IHR Archives - HopeGirl Blog

Biden Administration and HHS were the leaders in carrying out the IHR and Pandemic Treaty Globalist Agenda

Hope — Wed, 20 Nov 2024 18:00:38 +0000

Lawrence O. Gostin is a global public health attorney. He has held high-level positions in the World Health Organisation and has been involved in drafting the controversial Pandemic Treaty and International Health Regulations (“IHR”) amendments.

“Lawrence Gostin seems to have been at the centre of every really bad public health effort over the past 25 years,” Dr. Meryl Nass writes.

Gostin was present during the WHO’s negotiations on the IHR amendments and played a key role in their adoption, with the US Health and Human Services Secretary threatening to walk away if the amendments were not adopted. And so, they were adopted.

“That’s how it happened. It should have failed. But the big bully came in and said he was taking his toys and going home if everybody didn’t cooperate,” Dr. Nass said.

It Turns Out that the WHO’s International Health Regulations Amendments Were Doomed to Failure Until an 11^th-Hour Intervention

By Dr. Meryl Nass, 16 November 2024

In case you did not already know that the Biden administration and the Department of Health and Human Services were the leaders in carrying out the Globalist agenda, now you will.

Apologies for this long introduction, but Mr. Gostin has been my bête noir for the past 23 years, and it is extremely important to explain who Gostin is, what he has done, and the enormous influence he has had in the pandemic/bioterrorism landscape as a medical-legal “expert” on vast matters.

I talked about how Maurice Strong, and then Gro Harlem Brundtland almost singlehandedly brought the globalist climate-health agenda forward from around 1970. Lawrence O. Gostin’s name should be #3 in this list, beating out even Jeremy Farrar and Tony Fauci, who would be #s 4 and 5. These people created the architecture, the framework, the academic foundation from which the edifice of global governance through public health was created.

Lawrence O. Gostin is a global public health attorney (he used to call himself a public health attorney but now calls himself a global health attorney) who leads an Institute at Georgetown University. His career trajectory for at least the past 25 years has involved trying to centralise power over citizens via public health while restricting our human rights. He has a face and biography only a mother could love.

According to his Georgetown biography, and I left most of it out (emphasis added):

Lawrence O. Gostin is Distinguished University Professor, Georgetown University’s highest academic rank conferred by the University President …

Prof. Gostin is the Director of the World Health Organisation Collaborating Centre on National and Global Health Law. He is working with the WHO and the Intergovernmental Negotiation Body (INB) to draft a Pandemic Treaty. He also currently serves on WHO’s Review Committee for amendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR).

The WHO Director-General has appointed Prof. Gostin to high-level positions, including the IHR Roster of Experts and the Expert Advisory Panel on Mental Health. He served on the Director-General’s Advisory Committee on Reforming the World Health Organisation, as well as numerous WHO expert advisory committees, including on the Pandemic Influenza Preparedness Framework, smallpox, genomic sequencing data, migrant health, mental health, NCDs, and gender, equity and human rights. He served on the WHO/Global Fund Blue Ribbon Expert Panel: The Equitable Access Initiative to develop a global health equity framework. He chaired the WHO Health and Migration Consultation on Knowledge and Research in Migrant Health, including the WHO Triple Billion Goals …

He has chaired National Academy Committees on national preparedness for mass disasters, health informational privacy, public health genomics, and human subject research on prisoners.

Commissioned by the White House, Prof Gostin currently chairs the National Academies Committee on Current State of Research, Development, and Stockpiling of Smallpox Medical Countermeasures.

Prof. Gostin co-chaired the Lancet Commission on Global Health Law, which proposed the foundational concept of the Legal Determinants of Health.

Professor Gostin has been at the centre of public policy and law through multiple epidemics from AIDS, SARS, and Influenza H1N1 to Ebola, MERS, Zika, and mpox. The Washingtonian Magazine lists Prof Gostin as the most influential 500 people shaping policy in America. He served on two global commissions to report on the lessons learned from the 2015 West Africa Ebola epidemic. He was also senior advisor to the United Nations Secretary General’s post-Ebola Commission. Prof. Gostin also served on the drafting team for the G-7 Summit in Tokyo 2016, focusing on global health security and Universal Health Coverage.

Throughout the covid-19 pandemic, Prof Gostin has worked with the White House, federal public health agencies, and governors in the United States, as well as the World Health Organisation, GAVI, and the World Bank. Gostin currently serves as a member of the Independent Panel for a Global Public Health Convention (PGPHC): “global leaders working to strengthen the world’s ability to prevent, prepare, and respond to infectious disease outbreaks before they become widespread pandemics.” Prof. Gostin also serves on the Panel for the Global Health Security Index – the world’s most comprehensive assessment of global health security capabilities in 195 countries. He chairs the O’Neill Institute/Foundation of the National Institutes of Health Global Consultations on a Pandemic Treaty in support of the World Health Organisation …

Prof. Gostin is a Member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

With CDC, Professor Gostin drafted and then lobbied for the Model State Emergency Health Powers Act (“MSEHPA”) in 1999-2001, for which he was paid about $1,000,000. How convenient for CDC to have a model draft ready and waiting before the anthrax letters attack, which Gostin is said to have updated after the letters were sent.

