Report warns WHO pandemic treaty may hardwire Covid-era tactics into future responses.

A report involving a former WHO scientist warns the UK could be drawn back into lockdowns, mandates, and mass vaccination campaigns under a proposed WHO pandemic treaty.

Critics argue expanded surveillance systems and rapid-response funding could incentivize the same Covid-era playbook in future crises.

They warn this may normalize emergency-style restrictions, raising concerns about how much autonomy governments will retain when the next global health threat is declared.

By Niamh Harris April 27, 2026

A former lead scientist at the World Health Organization has warned that a new WHO agreement on how countries respond to pandemics will lead to repeated lock down-style restrictions.

His warning comes as the WHO prepares for talks in Geneva on Monday to finalize a sweeping pandemic treaty that aims to cover surveillance systems, pathogen sharing and rapid vaccine rollout targets.

Dr David Bell, a former WHO scientific officer and lead author of a new report, said the system could steer the UK and other countries back toward Covid-era measures. These include school and business closures, mask mandates, quarantines and large-scale vaccination campaigns—steps that were not part of standard pandemic planning before 2020.

MSN reports: He said: “It is inevitable that we will end up in repeated lockdowns because of how the system is set up.”

Dr Bell warned that the increased WHO funding, which is specifically earmarked for expanded pandemic threat surveillance and rapid-response triggers could escalate potential threats more quickly into full-scale interventions.

The UK is one of the largest contributors to the WHO, committing hundreds of millions through direct funding and international partnerships. The authors of the report say that means British taxpayers are helping fund a pandemic response they may later be subjected to again.

They are calling for the WHO completely overhauled or “replaced by an organisation better able to serve country needs.”.

Their new report – by the International Health Reform Project – calls for reform of the WHO, arguing it is too heavily tied to pandemic threat response programmes such as vaccines and diagnostics, shaped by a relatively small group of powerful public, private and public-private funders.

The report highlights how large-scale contributions to the WHO are frequently channelled into targeted initiatives – particularly vaccines, diagnostics and surveillance systems – with a significant proportion of funding earmarked for specific objectives rather than broader health needs which could save more lives.

Critics say this concentration of funding risks aligning global health priorities with the interests and models of its major funding partners, rather than broader health outcomes – and could also mean threats are identified and acted on more quickly through expanded surveillance systems.

Dr Bell, former director of the Bill Gates funded development laboratory- the Global Good Fund, said: “The British taxpayer is funding a system that is looking for theoretical threats that will then be used to justify locking them down and making them pay for vaccines.”

He added: “It would be better that they put more money into the NHS.”

Co-author Professor Garrett Wallace Brown, a current WHO advisor and global public health expert at Leeds University, said funding flows are shaping global health priorities.

He said: “These large sums of money from private organisations and from government organisations have skewed the agenda.”

He added: “If you’re pumping in the largest donations to technical solutions, surveillance and vaccines it is inevitable you will have little choice but to do what is specified for it. It’s basic economics.”

They say this creates a system where what gets funded – and what produces measurable results – increasingly drives decision-making, rather than what delivers the greatest overall health impact.

Source: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/warning-uk-could-face-repeat-lockdowns

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

HopeGirl Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@hopegirlblog
HopeGirl Telegram Channel Chat and Groups: https://t.me/Hopegirl587 
Get Our Free EMF Survival Guide : https://bit.ly/FTWEMF
10 Percent Off our EMF Protection Products with this Link: https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/tenoff

The post WARNING: UK Could Face Repeat Lockdowns Using the Same Pandemic Playbook appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

The world is experiencing the start of a new lockdown – this time related to energy use with the International Energy Agency (“IEA”) playing a key role, similar to the role the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) played during the covid-19 pandemic.

“Energy lockdown” refers to government-enforced or encouraged measures to reduce fuel, gas and electricity consumption in response to “global supply shocks.”  The “energy lockdown” trend has gained momentum this month following the closure of the Strait of Hormuz due to the US-Israel-Iran conflict.

Is it just a coincidence that “energy lockdowns” will achieve what Globalists have been aiming for, for years?

As we read the Brownstone Institute’s article below, let’s recall that Globalists, who sometimes refer to themselves as internationalists, and their puppets have long been hoping to implement climate lockdowns:

• Government report released in 2019 proves Lockdown was implemented to meet ‘Zero Carbon Targets’ enshrined in law, not because of Covid-19, 8 July 2021
• International Energy Agency demands Worldwide Lockdowns to meet Climate Goals, 2 May 2022
• Top 10 Most Dystopian Things Pushed by the World Economic Forum: No.4 Praising Massive Lockdowns, 14 June 2022
• UK local governments are declaring a “climate emergency” and forming committees to implement dystopian plans, 11 June 2023
• By 2030 you will not eat meat and you will be allowed only three items of new clothing a year, report says, 18 June 2023
• IMF calls for restrictions on economic activity that far exceed covid lockdowns to avoid a “climate disaster”, 27 November 2024

Energy Lockdown: The Drumbeat Begins

By Brownstone Institute, 25 March 2026

You recall how the covid lockdowns began. It was a soft and slow drumbeat that began in late January 2020, with growing amounts of panic and a faster tempo, increasing for several weeks. The US President and the UK Prime Minister resisted extreme reactions. Most governments did and so did most public health authorities.

