the world’s trees.

According to Gates, the solution to climate change is to chop down all the world’s trees and bury them in order to stop ‘global boiling‘.

Naturalnews.com reports: It’s called “Breakthrough Energy,” because Bill Gates always names his missions the opposite of what they accomplish, just like with his vaccine terrorization schemes. Talk about FAKE science. Where does Bill Gates find these poser scientists willing to shill for this insane scheme?

Believe it or not, U.S. Forest Services is prepared to “thin out” 70 MILLION ACRES of Western forest, much of which is in California, over the next 10 years. Gates says this will reduce carbon dioxide in the air so we can all breathe better, which is the furthest thing from science, ever.

Not one single human being will benefit from this. No homes will be built. No wood burned to keep people warm in the freezing winter. This is all about destroying the planet, reducing the world’s population by several billion people, while injecting everyone with mRNA spike prions that help put everyone six feet underground soon, with all the trees.

The Climate Change Cult is led by Psychopathic Bill Gates who plans to chop down all the world’s trees so we can … breathe?

Avoid drinking whatever Kool-Aid Bill Gates is drinking, because it makes you believe that chopping down all the forests and burying the trees will save earth from global warming and help all the humans breathe. Sure. This man needs to be locked up in prison and the key is what needs to be buried, not the trees.

Bill Gates is investing millions of dollars in a system of chopping down and burying trees to supposedly reduce carbon dioxide in the air, which makes no sense at all. This is a so-called “business” because they are getting money for carbon offsets. Watch for the name Kadama systems to be running and promoting this psycho-biz.

It’s a simple plan: kill the trees and kill all the people and bury it all underground together. The cover story? Dead trees keep carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere for thousands of years if you just bury their remains underground. So do people.

Kodama Systems, a forest management company based in the Sierra Nevada foothills town of Sonora, has been operating in stealth mode for years so nobody knows about this insanity. Now, Bill Gates and MIT Technology Review are now reporting the company has raised around $6.6 million to wipe out all chances of human survival on earth, in so many words.

To top it off, the payments processing company Stripe will provide a $250,000 research grant as part of the insane carbon removal plan. The trees will be buried in the Nevada desert, where nobody can use the wood for anything, ever. This will help prevent the release of greenhouse gases, that along with cow farts, is destroying the planet, supposedly.

“Bill Gates is investing in a system of chopping down and burying trees to reduce Carbon Dioxide in the air”

“This is a business because they are getting money for Carbon offsets”

Insane. pic.twitter.com/XvhD6UONGQ

— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) December 25, 2024

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Bill Gates Plans to Chop Down BILLIONS of Trees to ‘Radically Address Climate Change’ appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Source:  https://substack.com/home/post/p-149928719

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post The weaponization of weather: When ‘climate control’ is mass marketed as ‘climate change’ appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

According to a report by the Financial Times yesterday, Olam Agri, one of the world’s largest agricultural commodity traders, has warned that the world is heading towards “food wars” due to geopolitical tensions and climate change which are pushing countries into conflict over dwindling food supplies.

Speaking at the Redburn Atlantic and Rothschild consumer conference last week, Sunny Verghese, Olam Agri’s CEO, said trade barriers imposed by countries are exacerbating inflation and pushing countries into conflict over waning food supplies.

“Big agricultural commodity traders, which reaped record profits in 2022 after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine sent food prices soaring, have been accused of exacerbating flood price inflation through profit-boosting mark-ups,” the Financial Times said.

“Food prices started to climb in the wake of covid-19 and surged following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine as some exports of grain and fertilisers were blocked by the conflict. This deepened food insecurity in poorer countries and left consumers all over the world facing a cost-of-living crisis,” the news outlet noted.

But Verghese argued that elevated food price inflation was in part the result of government intervention. A proliferation of non-tariff trade barriers in 2022 in response to the war had “created an exaggerated demand-supply imbalance.”

The gist of his argument is that trade barriers and protectionist policies are creating tensions between countries, leading to conflicts over food supplies while climate change is affecting global food production, leading to shortages and price increases, which can spark conflicts over resources.

While Trade barriers and conflicts can lead to price increases, making food unaffordable for many people, conflicts over food supplies can lead to food insecurity, malnutrition and even famine.  And “food wars” could have a significant impact on the global economy, leading to economic instability and recession.

If there is a concern about “food wars,” why are governments of Western nations waging a war on farmers in the name of climate change?