It was primarily the MSEHPA which gave state governors new dictatorial authorities to impose most aspects of the covid lockdowns. Wikipedia says 40 states passed a version of it. According to Wikipedia, critics of the MSEHPA noted the following:

The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons claimed that the draft used sweeping language to the extent that it “could turn governors into dictators” since the MSEHPA gave governors the authority to declare public health emergencies, and afterward force vaccinations on the general public without their informed consent. The deployment of state National Guards could be used to administer the vaccines or substances. Legal liabilities for drug companies which manufactured the vaccines and/or substances were removed. ACT-UP/San Francisco protested the MSEHPA, stating it was a potential assault on gay men who could be rounded up en masse as vectors of disease, and the leaders of ACT-UP were jailed for three months on anti-terrorism charges for their protest.

Lawrence Gostin seems to have been at the centre of every really bad public health effort over the past 25 years. And he has been at the centre of the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty and International Health Regulations (“IHR”) amendments negotiations. He writes articles to push them. He is in the room with the negotiators. He advises the WHO Director-General.

Today his university and his department held a webinar on bird flu and vaccines at which Gostin spoke. It was extremely interesting. Below is the programme, which expanded beyond bird flu. I hope it goes online so others can watch.

I will post later on the H5 vaccines.

But now I want to repeat what Gostin said about the WHO’s negotiation of the IHR amendments on 1 June, the final day of the World Health Assembly. Recall that the diplomats had been unable to make a deal. Below is as close to verbatim as I could make it, taking notes as fast as possible while Mr. Gostin spoke:

“The IHR negotiations were collapsing. We thought they would collapse. Then, US HHS Secretary Becerra came into the room and said the USA would be walking away from this if we didn’t adopt it now, on the very last day. And then they did.”

So that’s how it happened. It should have failed. But the big bully came in and said he was taking his toys and going home if everybody didn’t cooperate. Reminds me of Vice President Biden threatening Ukraine’s former Prime Minister that if the prosecutor investigating Burisma (where Hunter was on the Board) wasn’t fired in a couple of hours, Biden would be taking his billion-dollar deal home.

We now have IHR amendments that, while watered down, are still more intrusive than we like. President Trump will be able to reject them, hopefully along with the WHO and Pandemic Treaty negotiations. The January 2022 US proposal on the earlier IHR amendments was to give nations only 6 months to reject new amendments. Had the US been able to get that through (it couldn’t), then by the time Trump took office it would have been too late to reject them.

It’s so interesting to see how both the IHR and Pandemic Treaty negotiations over the past 3 years were both intended to get the documents in force before Mr. Trump could take office. Well, they failed.

Good to know how the sausage is made.

Source: https://expose-news.com/2024/11/20/leaders-in-carrying-out-ihr-and-pandemic-treaty/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Biden Administration and HHS were the leaders in carrying out the IHR and Pandemic Treaty Globalist Agenda appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

WHO tries to sneak in IHR amendments without the approval of member states

Hope — Fri, 13 Oct 2023 17:00:02 +0000

On Saturday, the World Health Organisation (“WHO”) released a statement claiming: “Governments make progress towards agreeing amendments to the International Health Regulations.”

However, as Dr. Meryl Nass pointed out, the main point about this statement is that WHO declared it will not share the finalised International Health Regulations (“IHR”) amendments with the public and member states four months before the vote on it in May 2024 as WHO’s own rules require.

“WHO’s press release states what happened in very general terms, so only the already-initiated will understand it,” Dr. Nass said.

Here are the relevant statements within WHO’s press release:

We will continue work on a range of issues in the inter-sessional period before WGIHR6, as well as in early 2024.

The Co-Chairs noted that, in reference to Decision WHA75(9), it appeared unlikely that the package of amendments would be ready by January 2024. In this regard, the Working Group agreed to continue its work between January and May 2024. The Director-General will submit to the 77th Health Assembly the package of amendments agreed by the Working Group.

Governments make progress towards agreeing amendments to the International Health Regulations (2005), World Health Organisation, 7 October 2023

Dr. Nass explained what happened:

Article 55 of the WHO Constitution requires that amendments to WHO documents be offered to the member states and public 4 months in advance of a vote.

The Saudi co-chair said to the public that his Working Group on the IHR amendments may not complete their work by January needed to meet the timeline to be voted on in May 2024. In a choreographed move, he asked Principal Legal Officer Steven Solomon what to do about this. Solomon had already crafted a plan. His plan was to create a specious excuse to ignore the existing rules.

Nobody voted on ignoring them. Nobody said this was okay. It just became a done deal.

