Scientists are warning that California is overdue for a catastrophic “biblical megaflood” capable of transforming vast areas of the state into a massive inland sea and forcing millions of Americans to flee their homes.

The nightmare scenario, known as ARkStorm 2.0, envisions a relentless barrage of powerful storms striking California for roughly a month, unleashing flooding on a scale not seen since the Great Flood of 1861-62.

Researchers say the event could strike during any winter.

If it does, the devastation could exceed $1 trillion, making it one of the most expensive natural disasters in history.

Some communities could disappear beneath 20 feet of floodwater, while heavily populated regions stretching from San Francisco to Los Angeles would face widespread destruction.

Scientists Say State Is Overdue for Historic Megaflood

The warning centers on an event scientists call an Atmospheric River 1,000-year Storm, or ARkStorm.

The scenario was developed by the U.S. Geological Survey alongside federal, state, and academic researchers to model a realistic worst-case flood event.

Unlike a single storm, ARkStorm envisions a continuous chain of atmospheric rivers slamming into California over approximately 30 days.

Atmospheric rivers are narrow corridors of tropical moisture capable of transporting astonishing amounts of water across the Pacific.

When they collide with California’s coastal mountains and the Sierra Nevada, they release torrential rain and heavy snowfall.

Under the ARkStorm scenario, those systems would repeatedly hammer the state until rivers overflow, levees fail, and entire communities are submerged.

Floodwaters Could Swallow Vast Areas of California

Researchers warn that California’s Central Valley would bear the brunt of the catastrophe.

Floodwaters would surge through the Sacramento and San Joaquin river systems before spreading across one of America’s most productive agricultural regions.

Entire towns could disappear beneath the water.

The scenario projects flooding of up to 20 feet in some communities.

More than 1.5 million people could be forced to evacuate.

Nearly one-quarter of all buildings in California could sustain flood damage.

Power failures, transportation shutdowns, landslides, and infrastructure failures would ripple across every county in the state.

Scientists: ‘It Was Always a When, Not If’

Dr. Daniel Swain, a UCLA scientist who co-authored the ARkStorm 2.0 study, says the threat has become increasingly difficult to ignore.

“It was always a when, not if,” Swain told BBC Science Focus.

Swain said he once believed such a disaster might be centuries away.

“Now, it’s quite likely to be within my own lifetime,” he warned.

Researchers cannot predict exactly when the megaflood will occur.

Statistically, they say, it could happen this winter—or decades from now.

California Has Already Experienced One Before

The scenario is modeled in part on California’s Great Flood of 1861-62.

During that disaster, storms battered the state for approximately 45 days.

The Central Valley became an inland lake stretching nearly 300 miles.

Entire towns, farms, and transportation routes vanished beneath the floodwaters.

Sacramento was so badly affected that California temporarily moved its state capital to San Francisco.

Researchers say geological evidence shows that at least six even larger megafloods have struck California during the past 1,800 years.

Warmer Atmosphere Could Supercharge Future Storms

Scientists say today’s climate would likely make a future ARkStorm even more destructive.

Swain describes the atmosphere as functioning like an expanding sponge.

“You can essentially just imagine an ordinary kitchen sponge that grows progressively larger,” he said.

“It has the capacity to absorb much more water.”

When that moisture is released over California, rainfall becomes dramatically more intense.

At the same time, warming temperatures cause more winter precipitation to fall as rain instead of snow.

Rain falling onto existing mountain snowpack can rapidly melt it, sending enormous volumes of additional water rushing downstream.

Swain described the combination as a “double whammy.”

Researchers estimate runoff in parts of the southern Sierra Nevada could increase by 200% to 400% compared to historical megastorms.

Flood Defenses May Not Be Enough

California has spent decades constructing levees, canals, reservoirs, and pumping systems designed to protect the Central Valley.

But many of those defenses were not designed for biblical flooding.

The U.S. Geological Survey warns they were never designed to withstand the volume of water projected under an ARkStorm.

Millions of homeowners could also discover they lack sufficient flood insurance to rebuild.

Officials are investing up to $30 billion over 30 years through California’s Central Valley Flood Protection Plan to strengthen levees, restore floodplains, and improve emergency planning.

They are also developing high-resolution flood maps to better predict how water would move through communities.

Experts Warn California Still Isn’t Ready

Despite those efforts, scientists say preparations remain dangerously inadequate.

“There’s a lot more that needs to be done. We are not prepared,” said Dr. Christine Albano of the Desert Research Institute.

Unlike earthquakes, megastorms provide some warning.

Meteorologists could detect the developing storm sequence days, or even weeks, before the worst flooding begins.

That advance notice could provide critical time for evacuations and emergency preparations.

But experts warn that preparation today will determine whether a future ARkStorm becomes a natural disaster, or one of the worst humanitarian catastrophes in American history.

“Statistically, it could happen this year, or it might not happen for 70 years, if we get lucky,” Swain said.

Source: https://slaynews.com/scientists-warn-biblical-megaflood-risk-threatens-millions-california/

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

HopeGirl Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@hopegirlblog
HopeGirl Telegram Channel Chat and Groups: https://t.me/Hopegirl587 
Get Our Free EMF Survival Guide : https://bit.ly/FTWEMF
10 Percent Off our EMF Protection Products with this Link: https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/tenoff

The post Scientists Warn ‘Biblical Megaflood’ Risk Threatens Millions in California appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Gary D. Barnett warns that humanity is being taken over through digitisation, digital ID, algorithmic confinement and technocratic incarceration, which will lead to the end of freedom and property.

The transformation of mankind involves the intentional fusing of human and machine through neuroscientific nanoscale brain-computer interfacing, with methods including “vaccines,” geoengineering, mRNA platforms and precision medicine.

The only solution to stop this technological transhuman invasion, he writes, is through education, exposure and mass non-compliance.

Human Devolution by Nefarious Means: A Forced Digital/Nanotech Transformation

By Gary D. Barnett, 11 November 2025

“Conformity is the tool of the tyrant. What one chooses to conform to is critical. The Empire now rules by information superhighways to our souls. The Apple a day we have bitten is the Appian Way to make a phoney ‘I’ linked to algorithms of stupor.”—James Tunney, TechBondAge: Slavery of the Human Spirit

I do not know how many more times I will have to bring up the subject of the AI takeover; digitisation, digital ID, algorithmic confinement and technocratic incarceration that are being built and advanced at a pace that is obviously far beyond the scope of the common American plebiscite. This is the most crucial issue of our lives, and it has mostly been relegated as one piece among a plethora of distractive tyrannical events, without any cognitive awareness whatsoever that the digital usurpation of our existence is the end of all freedom and property, and possibly the end of mankind as we know it. Even with survival, the only resulting conclusion is that all those remaining will be slaves of a master class of evil technocrats.

