In a recent article, Paul D. Thacker described how the covid mantra “follow the science” has destroyed trust in science.  He used evidence gathered by journalist David Zwieg to demonstrate how and why.

“There is no going back to a time before covid made our world crazy. You are right to be mistrustful of trusted officials and respected institutions. Zweig’s writing lays out all the evidence you need to feel this way,” he wrote.

The following is an excerpt from the article ‘The Pandemic That Broke Our Faith in Modelling’ written by Paul D. Thacker and published by The Daily Economy on 23 October 2025.  You can read the full article HERE.

Journalist David Zweig documents much of the covid pandemic crazy in his book ‘An Abundance of Caution’. In diligent detail, he marches the horrified reader through a series of mistakes, most still unacknowledged, including the lack of scientific evidence for lengthy school closures and nonsensical “follow the science” requirements for masks and social distancing. The details he describes remain frightening because too many still deny what happened and refuse to admit they did anything wrong.

The month after the pandemic took off in the West, the Journal of the American Medical Association (“JAMA”) published a February 2020 summary of Chinese data and found just 2 per cent of covid patients were less than 19 years old and no children younger than 10 had died. “Disease in children appears to be relatively rare and mild,” Zweig discovers, digging up a World Health Organisation (“WHO”) report published that same month.

Just like the study in JAMA, WHO researchers stated that children accounted for around 2 per cent of reported cases, with only 0.2 per cent of children categorised as “critical disease.” This calculates to 0.0048 per cent of the total population who became seriously ill.

People interviewed by the WHO investigative team “could not recall episodes in which transmission occurred from a child to an adult.”

Despite research showing that kids were at minimal risk from the virus, Zweig records what we all now know: we ignored objective science in favour of subjective values, locked down our cities, shut down our schools and threw the kids on laptops pretending they would learn. Baseless fears that children were dying in large numbers lingered even six months into the pandemic, long after anyone with eyes could see the virus wasn’t killing kids.

Gallup released a poll in July 2020, finding that the public thought 40 times the number of people younger than 25 were dying than was actually the case.

“People were dying from a scary new disease, and my family and my neighbours were readily compliant with the governor’s orders to stay home, and stay apart from each other until some unknown time when this thing was going to go away,” Zweig writes, describing the state of his household a month into New York State’s lockdown. “And yet. This virus, which was a terror for the old, posed almost no threat to my kids or their friends.”

A former magazine fact checker, Zweig began digging into scientific studies and calling up established researchers to try and understand how state and federal governments formulated pandemic policies that seemed to ignore scientific evidence while harming his own children. Trusted officials, he found, were failing to adequately explain the uncertainties of published research and closing their eyes to documented consequences.

But the public never learned that pandemic strategies were based mostly on values, not objective science, because journalists had abandoned all pretence of reporting. Instead of scrutinising the scientific literature, journalists with legacy media outlets favoured calling up these same trusted officials. Reporters also platformed a coterie of self-branded experts who managed to claw their way out of scientific obscurity to become overnight authorities on epidemics in the press and on social media.

Many of the plans enforced during the pandemic ignored already established contagion-response strategies. In his book, Zweig cites several researchers who warned that school shutdowns would damage children during an epidemic, such as D.A. Henderson, a much-celebrated epidemiologist who led the international effort to eradicate smallpox before becoming dean of the school of public health at Johns Hopkins University.

“Disease mitigation measures, however well intentioned, have potential social, economic, and political consequences that need to be fully considered by political leaders as well as health officials,” Henderson wrote in a 2006 paper published in the journal Biosecurity and Bioterrorism. “Closing schools is an example.”

Henderson cautioned against locking kids out of school and forcing some parents to abandon work to stay at home, a policy that would place an unfair burden on certain segments of society to control virus transmission. Henderson and his co-authors also forewarned against policies based on scientific models, as they would fail to account for all social groups.

No model, no matter how accurate its epidemiologic assumptions, can illuminate or predict the secondary and tertiary effects of particular disease mitigation measures … If particular measures are applied for many weeks or months, the long-term or cumulative second and third-order effects could be devastating.