The War on Farmers is a global phenomenon and it has been gaining momentum in recent years. Various forms of attacks, restrictions and policies imposed on farmers by governments, corporations and environmental groups, threaten farmers’ livelihoods, national food security and the global food supply.

For example, the Dutch government has imposed strict regulations on farming practices, including reducing the use of nitrogen fertilizers, which has led to protests and concerns about food security.

Another example is the US government’s policies, such as the Renewable Fuel Standard, which have led to increased costs for farmers and reduced crop yields, making it difficult for them to compete with large corporations.

The War on Farmers continues.  Yesterday, livestock farmers in Denmark were warned that the farts and burps from their cows, sheep and pigs will be measured and taxed from 2030, the first country in the world to do so as it targets methane emissions.

And yesterday, the No Farmers No Food campaign posted the video below of a British farmer. “We’re now being paid to stop growing food and grow wildflowers,” he said.

“We’ve had enough.” pic.twitter.com/UNDe2tgC2I

— No Farmers, No Food (@NoFarmsNoFoods) June 26, 2024

Other policies for “climate change” that are destroying farming include the installation of “green” energy sources on prime agricultural farmland. A UK petition to stop mass-scale solar panels from being installed on prime agricultural land states: ”Utilising prime farmland for mass-scale solar energy projects … puts our future food security at risk.”  (You can sign the petition HERE.)

Read more: Farmers are being booted off their land in a drive for more solar power, former union chief warns, Daily Mail, 28 May 2024

It’s not global warming or a climate change “emergency” that could cause “food wars” –  it’s the War on Farmers.  It’s the attacks on farmers that have the consequences of creating food shortages, food insecurity and economic instability.

But that’s not Olam Agri’s worldview.  At the Redburn Atlantic and Rothschild consumer conference, Verghese urged the gathering of consumer industry executives, including the bosses of Coca-Cola and Associated British Foods, to “wake up” and take more action on climate change.  Governments should charge a tax for carbon, he argued.

This is the hypocrisy of the climate crisis agenda and it is a self-fulfilling prophecy.  Waging a War on Farmers to “fight climate change” and then blaming “climate change” for “food wars” is a never-ending cycle of problem-reaction-solution. It is the Hegelian Dialectic, manipulating public opinion and controlling society by creating a problem, eliciting a reaction and then offering a pre-determined solution.  A solution that only benefits self-styled elites and their agendas.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/06/27/the-war-on-farmers-will-cause-food-wars/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post The War on Farmers will cause “food wars” – not climate change appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Almost 15 years ago Jacob Nordangård began researching the politics behind climate change. Sceptical scientists were being discredited with accusations that they were paid by oil companies to discredit anthropogenic global warming.  Nordangård set out to establish if this was indeed the case. But he discovered something else instead.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/04/03/rockefellers-lbattle-with-the-climate-change-not/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post The Rockefellers’ long-standing battle with the climate change cult is not what it seems appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

UK scientists have begun developing vaccines as insurance against a new pandemic caused by an unknown “Disease X”.

The work is being carried out at the government’s high-security Porton Down laboratory complex in Wiltshire by a team of more than 200 scientists.

They have drawn up a threat list of animal viruses that are capable of infecting humans and could in the future spread rapidly around the world. Sky News’ science correspondent Thomas Moore has witnessed the work being done.

Source Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1XB5kJDTF4

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Disease X: UK Preps Jabs For Unknown Pandemic Possibly Caused By Climate Change [VIDEO] appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

In 2009, emails were leaked from the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit.  This was referred to as Climategate.  In 2011, in what was referred to as Climategate 2, nearly two years after similar emails ignited the Climategate scandal, a second batch of 5,000 emails were leaked. In 2013, a third batch of emails was released in what was referred to as Climategate 3.  With the release of the third batch of emails, the leaker revealed his motives for doing so.

“The hero who leaked the Climategate and Climategate II emails has revealed his motives – and released to selected climate science bloggers the password to further emails for them to assess. This may lead to more revelations of the group thinking, bullying and manipulation of evidence than were exposed by the original leaking of emails of the scientists most involved in devising the great warming scare,” Andrew Bolt wrote in Herald Sun’s blogs.