But it gets even worse, because this “new” digital existence also depends upon and includes the total weaponisation of “healthcare,” medicine and the long-planned technological transformation of mankind. This aspect of human domination is dependent on weakening or destroying the human body, mind and soul as it exists, in order to eliminate the human spirit through a eugenic strategy, while rebuilding compliant cybernetic organisms. (Cyborgs) Robotics immediately comes to mind, but it is much bigger than that; it is the intentional fusing of human and machine at multiple levels, including through neuroscientific nanoscale brain-computer interfacing. The preparation for this linking-up of human and computer is already highly developed.

While I will not get into the advanced state of meshing human and computer at the cellular level, I will say that these techniques are already happening and are in place. The transformative methods used are known in the abstract, but most have no clue that this has been going on for years, effectively altering the human state. Some of the methods being implemented that are meant either to dumb down, medically harm, brain interface via nanotech self-assembly and control through AI, are “vaccines,” especially the “covid” bioweapon, stratospheric aerosol injection geoengineering (chemtrails), most if not all mRNA platforms, precision medicine and possibly genetically modified food and health products. Delivery of these nano-structure building blocks will only become more advanced with time. Evidence of this technology is obviously showing up in the “vaccinated,” but also now in the unvaccinated.

The bottom line is that humanity is purposely being taken over, and by multiple means. This is why allowing digital ID, and the digitisation of all things, is the greatest risk we face. Everything else from the standpoint of total control is rather irrelevant, because once the control mechanisms of monetary, financial, medical and physical dominion of the human mind and body are in place, it will be too late to reverse. The only solution lies in education and exposure of what is happening to us, and the realisation by a critical mass to not comply and obey and to completely avoid all government systems in order to cause enough havoc so that the ruling class loses its grip on the masses. This does not mean that all have to participate, but large numbers in unison are necessary to stop this technological transhuman invasion.

This is biometric warfare based on a democidal culling of much, if not most of humanity. This plan is at minimum 100 years old, and has been pursued over time incrementally, but also continuously. Today, we are on the precipice of disaster, and the advancement of AI is the linchpin of the entirety of the Globalists’ plan for a technocratic one-world system of governance. We have arrived at the endgame, which means there is little time left before the end of this so-called human experiment.

I must state the obvious, as it appears that nothing has been learned about this heinous system over the past 250 years by this propagandised and brain-dead population; this after 60 insane presidential elections, hoping that new masters would save the day. Of course, all has worsened perpetually over the entirety of this country’s existence.

Voting is worthless and a trick of the State. Protest is worthless. Petitions are worthless. Civil unrest is worthless. Demonstrations are worthless. Writing to your evil, criminal congressmen is worthless. I had a comment from someone just this week saying that “he was watching and seeing a lot of people calling for the privatisation of industry.”His take is common, but very misplaced. His thought was that this was a sign of dissent, and if people begged the Government (master and ruler) enough, the State would acquiesce and cease the tyranny. “Calling for” the State to not harm you any longer, is simply begging your chosen masters to not abuse, terrorise or murder you, due just to your asking them to stop. Slaves (cattle), as you all are considered, cannot ask their ruler to not rule.

What is called for here is the elimination of the State in its entirety. This means active and forceful removal of the ruling system by whatever means necessary. This means collapsing the State monetary and financial system period. This does not have to mean aggression or violence unless as self-defence. It does mean, however, that as many people as possible (many millions) have to abandon, ignore, disobey and not comply with any order against real freedom. No digital ID ever! No Federal Reserve. No fiat or digital currency. No “health” or medical mandates. No wars. No militarisation of any kind in this country. Without this absolutely honest and vehement resistance, nothing of any value will be achieved.

The only result of failure to negate the State entirely, to eliminate the State and all its power, is the voluntary acceptance of your enslavement due to mass ignorance, indifference and cowardice. The choice is yours, each of you as individuals. Personally, I would not lose any sleep if most wanted government and wanted to be ruled as slaves by government, except for the fact that your inability as a gigantic, useless, collective horde to protect your own lives and freedom causes great harm to all of us who are willing to destroy this murderous system for the sake of life and family.

You are all on the verge of owning nothing, and those of you allowed to survive will only exist as fully dependent robotic humanoids whose life is only left to serve the global transhumanistic technocracy. The decision is yours, and yours alone.

“When bondage is built with billions of key strokes, the death of freedom, bit by bit, may not be so obvious. The masters hold the keys to chains or networks, to the links and sites fashioned into our consciousness. While we may browse, it is as a domesticated animal.”—James Tunney, TechBondAge: Slavery of the Human Spirit

Source: https://expose-news.com/2025/12/20/digitisation-of-all-things-is-the-greatest-risk-to-humanity/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Digital ID, and the digitisation of all things, is the greatest risk humanity faces appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Once upon a time, talk of AI stealing jobs from people was science fiction. Today, it’s real life. From graphic design and translation to copywriting and customer service, we have already seen how quickly automation can eat into work once done exclusively by humans. This trend is no longer a problem for the future – it’s already happening. What’s currently unfolding is not just a shift in productivity tools, but a total structural transformation in how the world economy functions. By 2030, the global workforce may look completely unrecognisable, with over 300 million jobs projected to be severely impacted or totally replaced in just the next few years.

No, It’s Not Coming: It’s Already Here

Current data reveals the scale at which this is already in motion:

• A 2025 poll in the UK found that 26% of workers fear AI will make their roles completely obsolete within their lifetime
• Goldman Sachs estimates that AI could severely impact, or totally replace, 300 million jobs globally by 2030
• 10% of UK university graduates in 2025 have already had to change career path due to AI threats in their original fields of choice

According to McKinsey’s 2025 analysis, 8 million workers in the UK will be affected by artificial intelligence by 2030, amounting more than a quarter of the current national workforce. Of those, 3.5 million could experience complete job displacement, with the rest seeing “significant task disruption”.

Notably, McKinsey’s report projects that the most affected groups will be women, young people, and lower-income workers, due to their saturation in fields such as retail, clerical support, and hospitality. However, health care jobs and roles in education and STEM-related fields are actually expected to grow as a result, meaning the UK’s already polarised labour market could widen further.

Once a theoretical risk, we’re now seeing real-time restructuring. Writers, junior developers, support agents, and administrative assistants are already being replaced partially or completely by automation. And this is just the beginning.

