Search engine giant Google is reportedly testing a new tool powered by artificial intelligence (AI) capable of analyzing information on current events and generating news stories.

The New York Times (NYT) expounded on Google’s new tool called Genesis, which the tech giant describes as a potential game-changer. According to the company, Genesis offers journalists a kind of personal assistant that could automate certain tasks and free up time for more in-depth reporting.

“AI-enabled tools [such as Genesis] could assist journalists with options for headlines or different writing styles,” said Google spokeswoman Jenn Crider. “Our goal is to give journalists the choice of using these emerging technologies in a way that enhances their work and productivity, just like we’re making assistive tools available for people in Gmail and Google Docs.”

According to her, the tech giant has pitched to news publishers – including smaller publishers – to explore new ideas and help journalists. Crider added: “Quite simply, these tools are not intended to – and cannot – replace the essential role journalists have in reporting, creating and fact-checking their articles.” (Related: Google unveils plan to use AI to completely destroy journalism.)

One anonymous source confirmed that Genesis would be launched to major news organizations, such as the NYT, the Washington Post (WaPo) and the Wall Street Journal (WSJ).

“We have an excellent relationship with Google, and we appreciate [Alphabet and Google CEO] Sundar Pichai’s long-term commitment to journalism,” said a spokesperson for News Corp., the owner of WSJ. Both the NYT and WaPo refused to comment.

AI in journalism a hotly-debated topic

The use of AI-enabled tools such as Genesis in newsrooms has been a topic of debate among media organizations worldwide. Some news outlets have expressed their intentions to explore responsible uses of AI in journalism. However, Genesis has instead raised anxiety among journalists, who fear that widespread adoption of AI for article generation might lead to misinformation and alter the perception of traditionally written stories.

According to renowned journalism professor and media commentator Jeff Jarvis, the new AI-enabled tool of Google has upsides and downsides. He stated: “If this technology can deliver factual information reliably, journalists should use the tool.”

However, Jarvis emphasized the importance of responsible application, particularly on topics that demand nuance and cultural understanding. He warned that misusing Genesis “could damage the credibility not only of the tool, but of the news organizations that use it.”

While Google has been quick to develop and deploy generative AI, it faced challenges with ensuring accuracy and responsible content curation.

Bard, a chatbot tool introduced by Google, has occasionally presented inaccurate information and failed to direct users to authoritative news sources. Additionally, the WSJ exposed the flaws of AI-enabled tools of Google for hospitals. These tools, the outlet said, delivered more inaccuracies and irrelevant information in its responses compared to real doctors in diagnostics.

The media industry as a whole has long-standing issues with Google, with the Accelerated Mobile Pages fiasco and Gannett’s lawsuit against Google for alleged ad tech monopolies hurting local news serving as proof of this. Likewise, AI companies including Google are using years of news articles and content to train their AI system without compensating the publishers. Given this, news organizations such as NBC News and NYT have spoken out against AI bots using their data without permission.

Visit EvilGoogle.news for more stories about Google’s nefarious plans with AI.

Watch this video outlining three examples of how Google’s Bard AI is a woke chatbot.

This video is from the Recharge Freedom channel on Brighteon.com.

Source Link:  https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-07-26-google-tests-ai-tool-writing-news-stories.html

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Mainstream media journalists are now OBSOLETE: Google tests new AI tool that can write NEWS STORIES and replace obedient journo-propagandists appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Politicians only support policies they believe help their electoral chances, and that range of options is shaped by social movements and shared “norms” within society. The mass media follows suit. A policy analyst named Joseph Overton once stated that an idea’s political viability depends on whether it falls within that range, and so that window frames their range of policies given the climate of public opinion at that time. This is called the Overton Window, and politicians and their subservient mass media cater to whatever the majority of the populace views as sensible, acceptable, and popular (even though it’s based on mostly lies and deception).

Since the outbreak of the Covid pandemic, politicians across the board have catered to public paranoia, hyped by the media and the CDC, and thus promoted Wuhan virus “vaccines” heavily, but at what cost to public health, and to their own credibility? Since the “Overton Window” shifts, and because the Covid “clot shots” are causing mass health carnage across the globe that’s inevitably becoming more exposed, the politicians and mass media are being forced to include certain “bad news” about the “vaccines” in their coverage, to remain in the Overton Window of acceptability.

