Due to the infrastructure being implemented under the digital ID framework in Australia, the next pandemic will not likely result in long-term large-scale lockdowns, but rather targeted surveillance, lockdowns and compliance orders.

A report funded by “philanthropic” foundations outlined the future pandemic responses in Australia, with recommendations for real-time data collection, setting up an Australian Centre for Disease Control and government decision-making through data usage. The aim is to have a well-coordinated response to future pandemics, with a focus on targeted surveillance, data sharing and compliance directives.

Additionally, Social Impact Investing through ESG scoring is shaping the narrative and agenda around how businesses deal with pandemics, with a focus on equity and inclusion.

All indications are that the future response to pandemics in Australia will involve targeted surveillance, rapid testing and compliance with vaccine mandates, all driven by technology such as digital IDs. The overall goal is to create a seamless, individualised approach to pandemic management, which could have implications for democracy and public pushback.

What is Planned When the Next Pandemic is Announced?

By Kate Mason

I came across a Facebook post where people were discussing whether there will be future pandemic lockdowns. People’s views primarily were that in the case of a full-scale lockdown, they would not comply and that the government would not try a full-scale lockdown again due to the large amount of people who protested about the government covid-19 measures in 2021-2022.

I don’t think there will be long-term large-scale lockdowns in the future. If there are, they will only be in place for a short time. I say this as the infrastructure for surveillance is being implemented under the digital ID framework – as well as other government measures, bodies and legislation introduced over the last few years – allowing for targeted surveillance, lockdowns and compliance orders.

Surveillance, targeted lockdowns and compliance orders are discussed in these excerpts with World Health Organisation (“WHO”) representatives (full video HERE) [Note: we were unable to upload the 4-minute clip included in Mason’s article, so we have embedded the video below to begin with the first part of Mason’s clip]:

Professor Mukesh Kapila, former Director of Emergencies at the WHO, states clearly that border closures and panicked strategies should not be implemented again, and that the covid measures created as many issues as they were tasked to solve. The answer is clearly targeted lockdowns for those who have a virus and those who are in contact (indicating strong surveillance measures), targeted early intervention mRNA injections (the number of people injected will expand as the virus circulates), and this links into a digital ID system.

I discuss the next advancement of Australia’s (mandatory) digital ID – TEx (as announced by Bill Shorten recently) in an interview with Reality Check Radio, and I discuss why I think lockdowns will be targeted:

The link to a more comprehensive look at the Digital Identity Trust Exchange (“TEx”) announcement is found HERE.

Fault Lines Report

The plan for Australia’s future pandemic responses were set out in an “independent” report released in October 2022, ‘Fault lines: an independent review into Australia’s response to covid-19’. The report was funded by Social Impact “Philanthropists”: John & Myriam Wylie Foundation, the Minderoo Foundation and the Paul Ramsay Foundation.

John and Myriam Wylie own the investment platform Tanarra. An investment firm with $3 billion under management. Tannara is heavily invested in surveillance technologies.

Minderoo is Andrew and Nicola Forrests’ philanthropic entity, heavily invested in Social Impact Bonds.

Paul Ramsay Foundation is a Social Impact Bond company. I specifically discuss the Paul Ramsay Foundation HERE.

On the surface, the Fault Lines report (if you didn’t read it) looked good:

The Fault Lines report asserted that the Australian government had been heavy-handed in its response to covid, and this created further societal inequity i.e. anyone who was vulnerable became more vulnerable. For example, there were serious repercussions for children’s learning, domestic violence, people’s socio-economic status and mental health etc.

People who had fought against government covid overreach were celebrating the release of the Fault Lines report. But, what’s important to understand is that the harms caused by a government policy are then used to justify an even more nefarious solution, which is what the Fault Lines report proposes. I read the Fault Lines report at the time and was horrified, so I put out a video:

I want to put the Fault Lines report back on people’s radar. Specifically regarding lockdowns, what the future vision is for pandemics and how this marries into digital ID. Forewarned is forearmed.