The drum pounding became earsplitting in late February. Faced with an incredible barrage, finally Boris Johnson and Donald Trump gave in. They got out in front of the problem and lowered the boom: stay home, essential/unessential, no flights, no parties, stop your consumerist ways. Just sit alone and be sad. Both came to regret this choice, but by then, others were in charge. 

The experts and institutions were everywhere, seizing the moment. The CCP, WHO, CDC, Imperial College London, Fauci, Birx, CNN/New York Times/MSNBC, and on it went, everyone telling us the same thing daily. Those who asked questions were shouted down, shamed, throttled, cancelled, deleted. It felt like we were surrounded on all sides by lies and liars, marionettes and mushbrains, sycophants and spooks. 

Six years later and nearly to the day, this new attempted lockdown seems to be going the same way, not concerning infectious disease but energy use. Isn’t it remarkable how the officially recommended methods of managing these completely different realms bear so much in common? They both come down to restricting your liberty, rationing your consumption, redirecting your attention and shouting down critics. 

The Iran War kicked off the price spike but it was uncanny how a machinery was so quickly put in place to instruct everyone on what to do. The panic about how to respond is intensifying. The crisis is without precedent, they say. We have to try new approaches, dramatic ones. 

Suddenly, this institution called the International Energy Agency holds new prominence in the world media. Founded in 1974, it’s an NGO associated with OPEC. It has no hard but only soft power – like the World Health Organisation, with whom the IEA shares a similarly authoritative branding. 

There is a new Fauci, too. The head of the IEA is the highly decorated and universally praised Dr. Fatih Birol. Though he has never worked in industry, any more than Fauci had seen patients in decades, Dr. Birol is said to be the world’s top expert and works closely with China on its supposed “energy transition.” Indeed, sporting an honorary doctorate from Imperial College London, he has been a member of the Chinese Academy of Engineering since 2013. 

Concerning the release of new energy reserves, Birol is nonplussed: “supply-side measures alone cannot fully offset the scale of the disruption.”

Remarkable, isn’t it? New script, same play, new actors for the same roles, overlapping protocols, nearly identical tempo of acceleration and dynamic of acoustics in the media. Around the world, countries are imposing price caps, consumption rationing, indoor temperature controls and shorter work weeks as a prelude to full-on stay home orders. They haven’t come to the US yet but they are spreading in Europe and the UK, as people panic about prices. 

Clearly, they say, we need to flatten the curve once again. Temporarily. Just until we get the problem under control. We just need to buy time. After all, we’ve never dealt with anything like this. Clearly, the long-term solution, they say, is a full switch to “renewables” but that cannot happen all at once.  

Inspired by the manner in which governments were able to control communication and people during the covid crisis, the IEA advises the following:

1. Work from home where possible. We’ll be back to languishing at home and consuming entertainment through laptops. IEA comments: “Displaces oil use from commuting, particularly where jobs are suitable for remote work.”

2. Reduce highway speed limits by at least 10 km/h ( 6-7 miles per hour), which is really nothing more than a method of creating annoyance. The IEA says “lower speeds reduce fuel use for passenger cars, vans and trucks,” but that is not always true. Slower traffic that disrupts flows creates more stop/start situations that cause more gas consumption. 

3. Encourage public transport. That exhortation has been the prattle of planners for half a century. Not everyone can do this, of course, and a mandate like that will cause many just to stay home. In this case, IEA is probably correct: “A shift from private cars to buses and trains can quickly reduce oil demand.” 

4. Alternate private car access to roads in large cities on different days. Now we are getting somewhere: imposed rationing allocated by arbitrary conditions. It would require a massive policing effort, one that is without precedent. IEA comments: “Number-plate rotation schemes can reduce congestion and fuel-intensive driving.”

5. Increase car sharing and adopt efficient driving practices. This is easily done in the same way police enforce HOV lanes. You cannot drive alone. You must have other passengers if you are going to be out on the road. IEA comments: “Higher car occupancy and eco-driving can lower fuel consumption quickly.”

6. Efficient driving for road commercial vehicles and delivery of goods. That’s it: the old essential/nonessential divide. Commercial deliveries are allowed because we have to live somehow but driving to the park for a picnic or visiting friends and families is not. 

7. Divert LPG [Liquefied Petroleum Gas] use from transport. Preserve propane for “essential needs.”

8. Avoid air travel where alternative options exist. This is already happening by default. Flight bookings have doubled in price. Airport security lines were running 4 hours until Donald Trump intervened. People miss flights or simply bail out and go home. IEA comments: “Reducing business flights can quickly ease pressure on jet fuel markets.”

9. Where possible, switch to other modern cooking solutions. Earlier, we saw a demand to save propane for cooking but here we see that this is not recommended either. We are supposed to switch to electric appliances. IEA comments: “Encouraging electric cooking and other modern options can reduce reliance on LPG.”

10. Leverage flexibility with petrochemical feedstocks and implement short-term efficiency and maintenance measures. This advice is directed toward energy plants to switch from one source to another to conserve oil. This suggestion reaches deep into industrial planning and would require draconian enforcement. 