In other words, in order for insidious politicians (and their evil cohorts at the CDC) to remain seemingly trustworthy in the eyes of the sheeple (brainwashed populace), they must at least partially admit now that the Wuhan virus jabs ARE causing health tragedies, including myocarditis, pericarditis, heart attacks, strokes, and deaths. There’s simply no avoiding it, if they want to keep the majority of their supporters and followers, but there’s a caveat to this, and it’s called “catch and release.”

“Catch and Release” news admits that some “conspiracy theories” are true, but only for brief moments, then it’s back to the twisted “norm”

For the majority of Americans to continue believing they’ve done the “right” thing by getting injected with billions of spike protein prions to supposedly help them not die from Covid-19 or its variants, the US government and their controlled media must remain in the spectrum of acceptability of governmental policies. This means shifting the Overton Window to include news that the Covid clot shots CAN actually cause health harm.

Mass media and the CDC are now engaging a “catch and release” format of these admissions, to appease the masses and try to keep them all in line, getting more clot shots, boosters, flu shots, and whatever is coming next. So they’re publishing a little bit of guilt admission about the dangers of clot shots now, just to help cover up the tsunami of news about it all that’s taking place across all independent media. It’s catch and release, and MSM will try to make their sheeple forget about it within a day or two, again.

For example, a medical doctor recently degraded the so-called “scientific community” in Newsweek, saying they need to take responsibility for the deadly consequences of misinforming billions of people about Covid-19. Yes, mainstream media calls out their own, occasionally, when there’s just too many incidences and far too much exposure to keep covering it all up. That’s when truth news and independent media says, “told you so.”

The controlled media complex literally INVENTED and perpetuates the “misinformation” and “fake news” they try to warn everyone about. Their whole business model is to cater to the Overton Window, while only admitting the atrocities of their lies when they absolutely have to and have painted themselves into a corner, as with their lies about lockdowns, masks, social distancing, vaccines and boosters.

CDC, WHO, FDA, AMA, MSM all in bed with Big Pharma to create the illusion they care about public health when their main goal is to decimate it

It is now clear that Covid jabs are very dangerous to all human health, in various ways, and especially to teens, adolescents, children, babies, and pregnant women. The Overton Window is shifting and widening, and the mainstream media pharma shills are trying to cover their tracks as best they can, but there’s a sad reality to this confession and admission. The bottom line is that mRNA is a population reduction technology being utilized to kill off a few billion people, and now the word is getting out.

Many people who got the first couple jabs are now saying they will not get boosters for Covid. But they are just suspicious, and need much more information that is not misinformation. They need to know that the pharma “buck” doesn’t stop with the Fauci Flu gene mutation injections, as flu shots, GMO foods, prescription medications, and fluoridated tap water are doing chronic damage to them every day, every week, every month, every year.

Best-selling author and famous natural health advocate David “Avocado” Wolfe exposes the grim reality of the deadly Covid jabs and how the “authorities” are utilizing the Overton Window to hang on to their brainwashed sheeple and keep them obeying the protocols of the scamdemic death trap. Watch the highly-informative interview of David Wolfe by Dr. Robert Scott Bell. Also, bookmark Vaccines.news to your favorite independent websites for updates on the Vaccine Holocaust that’s sweeping the nation and the world as you read this.

Source Link: https://naturalnews.com/2023-02-05-mainstream-media-forced-to-admit-covid-jabs-are-deadly.html

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post The OVERTON WINDOW: How mainstream media is now forced to admit Covid jabs are deadly appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Yes, this is really happening. They are now telling fully vaccinated people to take HIV drugs. Gee I wonder why? Could it be because they knew these shots would give everyone AIDS?

-Hope Girl

Source Article: https://www.planet-today.com/2022/03/mainstream-media-vaxxed-people-should.html

Mainstream Media: ‘Vaxxed People Should Take HIV Drugs to Lower COVID Risk’

by Planet Today

Scientists and the mainstream media are now asking fully jabbed people to begin taking HIV drugs in order to lower the risk of contracting COVID.

Yes, really.

The push for HIV drugs comes amid news that more fully-jabbed straight people are being diagnosed with HIV than gay people for the first time in history. According to a disturbing report, “in the last couple of years medical data indicates that an unprecedented wave of straight people have begun testing positive for HIV.”