As Climate Depot noted in 2019 – ten years after and despite corporate media’s best efforts to ignore and bury the revelations – scientists faithful to their calling and disciplines can only shudder at what Climategate revealed. Those who subverted the scientific method were not fringe players but at the pinnacle. They were doing the archetypal studies “proving” catastrophic human-caused catastrophic warming and shaping the content and messaging in the six-yearly reports of the United Nations’ Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”).

The following are extracts from the email forwarded to Bishop Hill from someone who identified as “FOIA.”  The email was published on 13 March 2013.  Read the full email HERE.

Releasing the encrypted archive was a mere practicality. I didn’t want to keep the emails lying around.

I prepared CG1 & 2 alone. Even skimming through all 220.000 emails would have taken several more months of work in an increasingly unfavourable environment.

Dumping them all into the public domain would be the last resort. Majority of the emails are irrelevant, some of them probably sensitive and socially damaging.

To get the remaining scientifically (or otherwise) relevant emails out, I ask you to pass this on to any motivated and responsible individuals who could volunteer some time to sift through the material for eventual release.

I don’t expect these remaining emails to hold big surprises. Yet it’s possible that the most important pieces are among them. Nobody on the planet has held the archive in plaintext since CG2.

That’s right; no conspiracy, no paid hackers, no Big Oil. The Republicans didn’t plot this. USA politics is alien to me, neither am I from the UK. There is life outside the Anglo-American sphere.

If someone is still wondering why anyone would take these risks, or sees only a breach of privacy here, a few words…

The first glimpses I got behind the scenes did little to garner my trust in the state of climate science – on the contrary. I found myself in front of a choice that just might have a global impact.

Briefly put, when I had to balance the interests of my own safety, privacy\career of a few scientists, and the well-being of billions of people living in the coming several decades, the first two weren’t the decisive concern.

It was me or nobody, now or never. Combination of several rather improbable prerequisites just wouldn’t occur again for anyone else in the foreseeable future. The circus was about to arrive in Copenhagen. Later on, it could be too late.

Most would agree that climate science has already directed where humanity puts its capability, innovation, mental and material “might.”  The scale will grow ever grander in the coming decades if things go according to script. We’re dealing with $trillions and potentially drastic influence on practically everyone.

We can’t pour trillions in this massive hole-digging-and-filling-up endeavour and pretend it’s not away from something and someone else.

If the economy of a region, a country, a city, etc. deteriorates, what happens among the poorest? Does that usually improve their prospects? No, they will take the hardest hit. No amount of magical climate thinking can turn this one upside-down.

It’s easy for many of us in the western world to accept a tiny green inconvenience and then wallow in that righteous feeling, surrounded by our “clean” technology and energy that is only slightly more expensive if adequately subsidised.

Those millions and billions already struggling with malnutrition, sickness, violence, illiteracy, etc. don’t have that luxury. The price of “climate protection” with its cumulative and collateral effects is bound to destroy and debilitate in great numbers, for decades and generations.

Even if I have it all wrong and these scientists had some good reason to mislead us (instead of making a strong case with real data) I think disseminating the truth is still the safest bet by far.

Featured image: David Cameron and Prince Charles attended the historic 2015 Paris climate change conference with 150 world leaders. Cameron committed Britain to an EU-Wide emission cut as a result. And Charles, writing in the Daily Mail in August 2017, stated there was no pause in global warming, influenced by the flawed NOAA paper that made this claim.  Source: How world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data, Daily Mail, 17 September 2017

Source Link: https://expose-news.com/2023/07/17/climategate-3-0-hero-speaks-and-releases-a-new-cache/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Climategate 3.0: Hero speaks and releases a new cache of emails proving Climate Change Fraud appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

In a world shrouded in suspicion and scepticism, where power seems concentrated in the hands of a privileged few and giant corporations, critical thinkers are raising questions about the intentions and actions of prominent entities such as the World Economic Forum (WEF) and renowned figure Bill Gates.

Whispers of a grand conspiracy suggest that under the guise of “saving the planet,” a dark agenda to depopulate the world may be unfolding.

In this in-depth analysis, we embark on a thought-provoking journey to uncover the alleged hidden motives behind the actions of these influential forces, exploring the claims and counterclaims while addressing the concerns of those seeking to change the world for the better.

The Great Reset: A Paradigm Shift or a Sinister Ploy?

At the centre of the controversy lies the WEF’s “Great Reset” initiative, a bold plan to reshape economies and societies post-pandemic. Advocates argue that it represents an opportunity to address pressing global challenges, while sceptics perceive it as a Trojan horse veiling a more sinister agenda.