Yet models are exactly what trusted officials relied on, Zweig writes, for pandemic procedures such as school closures whose damage to children is still being assessed. As for the segments of society who were most harmed, that would be the less privileged and the working class, whose experiences and perspectives were never injected in these models formulated by “laptop liberals” who had the privilege to work from home offices.

Zweig highlights the awful reporting by a few laptop warriors, such as New York Times reporter Apoorva Mandavilli, and a 2020 working paper by Dartmouth College and Brown University academics underlines how poor journalism was pervasive. Analysing 20,000 news articles and TV news segments from foreign English-language and American media for positive or negative tone, they found that US major media outlet coverage was far more downbeat.

“Among topics analysed, the researchers looked at schools’ coverage specifically,” Zweig writes. “They found that 90 per cent of school reopening articles in American mainstream media were negative, compared to only 56 per cent for English-language major media in other countries.”

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2025/10/24/how-follow-the-science-destroyed-trust-in-science/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post How “follow the science” destroyed trust in science appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Harlow is back. Quantum computing, disruptive technologies, new discoveries, where science and spirituality intersect and more

Source:  https://rumble.com/v703mty-jaim-harlow-quantum-computing-disruptive-technologies-science-and-spiritual.html?e9s=src_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Jaim Harlow Quantum Computing, Disruptive Technologies, Science and Spirituality 84 minute interview not 18 hours appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Taylor Welch is an investor & business consultant. His portfolio of companies have serviced over 50,000 individual small businesses in the last 5 years. He currently lives in Nashville Tennessee with his wife and 2 kids

Source:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fErqALnK-w4

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post The Science of Miracles (quantum neurology, cellular healing, & frequencies) w/Chris Cormier appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Science Confirms Biblical Creation – Dr. Jason Lisle

Source:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qjrTSra0pQ

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Science Confirms Biblical Creation – Dr. Jason Lisle appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Emerging Science on Nutraceuticals To Improve Heart Health. Join us for a discussion of cutting edge research and unique formulations of natural medicines that reduce the risk factors associated increase in cardiovascular disease and the underlying conditions (metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance) that create the inflammatory environment of the body the lead to heart disease over time. Speakers: Elizabeth Lee Vliet MD and Kathy Kresnik, TFH Director of Health and Resilience

Source: https://rumble.com/v6q0ja8-health-freedom-under-attack-dr-robert-young-found-guilty-on-suspicious-vict.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Emerging Science on Nutraceuticals To Improve Heart Health Part I appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

CONTROL THE POPULATION DATA – HIDE THE DEAD

Our World in Data – World Excess Mortality Graph

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-deaths-cumulative-economist-single-entity?tab=chart&country=~OWID_WRL

United Nations – Population Change Graph

https://population.un.org/wpp/Graphs/Probabilistic/POP/PopulationChange/900

United Nations – Live Birth Change Graph

https://population.un.org/wpp/Graphs/Probabilistic/FERT/Births/900

World Population Review – China Population Forecast Graph

https://worldpopulationreview.com/countries/china

Source:  https://www.brighteon.com/836e5aeb-cd15-4ad4-b891-e00bb5ec28d9

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post THE HIDDEN MECHANISMS OF GENOCIDE SCIENCE appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Dr. Gerald Pollack on the biochemistry and physics of water. Are there cell membranes? Is anything we’ve been taught really true?

Source:  https://rumble.com/v5ddgwh-ez-water-and-why-you-cant-just-trust-science-with-dr.-merritt-and-gerald-po.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post EZ water and why you can’t just trust science with Dr. Merritt and Gerald Pollack PhD appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Unredacted RKI protocols shed light on various questionable decisions and observations made by the German Covid Crisis Team throughout the pandemic.

The RKI covid protocols, through April 2021, were first released in heavily redacted form in March 2024. Following a public outcry, the German Health Ministry agreed to remove all but the most essential redactions and finally delivered on this promise in May. Thereafter, a former RKI employee leaked all documents available to him in completely unredacted form to the independent journalist.