There are features of this plan that surely remind you of what we went through just a few years ago with covid. 

Most people today have never heard of the IEA but the same was true of the WHO just six years ago, until it became a controlling force in our lives. At one point, internet censorship was so intense that YouTube announced that it would not permit any video that contradicted the advice of the WHO. That really happened. The same could happen here as well. Only IEA-approved posts on social media, for example. 

None of these measures will reduce the price of oil, gas, or anything else. What you don’t consume, someone else will. This is the whole point of rationing: to make sure that resources flow to uses deemed essential and away from those deemed unessential. 

Notice too how Trump himself was used in this operation in the same way he was in 2020: told that he has the perspicacity and power to do what no man has done before, he leapt into war with Iran, assured that it would be over quickly. Now we find out that the now-dead religious leader was a figurehead. Iran’s deep state is as large or larger than the US’s, and it had long prepared survival contingencies, including the closing of the Strait of Hormuz. 

To be sure, all this could end in a matter of days or weeks. If peace dawns in the Middle East, the Strait of Hormuz is opened and refining capacity grows, the price will fall. The Transportation Safety Authority could come back to work and the lines fall. Or perhaps Iran implausibly capitulates and begs for mercy. Normalcy would return. Prices go way down. 

Or maybe no one can stop this, just as when the covid caper spread to 194 locked-down nations and elected leaders had no power to stop it. Deeper, larger forces were at work that made entering hell look and feel inevitable. 

We seem to be headed into another lockdown situation under different excuses, a different goal, but the same methods and protocols. People must suffer so that elite powers can have a free hand in redesigning global functioning to keep us safe, keep us fed, and keep us warm. After all, the CCP for whom Dr. Birol has long consulted – and Imperial College London that showered him with emoluments – points the way. 

This is also six years later. We know the game. Millions do. The courts have ruled against the censorship. Few authors are willing to step forward to defend the covid period. The perpetrators are in hiding. The level of resistance is much more intense than it once was and we have many new institutions that reflect the learning that took place, preeminently Brownstone Institute. 

But should new lockdowns hit, don’t forget to wash your hands, wear your mask, and accept your jab. Whoops, we mean: minimise your gas consumption, use your microwave (not your gas stove), regard yourself as essential or unessential, and take no unessential trips. Even if they don’t manage to pull it off this time, we know the game. 

Source: https://theexposenews.com/2026/03/31/energy-lockdowns-begin/

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

HopeGirl Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@hopegirlblog
HopeGirl Telegram Channel Chat and Groups: https://t.me/Hopegirl587 
Get Our Free EMF Survival Guide : https://bit.ly/FTWEMF
10 Percent Off our EMF Protection Products with this Link: https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/tenoff

The post Energy lockdowns begin appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Josh Sigurdson reports on the international push for energy lockdowns, something we’ve been warning of for many years as the Strait of Hormuz continues to be shuttered, the Marines prepare for troop deployment in Iran and priced skyrocket.

Governments are bringing in rations worldwide as watchdog groups call for full fledged energy lockdowns. This means not being able to fly, drive, access your money or buy food.

From Asia to Europe, from Australian shortages to US, Canadian and British mandates, the situation is escalating fast.

Governments tend to target energy infrastructure in war and when the war is on humanity’s independence itself, expect the same. Order out of chaos. Problem, reaction, solution, repeat.

With the digital ration system already in place with things like the UN’s Pact For The Future which 193 countries signed onto in 2024 and blackouts scheduled for Earth Hour in the UK with laws to be reached by 2029 with the ban of beef and lamb as well as bans on air travel, it isn’t rocket science that this is a manufactured crisis using emergencies like the Iran War to achieve.

Cuba’s power grid is down. Another example. Oil is being withheld from multiple nations. Tankers being seized.

Meanwhile as we’ve warned, power is shifting from the west to the east in the WEF’s reset as Russia’s oil and has revenue doubles in a month and many countries are turning to the Chinese Yuan over the dollar for banking.

Pakistan has also made major deals with Iran this week, allowing some of their tankers through the Strait of Hormuz.

If this isn’t an emergency situation, what is? Most are completely dependent on grocery stores, banks and fuel. They all go together. Australia has lineups of trucks unable to move because of diesel shortages as gas stations shut off pumps. This is a warning.

Source: https://rumble.com/v77raty-emergency-energy-lockdowns-and-iran-war-domino-effect-cripples-fuel-and-foo.html?e9s=src_v1_mfp

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post EMERGENCY: ENERGY LOCKDOWNS & IRAN WAR! – Domino Effect Cripples Fuel & Food Supply! appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Clayton Morris explores the escalating global energy crisis as world leaders warn of incoming restrictions that could surpass the impact of previous lockdowns. This report breaks down the geopolitical tensions and economic implications of a shifting energy landscape that the mainstream media often ignores. Join Redacted for an in-depth analysis of these developing mandates and what they mean for your personal and financial freedom.