The Great Reset’s core principles revolve around rethinking capitalism, improving global governance, and addressing environmental and social challenges. Proponents argue that it is a necessary response to the interconnected crises we face, such as climate change, income inequality, and healthcare disparities. They believe that by aligning economic systems with environmental sustainability and social equity, we can create a more resilient and just world.

However, sceptics correctly raise concerns about the perceived overreach of the Great Reset. They question the motives behind its proposals, particularly the potential erosion of individual freedoms and the concentration of power in the hands of a few global elites.

The calls for increased regulation and Government intervention will lead to a loss of personal liberties and economic autonomy.

To understand the hidden messages within the Great Reset, a closer analysis of its language and proposals is necessary.

Critics highlight certain phrases and concepts that raise red flags, such as “stakeholder capitalism,” which suggests a shift towards a more collectivist economic model. They argue that this could pave the way for increased Government control and diminish the role of free markets.

Moreover, sceptics point to the involvement of influential figures like Bill Gates, who has advocated for population control measures in the past.

This connection fuels suspicions that the Great Reset may be a vehicle for implementing population control strategies under the guise of sustainability.

As critical thinkers, it is essential to engage in thorough research and examine multiple perspectives to form an informed opinion.

While the Great Reset claims to carry the potential for positive change, this could not be further from the truth and it is crucial to oppose, and if needed monitor, its implementation and ensure transparency and accountability.

By staying vigilant and demanding open dialogue, we can actively participate in shaping our collective future and ensure that it aligns with our values and aspirations.

Sources:

1. World Economic Forum – The Great Reset: https://www.weforum.org/great-reset
2. World Economic Forum – Stakeholder Capitalism: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/02/what-is-stakeholder-capitalism-definition/
3. World Economic Forum – What is the Fourth Industrial Revolution?: https://www.weforum.org/about/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-by-klaus-schwab
4. Time – Bill Gates: Here’s My Plan to Improve Our World and How You Can Help: https://time.com/5779943/bill-gates-how-to-avoid-a-climate-disaster/
5. The Guardian – The Great Reset Conspiracy Smoothie: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/feb/17/what-is-the-great-reset-and-why-are-some-people-so-worried-about-it

Bill Gates: A Visionary Philanthropist or a Puppet Master?

Separating fact from fiction, we question whether Gates is truly a visionary or a puppet master manipulating the strings of global affairs. Allegations swirl that his immense wealth and influence are leveraged to manipulate public health initiatives to secretly reduce global population numbers.

Bill Gates, the co-founder of Microsoft and renowned philanthropist, has long been a polarizing figure in public discourse. While many admire his efforts to improve global health and address pressing challenges, others raise concerns about the extent of his influence and the hidden motives behind his actions.

Critics argue that Gates’ philanthropic initiatives, primarily through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, serve as a smokescreen for a more covert agenda: depopulation.

They point to his support for initiatives such as family planning, reproductive health, and vaccine programs as evidence of a sinister plan to reduce global population numbers. These allegations stem from his statements and his philanthropic goals.

To understand Gates’ philanthropic endeavours, it is essential to delve into the work of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The foundation focuses on addressing some of the world’s most pressing challenges, such as poverty, infectious diseases, and education.

Through partnerships with governments, NGOs, and other philanthropic organizations, the foundation aims to improve the quality of life for millions of people worldwide.

One of the primary areas of focus for the Gates Foundation is global health. Gates has been a strong advocate for vaccination campaigns, particularly in developing countries, aiming to combat diseases like polio, malaria, and HIV/AIDS.

However, these efforts are not driven by benevolence but rather serve as a means to control population growth and make huge profits.

Gates’ financial investments have also come under scrutiny. Some argue that his involvement in industries such as pharmaceuticals and genetically modified crops indicates a hidden agenda to profit from global health crises or control the food supply.

Gates’ financial investments have sparked speculation and raised concerns. One area of scrutiny lies in his involvement in the pharmaceutical industry. Critics point to his significant investments in pharmaceutical companies, suggesting that his philanthropic endeavours in the field of public health may be driven by profit motives rather than solely altruistic intentions.

They argue that by promoting vaccines and other medical interventions, Gates stands to benefit financially from the widespread adoption of these products.