The unredacted documents include discussions about the ineffectiveness of mass testing, concerns about the use of FFP2 respirators, plans for vaccinating children despite lack of recommendation and puzzling alterations to testing procedures driven by ministerial instructions.

These revelations highlight the disconnect between scientific assessments and policy decisions, raising concerns about the basis for certain public health measures.

Earlier today, we published an article by Dr. Robert Malone highlighting peer-reviewed papers that demonstrate that the use of psychological techniques were purposefully deployed during the covid era to “fear nudge” and coerce people into taking a “vaccine.” 

The following article by Eugyppius demonstrates the same using documents from the Robert Koch Institut (“RKI”), a public health research and policy development institution which advises the German federal government on the identification of pathogens, disease surveillance and prevention (including vaccination).

Unredacted RKI protocols lay bare the entire Covid farce yet again

By Eugyppius

The Robert Koch Institut is the German equivalent of the American Centres for Disease Control; they are our primary public health authority, and as such they were central to the management of the covid pandemic in Germany.

The heretofore secret protocols of their “Covid Crisis Team” are now available unredacted and nearly in their entirety. In what follows, I assemble some samples for you. See if you can divine some common themes:

On 25 March 2020, our Crisis Team resolved to include in their dashboard and weekly reports the “epidemiological curve” illustrating new covid infections according to “reporting date and onset of illness.” Somewhat nervously, they added that, “You can see that the curve is slowly levelling off, but we should avoid drawing attention to this in our external communications, to encourage compliance with measures.” The German lockdowns were imposed as the first wave was already slowing down, and our public health authorities knew this.

On 29 July 2020, the RKI came to discuss a draft paper written by our virological-prophet-in-chief Christian Drosten, which provided “Recommendations for the autumn.” The article, they note, is “confidential,” especially because Drosten “decided in the meantime not to publish it.” This was because “his paper considered untargeted testing not to be useful, and this contradicts government policy.” Even a child could have seen that our mass testing regime was entirely pointless and provided useless data, and the scientists who were the public face of it knew this too. They didn’t say anything.

On 23 October 2020, with the second wave looming, the Covid Crisis Team prepared a general assessment on the advisability of making everybody wear FFP2 respirators. They complained that using such masks “requires training” and that “there is a lot of misuse” even “by medical staff, and masks must be individually fitted.” They worried furthermore that properly fitted FFP2 masks might make people feel too secure and undermine the pandemic “solidarity principle” by removing the manipulative emphasis on “the protection of others.” They also noted that FFP2 “masks increase respiratory resistance” and that “medical consultation may be necessary in the case of underlying diseases.” In conclusion, they said that “the harms of FFP2 masks may outweigh benefits” and wondered whether they should provide an announcement telling Germans that FFP2 masks are ill-advised. Despite this assessment by government epidemiologists, the first FFP2 mask mandates were imposed several months later.

On 19 May 2021, the RKI noted that “Even if STIKO [the German vaccine advisory body] does not recommend vaccination for children, [Health Minister Jens] Spahn is still planning a child vaccination programme.” Two days later they said that “Paediatric associations are reluctant to vaccinate children,” but also that “Politicians are already preparing vaccination campaigns to vaccinate the relevant age groups by the end of the school holidays.” On 14 July 2021, they had a whole brainstorming session about how to market the vaccines to kids, even though these medical interventions were still not recommended for them. They dreamed of an “influencer vaccination challenge on YouTube” and about “developing material for younger target groups” on social media. They wondered if “many aspects of the topic could” not “be approached with more humour.” It might be fun to make amusing social media content for children about vaccine side-effects: “For example, El Hotzo talked about his vaccine reaction.” (El Hotzo, in case you missed it, is Sebastian Hotz, the toxic social media personality who recently caused a minor scandal by expressing his regret on Twitter that Donald Trump’s would-be assassin failed to kill him.) And finally, at the end of the year on 15 December 2021, they noted laconically that, “The Health Ministry [under Karl Lauterbach] is currently considering a booster vaccination for children, although there is no recommendation and in some cases no authorisation.” The entire child vaccination campaign was a product of politicians and never had any basis in science, and everybody knew it too.

