<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Johns Hopkins Archives - HopeGirl Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.hopegirlblog.com/tag/johns-hopkins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link></link>
	<description>EYES OPEN HANDS DIRTY</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 07:53:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">118317610</site>	<item>
		<title>Johns Hopkins Study of 1.9 Million Women Confirms Covid ‘Vaccines’ Depopulate</title>
		<link>https://www.hopegirlblog.com/2025/05/21/johns-hopkins-study-of-1-9-million-women-confirms-covid-vaccines-depopulate/</link>
					<comments>https://www.hopegirlblog.com/2025/05/21/johns-hopkins-study-of-1-9-million-women-confirms-covid-vaccines-depopulate/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hope]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 14:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[ALTERNATIVE NEWS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1.9]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confirms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[covid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depopulate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Johns Hopkins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[million]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vaccines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.hopegirlblog.com/?p=17829</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="158" src="https://www.hopegirlblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/pregnant-woman-covid-vaccine-birth-defects-300x158.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="pregnant-woman-covid-vaccine-birth-defects" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" /><p>A major new study from world-renowned scientists at Johns Hopkins University has confirmed that Covid “vaccines” are reducing human populations by lowering birth rates.</p>
<p>The peer-reviewed study, led by Dr. Kunchok Dorjee, is the most comprehensive evaluation to date of the association between Covid “vaccination” and reproductive disturbances.</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.hopegirlblog.com/2025/05/21/johns-hopkins-study-of-1-9-million-women-confirms-covid-vaccines-depopulate/">Johns Hopkins Study of 1.9 Million Women Confirms Covid ‘Vaccines’ Depopulate</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.hopegirlblog.com">HopeGirl Blog</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<img width="300" height="158" src="https://www.hopegirlblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/pregnant-woman-covid-vaccine-birth-defects-300x158.jpg" class="webfeedsFeaturedVisual wp-post-image" alt="pregnant-woman-covid-vaccine-birth-defects" style="display: block; margin: auto; margin-bottom: 5px;max-width: 100%;" link_thumbnail="" decoding="async" loading="lazy" /><p class="slay-news-content">A major new study from world-renowned scientists at Johns Hopkins University has confirmed that Covid “vaccines” are reducing human populations by lowering birth rates.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The peer-reviewed study, led by <a href="https://publichealth.jhu.edu/faculty/4319/kunchok-dorjee">Dr. Kunchok Dorjee</a>, is the most comprehensive evaluation to date of the association between Covid “vaccination” and reproductive disturbances.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The massive investigation included a staggering 1.9 million women from around the world.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The team of researchers analyzed 17 individual global studies related to birth rates and menstrual cycles among women who had received mRNA injections.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The study warns of “significant risks” to women’s fertility and birth rates following Covid “vaccination,” aligning with previous warnings of “<a href="https://dailyclout.io/wp-content/uploads/Final-OHIP-2015-2022-Diagnostic-Codes-Patient-Counts-Analysis-Pre-COVID-vs.-Vaccine-Years-with-2020-Excluded.pdf">reproductive destruction</a>” caused by the injections.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The findings of the study were <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320162">published</a> in PLOS ONE journal.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">During the study, the researchers reviewed literature from January 2021 to November 2023, across Medline, Embase, and Web of Science.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">They selected 17 studies meeting stringent inclusion criteria.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Outcomes assessed included changes in menstrual cycle length, heavier flow, intermenstrual bleeding, and post-menopausal bleeding.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">A fixed-effects meta-analysis was conducted with Shore’s adjusted confidence intervals to account for heterogeneity.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The study included a total of 1,911,755 participants, with 7 prospective cohorts, 4 retrospective cohorts, and 5 cross-sectional.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The “vaccine” brands included were Pfizer, Moderna, Janssen (J&amp;J), and AstraZeneca.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The women included in the study were mostly menstruating, non-pregnant, non-lactating women ages 18–50.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The researcher also included three studies involving post-menopausal women.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The study found a 19% higher relative risk of increased menstrual cycle length following Covid “vaccination” (standardized risk ratio [sRR]: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.11–1.26).</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">On average, the first vaccine dose was associated with a 0.34-day increase in cycle length.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The second dose is with a 0.62-day increase.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">However, this effect was resolved by the second cycle post-vaccination, suggesting the change was temporary.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">When analyzed by vaccine brand, Pfizer and Moderna were associated with a 15% increased risk of cycle lengthening (sRR: 1.15), AstraZeneca with a 27% increase (sRR: 1.27), and Janssen with a 69% increase (sRR: 1.69), though the latter was based on a relatively small sample (n = 751).</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The study also evaluated changes in menstrual bleeding patterns.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Risk for heavier flow was not statistically significant.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Post-menopausal bleeding showed a 7% increase (sRR: 1.07) following both doses.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Intermenstrual bleeding increased by 16% after the first dose and 41% after the second.