The Fault Lines report finishes off with the vision of how they want future pandemics dealt with. The report assures us that pandemics will become more frequent and therefore there needs to be a well-oiled machine in place so disruptions are limited.

The Vision For Future Pandemic Policies

The Fault Lines report puts on the agenda:

• Real-time data on travel, health, customer spending and location. This implies a digital ID is in place.
• Harmonised systems – meaning large-scale lockdowns will be temporary, at most.
• An Australian Centre for Disease Control.
• Establish an inter-jurisdictional Public Service Centre of Excellence.
• Establish a panel of multidisciplinary experts and representatives to advise governments and the National Cabinet during health crises.
• People affected will receive immediate payments (this will be based on compliance).
• People who come or return from overseas are quarantined.
• Strong tracking, tracing, testing and quarantine methods are already in place – targeted lockdowns occur.
• Streamlined “health” messaging will be broadcast. All government agencies, private sector and non-governmental organisations (“NGOs”) in lockstep. People from multicultural backgrounds will be targeted in their homeland language.
• The system will be so seamless that individuals will be compelled to comply or … ?? This is not spelt out.

If the report is correct, when the next “pandemic” arrives it will not be a messy, noisy, ad hoc, confusing, tumultuous endeavour. It will be streamlined, meaning all aspects of the management of people will be in sync and justified through data. People will be managed with technocratic efficiency. This has implications for democracy and public pushback.

The ACDCP referred to below is the Australian Centre for Disease Control and Prevention.

The National Cabinet was formed in 2020 for the Government’s Covid response. They have not disbanded and address a number of portfolios, as found HERE.

Tracking and Tracing of People

My bet is that when the next pandemic hits Australia, the Government’s recently announced Trust Exchange (TEx) digital ID system will become compulsory to purchase goods, services, and to be able to work and access government services.

Mass scale lockdowns do not need to occur if you have contact tracing, ready-to-go vaccines and clear communication strategies in place:

Fault Lines Report Recommendations

Recommendation 1 – Strengthen Crisis Preparation, Planning and Testing

Firstly, the report calls for widening what can be defined as a pandemic:

The Government’s approach to the future pandemic must be thoroughly practised prior, involving many stakeholders – government, business, police, NGOs etc:

Supply chains must be involved in the plans, this includes medical equipment but would also include food. Hence, the tracking and tracing of our food systems which is being implemented (climate change and sustainability are other justifications used for food tracing):

Ministers from different States and Territories will be in lockstep:

Emergency legislative frameworks need to be ironed out:

The Victorian legislation referred to is the controversial Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (Pandemic Management) Bill 2021:

Targeted lockdowns will occur, and employers will have legal obligations to fulfil regarding vaccine mandates, testing and other compliance directives:

Recommendation 2 – Establish an Expert Body and Trusted Voice on Public Health

Create an Australian Centre for Disease Control and Prevention:

The Centre for Disease Control and Prevention coordinates the surveillance, tracking, data collation and analysis:

The ACDCP links into States and Territories:

The ACDCP advises the AHPPC:

The AHPPC is the Chief Medical Officer and the States and Territories Chief Health Officers:

The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (“CSIRO”) is mentioned:

HERE is the CSIRO ‘Strengthening Australia’s Pandemic Preparedness’, with a focus on vaccines and testing:

The Government is currently in the process of establishing an Australian Centre for Disease Control:

Recommendation 3- Improve Government Decision-Making Through Broader Advice and Greater Transparency

A panel of non-medical experts will be chosen to inform the Government on pandemic policies. The issue with this is that the chosen panellists will not question the overall pandemic narrative and medical interventions:

Recommendation 4 – Finance Public Service Collaboration, Capability and Communication

The Australian Public Sector is in the process of being reformed:

What this means is that the Government’s role is one of data collection, curation and implementation of solutions based on the data. This links inextricably into smart technology or cities and how people are monitored through digitalised tools:

Targeted messaging – the government faced issues with an inability to capture culturally and linguistically diverse (“CALD”) communities within Australia. Instead of listening to the Australian government, they were listening to in language commentary from their home countries. According to Fault Lines, this led to the CALD communities being “misinformed” as well as being targeted by nefarious actors spreading “misinformation.” The government must correct this:

After all, it doesn’t look democratic when the Government targets highly multicultural areas by sending in the army to enforce covid policies:

The areas in Sydney which were targeted as “areas for concern” during 2022 were all highly multicultural. People who lived in these areas were unable to leave their local government area:

Recommendation 5 – Modernise How Governments Use Data

Data will be made more freely available, under the pretence of “strengthening data.” Data on people is to be shared and must be the default position:

Regarding the Google and Apple partnership with the Australian government, the Application Programme Interface uses Bluetooth to create a log of other devices that come into close range:

Data sharing is the default position:

The Data Availability and Transparency Act 2022 allows for public-sector data sharing that permits Australian Government (Commonwealth) bodies to share their data with other Commonwealth bodies, Australian state or territory government bodies, or Australian universities. Found HERE.

Data sharing was problematic during covid once people crossed over State and Territory boundaries. This must be streamlined:

The government is currently in the process of overhauling Australia’s Privacy Act:

As stated above the Government agrees that under rolling emergency declarations – health, climate, biosecurity, terrorism, cybersecurity – people’s rights to privacy protections are waived. The public’s right to give consent to their data being shared is waived for research that is in the “public interest.”

Recommendation 6 – An Independent Office of the Evaluator General

The government is in the process of creating an Australian Centre for Evaluation under the guise of “wellbeing”:

And:

What This Means

The government, since 2020, has been busy passing legislation, digital surveillance tools and overarching bodies to be able to implement targeted surveillance, data sharing, contract tracing and Australia-wide coordinated systems. This will allow for seamless individualised approaches to testing, quarantine and vaccine mandates for the next upcoming pandemic which hits Australian shores.

I believe the next pandemic approach will be similar to the biosecurity responses to pests, two examples are:

1. In 2022-2023 the NSW government started killing bees due to finding Varroa at a Sentinel hive (I researched and campaigned intensely on the government measures and the whole thing stunk to high heaven). It started with small red zones which was a 10 km zone drawn around anywhere a varroa mite was found, everyone in the red zone had to kill their bees. The red zones kept growing until 40,000,000 bees were killed, according to the DPI (however this number seems low). In the map below, the red zones are where bees are killed and purple zones are where bees are monitored.  This is an early map, many more areas were added, but it shows the approach.

2. The Queensland government is currently baiting (multiple times the same area) and showering chemicals from planes and drones over parts of Queensland to kill fire ants. The zone where this is occurring keeps growing (this is an old map but shows the approach):

In my view, the future approach to pandemics (Fault Lines report states they want the definition of pandemics to broaden) will look something like this:

• When someone is found to have a virus their movements, during an identified contagious time, will be accessed and all close contacts – sitting near someone on a train, for example – will be notified that they need to quarantine.
• Testing will be enforced on those in quarantine.
• A readily available mRNA injection will be delivered.
• The surrounding community will be under suveillance and monitored more closely.
• The virus, will of course spread, so the process will roll on incrementally.
• Those who are in initial quarantine will be injected and released if they comply.
• Those who don’t comply will not be able to access emergency payments or be released from house arrest (details will become clearer on this over time).
• Outside movement, whilst under quarantine orders, will be made difficult through digital surveillance.

There won’t be mass lockdowns, where too many of us are shut down and therefore start to band together and say “enough”! This is very important to consider in how the people can stand together in future years.

Just a little on Impact Markets

It’s relevant that the Fault Lines report was funded by Social Impact investors. Social Impact Investing links into environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) scoring. Dr Julianne Romanello states that the ESG-Social Impact Investing framework “entail[s] the power to shape and to control individual minds and to engineer society so to further benefit those who already lord over the people through finance and who have demonstrated no compunction about their use of deception and division.”