On 10 September 2021, our official government Covidians were working on some horror called a “contact tracing management paper,” to provide advice to state health authorities on this futile and entirely pointless ritual. There came from on high “a ministerial instruction” that proposed alterations to the RKI testing procedures outlined in that document. This change apparently made no sense, because it “caused confusion on the part of state authorities.” This left the RKI wondering what they should do:

It is unusual for the Health Ministry to exert such influence on RKI documents. The minister’s authority to issue directives for RKI scientific documents is currently being legally scrutinised … The current assessment of the RKI management is that the recommendations are issued by the RKI in the role of a federal authority and that a ministerial instruction to supplement this recommendation must be complied with, as the BMG technically supervises the RKI and the RKI, as an institute, cannot appeal to scientific freedom. In this respect, the scientific independence of the RKI from the political arm is limited.

On 5 November 2021, after the vaccines had failed to do anything to stop the usual winter wave, the RKI noted that “The media are talking about a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” They said that “This is not correct from a scientific point of view” because “the entire population is contributing.” They decided it would be better not to say anything about this. First of all, unjustly blaming the unvaccinated “Serves as an appeal to all those who have not been vaccinated to get vaccinated.” And what is more, Health Minister Jens Spahn “talks of the [pandemic of the unvaccinated] at every press conference, presumably deliberately, so it can’t be corrected.”

In that same meeting, the RKI also observed that “one should be very careful with the statement that vaccinations protect against any (even asymptomatic) infection,” because “as the time between vaccinations increases,” infections become ever more likely.

This is all the more true because a continuous adaptation of the virus to the immune selection pressure in the population can be assumed, which could also reduce the protective effect of the vaccination against infection in the future.

They decided that they should keep silent about all of this as well and continue to promise that vaccination stops infection because telling the truth would “cause great confusion.”

On 7 January 2022, it came time to discuss testing procedures for travellers entering Germany. The RKI recommended “antigen testing before entry of all those aged 6 and over” as well as additional “testing of the unvaccinated after entry.” They said that the Health Ministry would “probably want three-month exceptions for boostered people,” because “the vaccinated must receive privileges of some kind, and this must be included in the entry regulations.” None of the repressions visited upon the unvaccinated had any epidemiological purpose; they were simple state harassment and coercion to further a pointless social engineering goal.

On 25 February 2022, the milder Omicron wave was in full force, and the RKI wanted to downgrade their overall risk assessment from “very high” to “high.” The Health Ministry under Karl Lauterbach intervened and forbade them from making this adjustment. This left RKI in a quandary – they had no good reasons to rate the risk as “very high,” but they were under orders to do so. One meeting participant suggested they adopt the “very high” rating but leave “the text of the revised risk assessment unchanged.” Others worried that would cause an inconsistency between the rating and the text justifying the rating. Another person asked what it would mean to adjust the text to reflect a “very high” assessment, as that was not the RKI’s assessment, and the risk assessment was supposed to reflect the Institute’s “professional judgement.”

The RKI Director Lothar Wieler at this point basically shrugged and said that they weren’t allowed to assess the risk as “high.” Others proposed removing the risk assessment entirely (but this would “escalate” tensions with the Ministry) or simply “not revising the risk assessment and no longer referring to it” (but this would “reflect negatively” on the RKI). They decided in the end for the first option – leaving the rating at “very high” with the text they had composed for “merely high.” They additionally resolved that it would be better “not to tweet about” the updated assessment, presumably lest too many people read it and wonder what was going on.

On 12 October 2022, they remarked in passing, in the course of a broader discussion on hygiene regulations for care homes, that, “There is no evidence that vaccination changes anything with respect to virus shedding” – at once destroying the entire rationale for the mass vaccination programme.