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">While absolute increases in cycle length were under a day, the relative risk signals are consistent and brand-dependent, with higher risk following Janssen and AstraZeneca vaccines.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Notably, cycle disruptions appeared dose-responsive—more pronounced after the second dose—and transient, fading by the second menstrual cycle.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">However, these results should not be dismissed as merely anecdotal.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The inclusion of over 1.3 million post-menopausal women and the observed uptick in post-menopausal bleeding, however slight, raises flags about broader immunological or endocrine effects.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Further, the study hints at a possible cumulative effect—one that doesn’t follow a linear dose-response model but suggests a threshold phenomenon, especially when multiple doses are given in a single cycle.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The news comes amid an explosive warning from Spain after a group of leading researchers confirmed that miscarriages are surging among Covid “vaccinated” women.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">A recent peer-reviewed <a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12884-025-07630-z">study</a>, led by Professor Noelia Rodríguez-Blanco of the Universidad Europea de Valencia SLU, has found that Covid-vaccinated women had a higher rate of miscarriage if they had also contracted COVID-19.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Alarmingly, however, these findings were buried in the data of the study.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The main “Results” section of the study’s paper only chronicled how the “vaccinated” moms had fewer cold-like symptoms.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The researchers retrospectively <a href="https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/spanish-study-high-miscarriage-rate-covid-vaccine-women/">examined</a> a sample of 156 pregnant women who tested positive for COVID-19 during pregnancy between 2020 and 2022.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Of these, 45 women had received at least one Covid “vaccine” dose.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Among the vaccinated group, six women (13.3%) had miscarriages.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Five of the miscarriages occurred in women who were vaccinated in the first or second trimester of pregnancy.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Another five miscarriages were recorded among the larger group (111) of unvaccinated women, resulting in a miscarriage rate of 4.5%.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">While downplaying the increased rate of child deaths, the study championed the Covid injection for successfully reducing the rates of pneumonia, vomiting, and headache.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">However, the unexpectedly high miscarriage risk reported among early-pregnancy infections in “vaccinated” women cannot be dismissed.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Another recent <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/4/345">study</a> documented how Covid “vaccines” are reducing women’s lifelong egg supply, leading to infertility.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Although that study was compiled using Covid-vaccinated rats, experts warn that the same impact among humans is also likely.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">In the “Conclusions” section, the <a href="https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/13/4/345">study</a> said:</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">“Our findings suggest that both mRNA and inactivated COVID-19 vaccines may detrimentally impact ovarian reserve in rats, primarily through accelerated follicular loss and alterations in apoptotic pathways during folliculogenesis.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">“Given these observations in a rat model, further investigations into the vaccines’ effects on human ovarian reserve are needed.”</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">Similar findings, coined “reproductive destruction,” were found in government data and <a href="https://dailyclout.io/wp-content/uploads/Final-OHIP-2015-2022-Diagnostic-Codes-Patient-Counts-Analysis-Pre-COVID-vs.-Vaccine-Years-with-2020-Excluded.pdf">reported</a> on by Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly of Daily Clout.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">The growing body of evidence continues to show that the mass global “vaccination” campaign has led to reduced birth rates.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">At the same time, global <a href="https://slaynews.com/news/japan-issue-global-alert-excess-deaths-covid-vaxxed/">excess death rates</a> have been <a href="https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-data-analyst-warns-excess-deaths-surging-off-charts/">skyrocketing</a> over the past four years.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">As experts <a href="https://slaynews.com/news/scientists-warn-global-fertility-crisis-threatens-97-world-population/">have been warning</a>, the human race may now be on the verge of a depopulation crisis.</p>
<p class="slay-news-content">In fact, it may have already begun.</p>
<p>Source:  <a href="https://slaynews.com/news/johns-hopkins-study-1-9-million-women-confirms-covid-vaccine-depopulate/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://slaynews.com/news/johns-hopkins-study-1-9-million-women-confirms-covid-vaccine-depopulate/</a></p>
<p>Bitchute: <a href="https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/</a></p>
<p>Gab: <a href="https://gab.com/hopegirl" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://gab.com/hopegirl</a></p>
<p>Telegram: <a href="https://t.me/Hopegirl587" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://t.me/Hopegirl587</a></p>
<p>EMF Protection Products: <a href="http://www.ftwproject.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.ftwproject.com</a></p>
<p>QEG Clean Energy Academy: <a href="http://www.cleanenergyacademy.com" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.cleanenergyacademy.com</a></p>
<p>Forbidden Tech Book: <a href="http://www.forbiddentech.website" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">www.forbiddentech.website</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.hopegirlblog.com/2025/05/21/johns-hopkins-study-of-1-9-million-women-confirms-covid-vaccines-depopulate/">Johns Hopkins Study of 1.9 Million Women Confirms Covid ‘Vaccines’ Depopulate</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.hopegirlblog.com">HopeGirl Blog</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.hopegirlblog.com/2025/05/21/johns-hopkins-study-of-1-9-million-women-confirms-covid-vaccines-depopulate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">17829</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