Minderoo and the Paul Ramsay Foundation are both members of the Global Impact Investing Network (“GIIN”). GIIN is the “global champion of impact investing, dedicated to increasing its scale and effectiveness around the world.”

The investments and returns will be funnelled through the ESG framework – environmental, social and governance.  Only companies that have a good ESG score will be able to survive. This means companies have to get on board the health and climate change mitigation agenda; the coerced genetically modified organisms, injections, synthetic biology, synthetic food, carbon tracking and tracing, genetically engineered “Climate Smart” seeds and plants, “renewables,” mass critical mineral mining, Managed Retreat, solar radiation modification etc, social giving (supporting the Social Impact Bond wellbeing-surveillance-interventions turning the welfare system into a for-profit market) and governance (how well is the company “looking after” people during pandemics – as one example) systems.

ESG and Social Impact investing is a key mechanism to create the global, centralised control infrastructure, which will be central to the One Health model and to contain everyone within the UN 17SDGs.

As found here:

And HERE, making very clear the way businesses deal with pandemics will determine whether they succeed or fail:

And here:

Put bluntly, ESG is the capture of the business world and finances into funding agendas. The United Nations Agenda 2030 to be exact.

The narrative states that covid created a fairer world where equity and inclusion – which means everyone vaccinated, and giving people money so they didn’t starve and become homeless whilst under house arrest i.e. lockdowns – trumped looking after the economy. In this new world order, where under rolling threats “no one is left behind,” those of us who would like them to leave us the hell alone have some serious upcoming challenges.

Oh, and in the equity and inclusion “Values Before Value” fairy dust spun over covid house arrests, coerced injections, police brutality, suspension of human rights and heavy surveillance they never factor in this reality:

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/09/01/australia-the-plan-for-future-pandemics/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Australia: The plan for future pandemics is not large-scale lockdowns but targeted, individualised surveillance, quarantines and mandates appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

On Friday, the World Health Organisation declared mpox a public health emergency of international concern (“PHEIC” pronounced “fake”) for the second time in two years.

It was known that a tabletop exercise in May 2021 had “predicted” a monkeypox outbreak to occur almost to the day when Tedros the Terrorist unilaterally declared mpox a PHEIC in May 2022. The tabletop exercise “predicted” the death of 270 million people. According to Dr. David Martin, the new variants that will kill will be in the vaccines.

Below is a reminder of that prediction and what it means for humanity.

In November 2022, the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) renamed monkeypox to mpox.   After monkeypox was named a PHEIC in 2022, Dr. David E. Martin, founder and CEO of M-CAM, called it a cover story for injuries and deaths from vaccines.

 In 2022, Jonathan Otto interviewed Dr. Martin for his ‘Unbreakable’ series.  The interview was included in episode 12 of ‘Unbreakable Revelation: The Global Agenda & Their Use of Bioweapons’.

During the interview, Dr. Martin spoke about CRISPR gene-editing technology and the use of snail venom and many other toxins.  He also spoke about monkeypox, the NTI’s tabletop exercise in March 2021 and the associated report published in November 2021.

During a 2021 tabletop exercise, the Nuclear Treat Initiative (“NTI”) predicted a laboratory-engineered vaccine-resistant monkeypox outbreak with 271 million deaths. This is a coverup for the fatalities of those who have been covid injected. WHO is a criminal organisation led by Bill Gates, Rockefellers and the Wellcome Trust.

Dustin Moskovitz sponsored the live pandemic simulation of the laboratory-engineered vaccine-resistant monkeypox outbreak with 3.2 billion cases around the world and 271 million deaths. Moskovitz is the founder of Open Philanthropy and co-founder of Facebook and wants CRISPR gene editing technology used on all humanity.