The RKI covid protocols, through April 2021, were first released in heavily redacted form in March of this year; following a public outcry, the Health Ministry agreed to remove all but the most essential redactions and finally delivered on this promise in May. Thereafter, a former RKI employee leaked all documents available to him in completely unredacted form to the independent journalist Aya Velázquez. She published this leak earlier this week; it runs to 3,865 pages, extends through 7 June 2023, and includes 10 GB of supplementary material. It is the source of many new revelations, some of which I have surveyed for you above.¹

It goes without saying that there is a near-total media blackout regarding this historic release; when they are not telling us that these documents contain nothing of interest, the press is passing along the RKI condemnation of the leak:

The Robert Koch Institute has criticised the publication of unredacted minutes of the RKI crisis team on the covid pandemic. The RKI expressly condemns the unlawful publication of personal data and trade and business secrets of third parties in these data sets and, in particular, any infringement of third-party rights,” the institute stated. The RKI had neither checked nor verified the data records, it said.

Perhaps if the Covidians had not spent years house-arresting and force-vaccinating millions of people, with the willing collaboration of the medical bureaucrats in the Robert Koch Institut, I could find it within myself to give the slightest f**k about “third-party rights” and privacy. But, they did, and I don’t.

Now I want to say a somewhat more complicated thing. Make no mistake – I am very happy that the RKI protocols have been released. They are an enormous discredit to the public health establishment and internet researchers will continue to unearth nuggets from this massive document trove for months if not years to come. At the same time, these protocols aren’t quite the key to the pandemic, and the reason shines forth between every line of these documents: The RKI is not where the most important decisions were made, it is merely where everybody was supposed to believe they were being made.

The scientists and bureaucrats of the Covid Crisis Team, in these minutes, often betray an outsider perspective little different from our own. You can see this most clearly from the material on child vaccination, a subject to which I devoted two close investigations last year (HERE, and HERE). I can find nothing in what the Covid Crisis Team says about the bizarre Health Ministry push to vaccinate children that was not already in the media.

On 19 May 2021, for example, when they say that Health Minister Jens “Spahn is … planning a child vaccination programme” although “STIKO … does not recommend vaccination for children,” they are more than a week behind press reports on Spahn’s plan. Our own epidemiologists, in other words, can shed no more light on where the child vaccination craze came from than any random internet researcher with moderately good search engine skills. This brings us to the first lesson of the RKI protocols, which also happens to be a central doctrine of the plague chronicle: Politics does not, and cannot, follow science. Rather, science follows politics, and scientists were no more central to decision-making during the pandemic than they were at any other time.

During the pandemic, scientists were called upon to provide an illusory science that politics could pretend to follow. This is the second great revelation of the RKI protocols, and it is why they are so embarrassing for the pandemicists. This is, again, something that we already knew, although, of course, it is profoundly helpful to have it documented beyond dispute in these records. The RKI Covid Crisis Team did not decide on lockdowns or vaccination strategy or anything else; that was a job for politicians in the Health Ministry, and for even more powerful politicians beyond them going all the way up the Chancellor’s office. Christian Drosten had to pretend to advise the politicians while withholding his own papers when they deviated from government policy. The RKI knew that the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” was nonsense but they kept quiet about it, and Drosten surely knew it was nonsense too when he told state media on 18 November that covid is above all a “disease of the unvaccinated.” The role of RKI epidemiologists and virus prophets like Drosten was merely to provide a pandemic fiction that would justify whatever it was the politicians already wanted to do. Along the way, they did untold and unforgivable damage to our society and to many millions of innocent people.

Note:

¹ The material is far too extensive for me to have examined on my own in just a few days. My summary rests on highlights collected in various press articles and across social media, including above all this piece in the Schwäbische Zeitung.

Featured image: The Robert Koch Institut in Berlin, where scientists do what politicians tell them to, and lie to the public accordingly, Eugyppius

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/07/27/germany-unredacted-covid-protocols-reveal-scientists-were/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Germany: Unredacted covid protocols reveal scientists were called on to provide an illusory science that politics could pretend to follow appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Former Air Force Major Thomas Haviland surveyed embalmers in 2022 about unusual clots being found in the bodies of vaccinated deceased.  Haviland did a second survey for 2023.

While reviewing and commenting on the latest survey results, A Midwestern Doctor gives possible mechanisms for how these clots are forming and discusses why corporate media and “the science” remain silent.