And now, according to a recent studies on COVID, “HIV drugs may curb COVID-19 risk.”

Reuters reports the following on the study:

Certain drugs used to treat HIV may have a role in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections, according to preliminary data that may help explain why people living with the condition have not appeared to be at higher risk for serious COVID-19 despite being generally more vulnerable to infections.

Doctors in France studied more than 500 people with HIV, a third of whom were receiving long-term treatment with protease inhibitor drugs as part of their antiviral therapy. Over the course of a year, SARS-CoV-2 infections were diagnosed in 12% of participants taking protease inhibitors and 22% of those not receiving these drugs. Four patients in the non-protease-inhibitor group were admitted to hospital with COVID-19. After accounting for other risk factors, individuals taking protease inhibitors were 70% less likely to become infected with SARS-CoV-2 than patients who were not taking these drugs, according to data scheduled for presentation at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

Some new treatments for COVID-19 use protease inhibitors, which block the virus from multiplying. “Protease inhibitor drugs have long history of use, a good safety profile, and are generally well tolerated,” Dr. Steve Nguala from the Intercommunal Hospital Center of Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, said in a statement. They have the potential “to prevent the spread of infections and mutation of future variants,” he said, adding that larger studies are needed to confirm the findings.

COVID-19 and flu make for a dangerous combo

Having COVID-19 and influenza at the same time puts hospitalized adults at much greater risk of critical illness and death compared to having COVID-19 without the flu, researchers reported on Friday in The Lancet.

Patients with SARS-CoV-2/influenza coinfections were more than four times as likely to require machines to help them breath and 2.4 times as likely to die compared to patients who only had COVID-19, according to a study of nearly 7,000 hospitalized patients with COVID-19, including 227 who also had the flu. Dr. Kenneth Baillie of the University of Edinburgh, who led the study, said the combination of the two viruses is particularly dangerous. “We expect that COVID-19 will circulate with flu, increasing the chance of co-infections. That is why we should change our testing strategy for COVID-19 patients in hospital and test for flu much more widely,” Baillie said in a statement.

“The vaccines that protect against COVID-19 and flu are different,” added Dr. Peter Openshaw of Imperial College London, “and people need both.”

Experimental COVID drug may be preventive and therapeutic

An experimental drug designed to be sprayed into the nose has shown the potential to both prevent infection and treat COVID-19, at least for some variants of the coronavirus, according to a study in mice.

The drug, called N-0385, inhibited entry of the virus into cells in the mice when administered before infection. When given up to 12 hours after infection, it prevented the mice from becoming seriously ill, researchers from Cornell University in Ithaca, New York reported on Monday in Nature. N-0385 is a small molecule that inhibits an enzyme called TMPRSS2. Some variants of the coronavirus – but not Omicron – use TMPRSS2 and the ACE2 protein on cell surfaces to fuse themselves to the cell membrane and inject their genetic material inside. N-0385, which would be given in only a few daily doses, “is simpler and less expensive to mass produce than other types of COVID-19 treatments, such as monoclonal antibodies,” study leader Hector Aguilar-Carreno said in a statement. The current study tested the drug against the original version of the virus and the Delta variant, but not against Omicron.

California-based EBVIA Therapeutics Inc said it is raising funds for human trials, drug development, formulation and mass production of N-0385. If clinical trials confirm its safety and efficacy, giving N-0385 in combination with other antiviral drugs could help reduce the risk of mutations that allow the virus to resist treatment, the research team said.

The post Mainstream Media: ‘Vaxxed People Should Take HIV Drugs to Lower COVID Risk’ appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

I’ve been saying this for years, THEY ARE PAID TO TELL YOU LIES! Do not be deceived! That’s quite a hefty paycheck for the devils work. 

-Hope Girl

Source: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/26/us-gov-1-billion-to-falsely-promote-covid-vaccine/

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released information to TheBlaze in response to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request. The information showed that the federal government had purchased advertising to the tune of $1 billion taxpayer dollars as part of a media campaign to build Covid-19 vaccine confidence.

