Connecting the Agenda published a video in 2016 describing the significant connections between the Rockefellers and the United Nations.

John D. Rockefeller Jr. provided $2 million to the League of Nations in 1927, which later became part of the United Nations Office in Geneva.

Additionally, the Rockefellers purchased the land for the United Nations Headquarters in New York, with John D. Rockefeller Jr. donating $8,515,000 in 1946, and Nelson Rockefeller negotiating the deal with the landowner, William Zeckendorf.

David Rockefeller, Nelson’s brother, benefited financially from the deal, as he owned land in the area that increased in value after the UN Headquarters was built, and he also invested in a building project across from the UN building through the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

The Rockefeller family has continued to support the United Nations, with the Rockefeller Foundation providing grants and the Rockefellers Brothers Fund funding the United Nations Foundation.

According to David Rockefeller’s autobiography, the family’s ultimate goal is to build a “more integrated global political and economic structure – one world,” which aligns with the United Nations’ Agenda 21 programme.

Connecting the Rockefellers to the United Nations

By Connecting the Agenda, 8 May 2017

Transcript

[Note from The Exposé: Many of the hyperlinks contained in the original transcript are no longer available or have changed.  We have kept these original links in the text below so that researchers can trace them on archive websites or elsewhere.]

In this analysis, the direct connection between the Rockefellers and the creation of the United Nations organisation will be made.

First, it should be noted that the organisation that preceded the United Nations, the League of Nations, received a significant amount of support from Rockefeller-related organisations.  In 1927, John D. Rockefeller Jr. provided the League of Nations with $2 million to “enhance its international relations library and promote peace through knowledge and understanding”.  This Library of the League of Nations later became known as the United Nations Office at Geneva (“UNOG”) when the league transferred its assets to the United Nations.  According to UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon, in a statement praising the Rockefeller family’s past and present support of international organisations, the interest from that original $2 million loan still provides approximately $150,000 every biennium to the United Nations.

The Rockefeller Foundation was also heavily involved with transition from the League of Nations to the United Nations as documented in the article ‘The Rockefeller Foundation and the Transition from the League of Nations to the UN’ by Ludovic Tournes of the University of Geneva. Further connections could be drawn between the Rockefellers and the League of Nations but for the sake of brevity, we will move on to the United Nations.

It is no secret that the land that the United Nations is built upon today was purchased with money donated by the Rockefellers.  The official Rockefeller Archive Centre has this to say on the matter:

John D. Rockefeller, Jr.’s deep interest in international relations was reflected by his many contributions directed to international causes. Perhaps most outstanding in this field was his gift of $8,515,000 in December 1946, for the purchase of the land for the permanent home of the United Nations in New York.

This land where the United Nations Headquarters now sits in New York was originally owned by a prominent real estate developer named William “Bill” Zeckendorf.  As the story goes, Nelson Rockefeller, on behalf of the United Nations, went to Zeckendorf with an offer to buy the property, Zeckendorf agreed, and Nelson’s father, John D Rockefeller, Jr., donated the money to the United Nations in order to finance the purchase of the land.  While this story is usually presented as just another selfless act of charity by the Rockefellers, there is some evidence to suggest that there were ulterior benefits associated with this donation.

Because the United Nations was set to transform the area, which was mostly old buildings and abandoned slaughterhouses, if someone were to own property in the area they would see a massive increase in value.  As luck would have it, David Rockefeller was one of those ownership interests that would benefit financially.  In his own autobiography titled ‘Memoirs’, David Rockefeller describes how after becoming a board member of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, the Endowment bought the land across from where the UN building would be erected, and how they profited greatly.

“I turned to Bill Zeckendorf, and he offered us one of the building sites he had acquired on the west side of First Avenue, across from where the new UN building would be erected.  Although the area was still filled with abandoned slaughterhouses and decaying commercial buildings, Bill felt the UN and other related projects would permanently transform the area.  He recommended that we buy the parcel before land values skyrocketed and then put up our own building.