“Given how many people are seeing these clots and how much concern still exists about them, it is remarkable that our entire scientific apparatus has blacklisted any research being conducted on it,” A Midwestern Doctor writes.

And much like corporate media, “the scientific press … will never cover stories which threaten the pharmaceutical sponsors who fund the medical journals.”

In November 2022, A Midwestern Doctor (“AMD”) published an article discussing the inexplicable blood clots being found within the vaccinated by embalmers across the world.  These blood clots attracted the public’s attention because their long elastic quality was very different from what was typically observed within the body.

(Related: “Died Suddenly” Blood Clots – What Causes Them?)

In December 2022,  Ryan Cole provided proof on The Highwire that these clots do exist and discussed exactly what was within them.

One of the most comprehensive videos AMD has seen on this topic was a Peak Podcast where host Chris Martenson interviewed embalmers and discussed the results of a survey that was sent out to 30 state funeral directors and embalmer associations across the USA, as well as approximately 800 funeral homes.

The survey was conducted by former Air Force Major Thomas Haviland.  He lost his lucrative defence contracting job in 2021 for refusing the mandated vaccine. Haviland then set out to verify the claims of unusual clots by surveying embalmers globally on what they were witnessing in their work so he could quantify how widespread this phenomenon had become.

(Related: 70% of Embalmers Report Finding Strange Blood Clots Beginning in Mid-2021)

Last week, Richard Hirschmann, the embalmer who played a pivotal role in bringing the public’s attention to these clots, shared a video on Twitter.  His tweet is being censored and cannot be viewed outside of Twitter.  Twitter has labelled it as “age-restricted adult content” and to view it, users are required to add a birthdate to their profile if they haven’t already done so.  However, in an article published yesterday in a follow-up to the November 2022 article, AMD has embedded the video that accompanied Hirschmann’s tweet.

In the November 2022 article, AMD argued that two separate processes were at work in the formation of these clots: misfolded proteins caused by spike proteins and Zeta potential.  In the latest article, AMD recapped the first article:

Normally, the body continually forms and then breaks down fibrin clots, but once they become misfolded, the enzymes the body uses to break the clots down no longer “fit,” and hence can’t break them down. Since the spike protein causes proteins to misfold (either due to its prion domain or its effect on the physiologic zeta potential), researchers had discovered that the presence of the spike protein caused misfolded fibrin clots to form that gradually collected on the walls of containers designed to stimulate the blood vessels. I thus reasoned that if this process continued, it would result in larger and larger clots forming which would eventually match the shape of the blood vessels they encased them. That model has since become the accepted explanation for those amyloid clots.

Zeta potential governs if substances suspended in a fluid remain apart or clump together. One of the most consequential effects of zeta potential is the effect on blood cells in the body, as once zeta potential becomes impaired, they clump together. In turn, since both the spike protein and the vaccine lipid nanoparticles contain a positive charge which impairs zeta potential, many videos exist of blood rapidly clumping together from the vaccine. This I believe accounts for the microclots that have been repeatedly observed in the blood after vaccination and after embalming corpses.

Embalmers are Still Finding Mysterious Clots in the Vaccinated, A Midwestern Doctor, 22 February 2024

The remainder of our article is a pared-down version of AMD’s latest article ‘Embalmers are Still Finding Mysterious Clots in the Vaccinated’.  Haviland has completed a second survey of embalmers for 2023 – the first, for 2022, was discussed in the Peak Podcast above.  AMD’s article yesterday is a follow-on from AMD’s article about the 2022 survey results, incorporating everything that has been learned since.

Why the Clots Cover-up?

One of the most common strategies the ruling class uses to control the population is to establish a rigid series of hierarchies in the society and then buy out every party at the top of the hierarchy, as this provides a fairly cost-effective way to monopolise truth within the society (e.g., you can only practice medicine if you have a medical license, the public is taught to highly trust whatever doctors tell them, and a lot of work is invested to assure that doctors comply with the dictates of medical industry).