Additionally, Gates’ investments in genetically modified (GM) crops have fueled suspicions regarding his control over the global food supply. His support for GM technology is part of a broader agenda to monopolize agriculture and exert influence over the world’s food production systems.

This control would grant Gates immense power and potentially enable him to manipulate food availability and prices to serve his own interests.

Gates of course denies this and has publicly stated that his investments align with his goal of addressing pressing global challenges, including improving health outcomes and enhancing food security. He asserts that his financial involvement allows him to leverage resources and expertise to make a meaningful impact in these areas.

But as critical thinkers, it is vital to engage in objective analysis, consider multiple perspectives, and demand transparency and accountability from all individuals and organizations involved in shaping our world.

Sources:

1. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/
2. The Guardian – “Bill Gates: Philanthropist or Captains of Industry?”: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jul/20/bill-gates-philanthropist-captains-of-industry
3. Vox – “The Bizarre Conspiracy Theories About Bill Gates”: https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/4/17/21224728/bill-gates-coronavirus-conspiracy-theories-pandemic-tiktok
4. The New York Times – “Bill Gates on Covid: Most US Tests Are ‘Completely Garbage’”: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/06/technology/bill-gates-interview-coronavirus.html
5. Forbes – “Why Bill Gates Keeps Investing Billions in Big Pharma”: https://www.forbes.com/sites/stephenmcbride1/2020/05/01/why-is-bill-gates-buying-up-so-much-farmland/?sh=4fe4c1557a3b

The Mysterious Role of Vaccinations: A Savior or a Silent Weapon?

Vaccines, hailed as the pinnacle of modern medicine and a vital tool in public health, have unwittingly become embroiled in the depopulation narrative. Real-world evidence strongly suggests that Covid-19 vaccines are intentionally designed to harm individuals or control fertility, raising concerns among those already sceptical of mainstream institutions.

We delve into the science behind vaccines, and by engaging with credible sources and scientific experts, we aim to shed light on the horrific facts surrounding vaccine-related allegations of injury and death.

To understand the role of vaccines, it is crucial to examine their scientific foundation. Vaccines allegedly work by stimulating the immune system to recognize and respond to specific pathogens, preparing the body to defend itself against future infections.

Prior to the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Covid-19 vaccines, the development and approval process for vaccines typically followed a rigorous timeline involving several stages of research, clinical trials, and regulatory scrutiny.

It is true that the average timeline for vaccine development, from initial discovery to final approval, historically took around 8 to 10 years. This prolonged timeline allowed for comprehensive and extensive testing to assess the safety, efficacy, and potential long-term effects of the vaccine candidates.

The traditional vaccine development process involved various phases, including preclinical testing in the laboratory and on animals, followed by three distinct phases of clinical trials involving human subjects.

Phase 1 trials primarily focused on assessing the vaccine’s safety and dosage levels in a small group of healthy volunteers.

Phase 2 trials expanded the study population to hundreds of individuals to evaluate the vaccine’s immunogenicity and further assess its safety profile.

Phase 3 trials, which are often the largest and most time-consuming phase, involved thousands to tens of thousands of participants.

These trials aimed to determine the vaccine’s efficacy in preventing the target disease while closely monitoring for any potential side effects.

During this phase, participants were divided into two groups, with one group receiving the vaccine and the other receiving a placebo or an alternative control measure. The researchers then compared the outcomes between the groups to evaluate the vaccine’s effectiveness.

Following the completion of clinical trials, vaccine developers would compile and submit extensive data to regulatory bodies, such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the European Medicines Agency (EMA), for review and approval.

These regulatory agencies allegedly rigorously scrutinize the data, including the vaccine’s safety and efficacy profiles, manufacturing processes, and quality control measures, before granting approval for public use.

However, in the case of the alleged Covid-19 pandemic, the development and approval process for vaccines underwent an accelerated timeline of just a few months.

The Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) mechanism allowed vaccines to be made available for emergency use before the completion of the usual lengthy regulatory process that ensured vaccines were safe for use among humans.

The decision to do this was extremely questionable when we consider that Bill Gates has shares in the major Covid-19 vaccine companies and was also a major funder of medicine regulators through his foundation.

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been a significant contributor to global health initiatives, including vaccine research and development. The foundation has provided funding for various organizations involved in vaccine development and delivery, including the World Health Organization (WHO), the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (CEPI), and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance.