Which Jobs Are Safe, And Who’s At Risk?

Nexford University, Microsoft and the US Career Institute have conducted studies using various models – such as the “Generative AI Exposure Index” and “task susceptibility” metrics – to assess which roles are most vulnerable to the automation takeover.

High-Risk Roles:

• Data entry clerks
• Call centre agents
• Translators and interpreters
• Customer service representatives
• Retail cashiers
• Legal assistants
• Junior Software Developers
• Bookkeepers and payroll clerks

As these jobs typically rely on pattern recognition, repetitive task cycles, or templated responses, they are particularly threatened by AI’s innate abilities. For example, Nexford reports that 80-90% of call centre workflows can already be automated using conversational AI instead.

Low-Risk Roles:

• Electricians, plumbers, construction workers
• Therapists and social workers
• Nurses and healthcare assistants
• Primary school teachers
• Strategic decision-makers and senior advisors
• Creative performers (musicians, actors)

Because these roles require human presence, dexterity, creative nuance, or emotional intelligence, they are currently set to remain largely unaffected by automation – at least until it learns to replicate these traits reliably. According to the US Career Institute, these roles are likely to remain safe for the next 10 years at least.

However, AI encroachment is still taking place in the safest sectors, such as curriculum assistants in education or diagnostic tools in healthcare. The safety net may only be temporary, and only applies to specific roles.

AI Takes Our Jobs – What Happens Next?

Will we see a smaller workforce, or different work worldwide? What happens to the 300 million people whose jobs will be displaced in the next 5 years?

As with previous industrial revolutions, automation may create new roles as it destroys others. Considering existing jobs like cybersecurity architects, AI trainers, and social media managers – none of which existed just a couple of decades ago – the optimists in this space are expecting new industries to rise to absorb the surplus labour force.

There is an often overlooked aspect to think about here though. This is assuming AI doesn’t just replace tasks, but actually generates enough entirely new value to sustain mass employment. And this is where things get a bit shaky. If AI becomes competent at knowledge work and manual roles such as with the developments in robots (as per Amazon, Google et al), the existing labour force may end up fighting for fewer seats at a shrinking table.

Futurist Adam Dorr suggests that most human labour will be economically unnecessary in just 20 years’ time, as we are inevitably replaced by AI systems that can outperform us in every area. In that case, jobs may exist, but fewer people will hold them.

The True Human Costs: Identity, Inequality, Income

Beyond the question about what happens to the jobs lies a deeper thought: what happens to humans when work disappears?

Work, as much as we may not like to admit it, has never been just about wages. Structuring our time, building relationships and communities, work also gives us identity. Dorr warns that the risk isn’t just unemployment, but also social disintegration.

There’s also the concern about exacerbating inequality. High-income earners with access to elite education and reskilling will have an easier time navigating the shift than the millions without the buffer, leaving existing lower-income workers stranded emotionally and economically. Already, as reported by Nexford in 2025, 19% of displaced US workers report that AI contributed to their job loss.

McKinsey recently reported that the volume of job ads for occupations with low AI exposure dropped 21%, while those with high exposure dropped 38%. Overall, job listings are down 43% between Q1 2022 and Q1 2025, as AI implementation isn’t just replacing one person at a time – it can usurp entire teams.

Remember that this is all current data, not projections or conspiracies. People are no longer wondering whether AI will take their job, and instead identifying whether their sector is investing in upskilling or allowing them to be replaced outright by machines.

What Kind Of Future Have We Chosen?

Is this shift to an AI-based workforce saving us from drudgery, or taking away the dignity of work? AI is a tool, and who it serves best depends on how it’s used.

Supporters say that automating boring or dangerous jobs is a clear net gain, and if fewer people are forced into low-value labour, society could start moving towards creativity, leisure, and entrepreneurship. But if that’s to be the case, it needs to be consciously designed. Without deliberate policy reforming education, mental health support, and universal income, we actually risk ending up with the worst of both worlds: fewer jobs, higher equality, and no clear safety net.

The Road to 2030 and Beyond

These next few years will be decisive. Employers are already shrinking headcounts in content creation, admin roles, and customer service – entire career paths that were once secure have been destabilised. And by 2030, reports suggest we should expect:

• Increased reliance on automation in law, finance, education, and healthcare
• Pressure on government systems to manage structural unemployment
• Leaner, more competitive white-collar job market

After 2030 is anyone’s guess. The question isn’t whether or not AI will be better at most jobs, but rather how long we choose to tolerate a system in which efficiency comes at human cost. In the end, AI can’t replace everyone. But then again, it doesn’t need to – even replacing workers at the current rate is enough to trigger massive social and economic fallout worldwide.

Final Thought

We can no longer warn that AI is coming – it’s already here. The workforce has transformed, and continues to do so seemingly exponentially. There is of course potential for a better, freer, easier future, but there’s no guarantee that’s where we’re heading.

If 300 million jobs do disappear by 2030, then it’s difficult to imagine how they can all possibly be replaced so quickly. But maybe the target isn’t to reshuffle people back into the workforce – maybe we just need technologically, socially, ethically and structurally prepare for the inevitability.

Source: https://expose-news.com/2025/08/07/its-here-ai-has-already-put-300-million-jobs-at-risk-what-next/

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post It’s Here. AI Has Already Put 300 Million Jobs At Risk: What Next? appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

In the United States we are ALL being bombarded by dangerous EMF radiation on a daily basis. The negative biological effects CAN include: Fatigue, sleep disturbances, concentration difficulties, headaches, immune system imbalances, cancer, evidence for Alzheimer’s disease, lower sperm count, other reproductive issues & much more. Find out HOW to prevent radiation poisoning and abate these serious health risks and in this discussion with Cory Hillis, President of EMF Solutions. Thanks for tuning in!

Source:  https://rumble.com/v6x0ikw-sub-atomic-chaos-cory-hillis.html?e9s=src_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_ucp_f

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post SUB-ATOMIC CHAOS: A Biblical Sized Risk to Humanity — Cory Hillis appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Michael Yon issues two huge warnings on Strait of Hormuz and USA domestic terrorism risk from Zionist extremists

Source:  https://www.brighteon.com/c4565631-bb38-4777-948a-959a8e85a167

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Michael Yon issues two huge warnings on Strait of Hormuz and USA domestic terrorism risk from Zionist extremists appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

In 2022, a Cleveland Clinic study found that the risk of covid infection increased with the number of covid vaccine doses received, a phenomenon known as negative efficacy.

Another study published earlier this month by the same researchers found that influenza-vaccinated people had a 26.9% increased risk of testing positive for influenza compared to unvaccinated people.

