The scope extends beyond social media to malicious reviews and defamatory posts on online communities, delivery apps and shopping platforms

A viral YouTube video, a one-star review on a delivery app, a heated post on a parenting community – all of these will fall under the same legal standard in South Korea starting next Tuesday.

The revised Information and Communications Network Act, widely known as the “fake news” law, introduces punitive damages for YouTubers with more than 100,000 subscribers and high-traffic TikTok accounts if they display what authorities define as “unlawful” content. Platforms such as Naver, Kakao, Google and Meta stand to face steep penalties if they fail to police such content.

The enforcement decree spells out who can be sued for punitive damages over illegal and fabricated information.

Individuals on online platforms such as YouTube or TikTok who have posted at least three pieces of content over the past three months and either have more than 100,000 subscribers or average more than 100,000 monthly views in that period will fall under the definition of major online information producers.

If they are found to have deliberately spread false information that causes harm to obtain an unfair advantage, judges can impose damages of up to five times the proven loss. What can be considered an unfair advantage encompasses not just economic gains, but also intangible benefits such as expanding social or political influence.

Meanwhile, platforms with more than 1 million daily active users on average over the last three months are required to operate reporting and monitoring systems. Once a complaint is received, they must verify it through the new transparency centre under the state-run Korea Media and Communications Commission.

Any platform failing to delete content that has already been confirmed as unlawful faces corporate administrative surcharges. Should it refuse to obey formal government corrective orders to take down such content, its CEO can be held personally liable and prosecuted.

The scope extends beyond YouTube videos and social media posts. Malicious reviews and defamatory posts on parenting communities, delivery apps and online shopping platforms are subject to the same standard.

Major platforms are already scrambling to align their systems with the new regime, but say the law asks them to do something they are not designed to do: decide what is true.

“We are tightening our rules to match the new law,” a Naver representative said. “We will get guidelines through the Korea Internet Self-Governance Organisation (KISO). If a case feels ambiguous, we’ll have to send it back to KISO again for review. I think we’re going to have to go through that kind of process quite a lot in the early stages.”

Kakao, the operator of Korea’s most popular messaging app KakaoTalk, has taken a similar stance, according to a source familiar with the situation.

Due to the limits of its system for determining what was true and factual, Kakao “cannot realistically investigate the hidden motives behind each post or determine complex legal facts on its own, so it plans instead to request reviews from KISO and actively comply with the organisation’s deliberation results”, the source said.

Meta, a global company that operates popular platforms such as Facebook and Instagram, is also preparing for the new law, a source familiar with the matter said without elaborating.

A public relations agency representing Google Korea, a tech giant behind the search engine and YouTube, said it has not received guidance from the headquarters yet.

US scrutiny

The “fake news” law also carries diplomatic implications. The United States has recently taken issue with the European Union’s Digital Services Act (DSA), viewing it as an excessive restriction on free speech, and observers expect Washington to scrutinise South Korea’s approach as well, given that American firms are among the most prominent platforms affected.

Experts say the law stems from domestic anxiety over misinformation rather than any desire to single out US firms. But they also admit that South Korea-only rules placing heavy burdens on a few US tech giants could easily be recast as trade disputes or used as leverage in alliance politics, as has already occurred in Europe.

A media scholar, speaking on condition of anonymity, likened South Korea’s approach to Europe’s DSA, which defines very large platforms and imposes extensive obligations on them, many of which fall on US firms.

“The numeric thresholds we are now seeing for users and unloaders basically imitate it,” she said. “Europe has already faced criticism that this was about targeting American companies, and Korea risks inviting similar accusations.”

South Korea’s Starbucks shut for staff history lesson after ‘Tank Day’ promotion backlash

An industry expert, requesting anonymity, voiced a similar concern from the corporate side.

The law “can easily become a spark for trade disputes”, the expert said, pointing to the recent controversy over US-incorporated firm Coupang as an example of how regulatory issues could spill over into the broader Seoul-Washington relationship.

Conservative politicians and activists have condemned the law as a direct threat to freedom of expression and a step towards systemic censorship.

A petition on the National Assembly website calling for the repeal of the law gathered more than 140,000 signatures between May 26 and June 26.

Because the same liability rules apply to everything from viral YouTube videos to parenting forum posts, delivery app reviews and comments on shopping platforms, critics say the law will change how platforms behave towards disputed content.

Faced with the legal risk, operators may decide it is safer to take down a contested review or post as soon as a conflict arises than to keep it up and risk being punished later, raising fears that disputed content could be removed much faster and more often than before.

Independent lawmaker Han Dong-hoon, former justice minister, warned that once the state was empowered to decide what counted as fact, online platforms would be pushed to filter out any information that did not fit its narrative.

“Put simply, the law tells portals and community operators to pre-screen and remove any posts the government deems illegal, and to punish them if they do not comply. Faced with that risk, operators will try to minimise their own liability by erring on the side of deleting more content than necessary, leading to confusion and harmful effects from censorship,” he said in a social media post.

Representative Kim Jae-sub of the main opposition People Power Party went further, likening the law to historic speech-control statutes under authoritarian regimes.