For example, we have been conditioned to believe news is not credible unless it comes from an authoritative source (e.g., a major news outlet). As you might expect, almost all the media companies in the USA are owned by six corporations, their CEOs all belong to similar groups (e.g., the World Economic Forum) and they consistently only promote the ruling class’s narrative regardless of how much it flies in the face of reality.

Similarly, we have been conditioned to believe science is only valid if it is endorsed by a credible scientific publication, but since those publications are funded by industry they will only report results which support their sponsors. This, in turn, resulted in an almost complete censorship of the harms of the covid [vaccine] throughout the scientific literature and ridiculous, and sometimes overtly fraudulent, articles being published that debunked the use of any competing treatment for covid (e.g., ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine).

Because of how over-the-top the censorship was during covid, the public realised how much we were being exploited by these monopolies and attempted to find ways to get to the truth that were outside this rigid hierarchy. That for example is why the alternative media took off during the pandemic – and reciprocally why many “professional” journalists are now being laid off. Likewise, independent science flourished as many citizens realised the only way the data on the dangers of the vaccines could get out was if the medical journals were bypassed entirely.

Since admitting the existence of those fibrous clots would also be extremely damaging for the vaccine narrative, it was a forgone conclusion no medical journal would publish anything on the subject. Fortunately, a group of citizen scientists led by former USAF Major Tom Haviland – who was forced to retire after 16 years of post-military work as an electrical engineer for a defence contractor because of Biden’s vaccine mandate – decided to take on the project themselves and trust the alternative media would promote what they found.

The Embalmer’s Survey

Their idea was relatively simple, put together a detailed survey about the blood clots, send it to embalmers around the country – along with people outside the United States – and see what they said.

In the first go of this last year, 800 funeral homes were contacted along with 30 state funeral directors’ associations who were asked to forward the survey to their members.

In the second go, 1,700 funeral homes and 50 state or national associations were emailed.  Not surprisingly, this resulted in more responses coming from the Midwest, as people there were not as ideologically committed to defending the vaccines.

As the results were compelling (and as Hirschman demonstrated above the blood clots have not gone away), this inspired Haviland’s team to redo the survey this year and again share the results. This was an important step because one of the key standards for determining truth in science is “reproducibility” and if the results were consistent, that would strengthen the case this is indeed a real phenomenon.

2022 vs. 2023

As you can see, these results are relatively consistent, which indicates suggests this really happening. Additionally, it appears the clots have gotten a bit rarer, which would be expected since the vaccination rate is decreasing and some of those who had the clots are now deceased.

Now let’s look at the other results.

The 2022 Survey

The results above suggest the clots were due to the spike protein and more likely to be caused by the vaccines as they put more of the spike protein into the body than covid.

The jugular and femoral veins are the most common sites embalmers use to access the body which is why the fibrous clots are likely predominantly being observed there. Additionally, a good case can be made that jugular vein and iliac vein (which the femoral vein feeds into) being compressed leads to a variety of chronic illnesses (e.g., the documentary in THIS article discusses how jugular vein obstruction can lead to Multiple Sclerosis while THIS article discusses how iliac vein compression is commonly seen in covid vaccine injuries).

While not quite the same question, the answers above are somewhat consistent with each other and suggest that the increase in traditional blood clots was at least in part due to covid infections.

The 2023 Survey

Note: The question above unfortunately did not have a comparative to 2019 and earlier.

There is some evidence to link each of the causes of infant deaths listed to the covid vaccines. Conversely, there is a lot of evidence spanning a century linking sudden infant death syndrome (“SIDS”) to the routine childhood vaccines, which led many to correctly predict that the 2020 covid lockdowns would lead to an unprecedented drop in SIDS.  This was subsequently also confirmed by the FL infant death rate dropping in 2021 – distrust over the covid vaccines made Florida parents skip routine childhood vaccinations. Because of these two competing trends and all infant deaths being compared between 2019 to 2023, it’s hard to interpret this data. Nonetheless, an overall increase in deaths did appear to result from covid vaccination.

The final question from the 2023 survey (below) is probably one of the most interesting ones to ponder as there are a variety of ways to interpret it.