Experts, including Dr. Meryl Nass, suggest that the results are not surprising due to the lack of efficacy testing for flu vaccines before they are used on the public.

Another Cleveland Clinic Study Exposes More False Narratives on Vaccine Efficacy

By Miss Information as published by New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out With Science (“NZDSOS”)

Based in Ohio, USA, Cleveland Clinic is considered a leader in clinical research, education and care. With tens of thousands of employees, they are uniquely placed to investigate outcomes of staff vaccination policy including covid and influenza vaccine mandates.

In 2022, Cleveland Clinic researchers led by Dr. Nabin Shrestha and Dr. Steven Gordon at the Department of Infectious Diseases followed over 51,000 employees. They found that the proportional risk for covid infection increased with the number of covid vaccine doses an individual received.

This is known as negative efficacy and can be due to a multitude of factors, including but not limited to:

• the fact that RNA viruses (including coronaviruses and influenza) mutate rapidly, rendering vaccines targeting prior strains useless. This is known as immune imprinting, or “original antigenic sin”;
• immune suppression caused by persistence of circulating covid vaccine-induced spike protein can increase the risk of infection as well as other immune-related disorders;
• repeated exposure to vaccine-induced spike protein can result in antibodies switching from protective IgG1, IgG2 and IgG3, to the less protective and immune-suppressing IgG4 class, which is also associated with other risks.

Influenza is also an RNA virus, but with haemagglutinin (“HA”) and neuraminidase (“NA”) proteins on its surface, rather than the spike proteins present on coronaviruses. As with the spike protein, HA and NA proteins mutate rapidly. This forms the theory behind annual updates to influenza vaccines as manufacturers attempt to predict evolutionary changes to the HA and NA proteins.

In a recent study, the same Cleveland Clinic researchers followed over 53,000 employees through the 2024-2025 US influenza season, which lasted for 25 weeks from 1 October 2024. The preprint of their study was published at ‘Effectiveness of the Influenza Vaccine During the 2024-2025 Respiratory Viral Season’.

Cleveland Clinic employees are mandated either to receive an annual influenza vaccine or to seek an exemption on medical or religious grounds. By the end of the study, 82.1% of the study cohort had received an influenza vaccine, and 98.7% of these received an inactivated 3-valent influenza vaccine.

A proportional hazards model was used to calculate the relative risk between vaccinated and unvaccinated people, adjusting for age, sex, clinical nursing job and location to minimise potential bias. Participants were only counted as vaccinated seven days after receiving a single dose of influenza vaccine.

The outcome for influenza-vaccinated employees by the end of the study was a statistically significant 26.9% increased risk of testing positive for influenza compared with employees who did not receive the seasonal vaccine.

It is interesting to note that of 53,402 employees, only 1,079 tested positive for influenza throughout the 25-week season, suggesting a very low overall risk of infection, at about 2%.

Whilst the study has not yet been peer-reviewed, the design has been described as rigorous, robust and transparent. Limitations to the study include the population cohort being working age and otherwise healthy (no children or elderly included); vaccine failure being specific to a single product given to most of the vaccinated cohort; and the study design not examining risk for severe illness, hospitalisation or death (which are unlikely to be observed in an otherwise healthy cohort).

Internist Dr. Meryl Nass said the results weren’t surprising. “Flu shots are not tested for efficacy before use,” she said. “They are grandfathered in, based on the license of earlier flu vaccines, with rudimentary safety testing.” As a result, “negative efficacy is possible.”

The results of this study support an array of prior literature. In 2009, it was observed that “prior receipt of 2008-09 trivalent influenza vaccine was associated with increased risk of medically attended [pandemic] pH1N1 illness during the spring-summer 2009 in Canada.” A 2013 study found that current and prior season influenza vaccination increased the risk of infection. A 2016 Cochrane systematic review showed that research did “not provide reasonable evidence to support the vaccination of healthcare workers to prevent influenza in those aged 60 years or older resident in [Long Term Care Institutions] LTCIs.“

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2025/04/26/flu-vaccines-have-negative-efficacy/

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post A new study finds that flu vaccines have negative efficacy, meaning the risk of getting flu is higher after vaccination appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has made an alarming admission, revealing that people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines” are at risk of suffering a sudden and unexpected death for up to 15 years after they received their last injection.

According to the FDA, the mRNA “vaccines” have created a sudden death ticking time bomb due to the massively increased risk of “vaccinated” people suffering from a deadly blood clot.

The shocking admission was revealed in a new peer-reviewed study published in the prestigious International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science.

According to the study, the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research admits that the “regulatory window of concern” for a novel genetic product, such as Covid mRNA “vaccines,” is 5-15 years.

Worryingly, the admission suggests that the vaccinated population may be facing a wave of surging blood clots as the Covid shots were only rolled out for public use roughly four years ago.

The study suggested this means fatal pulmonary hemorrhage should be considered a potential “consequence of the novel product even months to years after the last injection.”

The research was conducted by renowned American cardiologist Dr. Peter A. McCullough and prominent epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher, MPH.

McCullough and Hulsher conducted the study to investigate the long-term risks of pulmonary hemorrhage – blood clots.

Pulmonary hemorrhage is a life-threatening condition that occurs when blood bleeds into the lungs

The bleeding causes clots to form in the lungs, leading to hemodynamic instability and fatal outcomes due to suffocation or shock.

They noted that previous studies have only linked blood clots to mRNA injections in people shortly after vaccination.

However, the long-term risks have remained largely unstudied.

During the study, they investigated the death of a 47-year-old man who died from a pulmonary embolism 555 days after receiving the vaccine.

According to a new peer-reviewed study, the fatal blood clot was caused by a Pfizer “vaccine” that came from a “highly lethal batch” of Covid shots.

The study determined that the 47-year-old had a good medical history and was not taking medication at the time of his fatal illness.

The study noted that the Covid injections “have been previously associated with pulmonary hemorrhage, typically observed shortly after vaccination.”

In a Substack post, Hulscher notes that this “is the first published instance of a fatal adverse event occurring more than one year after a COVID-19 mRNA injection, highlighting the potential for serious long-term adverse effects.”

According to the study, the 47-year-old “exhibited symptoms of a mild respiratory infection” before his death.

However, his health rapidly deteriorated as he experienced severe respiratory distress.

He also suffered a cardiac arrest “with evidence of profuse pulmonary bleeding.”

His heart size remained normal.