Source: https://rumble.com/v77o92o-energy-lockdowns-are-here-putin-says-worse-than-covid-redacted-w-clayton-mo.html

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Energy Lockdowns are Here, Putin Says “Worse than Covid” | Redacted w Clayton Morris appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Florida Senate has passed a crucial medical freedom bill for all vaccines, multiple countries have entered wartime energy lockdowns and rationing, and several Trump admin officials have been moved to military bases as rumors swirl of what comes next.

Source: https://rumble.com/v76z6x2-wartime-energy-lockdowns-commence-multiple-nations-in-crisis-daily-pulse-ep.html

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Wartime Energy Lockdowns Commence, Multiple Nations in Crisis | Daily Pulse Ep 214 appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Researchers have warned that millions of children around the globe now have ‘permanent brain damage’ as a result of the harsh lockdowns inflicted during the pandemic.

A new study led by the University of East Anglia highlights the severe cognitive impairment on children aged four to five, when the first lockdowns hit in March 2020—a critical stage for learning to socialize, follow routines, and navigate classroom life. Instead, millions of youngsters were trapped at home, subjected to online “learning” or parental teaching amid widespread government mandates.

Modernity.news reports: These children, now around 10 to 11 in their final year of primary school, showed less growth in self-regulatory and cognitive flexibility scores over time compared to a group who were in preschool during the initial outbreak, according to the research published in the journal Child Development.

Researchers from the University of East Anglia, along with some from Lancaster University, and Durham University tracked 139 children aged between two-and-a-half and six-and-a-half over several years, with baseline data from before Covid allowing precise measurement of how development stalled.

Using the Minnesota Executive Function Scale, they assessed cognitive skills at regular intervals. Lead researcher Prof John Spencer from UEA’s School of Psychology said: “Children who were in reception when the country shut down showed much slower growth in key self-regulation and cognitive flexibility skills over the next few years than children who were still in preschool.”

“Reception is a critical year for peer socialisation. It’s when children learn classroom norms and build early friendships that shape their confidence,” Spencer added.

For this cohort starting school in 2020, classrooms shuttered, routines collapsed, and social interactions were severely restricted under heavy-handed policies. “Without these experiences, children’s self-regulatory skills didn’t develop as quickly year-on-year after the lockdowns ended,” Spencer further noted.

Many in this group also suffered repeated Covid infections, potentially compounding the damage from isolation. “Our findings suggest that peer socialisation and the new self–regulatory skills children must master in reception might be particularly critical for the development of executive function skills,” the researchers stated.

“Without these experiences, reception children had a challenging time developing self–regulation and cognitive flexibility in the years that followed the pandemic,” the study adds.

The research underscores how top-down government interventions disrupted natural childhood milestones, with effects lingering years later. It calls for more support from teachers, schools, and health services for this affected generation, while raising red flags about safeguarding kids in future “emergencies.”

A 2023 report by Speech and Language UK revealed the average child missed 84 school days due to Covid policies. Eight in ten teachers reported worsened pupil inattention post-pandemic, blaming screen-based “learning” and stunted social skills.

Teachers have also noted rises in needless chatter, shouting, and inappropriate laughing, with the “ever-swiping nature” of social media like TikTok worsening the fallout.

Previous research showed teenage girls’ brains aged prematurely by up to four years during lockdowns, with boys affected by one-and-a-half years—linked to social restrictions hitting girls harder.

University of Washington researchers compared MRI scans from 2018 to post-pandemic ones in 2021-2022, finding accelerated cortical thinning, a natural process tied to anxiety, stress, and higher disorder risks. Whether this is permanent remains unclear, but it spotlights the unseen toll of isolating youth.

This latest warning adds to a mountain of evidence exposing lockdowns as a disastrous overreach that prioritized control over common sense, devastating children’s futures.

A previous study highlighted how lockdowns drove 60,000 children in the UK to clinical depression, with the enforced isolation sparking widespread mental health crises among youth that required professional intervention.

Another investigation revealed that babies born during lockdown were less likely to speak before their first birthday, as the lack of face-to-face interactions and exposure to facial expressions hindered early language acquisition.

A further study found many children unable to say their own name due to the impact of lockdown, pointing to profound speech and developmental delays from limited social engagement.

Research also uncovered that children were suffering from as many as three different viruses simultaneously due to weakened immunity caused by lockdown, since prolonged indoor confinement prevented the natural building of defenses against common pathogens.

In addition, an outbreak of hepatitis in children was directly attributed to lockdowns that weakened immunity, resulting in unexpected surges of the liver condition among previously healthy kids.

Doctors also raised alarms over a mysterious outbreak of brain infections in Nevada kids, believing it was linked to COVID lockdowns that left children’s immune systems vulnerable and unprepared for routine exposures.

Disturbing lockdown drawings also illustrated the severe effect on children’s mental health, where artwork captured the trauma, fear, and emotional distress from being cut off from normal life.

These findings, among others like excess deaths and ignored warnings, paint a picture of policy failure. Lockdown zealots dismissed the collateral damage, but the data doesn’t lie—government mandates crushed freedom and futures alike.

Never again should bureaucrats be allowed to play god with our kids’ lives. Prioritizing liberty and evidence over fear is the only way to protect the next generation from such needless harm.