Conclusion

Given how many people are seeing these clots and how much concern still exists about them, it is remarkable that our entire scientific apparatus has blacklisted any research being conducted on them.On one hand, I think this degree of censorship is tragic, but on the other, I see it as arguably being a good thing since the misconduct by the scientific establishment has been so egregious, it has started to encourage the public to break free from their information monopoly.

For example, before covid, the average article in the top medical journals received around 10,000 views, while during the pandemic, covid related articles experienced a traffic spike and averaged an unprecedented 117,341 views per article. In contrast, Hirschman’s video got 20,500,000 views and even a nobody like me gets between 50,000-150,000 views per article.

This is almost identical to the loss in viewership the mainstream media is facing as the alternative media eclipses it. For example, the major networks receive between 400,000 to 3,000,000 views during prime time, yet Tucker Carlson’s interviews with Vladimir Putin, Donald Trump, Andrew Tate, Javier Milei, and Victor Orban over the last six months have each received between 100-400 million impressions, making each one arguably the most watched interview in history.

While Tucker is presently the most successful independent broadcaster, he’s not the only person who receives more views than the media conglomerates (e.g., Joe Rogan does too).

All of us believe that corporate media is between a rock and a hard place.  To survive it needs to do real journalism and publish the truth to regain its viewers, but if it does that, then it will lose the corporate sponsorship which sustains the industry (e.g., by bribing the media through advertisement money to not cover stories which cast its sponsors in a bad light).

I believe this is identical to what’s happening with the scientific press, which likewise will never cover stories which threaten the pharmaceutical sponsors who fund the medical journals.

If you take a step back, it is incredulous to believe no one is covering the biggest news story of our time, the “unexplained” spike in excessive death. To put that into context, in the first 9 months of 2023, 158,000 Americans who should still be alive died – which for reference is significantly greater than the total number of American deaths from every war America has been involved in since World War II.

On one hand, corporate media’s unwillingness to cover this illustrates just how much the corrosive corruption within our society has been allowed to fester. On the other, it also illustrates the cyclical nature of society; once corruption goes too far, it eventually inspires a public revolt (e.g., people abandoning both the scientific and popular press).

In turn, I believe we are presently in the situation foretold by the classic fable the goose that laid the golden eggs. Like the owners of that goose – who, not satisfied with the prosperity of the single golden egg it laid each day, decided to cut it open and extract all of them, only to discover none were inside – I believe the pharmaceutical industry shot itself in the foot by allowing their unchecked greed throughout the pandemic to facilitate conduct that was so egregious it awoke the general public to their predatory businesses model and hence “killed their golden goose.”

I am thus immensely grateful that independent journalism and science were able to flourish throughout covid, and I thank each of you for doing your part to help make that possible. Were it not for a large contingent of the public (e.g., you) helping support the independent voices, dedicated individuals like Haviland, and brave whistleblowers (e.g., embalmers Richard Hirschman, Anna Foster, funeral home directors John O’Looney and Chad Whisnat, and the countless people who spoke out about what actually happened within the covid vaccine trials) none of it could have ever happened.

Read the full article ‘Embalmers are Still Finding Mysterious Clots in the Vaccinated’ by A Midwestern Doctor HERE.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/02/23/the-science-will-never-cover-stories-which/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Survey of embalmers shows how many are finding rubbery clots; “the science” will never cover stories which threaten Big Pharma sponsors appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

In this episode, I speak with Richard Hirschman. He is a now internationally known embalmer who has
been discussing his findings of rubbery clots and was featured in the Stew Peters documentary “Died
Suddenly”. We discuss our collaborative findings and observations. Richard had send me multiple clots
for analysis and I explain the findings of polymer plastics and self-assembly nanotechnology. Richard
confirms my findings that these clots continue to grow outside of the body, after death.

Source:  https://rumble.com/v4buruf-truth-science-and-spirt-episode-6-rubbery-clots-conversation-with-richard-h.html

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Breaking News: Embalmer Richard Hirschman Confirms Rubbery Polymer Clots Grow Outside Of The Body And Were Found In a Deceased Child. Truth, Science And Spirit Ep 7 – Must watch & Share appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.