“The evidence suggests that this man died of a cardiopulmonary arrest most likely as a result of acute pulmonary hemorrhage, with the COVID-19 vaccine potentially playing a role in the development of cardiopulmonary pathology and hemorrhage,” the study concluded.

This finding is “significant because it demonstrates that death can occur even more than a year after the primary series of mRNA [shots],” McCullough said.

“Similar studies have found pulmonary embolism, for which, if left long enough, will cause necrosis and pulmonary hemorrhage,” McCullough added.

“COVID-19 vaccines are well-known to cause blood clots and pulmonary embolism.”

Hulscher said:

“The biological plausibility of delayed pulmonary hemorrhage following COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is supported by documented short-term cases occurring soon after injection, regulatory concerns over prolonged genetic product effects, the persistence and pathogenicity of Spike protein, and emerging evidence of potential plasmid DNA genome integration contributing to sustained Spike protein expression.”

The study notes that the FDA’s “regulatory window of concern” admission means fatal pulmonary hemorrhage should be considered a potential “consequence of the novel product even months to years after the last injection.”

Despite the autopsy’s findings and prior research on the subject indicating a possible link between mRNA shots and pulmonary embolism, “the medical examiner determined the cause of death was attributed to atherosclerotic and hypertensive cardiovascular disease, without considering the recent pulmonary hemorrhage and unremarkable medical history.”

The study also noted that the man’s autopsy failed to investigate potential contributions from the Covid injection, such as the presence of the spike protein, “vaccine” mRNA, or related antibodies.

During an interview with CHD, health freedom activist Mary Holland weighed in on the study and the alarming admission from the FDA.

Speaking with CHD’s Polly Tommey, Holland questioned whether people would have willingly taken the shot if they knew that getting a “vaccine” could potentially kill or injure them for up to 15 years after the initial injection.

Holland argues that one of the greatest crimes against humanity is that the FDA knew this was a possibility but put their “vaccines” on the market anyway.

Worse still, the FDA kept this fact hidden from the public until it was too late.

“The FDA itself is saying the period of concern for these blood clots is 5 to 15 years,” Holland said.

“Well, they sure didn’t tell people that when they were encouraging everybody to go get these shots.”

WATCH:

This news comes amid growing concerns about the presence of dangerous blood clots in vaccinated people.

As Slay News previously reported, embalmers and investigators have issued a chilling warning after uncovering new evidence regarding surging reports of “white fibrous clots” found in the corpses of people who received Covid mRMA “vaccines.”

During 2024, embalmers reported that the clots were discovered in a staggering 27% of Covid-vaccinated corpses.

Meanwhile, another recent revelation from the FDA has sent shockwaves through the medical and scientific communities.

As Slay News reported, the FDA made the explosive admission that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are spiked with contaminations that triggered a global surge in cancers.

The federal agency made the admission after an FDA study confirmed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” contains dangerous levels of excess DNA contamination.

Leading scientists have been warning for some time that surges in deadly cancers among the Covid-vaccinated were caused by DNA fragments in the mRNA injections.

Those warnings have now been confirmed in a bombshell study conducted in the FDA’s own laboratory.

Tests conducted at the FDA’s White Oak Campus in Maryland found shocking levels of DNA contamination in the “vaccines.”

Source:  https://slaynews.com/news/fda-covid-vaccinated-risk-sudden-death-15-years/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post FDA: Covid-Vaccinated at Risk of Sudden Death for 15 Years appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

On Thursday, the UK Health Security Agency released data relating to its Autumn 2024 covid vaccination programme in England. Disappointingly, 8 million people, 14% of the population, have had yet another harmful injection.

Of the 34% of the population who UKHSA deem to be at high risk regarding covid and so eligible for an Autumn 2024 dose, 41% allowed themselves to be injected. Proportionally far more people who identify as white British have been duped, or coerced, into taking the latest “booster.”  It seems white British people are more vulnerable not to covid but to blindly trusting UKHSA, the National Health Service and/or the Government.

In August 2021, the UK Department of Health and Social Care boasted that over 88% of adults had a first dose and over 72% of adults had two doses.  In September 2021, the first of the booster doses began. There have been two doses a year – spring and autumn campaigns – so some people have had 6 additional doses up to and including the spring of 2024, meaning they have had 8 injections between the winter of 2020 and the summer of 2024.  The vaccination campaign in the autumn of 2024 would be the ninth injection in four years.  It is this ninth injection that is the subject of our article.

During the winter months, the UK Health Security Agency (“UKHSA”) publishes its ‘National flu and COVID-19 surveillance report’ every week.  Within the data is a summary of how many people in England UKHSA believes are at high risk with regards to covid.  The data also shows how many people within these groups have lined up for yet another dose.

In the first week of October, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (“JCVI”) advised the Government to offer another dose of the harmful covid injection to the following groups:

• All adults aged 65 years and over. This includes those who turn 65 by October 2024.
• People aged 6 months and over who are in a clinical risk group: As defined in tables 3 and 4 of UKHSA’s Green Book on immunisation against infectious disease.
• Care home residents, regardless of age.
• Health and social care workers and staff working in care homes for older adults aged over 16 years.

The UK’s Autumn 2024 covid injection programme began in early October 2024, coinciding with the Government’s flu vaccination campaign.  The latest UKHSA report is up to 11 November 2024 (week 46).

Within UKHSA’s report titled ‘National flu and COVID-19 surveillance report: 21 November (week 47)’ is a supplementary table which shows totals per region and age group of the “cumulative covid vaccine uptake in those who are living and resident in England vaccinated with an Autumn 2024 dose.”

It makes sad reading because four years after the first warnings about the dangers of covid “vaccines” began to emerge, there is still a shocking number of people who continue to risk their health and their lives by rolling up their sleeves as and when called to do so.

Related:

• Medicine Regulators knew in October 2020 that the Covid-19 Vaccines would cause blood clots, heart damage, harm to children, and death
• Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee 22 October 2020 Meeting Presentation Steve Anderson

According to the Office for National Statistics, the population of England in mid-2023 was 57,690,323.  Of those, 8,007,702 received a covid injection in the Autumn 2024 campaign.  That equates to 14% of the total population who still do not understand that the covid injections are the most injurious medical intervention unleashed on the public … so far.

So, who are these people?  We don’t know the details but some high-level categorisations give some insight.  As noted above, UKHSA provides a breakdown of where vaccinees live and the age bracket they fall into.  We’ve used UKHSA’s data included in the ‘National flu and COVID-19 surveillance report: 21 November (week 47)’ to produce the tables below.

There are 9 official regions in England.  Because the region for some vaccinees was “unknown,” UKHSA has included “unknown” as a region and so categorised their data into 10 “regions.”