Source: https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/study-covid-lockdowns-gave-millions-of-children-permanent-brain-damage/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Study: COVID Lockdowns Gave Millions of Children ‘Permanent Brain Damage’ appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Due to the infrastructure being implemented under the digital ID framework in Australia, the next pandemic will not likely result in long-term large-scale lockdowns, but rather targeted surveillance, lockdowns and compliance orders.

A report funded by “philanthropic” foundations outlined the future pandemic responses in Australia, with recommendations for real-time data collection, setting up an Australian Centre for Disease Control and government decision-making through data usage. The aim is to have a well-coordinated response to future pandemics, with a focus on targeted surveillance, data sharing and compliance directives.

Additionally, Social Impact Investing through ESG scoring is shaping the narrative and agenda around how businesses deal with pandemics, with a focus on equity and inclusion.

All indications are that the future response to pandemics in Australia will involve targeted surveillance, rapid testing and compliance with vaccine mandates, all driven by technology such as digital IDs. The overall goal is to create a seamless, individualised approach to pandemic management, which could have implications for democracy and public pushback.

What is Planned When the Next Pandemic is Announced?

By Kate Mason

I came across a Facebook post where people were discussing whether there will be future pandemic lockdowns. People’s views primarily were that in the case of a full-scale lockdown, they would not comply and that the government would not try a full-scale lockdown again due to the large amount of people who protested about the government covid-19 measures in 2021-2022.

I don’t think there will be long-term large-scale lockdowns in the future. If there are, they will only be in place for a short time. I say this as the infrastructure for surveillance is being implemented under the digital ID framework – as well as other government measures, bodies and legislation introduced over the last few years – allowing for targeted surveillance, lockdowns and compliance orders.

Surveillance, targeted lockdowns and compliance orders are discussed in these excerpts with World Health Organisation (“WHO”) representatives (full video HERE) [Note: we were unable to upload the 4-minute clip included in Mason’s article, so we have embedded the video below to begin with the first part of Mason’s clip]:

Professor Mukesh Kapila, former Director of Emergencies at the WHO, states clearly that border closures and panicked strategies should not be implemented again, and that the covid measures created as many issues as they were tasked to solve. The answer is clearly targeted lockdowns for those who have a virus and those who are in contact (indicating strong surveillance measures), targeted early intervention mRNA injections (the number of people injected will expand as the virus circulates), and this links into a digital ID system.

I discuss the next advancement of Australia’s (mandatory) digital ID – TEx (as announced by Bill Shorten recently) in an interview with Reality Check Radio, and I discuss why I think lockdowns will be targeted:

The link to a more comprehensive look at the Digital Identity Trust Exchange (“TEx”) announcement is found HERE.

Fault Lines Report

The plan for Australia’s future pandemic responses were set out in an “independent” report released in October 2022, ‘Fault lines: an independent review into Australia’s response to covid-19’. The report was funded by Social Impact “Philanthropists”: John & Myriam Wylie Foundation, the Minderoo Foundation and the Paul Ramsay Foundation.

John and Myriam Wylie own the investment platform Tanarra. An investment firm with $3 billion under management. Tannara is heavily invested in surveillance technologies.

Minderoo is Andrew and Nicola Forrests’ philanthropic entity, heavily invested in Social Impact Bonds.

Paul Ramsay Foundation is a Social Impact Bond company. I specifically discuss the Paul Ramsay Foundation HERE.

On the surface, the Fault Lines report (if you didn’t read it) looked good:

The Fault Lines report asserted that the Australian government had been heavy-handed in its response to covid, and this created further societal inequity i.e. anyone who was vulnerable became more vulnerable. For example, there were serious repercussions for children’s learning, domestic violence, people’s socio-economic status and mental health etc.

People who had fought against government covid overreach were celebrating the release of the Fault Lines report. But, what’s important to understand is that the harms caused by a government policy are then used to justify an even more nefarious solution, which is what the Fault Lines report proposes. I read the Fault Lines report at the time and was horrified, so I put out a video:

I want to put the Fault Lines report back on people’s radar. Specifically regarding lockdowns, what the future vision is for pandemics and how this marries into digital ID. Forewarned is forearmed.

The Fault Lines report finishes off with the vision of how they want future pandemics dealt with. The report assures us that pandemics will become more frequent and therefore there needs to be a well-oiled machine in place so disruptions are limited.

The Vision For Future Pandemic Policies

The Fault Lines report puts on the agenda:

• Real-time data on travel, health, customer spending and location. This implies a digital ID is in place.
• Harmonised systems – meaning large-scale lockdowns will be temporary, at most.
• An Australian Centre for Disease Control.
• Establish an inter-jurisdictional Public Service Centre of Excellence.
• Establish a panel of multidisciplinary experts and representatives to advise governments and the National Cabinet during health crises.
• People affected will receive immediate payments (this will be based on compliance).
• People who come or return from overseas are quarantined.
• Strong tracking, tracing, testing and quarantine methods are already in place – targeted lockdowns occur.
• Streamlined “health” messaging will be broadcast. All government agencies, private sector and non-governmental organisations (“NGOs”) in lockstep. People from multicultural backgrounds will be targeted in their homeland language.
• The system will be so seamless that individuals will be compelled to comply or … ?? This is not spelt out.