“Several of the more conservative board members thought the plan far too risky and criticised spending the endowment’s limited funds on a construction project in an unproven location.  The endowment’s longtime treasurer opposed the project and resigned from the board, predicting it would bankrupt us.  However, a strong majority of the board backed the proposal, especially after I was able to persuade Winthrop Aldrich to open a Chase branch on the ground floor.  Once the building was completed, we rented much of the building to not-for-profits and easily handled the mortgage payments. As Bill Zeckendorf predicted, the area around the UN quickly became one of New York’s prime neighbourhoods and continues to be so to this day.” (pg 150)

David Rockefeller conveniently leaves out of this passage that it was the same Bill Zeckendorf who sold the land to the United Nations, through the funding of David’s father John D. Rockefeller Jr, that was selling the endowment the land near the United Nations off of his “prediction” that the land values would skyrocket.  I am not sure of the extent that insider information was involved in this deal, but, in the least, this proves that a Rockefeller did seemingly benefit financially from the creation of the United Nations in that location.

(As a side note: Wikipedia also twice refers to the Rockefellers owning land in another area around the United Nations known as Tudor City.  The sources for the information in those two entries seem to be of questionable origin so I cannot yet present that information as fact.)

Another family connection to the founding of the United Nations is David’s brother Nelson Rockefeller being a member of the US delegation at the gathering that marked the founding of the United Nations, the 1945 Conference on International Organisation.  Nelson would also go on to fund The United Nations World magazine in an effort to promote the UN.

It should be noted, the designers of the United Nations Headquarters were working out of an office in Rockefeller Centre.  The chief architect of the project was Wallace K. Harrison, a man with interesting Rockefeller connections himself.   Charlene Mires, author of the book ‘Capital of the World: The Race to Host the United Nations’, describes Harrison as “one of the designers of Rockefeller Centre, a Rockefeller relation by marriage, a confidant of Nelson Rockefeller and a member of the booster committee that had been working to bring the UN to New York.”

This Rockefeller support of the United Nations continued after the creation of the UN and continues to this day.  It would be too much to list all of the ways that Rockefeller-related organisations contribute to the United Nations today but their influence can be seen through examples like the Rockefeller Foundation providing grants to the United Nations, or the Rockefellers Brothers Fund funding the United Nations Foundation.

More important, though, than the motive to make some money off of a land deal was the Rockefeller vision of a one world government as revealed on pg. 405 of David Rockefeller’s autobiography ‘Memoirs’.  It is in this passage that David reveals his family’s ultimate goal:

For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicised incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions.

Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working in the best interests of the United States, characterising my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.

The United Nations fits well into the Rockefeller family’s goal “to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world.”  Through United Nations programs such as Agenda 21, local decision-making power is being eroded and being replaced by regional governments that continue to become more centralised.  In the analysis titled ‘The Problems with Connecticut Climate Change Policy – Part 4: The Rockefeller Connection’, the connections between Agenda 21, the Rockefellers, and current events taking place in Connecticut are detailed.  Through these connections, a pattern emerges of a system being created that is designed to reduce the decision-making power of individual towns, cities and states, transferring that power over to large, centralised, non-elected bureaucracies.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2025/01/24/connecting-the-agenda-rockefellers-and-the-un/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Connecting the Agenda: Rockefellers and the United Nations appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

At the end of last month, an associate legal officer in the UN Treaty Section was caught on hidden camera admitting that the United Nations (“UN”) has ambitions to be a one-world government with its own military power.

In two weeks, the UN is hoping 193 countries will adopt the Pact for the Future, originating from the UN Secretary General’s ‘Our Common Future’.  Our Common Future is António Guterres’ vision to “strengthen global governance for present and future generations.”

At the end of last month, Mug Club Undercover recorded Jorge Paoletti, a self-described “Globalist” and a legal affairs official in the UN Treaty Section, saying: “They created this institution [the UN] which is the closest we’ve ever got to kind of like a world government. A world state,” Paoletti said.

“Like a one-world government?” the undercover reporter asked.  “Exactly,” Paoletti responded.