Therefore, this conflict of interest stinks of corruption as Bill Gates could have threatened to withdraw his funding to medicine regulators if they failed to grant EUA of the Covid-19 injections he had shares in to increase his return on those shares.

In 2017, the UK Medicine Regulator, the MHRA, received a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation worth £980,000 to facilitate a “collaboration” between the two entities.

But according to a Freedom of Information request answered by the MHRA in May 2021, the Gates Foundation sent funds of over $3 million to the MHRA to support “a number of projects.”

While this relationship might not have raised eyebrows under different circumstances, the fact that the Gates Foundation owns shares in companies developing Covid-19 vaccines authorized for emergency use in children by the MHRA raises questions about potential conflicts of interest.

In 2016, Moderna announced that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation had granted them $20 million to support their initial project, which involved the evaluation of antibody combinations in a preclinical setting and the conduct of a Phase 1 clinical trial for a potential mRNA injection.

Moderna also revealed that the framework agreement between Moderna and the Gates Foundation could potentially result in total funding of up to $100 million for follow-on projects proposed and approved by the Gates Foundation through 2022.

As part of this agreement, Moderna is obliged to grant the Gates Foundation certain non-exclusive licenses.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation also bought shares in Pfizer back in 2002 before “coincidentally” buying $55 million worth of shares in BioNTech in September 2019, just before the alleged Covid-19 pandemic struck.

The partnership between Pfizer and BioNTech has proven to be highly profitable, as their Covid-19 vaccine was among the first to receive emergency use authorizations worldwide.

This rapid approval and widespread distribution have resulted in a substantial increase in the stock prices of both companies.

Consequently, the Gates Foundation’s investments in these corporations have also grown in value, adding to the foundation’s already significant wealth.

The real-world evidence surrounding Covid-19 vaccines strongly suggests that they contain harmful substances and serve as a covert means to control fertility and cause depopulation.

The allegations are supported by scientific evidence contained in published Government data.

• Confidential Pfizer Documents reveal 90% of Covid Vaccinated Pregnant Women lost their Baby. (Source)

• Pfizer and Medicine Regulators hid the dangers of Covid-19 Vaccination during Pregnancy due to Animal Study finding an increased risk of Birth Defects & Infertility. (Source)

• Confidential Pfizer Documents reveal the Covid-19 Vaccine accumulates in the Ovaries. (Source)

• The number of Women suffering from ovarian cancer in 2021 was significantly higher than in 2020 and the 2017-2019 average. (Source)

• Newborn Baby Deaths hit critical levels for 2nd time in 7 Months in March 2022. (Source)

• Covid-19 Vaccination increases the risk of suffering Miscarriage by at least 1,517%. (Source)

All of the above points to the potential for depopulation due to the horrific effects, discovered in the confidential Pfizer documents, that Covid-19 vaccination can have on the ovaries, fertility, pregnancy, and newborn babies.

However, further figures on the incredible amount of excess deaths all but confirm that Covid-19 vaccination is a recipe for a depopulation disaster.

As Governments around the world raced to coerce every man, woman and child they could to get the Covid-19 vaccine, they gave away an astounding $75 billion of taxes collected from your hard-earned money to Pfizer, a company with a dark history of offences and fines, for its experimental mRNA injection.

This massive investment was allegedly made in the name of public health, but real-world data strongly suggests otherwise. However, it should come as no surprise considering our health and well-being were left in the hands of a company that has caused significant harm to the public in the past.

The data provided to the Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) and EuroMOMO by official Government departments points to a significant increase in excess deaths since the rollout of Covid-19 vaccines in the USA, Canada, New Zealand, Australia, the UK and half of Europe. (Source)

This surge in excess deaths raises concerns about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, especially considering the drastic differences in excess deaths before and after the vaccine rollout.

Data provided to EuroMOMO by 27 countries across Europe highlights a striking correlation between the European Medicine Agency’s (EMA) extension of the emergency use authorization for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine to children aged 12 to 15 and the subsequent increase in excess deaths among children across Europe. (Source)

Excess deaths among children aged 0 to 14 across 27 countries across Europe, including the UK, France, Spain, Italy and most of Germany, increased by 760% up to week 12 of 2023 following the European Medicines Agency extending the emergency use authorization of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine to children aged 12 to 15. (Source)

Transparency in vaccine development, regulatory processes, and post-marketing surveillance is essential for building public trust and fostering informed decision-making.