The South East has the highest number of people who UKHSA deems eligible for covid “vaccines” and also has the second highest uptake.  The South East of England consists of the nine counties of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, East Sussex, Hampshire, the Isle of Wight, Kent, Oxfordshire, Surrey and West Sussex.

The South West has proportionally the highest uptake but is the fifth-highest region in terms of the number of people deemed to be eligible.  The South West of England consists of the counties of Cornwall (including the Isles of Scilly), Dorset, Devon, Bristol, Gloucestershire, Somerset and Wiltshire.

UKHSA has calculated that 19,703,275 people in England are aged 65+, clinically at risk or work in a healthcare setting.  That equates to a staggering 34% of the population. The high number of eligible persons is not due to an ageing population as one would assume; 41% of those UKHSA considers vulnerable to covid are under 65 years old.

The majority of the “under 65 years clinical risk group” are not immunosuppressed.

Some of the under “65 years, not immunosuppressed” will be health and social care workers and care home staff.  The remainder will be in a clinical risk group as described by UKHSA’s ‘COVID-19: the green book, chapter 14a’ (“Green Book”) published in September 2024.  This document provides covid vaccination information for public health professionals.

The Green Book includes two tables giving examples of children and adults considered to be at “clinical high risk.”  The examples are not exhaustive and “within these broad groups, the prescriber may need to apply clinical judgment …  A more comprehensive list of potentially eligible diagnoses, and the appropriate clinical codes, can be found in the link at the end of the chapter,” the Green Book states.

In the next paragraph, the Green Book states, “In December 2021, following the recognition of pregnancy as a risk factor for severe covid-19 infection and poor pregnancy outcomes during the Delta wave, pregnancy was added to the clinical risk groups.”

The Green Book’s Table 3 (for 16 years and over) and Table 4 (for children under 16 years) give the following as examples of those who are deemed to be at “clinical high risk” and so should be offered a covid injection:

• Chronic respiratory disease.
• Chronic heart disease and vascular disease.
• Chronic kidney disease.
• Chronic liver disease.
• Chronic disease of the digestive system.
• Chronic neurological disease.
• Diabetes mellitus and other endocrine disorders.
• Immunosuppression.
• Asplenia or dysfunction of the spleen.
• Morbid obesity (Adults with a Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m²).
• Severe mental illness.
• Younger adults in long-stay nursing and residential care settings.
• Pregnancy.
• Serious genetic abnormalities that affect a number of systems.   Including mitochondrial disease and chromosomal abnormalities.

It reads like a combination of a list of covid vaccine injuries and a eugenicist’s hit list.  As if to prove the point, UKHSA advises healthcare professionals that “Pfizer BioNTech vaccine is the preferred vaccine for children due to a slightly lower reported rate of myocarditis [compared to Moderna].”

At some point, the document may be updated and replaced so we have saved a copy of the September 2024 Green Book below.  Even a cursory browse through it leaves one with the feeling of “it simply beggars belief.”

Another analysis of UKHSA’s ‘National flu and COVID-19 surveillance report: 21 November (week 47)’ data we found interesting was the ethnic groups who have had the highest vaccine uptake during the Government’s Autumn 2024 covid injection campaign.

A second supplementary table in the data file gives totals for ethnicity groups. For some reason, there are an additional 172 eligible persons when categorised by ethnicity than there are categorised by region.  However, the difference is too small to make a significant difference when looking at category totals so we can ignore it for this purpose.

Presuming the ethnicity data has been relatively accurately compiled, white British and Irish make up the lion’s share of the people eligible, as would be expected.  Disappointingly, they are also the most ignorant.  The two groups stand out as having the highest uptake in vaccines, by far.

If you live in the South East or the South West, please speak out more about the harms of the vaccines.  Speak to family members, shopkeepers, stallholders or anyone who will listen, or won’t.  Also talk with like-minded friends in coffee shops, on buses or in any public place loud enough so that people nearby have the privilege of overhearing.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/11/23/people-in-england-still-prepared-to-risk-their-lives/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post 8 million people in England are still prepared to risk their lives by having another covid injection appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

In 2016, the Blackpool Council approved a fluoridated school milk plan.  All Blackpool primary school children in Years one to six are now able to have fluoridated milk as part of the school breakfast scheme.

Under this scheme, each participating child receives milk that contains 4.2 ppm of fluoride every school day.  This is in addition to the fluoride added to water supplies that fall below 1 ppm.

In the US, the safe limit in water was deemed to be 0.7 ppm – until a court ruled last week that 0.7 ppm poses an unreasonable risk of reducing IQ in children.

It’s free – no cost to parents,” the Blackpool Council states promoting its fluoridated milk for school children.  Adding, “It’s safe to drink.”

It re-emphasises that it’s safe to drink in bold type in the very next sentence:

In 2016, when Blackpool Council first approved the plan, the BBC noted: “Under the fluoridated milk scheme, each 189ml carton will contain 0.8mg of fluoride – the equivalent of 4.2 parts per million.”

Regarding the upper tolerable intake limit, the World Health Organisation estimates it is calculated as 0.1 mg/kg body weight per day.  This upper limit relates to fluoride from all sources, including toothpaste.

In a 2010 European Union Science Committee document, the estimated upper tolerable intake limit for children aged between 8 and 14 years is 5 mg/day, extrapolated from the estimated upper limit for adults.  The upper tolerable intake limit for children aged between 4 and 8 years is estimated at 2.5 mg/day.  As noted by Fluoride Action Network, for children younger than 4, between 60% and 104% of their recommended daily limit of fluoride (0.7 mg) is obtained from toothpaste alone while brushing their teeth twice daily.  The upper tolerable intake limit for 2 and 3-year-olds is 1.3 mg daily – they get 0.7 mg from toothpaste and then you add the fluoride intake from its many sources including water and milk.

As the European Union Science Committee document demonstrates, it is complex and impossible to calculate anyone’s total daily fluoride intake with any accuracy.

Each child participating in the scheme receives a carton of 189ml of fluoridated milk.  Therefore, each participating child is given milk containing 4.2 parts per million (“ppm”) of fluoride every school day.

A 2022 policy paper for the UK government stated, “In some parts of England the level of fluoride in the public water supply already reaches the target concentration of water fluoridation schemes (one milligram per litre (1mg/l)), sometimes expressed as one part per million (1ppm)), as a result of the geology of the area. In other areas the fluoride concentration has been adjusted to reach this level as part of a fluoridation scheme.”