In Paoletti’s words, the UN aspires to be a globalist world government that rules over Earth’s citizens, all of whom would be forced to adhere to a uniform identity.

“One of the objectives of the UN is to create an identity of a global citizen … of someone who shares an identity, a political identity, with everyone on this planet,” he said.

Paoletti lamented, however, that the UN is not as effective as it should be – though this could change if the organisation had military power.

“The United Nations does not have its own army,” Paoletti said.

“Should it?” the undercover journalist asked.  “Absolutely,” the official responded.

We have embedded Louder with Crowder’s video below to begin at the Mug Club Undercover section.

If you are unable to watch the video above on Rumble, you can watch a clip taken from it of the relevant section on Odysee HERE.

Two days after this video surfaced, Stéphane Dujarric, spokesperson for the UN Secretary-General, was asked at a press briefing what he thought of Paoletti’s remarks.  The question was specifically referring to the remarks he made about Donald Trump and UN staff being terrified that he may be re-elected as President.

Dujarric answered that Paoletti was a junior staffer and was not speaking on behalf of the UN. “I will just state for a fact that this is not, you know, when someone is recorded without their knowledge in a private setting, I don’t think any good journalist could interpret it as being the official position of the United Nations,” Dujarric said.

So as expected, Dujarric was stating the obvious while brushing aside the question.  Although the question was not related to the section of the undercover video we focussed on above, it does authenticate that the discussion took place.

As The Gold Report highlighted, this revelation comes within weeks of the Summit of the Future when dignitaries from around the world will gather at the UN headquarters in New York to sign the ‘Pact for the Future’ (“Pact”).

The Pact demands that “member states [ ] repeatedly ‘reaffirm’ their ‘unwavering commitment’ to the UN, its charter, its purposes, its principles and Agenda 2030. They vow to comply with the UN’s International Court of Justice and promise to ‘reform the international financial architecture’,” The Gold Report said.

“Altogether, the document lists 60 actions that member states should take. In nearly all of them, the agreement makes it clear that the countries’ interests revolve around the UN and its globalist systems,” The Gold Report added.

But that’s not all. Buried towards the end of the Pact is a requirement that member states embed UN “agreements and resolutions” in their own national laws.

The Pact will be accompanied by two annexed documents: the ‘Global Digital Compact’ and the ‘Pact for the Future Implementation Roadmap’, a detailed plan for implementing the Pact’s commitments, including timelines, responsibilities and indicators for tracking progress.  You can find links to copies of all three documents on the UN’s website HERE (scroll down to the section titled ‘Outcome documents and letters from the co-facilitators’).

After the Summit, the UN will monitor the implementation of the pact by countries who have signed up to it, with regular reviews and assessments to ensure progress and accountability.

The UK has expressed its commitment to the Summit of the Future.  Even though the UK has participated in the practical consultations on preparations for the Summit which began in February 2023, the specific signatory representative from the UK, the person who will sign the Pact, has not been publicly disclosed. Perhaps it is the UK’s Permanent Representative to the United Nations, Dame Barbara Woodward, and other “relevant officials” that have been and will represent the country in the Pact’s discussions and negotiations? But without public disclosure, we are left to wonder who is negotiating and committing our present, future and future generations to a foreign organisation that is under the control of unelected, unaccountable and unknown bureaucrats.

Did you give your government, or its appointees, permission to negotiate or agree to this Pact on your behalf?  Did your government make you aware of the Pact’s commitments, the impact it will have on your and your children’s lives or even notify you that a Pact is being negotiated and being put to unelected bureaucrats to sign on your behalf on 22 September?

According to the UN, one of the overarching purposes of the Summit, and the Pact, is to “restore trust.”  Trust in what? Trust in whom?  When something is not done openly and transparently, and commitments are made by a select few that impact billions of people’s lives without their knowledge or consent – it does not restore trust in the United Nations or those who claim to represent nations.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/09/10/un-legal-officer-caught-on-camera/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post United Nations legal officer is caught on camera stating the UN’s ambition to become a world government appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

The United Nations is signing away the people’s freedom.