If the report is correct, when the next “pandemic” arrives it will not be a messy, noisy, ad hoc, confusing, tumultuous endeavour. It will be streamlined, meaning all aspects of the management of people will be in sync and justified through data. People will be managed with technocratic efficiency. This has implications for democracy and public pushback.

The ACDCP referred to below is the Australian Centre for Disease Control and Prevention.

The National Cabinet was formed in 2020 for the Government’s Covid response. They have not disbanded and address a number of portfolios, as found HERE.

Tracking and Tracing of People

My bet is that when the next pandemic hits Australia, the Government’s recently announced Trust Exchange (TEx) digital ID system will become compulsory to purchase goods, services, and to be able to work and access government services.

Mass scale lockdowns do not need to occur if you have contact tracing, ready-to-go vaccines and clear communication strategies in place:

Fault Lines Report Recommendations

Recommendation 1 – Strengthen Crisis Preparation, Planning and Testing

Firstly, the report calls for widening what can be defined as a pandemic:

The Government’s approach to the future pandemic must be thoroughly practised prior, involving many stakeholders – government, business, police, NGOs etc:

Supply chains must be involved in the plans, this includes medical equipment but would also include food. Hence, the tracking and tracing of our food systems which is being implemented (climate change and sustainability are other justifications used for food tracing):

Ministers from different States and Territories will be in lockstep:

Emergency legislative frameworks need to be ironed out:

The Victorian legislation referred to is the controversial Public Health and Wellbeing Amendment (Pandemic Management) Bill 2021:

Targeted lockdowns will occur, and employers will have legal obligations to fulfil regarding vaccine mandates, testing and other compliance directives:

Recommendation 2 – Establish an Expert Body and Trusted Voice on Public Health

Create an Australian Centre for Disease Control and Prevention:

The Centre for Disease Control and Prevention coordinates the surveillance, tracking, data collation and analysis:

The ACDCP links into States and Territories:

The ACDCP advises the AHPPC:

The AHPPC is the Chief Medical Officer and the States and Territories Chief Health Officers:

The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (“CSIRO”) is mentioned:

HERE is the CSIRO ‘Strengthening Australia’s Pandemic Preparedness’, with a focus on vaccines and testing:

The Government is currently in the process of establishing an Australian Centre for Disease Control:

Recommendation 3- Improve Government Decision-Making Through Broader Advice and Greater Transparency

A panel of non-medical experts will be chosen to inform the Government on pandemic policies. The issue with this is that the chosen panellists will not question the overall pandemic narrative and medical interventions:

Recommendation 4 – Finance Public Service Collaboration, Capability and Communication

The Australian Public Sector is in the process of being reformed:

What this means is that the Government’s role is one of data collection, curation and implementation of solutions based on the data. This links inextricably into smart technology or cities and how people are monitored through digitalised tools:

Targeted messaging – the government faced issues with an inability to capture culturally and linguistically diverse (“CALD”) communities within Australia. Instead of listening to the Australian government, they were listening to in language commentary from their home countries. According to Fault Lines, this led to the CALD communities being “misinformed” as well as being targeted by nefarious actors spreading “misinformation.” The government must correct this:

After all, it doesn’t look democratic when the Government targets highly multicultural areas by sending in the army to enforce covid policies:

The areas in Sydney which were targeted as “areas for concern” during 2022 were all highly multicultural. People who lived in these areas were unable to leave their local government area:

Recommendation 5 – Modernise How Governments Use Data

Data will be made more freely available, under the pretence of “strengthening data.” Data on people is to be shared and must be the default position:

Regarding the Google and Apple partnership with the Australian government, the Application Programme Interface uses Bluetooth to create a log of other devices that come into close range:

Data sharing is the default position:

The Data Availability and Transparency Act 2022 allows for public-sector data sharing that permits Australian Government (Commonwealth) bodies to share their data with other Commonwealth bodies, Australian state or territory government bodies, or Australian universities. Found HERE.

Data sharing was problematic during covid once people crossed over State and Territory boundaries. This must be streamlined:

The government is currently in the process of overhauling Australia’s Privacy Act:

As stated above the Government agrees that under rolling emergency declarations – health, climate, biosecurity, terrorism, cybersecurity – people’s rights to privacy protections are waived. The public’s right to give consent to their data being shared is waived for research that is in the “public interest.”

Recommendation 6 – An Independent Office of the Evaluator General

The government is in the process of creating an Australian Centre for Evaluation under the guise of “wellbeing”:

And:

What This Means

The government, since 2020, has been busy passing legislation, digital surveillance tools and overarching bodies to be able to implement targeted surveillance, data sharing, contract tracing and Australia-wide coordinated systems. This will allow for seamless individualised approaches to testing, quarantine and vaccine mandates for the next upcoming pandemic which hits Australian shores.