In November 2021, NTI published the results of the tabletop exercise in a report titled ‘NTI Paper: Strengthening Global Systems to Prevent and Respond to High-Consequence Biological Threats’.  NTI’s report stated:

We are grateful to Open Philanthropy. The exercise and report would not have been possible without their generous support. [The colophon]

Executive Summary:

In March 2021, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) partnered with the Munich Security Conference (MSC) to conduct a tabletop exercise on reducing high-consequence biological threats. Conducted virtually, the exercise examined gaps in national and international biosecurity and pandemic preparedness architectures and explored opportunities to improve capabilities to prevent and respond to high-consequence biological events. Participants included 19 senior leaders and experts from across Africa, the Americas, Asia, and Europe with decades of combined experience in public health, biotechnology industry, international security, and philanthropy.

The exercise scenario portrayed a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months. Ultimately, the exercise scenario revealed that the initial outbreak was caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory with inadequate biosafety and biosecurity provisions and weak oversight. By the end of the exercise, the fictional pandemic resulted in more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide. [Pg. 6]

They plan to use the invisibility of a pathogen to bring the world to its knees, Dr. Martin told Otto.  “This is when people really need to stand up and pay attention because we are on the verge of the cover-up of all times – which according to Pfizer CEO can lead to the loss of half of the world’s population … This entire thing is programming the public to accept a genocide of global proportions,” he warned.

Below is a 25-minute excerpt from the interview for Unbreakable where Dr. Martin spoke about mpox.  You can watch the full one-hour interview on BitChute HERE or Rumble HERE.  You can watch the full almost two-hour Unbreakable Revelation episode 12 on BitChute HERE or Rumble HERE.

In May 2022, NTI issued a statement in response to social media posts linking WHO’s declaration of a mpox PHEIC to the tabletop exercise which you can read HERE.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/08/20/pandemics-and-vaccine-agenda-they-are-programming-the-public-to-accept-a-genocide-of-global-proportions/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Pandemics and vaccine agenda: They are programming the public to accept a genocide of global proportions appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

• The WHO could order governments to impose rules in future disease outbreaks
• Tory MPs have called for a block on powers that would dictate UK health policy

New powers could potentially plunge Britain, the US and Australia into lockdown measures at the whim of the World Health Organization, it was claimed today.

The UN agency – heavily criticised for how it handled Covid – is considering 300 amendments to its legally-binding rulebook.

One measure floated, MPs and campaigners fear, opens the door for member states to be made to comply with any advice issued during future pandemics, such as enforcing vaccine passports and border closures.

It states that countries vow to ‘undertake to follow WHO’s recommendations in their international public health response’.

Critics today described the proposal – which still has to be voted on before ever cropping up in real-world policy – as an ‘unprecedented land grab’.

 

The UN health agency, led by Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, could order the Government to impose quarantine rules, vaccine passports and close the borders, if a draft update to its powers is approved.

Member states would also have to use 5 per cent of health budgets on preparing for another pandemic if controversial proposals are given the go ahead.

Six Tory MPs have now written to the Foreign Office, demanding it blocks any new powers that could see the WHO dictate policy and budgets in the UK.

Ex-Cabinet minister Esther McVey warned the powers would see the organisation, described as China’s puppet by critics, move from a ‘member-led advisory body to a health authority with powers of compulsion’.

In response to the fears, the Government insisted it ‘would never agree to anything that crosses our points of principle on sovereignty’.

Molly Kingsley, founder of UsForThem, which campaigned against school closures and masks in classrooms during the pandemic, said: ‘The Government have come back and said, well actually we’re quite worried too.

‘And they’re right to be because this is a really, really unprecedented land grab by the WHO.’

In 2018, the WHO identified nine priority diseases (listed) that pose the biggest risk to public health. They were deemed to be most risky due to a lack of treatments or their ability to cause a pandemic

She told Talk TV: ‘What the proposals do is change what is currently guidance that the WHO gives to binding recommendations.

‘And that includes binding recommendations over things like lockdown, mandatory vaccination, quarantine, isolation and restrictions on travel.’

Ms Kingsley added: ‘You have to ask, who is the WHO to be granting themselves powers?’