Jeffrey Tucker is here to talk about the UN declaration that would give unlimited power to the World Health Organization.

The goal of controlling a pandemic requires destroying the freedoms of the average American.

The United Nations sees this is a major opportunity to amass more power.

The UN is trying to codify what the W.H.O. recommended in 2021.

This is part of the Great Reset and will result in a one world government.

Pandemics used to be rare but now we are told that dealing with never ending pandemics will be the new normal.

Fortunately, the people are not buying the lies and resistance is growing.

Source:  https://rumble.com/v3itrum-united-nations-declares-war-on-sovereignty-w.h.o-plans-one-world-government.html

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post United Nations Declares WAR On Sovereignty: W.H.O Plans One World Government appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

In 2007, Dr. Rosalind Peterson gave a presentation at the United Nations in which she stated that chemtrails form man-made clouds that trap warmth in the atmosphere, exacerbate global warming, contribute to long-term climate change, and affect natural resources and agriculture.  Chemtrails are not a “conspiracy theory,” they are fact – they know and they have always known.

She was a Keynote Speaker at the United Nations (“UN”) 60th Annual DPI/NGO Conference on Climate Change held on 5-7 September 2007 at the UN Headquarters in New York.  The conference was given the title  ‘Climate Change: How It Impacts Us All’.  It appears the only reference to this conference that remains on the UN’s website is a press release dated 5 September 2007.  The press release made no mention of Dr. Peterson’s contribution but the Conference’s final report did.

At the Conference, Dr. Peterson spoke about agriculture and the negative impacts of experimental weather modification programs on tree and plant health, increasing UV Radiation, aviation impacts on climate, and other important issues. Afterwards, she also presented her UN PowerPoint Presentation to colleges, universities and interested groups.

Below is a recording of Dr. Peterson’s presentation with an introduction given by herself.  It was downloaded from the California Sky Watch website HERE.

“We are in a global drumbeat right at the moment talking about climate change and global warming.  One of the things that is affected by climate change is agriculture.  But some of what we are seeing is man-made but man-made in a different way than you may guess,” she began.

“Weather modification programmes – experimental ones, done by private companies, done by the United States government, done by states across the United States – are underway.  There are more than 50 of them in operation across the United States.  All of these impact agriculture because they change the micro-climates needed for agriculture to survive.

“There are programmes around the world – international corporations are modifying our weather all the time.  And they’re modifying it in ways that cover thousands and thousands of square miles.  Most of it is chemically altered so what happens is that we are putting chemicals – ground-based chemicals that are shot into the air or chemicals coming from aeroplanes – that change or modify our weather.

“Many times, we’re talking about artificially putting chemicals – like sulphur or particulates – into the atmosphere in what they call geoengineering schemes, to … help the planet, supposedly, help the planet to not go through such a tremendous global climate change and to mitigate global warming. However, the incidents of putting chemicals into our atmosphere are going to change and impact agricultural crop production … reduce crop production.”

Dr. Peterson goes on to give more details about “persistent jet contrails,” which today we colloquially call chemtrails, including how they exacerbate global warming. A chemtrail can expand 4,000 kilometres and last for 20 hours, she said.

“It wasn’t until the late 1980s … that we started have jet contrails that persist … How do you like your skies, natural or man-made?  Right now, we are making man-made clouds and this is trapping warmth in our atmosphere.”

According to NASA, Dr. Peterson said, man-made clouds also contribute to long-term changes in Earth’s climate and affect natural resources.  “Our drinking water is impacted because the chemicals are now beginning to show up in our drinking water … Many of our forests … are dying … we believe that these trees are impacted because they cannot absorb enough water because aluminium is going into their root system,” she said.

The types of chemicals they are using are aluminium, barium, strontium, magnesium, calcium and manganese.