HHS has billed the campaign as a “national initiative to increase public confidence in, and uptake of, COVID-19 vaccines while reinforcing basic prevention measures such as mask-wearing and social distancing.” Data don’t support these measures, but the media campaign was likely hiding something more sinister.

Anyone who has spent time reading the news, watching TV news coverage, or browsing social media in the past year has more than likely been exposed to the government’s advertising. HHS ads posted to YouTube have been viewed millions of times and commercials featuring celebrities like singer Sir Elton John and actor Sir Michael Caine have been the subject of news coverage, such as this feature from NBC News

By Dr Joseph Mercola

HHS Paid News Media to Build Vaccine Confidence

Within the documents sent from HHS, TheBlaze³ found that hundreds of organizations in the news media were paid to produce TV, print, radio and social media advertising timed to coincide with an increasing availability of the genetic therapy shots.

The government also collaborated with social media influencers whose audience included “communities hit hard by COVID-19” and also engaged “experts” to be interviewed and promote the mass vaccination campaign in the news.⁴ One of those experts was the director of NIAID and chief medical adviser to the White House, Dr. Anthony Fauci.

In other words Fauci, the man who has been the “face” of COVID-19 in 2020 and 2021,⁵ who publicly disparaged anyone who questioned the data he was using to support his recommendations, and who blithely referred to himself as “the science,”^6,7 was, in fact, a shill.

Virtually every one of the news organizations paid by HHS, including ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, The Washington Post, Los Angeles Times and the New York Post, covered stories about the vaccines and did not disclose they had accepted taxpayer dollars to support the vaccine effort. It is common practice for the editorial teams to function separately from the advertising departments, so it appears the organizations felt there was no need to disclose their funding.

The advertising took several forms, including an amusing social media campaign featuring Elton John and Michael Caine, fear-based ads that featured survivor stories and straightforward informational ads promoting the safety and efficacy of the current mRNA shot for COVID-19.

Shani George, vice president of communications for The Washington Post made a statement about the funding they received for media advertising from the federal government, saying:⁸

“Advertisers pay for space to share their messages, as was the case here, and those ads are clearly labeled as such. The newsroom is completely independent from the advertising department.”

A spokesperson for the Los Angeles Times also responded to TheBlaze and gave a similar response. Other publications either did not respond or declined to comment. However, it is important to note that the reporters and editorial staff responsible for news also likely read their own publication or watch the online videos.

It’s not hard to imagine that a large news organization promoting vaccinations through their advertising department would not look kindly on editorial staff who choose to report facts that do not align with large sums of money spent by advertisers. You can guess what the editorial staff may be told to write. TheBlaze offered several examples of thinly disguised advertising published as “news,” including:

• An October BuzzFeed⁹ article featured “essential facts” about eligibility for the vaccine and unbalanced, pro-vaccine statements from health agency experts such as CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky, HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra and epidemiologist Dr. George Rutherford.
• Articles in the Los Angeles Times¹⁰ featured “experts” advising people how to convince their vaccine-hesitant friends and relatives to change their minds.
• A Washington Post article covered “the pro-vaccine messages people want to hear.”¹¹
• A Newsmax article in November ran the headline “Newsmax Opposes Vaccine Mandate, Here’s Why.”¹² The article, obviously an opinion piece, began by saying the mandate was a “dangerous overreach” and then proceeded to support the vaccine campaign with statements like, “The vaccine …has been demonstrated to be safe and effective” and “Newsmax has encouraged citizens, especially those at risk, to get immunized.”

Journalistic Objectivity Likely Impossible

The U.S. government is not the only entity to recognize the power behind controlling the news media. Bill Gates is another. Using more than 30,000 grants, Gates has contributed at least $319 million to the media, which senior staff writer for MintPress News Alan McLeod revealed.¹³

Recipients included CNN, NPR, BBC, The Atlantic and PBS. Gates has also sponsored foreign organizations that included The Daily Telegraph, the Financial Times, and Al Jazeera. More than $38 million has also been funneled into investigative journalism centers.

Gates’ influence within the press is far-reaching, from journalism to journalistic training. This ultimately makes true objective reporting about Gates or his initiatives virtually impossible. MacLeod writes:¹⁴

“Today, it is possible for an individual to train as a reporter thanks to a Gates Foundation grant, find work at a Gates-funded outlet, and to belong to a press association funded by Gates. This is especially true of journalists working in the fields of health, education and global development, the ones Gates himself is most active in and where scrutiny of the billionaire’s actions and motives are most necessary.”