The WHO will ignore its own rules and refuse to share the finalised IHR Amendments with the public and member states 4 months before the vote in May 2024, Dr. Meryl Nass, 10 October 2023

Yesterday, Dr. Nass, James Corbett and James Roguski discussed the United Nations, WHO, conflicts of interest and Steven Solomon’s underhand attempt to reinterpret WHO’s rules to pass IHR amendments without the public knowing about it.

Earlier this month, the Working Group on Amendments to the International Health Regulations (“WGIHR”) gathered for one of their mostly secret meetings. “They dropped what I think is an absolute bombshell,” Roguski said.

The bombshell was that the co-chair of the Working Group, Dr. Abdullah Asiri of Saudi Arabia, said very clearly that the WGIHR don’t think they’re going to meet their deadline. This is as outlined by Dr. Nass earlier in this article.

Effectively, Dr. Nass said, Solomon provided a fake legal argument for why WGHIR don’t have to give the public four months to review the IHR amendments before they are voted on at the 77^th Health Assembly in May 2024.

Roguski believes that the legalese Solomon uses to bend the rules is really an attempt to cover up the WGIHR’s failure to bring the Global South and Global North into agreement. He also believes the whole charade of the IHR amendments negotiations belongs in a World Trade Organisation setting rather than a World Health Organisation setting. “Because they’re not talking about health, they’re talking about money. This is a trade dispute about intellectual property and ‘equity’,” he said.

Related: 11 United Nations member countries push back against pandemic declaration, Natural News, 29 September 2023

WGHIR are failing at their public front for this agenda, Corbett argued. It was never about health, he said. “It was about the money grab. Well, that’s a very big part of it. And now they’re trying to cover it up with legalese and bureaucratic nonsense.”

The three analysts agreed that WHO are trying to sneak in their plans without us noticing until it’s too late. The last thing WHO wants is for people to be paying attention to what they’re doing and raise objections. Let’s not give WHO what they want; let’s raise our voices and make a fuss. #ExitTheWHO

At the end of last month, the US House of Representatives passed its annual State Department and Foreign Operations spending bill. The bill specifically prohibits funds to WHO, along with other organisations with nefarious plans. “Now that bill will go to the Senate,” Dr. Nass said. The bill will go back and forth between the House and Senate until a final bill is agreed. It will be up for a final vote in about a month or so, she added. And emphasised that “it’s important that we [Americans] talk to our Senators and our Representatives and say: ‘We want these funding cuts to stay in the bill’.” #DefundThe WHO

Dr. Nass, Corbett and Roguski then deconstructed the propaganda spread by WHO using a promotional video featuring Solomon. The takedown of WHO’s dishonest narrative is not only informative but rather enjoyable; it’s recommended watching.

Roguski also discussed the true aims of the theatre of the IHR amendments and a Pandemic Treaty “negotiating text.” Officially, WHO refers to the Pandemic Treaty as the “WHO CA+,” an abbreviation for WHO accord on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.

While this theatre is going on, in the background WHO and its advocates are busy building, among other things, the ‘Global Digital Health Certification Network’, Roguski said.

To add to Roguski’s warning about what is happening behind the scenes, Dr. Nass highlighted a statement by Tedros the Terrorist towards the end of September:

Dr. Tedros said governments and multilateral partners have already commenced building the foundations for a safer world, with the establishment of the Pandemic Fund, the WHO Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence, the WHO BioHub to voluntarily share novel biological materials [i.e., biological warfare agents], and the mRNA vaccine technology transfer hub. [Emphasis our own]

WHO welcomes historic commitment by world leaders for greater collaboration, governance and investment to prevent, prepare for and respond to future pandemics, World Health Organisation, 20 September 2023

“These things are specified in the versions of the treaty and the amendments that we’ve seen so far … but they haven’t been negotiated, they haven’t been accepted, they haven’t been voted on,” Dr. Nass said. If this process is about the member nations negotiating and agreeing to the IHR amendments and a Pandemic Treaty, the question is: Why has WHO already started building all these hubs?

To add to WHO’s duplicity, it is steeped in conflicts of interest. In June 2022, Fahrie Hassan, a South African molecular biologist, exposed WHO’s conflicts of interest at the launch of The African Sovereignty Coalition. Hassan’s presentation is included at the end of the video below. You can also watch Hassan’s 20-minute presentation HERE. Hassan gave a more comprehensive presentation to the World Council for Health in July 2022 which you can watch HERE and you can find a copy of the slides from his presentation HERE.

Children’s Health Defense: WHO’s Legal Officer Tries To Reinterpret Rules, Pass IHR Amendments Without the Public Knowing, 9 October 2023 (75 mins)

If you are unable to watch the video above on Rumble, you can watch it on CHDTV HERE.

Show notes:

Source: https://expose-news.com/2023/10/11/who-tries-to-sneak-in-ihr-amendments/