The powers are being considered as part of an update to the WHO International Health Regulations (IHR) 2005, which sets out obligations for its 194 member states to prepare for and respond to outbreaks and other public health risks.

Among the 308 suggested changes are proposals to create a ‘legally binding’ response to public health emergencies, The Telegraph reported.

This amendment, suggested by African nations, states that the current wording of the IHR is ‘weak’.

The exact wording is in relation to getting the WHO to coordinate sharing drugs, tests, PPE and vaccines across the planet.

Yet the wording of another amendment proposes that: ‘Parties recognize WHO as the guidance and coordinating authority of international public health response during public health Emergency of International Concern and undertake to follow WHO’s recommendations in their international public health response.’

Ms Kingsley said this would effectively amount to making any WHO recommendations legally-binding.

In parallel, the agency is also working on a pandemic preparedness treaty.

WHO chiefs say both instruments will make the world safer from health threats, with another crisis feared to be lurking around the corner.

Bosses of the organisation are whittling down the suggested amendments, before a vote next spring decides whether they will come into force.

At a four-day meeting last month, the WHO discussed a third of the proposed amendments while being ‘mindful’ of each nation’s ‘equity, sovereignty and solidarity’.

The IHR working group is set to meet again in July, October and December and will agree on an amendments package to present to the World Health Assembly (WHA) in May next year, where a majority vote among member states decides whether they should be adopted.

The updated IHR would then come into force within a year for all member states, unless a country files a rejection.

And a meeting about the ‘complimentary’ pandemic treaty will take place in July, which sets out that all nations are expected to devote no less than 5 per cent of their budget to improve their pandemic preparedness.

 

Molly Kingsley, founder of UsForThem, which campaigned against school closures and masks in classrooms during the pandemic, said: ‘The Government have come back and said, well actually we’re quite worried too. ‘And they’re right to be because this is a really, really unprecedented land grab by the WHO’

However, a letter from Tory MPs, led by Ms McVey, calls for a vote in the Commons on the draft before it is signed.

The letter, seen by The Telegraph, states that there is ‘growing concern’ about both the IHR and the treaty.

Ms McVey said: ‘The plans represent a significant shift for the organisation, from a member-led advisory body to a health authority with powers of compulsion.

‘This is particularly worrying when you consider the WHO’s poor track record on providing consistent, clear and scientifically sound advice for managing international disease outbreaks.’

The WHO repeatedly came under fire during the pandemic for its stalwart defence of China.

This included parroting Beijing’s dismissal that the virus could have leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology.

In the earliest days of the outbreak, WHO director Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus even went as far as to praise Beijing’s ‘commitment to transparency’ which he called ‘beyond words’.

At around the same time, China’s Communist Party began censoring public information about the spread of the virus and its potential origins, at one point suggesting that US troops could have been the initial carriers.

Ms McVey’s letter was co-signed by Tory MPs Sir John Redwood, David Davis, Philip Davies, Sir Christopher Chope and Danny Kruger, The Telegraph reported.

Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office minister Andrew Mitchell said: ‘The UK is supportive of the pandemic treaty currently being negotiated by national governments, which could speed up the sharing of data on new pandemic threats so we are able to respond quickly in the event of future pandemics.

‘We’re clear that we would never agree to anything that crosses our points of principle on sovereignty or prevents the UK from taking decisive action against future pandemics.’

A WHO spokesperson said: ‘Just as with negotiation on pandemic accord this is a process led by sovereign states and the WHO secretariat is facilitating the negotiations.

‘As with all international instruments, any amendments to IHR, if and when agreed by member states, would be determined by governments themselves, who would take any action while considering their own national laws and regulations.’

Source Link: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-12127267/Britain-thrown-lockdown-future-World-Health-Organization.html

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post WHO do you think you are? Outrage over ‘unprecedented land grab’ that ‘could see World Health Organization force Britain, the US and Australia into lockdowns in future pandemics’ appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.