It is important to note that Gates has an intense interest in health, and specifically vaccinations.¹⁵ And with this power to control the media and his strong connections with health organizations such as Johns Hopkins, with whom he collaborated for Event 201,¹⁶ it’s not hard to imagine that his influence can be seen in many of the stories you read or watch each day.

This government overreach into the Fourth Estate is not unique to the U.S. Leaked documents¹⁷ have demonstrated that the BBC News and Reuters have also been involved in a covert operation in which the U.K. sought to infiltrate Russian media and promote a U.K. narrative using a network of Russian journalists.

Multimillion-dollar contracts were used to advance these aims, which included 15,000 journalists and staff. The campaign closely follows a U.S. clandestine CIA media infiltration campaign launched in 1948 called Operation Mockingbird.^18,19 About one-third of the CIA budget, or $1 billion each year, was spent on bribes to hundreds of American journalists, who then published fake stories at the CIA’s request.

While it may sound like ancient history, there’s evidence to suggest it continues today. Although the messages have changed with the times, the basic modus operandi of dissemination remains the same. Other reports^20,21,22 have also highlighted the role of intelligence agencies in the global effort to eliminate “anti-vaccine propaganda” from public discussion, and the fact that they’re using sophisticated cyberwarfare tools to do so.

Facts Reveal Reason Government Is Paying News Media

All-cause mortality and death rates are difficult statistics to change. People are either dead or they’re not. There is only one reason a person is included in the National Death Index Database: They have died regardless of the cause. Evidence is mounting that all-cause mortality is rising to levels greater than were seen during 2020 at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.

OneAmerica,²³ a mutual insurance holding company, announced the death rate in working-age Americans from 18 to 64 years in the third quarter of 2021 was 40% higher than prepandemic levels. Other insurance companies are also finding similar results and citing higher mortality rates.²⁴

The Hartford Insurance Company announced mortality had increased 32% from 2019 and 20% from 2020 during 2021. Lincoln National also reported claims increased by 13.7% year-over-year and were 54% higher in the fourth quarter compared to 2019. Funeral homes are posting an increase in burials and cremations in 2021 over 2020.²⁵

The overall mortality increase noted after the global release of the COVID shot is also being reported in other countries. A large German health insurance company reported their data^26,27 were nearly 14 times greater than the number of deaths reported by the German government. The health insurance company gathered the data directly from doctors who were applying for payment from a sample of 10.9 million people.

A reporter from The Exposé²⁸ notes that while the world has been distracted by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the U.K. government quietly released a report²⁹ that confirmed 9 in every 10 deaths from COVID-19 in England were in people who were fully vaccinated.

Each week the U.K. Health Security Agency publishes a surveillance report. The February 24, 2022, report shows 85% to 91% of adults who are infected, hospitalized or died from COVID-19 were fully vaccinated.

Pfizer Documents Show Vaccines Not Fully Safe

Four days after the FDA approved the Pfizer vaccine for ages 16 and older, a group of public health professionals, doctors, scientists and journalists submitted a FOIA request to release the data Pfizer used for the approval of Comirnaty.³⁰ The nonprofit group of professionals is called the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency (PHMPT).³¹

Despite the FDA’s claim that the organization was committed to transparency,³² the agency first requested 55 years³³ to release the data that supported the approval of Comirnaty after the FOIA was filed, and then asked for another 20 years to fully comply.³⁴ All told, the FDA wanted 75 years to release documentation that supported their approval of a genetic therapy being promoted for mass vaccination.

When the FDA did not release the data, the PHMPT sued the FDA since it is the FDA’s statutory obligation³⁵ to publish the documentation within 30 days of approving a drug. Although they asked for 75 years, January 6, 2022, the court ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages of the documents each month so they would be completed within 8 months.³⁶

March 1, 2022, the first of those documents were released and have been posted for public view on the PMHPT website.³⁷ What’s included in these documents may answer the question of why the government felt $1 billion was required to boost vaccine confidence.