The policy paper continued, “The World Health Organisation recommends a maximum level of 1.5 milligrams of fluoride per litre of water (mg/l) [or 1.5 ppm].”

In addition to the 1 ppm of fluoride in drinking water, the Blackpool Council is adding 4.2 ppm to breakfasts for children participating in the school breakfast scheme.

For comparison, in the US, the recommended safe level of fluoride in water is 0.7 ppm.

As Libertarianism UK noted, the US safe limit of 0.7 ppm was lowered in 2015 from the previous 0.7-1.2 ppm range.  The Department of Health and Human Services lowered the safe limit because it was decided the higher limit of 1.2 ppm was a potential danger.

It’s not only Blackpool council risking the health of children.  At the end of its webpage, Blackpool Council notes that “a successful fluoride milk scheme has been operating in Manchester for a number of years.”  We couldn’t find a start date for when Manchester began distributing fluoridated milk to schools.  But we assume children in Manchester have been given the same unsafe 4.2 ppm of fluoride in each carton of milk for “a number of years.”

Meanwhile, on the other side of the pond, the Federal Court in California ruled on Tuesday that adding 0.7 ppm of fluoride to water poses an unreasonable risk to children’s intelligence.

Last month, the long-delayed final report from the US National Toxicology Programme (“NTP”) confirmed that there is a large, consistent and reliable body of scientific research linking fluoride to reduced IQ.

After the release of the NTP report, it was expected that Californian Judge Edward Chen would issue his final ruling for a case brought against the US Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”).

For nearly a decade, Food & Water Watch, Fluoride Action Network and others have been in a legal battle with the EPA after the EPA denied their petition against local water utilities adding fluoride into water supplies.

Last week, on 24 September, Judge Chen issued his ruling. He ruled that fluoridation of water at 0.7 mg/l “poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children.”  0.7 mg/l is the equivalent of 0.7 ppm.

Judge Chen noted that the finding does not “conclude with certainty” that fluoridated water is “injurious to public health” but does find there is “an unreasonable risk of such injury” and the EPA cannot ignore the risk.

Related: EPA Lawsuit, Fluoride Action Network and US Department of Health and Human Services report confirms fluoride exposure is associated with lower IQ in children

Federal Judge Rules Fluoride is a Neurotoxin in Historic Lawsuit

Fluoride poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children, according to a US federal court.

By Derrick Broze as published by The Last American Vagabond

On Tuesday a federal court in California found that fluoridation of water at 0.7 milligrammes per litre “poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children.”

The new ruling issued by Judge Edward Chen noted that the finding does not “conclude with certainty” that fluoridated water is “injurious to public health” but does find there is “an unreasonable risk of such injury.” This risk is sufficient to require the EPA to enact a regulatory response, Chen wrote.

The decision is the latest ruling in an eight-year legal battle between the US Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and the Fluoride Action Network (“FAN”). The lawsuit began following the EPA’s 2016 decision to deny the plaintiff’s petition under the Toxic Substances Control Act (“TSCA”). The first phase of the trial took place in summer 2020 via Zoom and the second phase of the fluoride lawsuit concluded in February in San Francisco.

While Judge Chen did not tell the EPA what the response to the ruling should be, he did rule that the EPA cannot ignore the risk.

The EPA must now initiate a rulemaking process to determine what regulation they will implement to lower or eliminate the risk posed by water fluoridation. The EPA is likely to appeal the decision, but could also drag out the rulemaking process for years.

The Fluoride Action Network believes the most effective way to eliminate this risk is to end water fluoridation and ban the practice altogether.

“In our view, attempts by the EPA to appeal or delay this ruling will only result in harm to hundreds of thousands of additional children, particularly those whose families are unable to afford expensive reverse osmosis or distillation filtration of their tap water,” wrote Stuart Cooper, Executive Director for the Fluoride Action Network.

Judge Chen’s ruling includes several strong statements which make it clear his court has no doubt water fluoridation is causing harm, even at the levels currently recommended by US health agencies. These statements conflict with the claims of the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention and lobbying groups like the American Dental Association.

“The Court finds that fluoridation of water at 0.7 milligrams per litre (“mg/l”) – the level presently considered ‘optimal’ in the United States – poses an unreasonable risk of reduced IQ in children,” Chen wrote.

Chen goes on to note that “there is little dispute” regarding the hazard fluoride poses to human health.  “Indeed, EPA’s own expert agrees that fluoride is hazardous at some level of exposure,” the judge acknowledges. “And ample evidence establishes that a mother’s exposure to fluoride during pregnancy is associated with IQ decrements in her offspring.”

Judge Chen’s statement regarding fluoride exposure during pregnancy reinforces statements made by multiple expert witnesses presented by the FAN during the trials.

One such witness was Dr. Howard Hu. In February, Hu told the court that babies in the third trimester typically pull calcium from the mother’s bones as they develop their skeletal structure. If a mother is receiving fluoride this will be stored in her bones. When her child begins pulling minerals from the mother it will also receive fluoride via the placenta.

Following his testimony to the court, Dr. Howard Hu confirmed to The Last American Vagabond that he believes fluoride is a neurotoxin.

“Yes. I would say that, in my view, the evidence is quite persuasive that there is a negative impact of fluoride exposure on the neurodevelopment of children, particularly the research that’s been coming out in prenatal exposure,” he said.

If you are unable to watch the video above on Rumble, you can watch it on Voluntary Tube HERE.

Judge Chen acknowledged that there is uncertainty as to the precise level at which fluoride becomes hazardous. However, he also stated that even with this uncertainty “the risk to health at exposure levels in United States drinking water is sufficiently high to trigger regulatory response by the EPA under Amended TSCA.”

In response to the ruling, FAN’s attorney, Michael Connett, said, “The Court has done what EPA has long refused to do: applied EPA’s risk assessment framework to fluoride. It’s a historic decision.”

Connett also stated that while the EPA’s rulemaking process begins, policymakers ought to ask, “Should we really be adding a neurotoxicant to our drinking water?”

Censored Report From the NTP Released in August

The ruling comes on the heels of the release of a long-delayed and censored report from the US National Toxicology Programme (“NTP”).  The NTP report found “moderate confidence” that fluoride exposure is “consistently associated with lower IQ in children”

The NTP is run by the US Department of Health and Human Services to coordinate, evaluate, and report on toxicology within public agencies, and is headquartered at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (“NIEHS”).

The NTP’s final report was a factor in Judge Chen’s ruling, with Chen writing, “Notwithstanding inherent difficulties in observing effects at lower exposure levels… scientists have observed a statistically significant association between fluoride and adverse effects in children even at such “lower” exposure levels (less than 1.5 mg/l).”