I believe the next pandemic approach will be similar to the biosecurity responses to pests, two examples are:

1. In 2022-2023 the NSW government started killing bees due to finding Varroa at a Sentinel hive (I researched and campaigned intensely on the government measures and the whole thing stunk to high heaven). It started with small red zones which was a 10 km zone drawn around anywhere a varroa mite was found, everyone in the red zone had to kill their bees. The red zones kept growing until 40,000,000 bees were killed, according to the DPI (however this number seems low). In the map below, the red zones are where bees are killed and purple zones are where bees are monitored.  This is an early map, many more areas were added, but it shows the approach.

2. The Queensland government is currently baiting (multiple times the same area) and showering chemicals from planes and drones over parts of Queensland to kill fire ants. The zone where this is occurring keeps growing (this is an old map but shows the approach):

In my view, the future approach to pandemics (Fault Lines report states they want the definition of pandemics to broaden) will look something like this:

• When someone is found to have a virus their movements, during an identified contagious time, will be accessed and all close contacts – sitting near someone on a train, for example – will be notified that they need to quarantine.
• Testing will be enforced on those in quarantine.
• A readily available mRNA injection will be delivered.
• The surrounding community will be under suveillance and monitored more closely.
• The virus, will of course spread, so the process will roll on incrementally.
• Those who are in initial quarantine will be injected and released if they comply.
• Those who don’t comply will not be able to access emergency payments or be released from house arrest (details will become clearer on this over time).
• Outside movement, whilst under quarantine orders, will be made difficult through digital surveillance.

There won’t be mass lockdowns, where too many of us are shut down and therefore start to band together and say “enough”! This is very important to consider in how the people can stand together in future years.

Just a little on Impact Markets

It’s relevant that the Fault Lines report was funded by Social Impact investors. Social Impact Investing links into environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) scoring. Dr Julianne Romanello states that the ESG-Social Impact Investing framework “entail[s] the power to shape and to control individual minds and to engineer society so to further benefit those who already lord over the people through finance and who have demonstrated no compunction about their use of deception and division.”

Minderoo and the Paul Ramsay Foundation are both members of the Global Impact Investing Network (“GIIN”). GIIN is the “global champion of impact investing, dedicated to increasing its scale and effectiveness around the world.”

The investments and returns will be funnelled through the ESG framework – environmental, social and governance.  Only companies that have a good ESG score will be able to survive. This means companies have to get on board the health and climate change mitigation agenda; the coerced genetically modified organisms, injections, synthetic biology, synthetic food, carbon tracking and tracing, genetically engineered “Climate Smart” seeds and plants, “renewables,” mass critical mineral mining, Managed Retreat, solar radiation modification etc, social giving (supporting the Social Impact Bond wellbeing-surveillance-interventions turning the welfare system into a for-profit market) and governance (how well is the company “looking after” people during pandemics – as one example) systems.

ESG and Social Impact investing is a key mechanism to create the global, centralised control infrastructure, which will be central to the One Health model and to contain everyone within the UN 17SDGs.

As found here:

And HERE, making very clear the way businesses deal with pandemics will determine whether they succeed or fail:

And here:

Put bluntly, ESG is the capture of the business world and finances into funding agendas. The United Nations Agenda 2030 to be exact.

The narrative states that covid created a fairer world where equity and inclusion – which means everyone vaccinated, and giving people money so they didn’t starve and become homeless whilst under house arrest i.e. lockdowns – trumped looking after the economy. In this new world order, where under rolling threats “no one is left behind,” those of us who would like them to leave us the hell alone have some serious upcoming challenges.

Oh, and in the equity and inclusion “Values Before Value” fairy dust spun over covid house arrests, coerced injections, police brutality, suspension of human rights and heavy surveillance they never factor in this reality:

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/09/01/australia-the-plan-for-future-pandemics/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Australia: The plan for future pandemics is not large-scale lockdowns but targeted, individualised surveillance, quarantines and mandates appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Trust the Evidence has started a list of people and institutions who pushed the harmful and destructive idea that you could “suppress” or “eradicate” SARS-CoV-2 using social measures, for example, “lockdowns.”

“Those listed below showed crass ignorance of respiratory viral epidemiology, and they are likely to approach other topics with the same facile attitude in the future,” Dr. Tom Jefferson and Professor Carl Heneghan said. 

“Some of them have since apologised, but most of them are carrying on, pretending nothing happened.”

‘You don’t copy the losers’; A provisional list of institutions and individuals who pushed “zero covid”

By Dr. Tom Jefferson and Professor Carl Heneghan

A partial list of institutions and individuals who pushed the pernicious idea that you could “suppress” or “eradicate” SARS-CoV-2 with social measures follows.

Some of them have since apologised, but most of them are carrying on, pretending nothing happened, all is sweetness and light, the birds are singing in the trees, pigs are flying, and hopefully, they think we will all forget what they instigated.

Listing on this post is not dictated by the fact that some of the names launched personal attacks on us; we are not the Count of Monte Cristo out for revenge.

We include the names because, despite their impressive credentials (in some cases), it was quite clear to us by 8 April 2020, that “zero covid” was pie in the sky – poisoned pie. You cannot suppress an endemic respiratory virus, at least not until you have understood its ecology and routes of transmission. Neither of these boxes has been ticked.

Read more: COVID-19 – The Tipping Point, The Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, 8 April 2020

The acceptance or pushing of this folly had two catastrophic consequences.