An initial review of some of the papers by one Trial Site News reporter revealed many errors and anomalies. In an interview with Stephen Bannon, mRNA technology inventor Dr. Robert Malone talked about the documentation and the need to develop a team to comb through the information and catalog it for reference. He said:³⁸

“So, all this information comes piped through pharmacovigilance what’s called the pharmacovigilance shop at Pfizer and BioNTech. I presume Pfizer. And then that’s been summarized and submitted to the FDA as a series of documents. So this is a window into what FDA actually knows, which is by inference what CDC knows.

When they tell us there’s no risks and we should go ahead and start mandating or forcing vaccination on our children, what we have for instance, in that section you’re referring to of the listed adverse events is a huge list of what is considered to be adverse events of interest, which means that they’re not just one-offs.

It happens multiple times throughout the world and what we’re finding is embedded throughout this huge volume of documents that the judge has forced Pfizer and the FDA … remember our government tried really hard to keep this information from us and fortunately the courts have called their bluff and forced them to disclose it. Now it’s up to us to comb through it.”

Malone went on to describe the trouble that will likely arise in the coming weeks and months for Pfizer and the FDA from the information that is now freely available to the public when Bannon asked, why is it so important that the courts demanded the information be released now?

“The courts have forced Pfizer and the FDA to comply with the law which is that after licensure is granted these documents must be made available. Previously they’re considered confidential.

And remember that as Naomi’s [Naomi Wolfe] about to discuss, and the truckers are so upset about, we have been forced to take these vaccines and we have been told that they’re fully safe and effective. What this documents is the government has been well aware that they are not fully safe and has hidden this information from us.

What that really matters for Pfizer is that the indemnification clauses require Pfizer disclose known adverse events and this documentation demonstrates they didn’t do so. A lot of the lawyers are licking their chops over this because it seems to indicate a break in the veil that may allow legal action basically due to fraud and concealment of these risks from the general public.

This is why you have not been able to have full informed consent, is they’ve hidden all this information from you and they’ve used all the propaganda and censorship tools — which you’re about to cover — and paid media, to keep all this information from you and spin it, so that you think the left is right and the down is the up and the moon is made of green cheese.”

Source & References

• ^1, 8 TheBlaze, March 3, 2022
• ² Health and Human Services, We Can Do This
• ^3, 4 TheBlaze, March 3, 2022, Para 1, 2
• ⁵ YouTube, April 29, 2020
• ⁶ Fox News, November 28, 2021
• ⁷ National Review, November 29, 2021
• ⁹ BuzzFeed, October 20, 2021
• ¹⁰ Los Angeles Times, May 17, 2021
• ¹¹ Washington Post, April 22, 2021
• ¹² Newsmax, November 7, 2021
• ^13, 14 MintPress News November 15, 2021
• ¹⁵ GatesFoundation, January 2010
• ¹⁶ Center for Health Security, Event 201
• ¹⁷ The GrayZone February 20, 2021
• ¹⁸ SGT Report October 7, 2019
• ¹⁹ ATI March 12, 2018
• ²⁰ The Times November 9, 2020
• ²¹ UK Defense Journal November 10, 2020
• ²² The National News November 9, 2020
• ²³ The Center Square, January 1, 2022
• ^24, 25 Zero Hedge, February 5, 2022
• ²⁶ Health Impact News, February 23, 2022
• ²⁷ Greater Mountain Publishing, February 27, 2022
• ²⁸ The Exposé, March 1, 2022
• ²⁹ UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) Covid-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report, February 24, 2022
• ^30, 31 Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency
• ³² Food and Drug Administration, November 17, 2020
• ³³ MSN, November 19, 2021
• ³⁴ Euro Weekly December 9, 2021
• ³⁵ SOPP 8401.7: Action Package for Posting December 11, 2020, page 1, III
• ³⁶ Trial Site News, March 7, 2022
• ³⁷ PMHPT, Pfizer Documents
• ³⁸ Rumble, March 5, 2022 Minute 3:19 and 5:20

The above blog post is sourced from this Daily Expose article: https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/03/26/us-gov-1-billion-to-falsely-promote-covid-vaccine/

Follow HopeGirl on:
Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/
Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl
Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587
EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com
QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com
Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post US Government gave $1billion of Tax Payers Money to the Mainstream Media to falsely promote Covid-19 Vaccines appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

The post 16 Signs That You’re A Slave To The Matrix appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.