The NTP’s final report, also known as a monograph, reported that 72 studies examined the “association between fluoride exposure and IQ in children,” and 64 of those studied found “an inverse relationship associated between estimated fluoride exposure and IQ in children.”

Of the total 72 studies, the NTP considered 19 of those studies to be “high quality”, and of those high-quality studies, 18 “reported an inverse association between estimated fluoride exposure and IQ in children.”

Even among another 53 studies which were considered to be “low-quality” the NTP found that “46 of the 53 low-quality studies [88%] in children also found evidence of an inverse association between estimated fluoride exposure and IQ in children.”

The NTP report has been the source of controversy over the last couple of years as it became clear that elements of the US government were seeking to prevent its release.

Now that the final ruling from Judge Chen has been released, time will tell if local, state and national governments outside of the United States listen to the rulings and warnings, or continue to ignore the scientific data and allow the poisoning of their own populations.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/09/28/us-court-rules-that-fluoride-added-to-water/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post US court rules that fluoride added to water supplies poses a risk of reducing children’s IQ appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Justin Leslie, a former operative with Project Veritas and O’Keefe Media Group, and a scientist previously involved in vaccine formulation at Pfizer, has brought to light unreleased recordings that raise serious questions about the pharmaceutical giant’s development and promotion of its COVID-19 vaccines. These recordings captured internal discussions among Pfizer’s top vaccine researchers expressing grave concerns over the vaccines’ safety, efficacy, and the rush to market due to the pandemic emergency.

According to Zero Hedge, the leaked footage includes an October 6, 2021 conversation with Kanwal Gill, a principal scientist at Pfizer, discussing the ethical implications of rolling out experimental booster injections.

“Do we know that, just thinking ethically, is it okay to give people another experimental injection? Are we sure it’s going to be safe and effective? Are we just rolling these out because we want to roll them out for money?” asked Leslie.

Gill responds by acknowledging the real-time nature of the data being collected and the historical challenges faced by mRNA vaccines, which had never previously reached clinical trials due to side effects.

“This is real-time data that we are generating. We don’t even know when we started vaccinating people. We had no idea how it’s going to look like,” said Gill.

“MRNA vaccines have been there for 50 years, but nothing made to clinical. Why? Because mRNA vaccines have been known to have side effects,” she added.

“Moderna has been working on it for ten years. This is not a new thing. But why it did not reach trial was because of all these side effects. Pfizer and Moderna used the emergency and the pandemic to kind of get through it now. But even the CDC model never gets FDA,” Gill admitted.

BELOW IS THE VIDEO POSTED BY LIAM COSGROVE OF ZERO HEDGE:

Principal scientist at Pfizer, Kanwall Gill in 2021:

“We had no idea how it’s going to look like. MRNA vaccines have been there for 50 years, but nothing went to clinical trial because MRNA have been known to have side effects.”

Credit to whistleblower @justintegrity_ pic.twitter.com/RZXrRReMxz

— Liam Cosgrove (@cosgrove_iv) March 12, 2024

Gill also candidly admits that unlike the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, whose side effects were promptly identified, the mRNA and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used in Pfizer’s vaccine are “very sneaky,” implying that significant complications may not yet have surfaced.

“Only Johnson Johnson’s side effect came out quickly, that there was a clot, that clot that was happening with Johnson Johnson’s. But other than that, mRNA and LNP are very sneaky. I think we are not still seeing a lot of like huge complications,” Kanwal said.

Gill further highlights the unconventional trajectory of Pfizer’s vaccine development, noting that the process skipped the traditional phases of clinical trials, jumping directly to phase three. This accelerated approach, while expediting the vaccine’s availability, bypasses years of observation and data collection typical of vaccine development.

Pfizer’s principal scientist in 2021:

“It takes 10 year for a vaccine to come out. It takes years of observations… we are doing everything at the same time.”

“Even Pfizer CEO and even [BioNTech CEO] won’t have answers… it’s also becoming a money game.”
H/t @justintegrity_ pic.twitter.com/KdbocxGwmV

— Liam Cosgrove (@cosgrove_iv) March 12, 2024

Another colleague, Ramin Darvari, a pharmaceutical formulation scientist at Pfizer, was recorded expressing concerns that have since been validated about the possibility that repeat booster intake could damage the cardiovascular system.

WATCH

:HTTPS://TWITTER.COM/I/STATUS/1767379490999579085

Pfizer’s pharmaceutical formulation scientist, Ramin Darvari, in 2021:

“They’re engineering it specifically for me to take the next one, so increasing my consumption.”

“It’s going to affect my heart, and I’m going to die. And nobody’s talking about that.”

h/t @justintegrity_ pic.twitter.com/iYb8aVo872

— Liam Cosgrove (@cosgrove_iv) March 12, 2024

While none of these revelations are particularly shocking in 2024, they cast a somber light on the internal discussions at Pfizer during the early vaccine rollouts.

At a time when the company was publicly assuring there were “no serious safety concerns,” the candid conversations captured in Leslie’s footage suggest a more complex picture was emerging behind closed doors.

Leslie’s revealing narrative unfolds through his documentary, “Project Whistleblower,” a two-part film designed to shed light on the severe misconduct in the context of the COVID-19 vaccine development and distribution.

Leslie’s journey began amidst the turbulent peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, a period marked by intense debates over vaccine mandates and the approval of vaccines for children.

Seeking to expose the grievous risks associated with these vaccines, risks he suggests were downplayed or ignored by those in power, Leslie approached James O’Keefe and Project Veritas.

“I have whistleblown against Pfizer and the media for crimes against humanity.  I am a Pfizer scientist and investigative journalist whistleblower of Project Veritas and O’Keefe Media Group. I have produced this documentary PROJECT WHISTLEBLOWER to get my story out there and so that my words are not twisted or tangled. It is in two parts, Vol. 1 and Vol. 2.   It is has been a long and unprecedented road that I have been on, resulting in the release of my documentary film called Project Whistleblower.  The film can be found if you follow the links to my website https://justintegrity.net,” according to Leslie’s GiveSendGo campaign.

You can watch the first and second part of the expose below:

Project Whistleblower- Volume 1

PArt II:

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/03/17/must-watch-previously-unpublished-recording-pfizer-scientist-confirming-risk-very-sneaky-side-effects-of-mrna-covid-jabs/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post MUST WATCH: Previously Unpublished Recording – Pfizer Scientist Confirming Risk & “Very Sneaky” Side Effects of mRNA COVID Jabs. appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.