First, it gave backing to restrictions.

Second, some or most created a witch hunt climate in which few people felt like knuckling down and studying what was going on, thus missing the golden opportunities the situation presented to solve some of the riddles.

Third, those listed below showed crass ignorance of respiratory viral epidemiology and they are likely to approach other topics with the same facile attitude in the future: small hands, long tongue. So here we go in no particular order (with thanks to the source in brackets):

1. Deborah Birx from minute 7.25
2. The Australian government (Premier of Victoria Daniel Andrews).
3. Devi Sridhar and the Scottish government
4. Zero Covid (Stéphane Bilodeau, Dr. Malgorzata Gasperowicz, Karl Parkinson) Dr. Irfan Dhalla
5. Dr. Andrew Morris, author of the immortal quote: “You’re not going to be a winner if you follow the losers. You go and try and replicate, or at least figure out, what the winners do. And right now, we’re pursuing a losing strategy.”
6. Dr. Samir Sinha
7. Bill Gates
8. Attendees  of the conference for Zero Covid. Supporters of Covid Action UK, formerly known as Zero Covid UK.
9. UK Zero Covid conference attendees: Jeremy Corbyn MP, Diane Abbott MP and Jeremy Hunt MP
10. ‘Zero Covid’ Catastrophe: Participating Nations See New Records Across the Board, Jordan Schachtel, 16 July 2021, American Institute for Economic Research
11. America’s Coronavirus Endurance Test. To defeat the virus, we will have to start thinking in years, not months. Howard Markel, 6 August 2020, The New Yorker 
12. Anatomy of the Hong Kong Disaster. Ian Miller, 19 March 2022:  Brownstone Institute 
13. Inside Shanghai’s Zero Covid Camp, 7 April 7, 2022, Unherd
14. Coping With ‘Zero Covid’. Our correspondent takes you inside Shanghai’s Covid lockdown. Ian Prasad Philbrick, 19 May 2022, The New York Times 
15. Trudeau needs a Covid-19 Emergency Order. Here’s how to do it, Amir Attaran, 27 November 2020, Maclean’s.  Amir Attaran is a biomedical scientist, lawyer, and professor in the Faculty of Law and the School of Epidemiology and Public Health at the University of Ottawa. Macleans
16. Who Pushed for Lockdowns? 101 Leading Voices, Michael Senger, 15 April 2022, Brownstone Institute (see table below).

17. Scientific consensus on the COVID-19 pandemic: we need to act now. Published online 14 October 2020, The Lancet (see image below).

18. Signatories of the John Snow memorandum; “more than 6,900 scientists, researchers & healthcare professionals.”
19. Endorsers of the John Snow memorandum
20. Honourable mention to the All-Party Parliamentary Group (“APPG”) on Coronavirus, chaired by Member of Parliament Layla Moran.  A group that has now folded despite being well-funded.  [For a list of members see HERE and an archive of the website on the Wayback Machine HERE.] Conservative MP Dan Poulter, vice-chair of the APPG on coronavirus, said:

The OECD data is very concerning and helps show the danger of thinking that the coronavirus pandemic presents us with a binary choice between saving the economy or saving lives.

This is a false dichotomy, and the truth is that minimising community transmission will allow a faster and stronger economic recovery. This is why the APPG on coronavirus has been pushing government to aim to reduce Covid-19 transmission to as close to zero as possible in preparation for the difficult winter months ahead.

Saving lives or UK economy from Covid a ‘false choice’, MPs warn, The Guardian, 26 August 2020

21. Depressingly, even Sponge Bob pushed for lockdown.

If you have any additions to the list, Trust the Evidence welcomes them in the comments below their article HERE.

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Hall of Shame: A worldwide list of those who pushed for covid “lockdowns” appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Watch Dr. David Martin as he talks about Covid 2.0, Fires, False Flags, as well as some pointed advice to everyone who fears the Cabal that is the WEF and Deep State.

Source Link:  https://www.bitchute.com/video/PcqTIYNTP8Ri/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Dr. David Martin: DON’T FEAR the Coming Lockdowns… the Cabal is Already DEAD | Man In America appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Josh Sigurdson reports on the threats of further lockdowns as Britain is on lockdown alert over an “endemic” caused by mosquitoes. It just happens that vaccine mosquitoes were just released by Bill Gates.

Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever which government science shills claim kills 40% of people who get it and cannot be tested for properly is the latest fear monger campaign to bring in further lockdowns in Britain. At the same time fear is spreading in the US as “Norovirus” allegedly spreads on cruise ships.

The reality is that likely there are no real illnesses being “spread” outside of vaccine induced illnesses and this proves to be a good coverup for the deaths. All the same, there is no doubt that we are being poisoned in multiple ways every day as well.

The United Nations recently claimed they could take control measures over nearly all countries at the same time to force lockdowns over climatic events, pandemics, power grid failures and much more. Interesting that days after the UN makes such claims, there are threats of further lockdowns due to some “endemic” virus.

Source Link: https://www.bitchute.com/video/uyIVfo8PRxIr/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post BREAKING: NEW LOCKDOWNS IN THE UK? – Globalists Threaten New Virus Hoax! appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.