It is also vital to respect individual autonomy and provide accurate information to empower individuals to make informed choices regarding their health and well-being.

Transparency and Accountability: Demanding the Truth

In a world rife with distrust and scepticism, the demand for transparency and accountability becomes more pressing than ever. When it comes to the allegations of depopulation under the guise of “saving the planet,” the lack of openness and clear communication raises legitimate concerns among those questioning the motives of powerful institutions and individuals.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) and Bill Gates, are undeserving influential figures in global affairs and should be subject to rigorous scrutiny and independent investigations.

Serious questions about the transparency surrounding their initiatives and their commitment to sharing reliable data and unbiased analysis have been raised. These calls for greater transparency aim to shed light on the true intentions behind their actions and mitigate suspicions of a hidden agenda.

One aspect that sceptics highlight is the need for comprehensive data and evidence to support claims made by the WEF and Bill Gates.

Without access to reliable information, it becomes challenging for the public to evaluate the validity of their statements and initiatives. Transparency regarding the sources of data, methodologies used for analysis, and potential conflicts of interest is crucial to instil trust and ensure that decisions are based on sound evidence rather than hidden motives.

Independent investigations can play a vital role in addressing concerns and validating or debunking suspicions. These investigations should be conducted by reputable organizations or individuals with expertise in relevant fields, free from any potential biases or conflicts of interest.

Such inquiries can provide objective assessments of the actions and agendas of the WEF and Bill Gates, helping to uncover any hidden motives or confirm their commitment to the betterment of society.

Furthermore, open dialogue and critical thinking are essential in navigating complex issues and understanding different perspectives. Encouraging discussions that invite diverse viewpoints allows for a comprehensive exploration of the subject matter.

By fostering an environment that respects the principles of intellectual rigour and informed debate, individuals can weigh the evidence and arguments presented, helping them form their own conclusions.

It is important to note that promoting transparency and demanding accountability is a call for clarity, evidence-based decision-making, and the protection of individual rights and well-being.

The aim is to ensure that the actions and initiatives of powerful entities align with the best interests of the public and are subject to scrutiny when necessary.

In conclusion, the demands for transparency and accountability are essential in addressing concerns surrounding the alleged depopulation agenda.

By advocating for independent investigations, access to reliable data, and unbiased analysis, individuals can actively engage in the process of evaluating the intentions and actions of the WEF and Bill Gates.

Emphasizing critical thinking and open dialogue enables the exploration of different perspectives, empowering individuals to make informed decisions and safeguard their own futures.

Conclusion: The Power of Discernment and a Call to Action

In a world yearning for truth and authenticity, critical thinking emerges as a powerful tool.

While scepticism surrounds the intentions and actions of the World Economic Forum and Bill Gates, it is crucial to approach the subject with an open and discerning mind. By conducting an extensive analysis of the evidence, relying on credible sources, and fostering constructive dialogue, we navigate the murky waters of conspiracy and unveil the potential truth.

Ultimately, we empower individuals to shape the world they inhabit by relying on facts rather than conjecture, armed with knowledge and critical thinking.

As we conclude this exploration of the alleged depopulation plan by the World Economic Forum and Bill Gates, it is essential to emphasize that the journey toward uncovering the truth requires an ongoing commitment to transparency and accountability.

While suspicions and scepticism may persist, it is crucial to separate baseless conspiracy theories from substantiated claims, relying on evidence-based analysis and rigorous examination of available information.

Moving forward, it is imperative that we demand transparency from institutions and individuals who wield significant influence over global affairs. The establishment of independent oversight mechanisms and the release of comprehensive data can help alleviate concerns and rebuild trust.

By holding the powerful accountable and promoting an open dialogue, we can collectively shape a future based on truth, fairness, and justice.

In conclusion, the alleged depopulation plan propagated by the World Economic Forum and Bill Gates is a matter that warrants serious consideration and examination.

By maintaining a commitment to seeking the truth, promoting transparency, and encouraging responsible discourse, we empower ourselves to navigate the complex landscape of global affairs.

It is up to each individual to engage critically, challenge assumptions, and contribute to a better world based on justice, equality, and the pursuit of truth.

Source Link: https://expose-news.com/2023/05/07/schwab-gates-great-reset-plan-depopulation/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Unmasking The Great Reset: Schwab, Gates, and the Sinister WEF Plot to Depopulate the World using COVID Vaccines & Climate Change Lies as a Recipe for Disaster appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.