“If we don’t look at the problems that we are creating, the atmospheric testing programmes – in other words, the [persistent] jet contrails that are warming our climate – and we say to ourselves we want to geoengineer something else, we want to add more particulates to help global warming or to stop climate change, what we’re going to have is we’re going to have a pea soup up there of chemicals which are going to be detrimental to our health,” Dr. Peterson said.

Source Link: https://expose-news.com/2023/06/25/sixteen-years-ago-un-was-told-about-chemtrails/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Sixteen years ago, the United Nations was told that chemtrails are bad for agriculture and bad for natural resources appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

The United Nations (UN) is planning to introduce a global digital ID system that is linked to individuals’ bank accounts.

The plan, which is similar to the system developed by the World Economic Forum (WEF), is outlined in three new policy briefs from the UN titled, “A Global Digital Compact, Reforms to the International Financial Architecture, and The Future of Outer Space Governance.”

The goal of the briefs is to advance UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres’s “vision for the future.”

Officially titled “Our Common Agenda,” Guterres’ “vision” should be given the green light in September 2024 during an event dubbed, “The Summit for the Future.”

From the report:

Digital IDs linked with bank or mobile money accounts can improve the delivery of social protection coverage and serve to better reach eligible beneficiaries.

Digital technologies may help to reduce leakage, errors and costs in the design of social protection programmes.

Not unlike their unofficial counterparts over at the WEF, the UN also speaks about basically regulating the global digital future.

The unelected organization uses phrases such as “international cooperation” and “many stakeholders” who will “advance principles, objectives, and actions” to describe this globalist agenda.

The UN describes this goal as “an open, free, secure and human-centered digital future.”

The digital future as envisaged by these groups is going to be quite the opposite of open, free, or human-centric, however.

As far as the UN’s “vision” for a future global financial system, it is supposed to be harmonized with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

It would be governed by something called “the apex body” that is yet to be set up.

The key actors here would be the UN chief, as well as the Group of 20, the Economic and Social Council, and “heads of international financial institutions.”

Within this, the UN sees “visions” of “a Global Digital Compact.”

Essentially, the objective is to have people, devices, and entities, all tied up in a connected network that could apparently be centrally administered, seemingly by unelected bureaucrats.

When those planning this future scheme worry about any negative impact, they never see it as potentially affecting everyone – but only “civil society (…) or selected groups excluded from social benefits.”

Meanwhile, the WEF has just partnered with a leading biometrics company to advance its own agenda to digitize humanity.

Swedish biometrics company Fingerprint Cards has taken a big step into the WEF’s New Champions Community, an assembly of mid-sized enterprises.

The WEF is keen to promote biometric forms of digital ID and claims the technology would serve as a steward of “social inclusion.”

The New Champions Community’s schedule includes a meeting in Tianjin, China from June 27 to 29 during the WEF Summer Davos gathering.

Charles Burgeat, Senior Vice President of Strategy at Fingerprint Cards, imparted what he thought was a nugget of wisdom:

“As a proud member of the WEF New Champions Community program, we want to be recognized as a purpose-driven company that contributes positively to the changes needed to operate in the new digitalized world.

“By joining this Community, we look forward to brainstorming and exchanging ideas with peers, and bring our expertise of the biometrics industry.”

Fingerprint Cards faced choppy waters in Q1 of 2023, posting a loss of 70 million Swedish krona ($6.4 million) on a revenue of SEK 117 million ($10.8 million), Biometric Update reported.

However, the firm plowed forward, achieving key milestones, including integrating its fingerprint biometrics in 700 Android smartphones and shipping 1 million biometric sensor modules for payment cards.

Xiaomi’s Redmi K60 secured the distinction of being the first smartphone boasting Fingerprint Cards’ under-display tech.

Xiaomi is a Chinese tech company.

The WEF, already well-versed in the digital tapestry of biometrics, continues to champion the sector.

The organization previously inducted Yoti into an associated coalition.

Source Link: https://www.sott.net/article/481501-United-Nations-planning-digital-ID-linked-to-bank-accounts

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post United Nations planning digital ID linked to bank accounts appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.