“Hitler had the Heimtuckegesetz, a law against malicious criticism, and Stalin had Article 58 of the Soviet criminal code banning anti-Soviet agitation,” he said. “Now the Lee Jae Myung administration has revised the Information and Communications Network Act, a ‘community censorship law’ that serves the same purpose: to shut down legitimate criticism of those in power.”

He cited past cases in which Lee and the ruling Democratic Party of Korea branded investigations into the Daejang-dong development scandal in Seongnam, Gyeonggi province, and a controversial trip by former Seoul mayoral candidate Chong Won-o, as “fake news” – only for those allegations to later be confirmed as true.

“Just imagine how convenient a governing tool this ‘community censorship law’ will be,” he added.

Source: https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east-asia/article/3358967/south-korea-fake-news-law-triggers-free-speech-censorship-fears

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

HopeGirl Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@hopegirlblog
HopeGirl Telegram Channel Chat and Groups: https://t.me/Hopegirl587 
Get Our Free EMF Survival Guide : https://bit.ly/FTWEMF
10 Percent Off our EMF Protection Products with this Link: https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/tenoff

The post South Korea ‘fake news’ law triggers free speech, censorship fears appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Mike Waltz’s exit sparks panic among Iran war hawks, with Steve Witkoff facing attacks as a potential replacement as Trump resists war. Economists warn of a 60% recession chance and dollar collapse, but Dr. Kirk Elliot predicts recovery after pain. RFK Jr. claims HHS as responsible for child trafficking and pushes to protect children, dropping truth bombs about measles.

Source:  https://rumble.com/v6su58j-waltz-out-recession-fears-and-rfk-jr.s-vaccine-truth-bombs-daily-pulse-ep-1.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Waltz Out, Recession Fears, & RFK Jr.’s Vaccine Truth Bombs – Daily Pulse Ep 16 appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Dr. James Miller joins us to discuss the miracle drug big pharma fears, healing people all over the country from severe illness and disease such as spinal injuries, people needing lung transplants, vaccine injuries and even assisting children with Down Syndrome!

Source:  https://rumble.com/v6sfbob-natures-cure-the-miracle-drug-big-pharma-fears-daily-pulse-ep-9.html?e9s=src_v1_upp

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Nature’s Cure: The Miracle Drug Big Pharma Fears | Daily Pulse Ep 9 appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

There are fears in India about the impact of a move to cut corruption by replacing the country’s major banknotes could spread wider and last longer than first thought, with warnings economic growth and food production will suffer.

In rural India, the promised “short term” pain of currency change is creeping into winter.

The northern state of Bihar is one of India’s poorest.

In the village of Bakhtiyarpur, farmer Rajgir Rai and his son want to buy seed for a winter wheat crop, but cannot.

“When I give a 500 rupee note to somebody, he tells me to first ‘go get it converted’,” he explained, waving the worthless bill in frustration.

Several weeks ago India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi cancelled 500 and 1,000 rupee banknotes overnight.

‘There is no flow of cash in the market’

But an ongoing inadequate supply of replacement currency means like many rural Indians, Mr Rai still cannot get new notes.

Mr Rai said farmers like him depended on cash from selling one crop to plant the next.

“We cannot use the money that we have earned anymore,” he said.

“We can’t use that to make payments. What can we do?”

As his staff weigh orders, all for fewer or cheaper seeds, store owner Shailender Kumar told Saturday AM his business was down 60 per cent.

“Our season starts at the beginning of November,” he said.

“But our sales never picked up — there is no flow of cash in the market.”

Rendering trillions of rupees worthless has caused enormous upheaval across India, yet it remains popular, as Indians support curbing rampant tax evasion and corruption.

But there is also growing anger over impacts the Government appears not to have anticipated.

In Parliament on Thursday, former Indian prime minister Manmohan Singh launched a scathing attack on the Government’s handling of its policy, saying it had been “monumentally mismanaged”.

Delays in replacing the cancelled notes “reflect very poorly” on Prime Minister Modi’s team, finance ministry and India’s Reserve Bank, he said.

Photo: The move to abolish the notes has caused chaos for businesses. (Reuters: Jayanta Dey)

Crops to suffer

As he tilled his soil, frustrated farmer Sunil Kumar said despite good monsoon rain, he expected his forthcoming crop to disappoint.

“I had no cash to buy new seed, so I resorted to using the seed I had at home,” he said.

He could not afford decent fertiliser either, and knows yield and quality will suffer as a result.

“When I go to sell this crop, I won’t get the usual market price,” he lamented.

In belated recognition of the potential economic and food supply consequences, the Government has offered farmers seeds on credit.

But none of the farmers the ABC spoke to were aware of that offer.

The potential ripple effect has analysts estimating the currency change could wipe as much as four percentage points from India’s 7.6 per cent annual growth.

But not all are entirely pessimistic.

“This quarter could be 30 to 40 per cent down,” Indian agricultural economist Ashok Gulati said.

“But within six months, I think we will bounce back.”

What few are willing to predict however, is if the pain will be worth it.

Source:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-26/indian-currency-ban-triggers-fears-for-economy-food-production/8058922

The post Indian currency ban triggers fears for economy and food production appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.