A chilling new study has revealed that Canada’s rapidly expanding euthanasia regime could save the government’s socialized healthcare system trillions of dollars, with the biggest financial gains coming from the introduction of “non-voluntary” euthanasia.

The findings are fueling alarm among critics who have long warned that Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program risks creating financial incentives for the state to encourage death over care.

Since legalizing euthanasia, Canada has repeatedly expanded eligibility requirements, transforming what was initially presented as a limited option for terminally ill patients into one of the world’s most permissive assisted-death programs.

Now, new research suggests the economic benefits to government coffers could be enormous.

Study Projects Massive Financial Savings

A 2017 study estimated that MAiD could reduce annual healthcare spending by between $34.7 million and $138.8 million, far exceeding the direct costs of administering the program.

More recently, a 2025 cost-benefit analysis by researchers Uzair Jamil and Joshua M. Pearce projected dramatically larger savings as euthanasia eligibility expands.

The study, titled “Government Economics of Expanding Canada’s Medical Assistance in Dying to Vulnerable Populations and the Ethical Implications of Allowing the State to Control Death,” examined both voluntary and non-voluntary scenarios across several population groups.

Researchers concluded that total projected savings could reach as high as CAD $1.273 trillion by 2047.

The analysis examined the financial impact of extending euthanasia access among several vulnerable groups, including the mentally ill, homeless individuals, retired elderly populations, indigenous communities, and broader MAiD recipients.

Across nearly every category examined, non-voluntary euthanasia scenarios generated substantially greater projected financial benefits than voluntary participation.

For retired elderly populations alone, researchers estimated economic benefits exceeding CAD $1.2 trillion under non-voluntary scenarios.

Critics Warn Of Dangerous Incentives

The findings have intensified concerns that governments facing mounting healthcare costs and aging populations could begin viewing citizens as financial liabilities rather than individuals deserving care and support.

Critics argue that once governments recognize large-scale fiscal savings from euthanasia programs, pressure may grow to continually expand eligibility standards.

The study itself explores the ethical implications of allowing government financial interests to intersect with decisions surrounding life and death.

Opponents warn that vulnerable populations, including the elderly, disabled, mentally ill, and economically disadvantaged, could face increasing pressure in systems where ending lives produces measurable budgetary benefits.

Fresh Concerns Over Canada’s Expanding MAiD Program

The study comes as new reports raise additional questions about Canada’s euthanasia system.

Recent investigations by the National Post and The Globe and Mail detailed controversial cases involving MAiD procedures and patient assessments, as Slay News reported.

One report described a physician conducting a patient assessment outside a Tim Hortons restaurant before transporting the individual to a facility where euthanasia was carried out later that day.

Another report detailed cases in which patients reportedly resumed breathing after being declared dead while still under the effects of paralysis-inducing drugs used during euthanasia procedures.

The reports have renewed concerns among critics who argue that safeguards designed to protect vulnerable Canadians may be failing as the program continues to expand.

As Canada broadens access to assisted death and researchers project increasingly large economic savings from euthanasia, opponents warn the country is entering dangerous territory where financial incentives risk influencing policies involving human life itself.

Source: https://slaynews.com/study-non-voluntary-euthanasia-save-canada-healthcare-trillions/

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

HopeGirl Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@hopegirlblog
HopeGirl Telegram Channel Chat and Groups: https://t.me/Hopegirl587 
Get Our Free EMF Survival Guide : https://bit.ly/FTWEMF
10 Percent Off our EMF Protection Products with this Link: https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/tenoff

The post Study: ‘Non-Voluntary’ Euthanasia Will Save Canada’s Healthcare Trillions appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c98n8lrj7y6o

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Americans brace to start New Year without healthcare appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Canada’s healthcare system is broken – inefficient, expensive, and leaving tens of thousands of Canadians to die waiting for care every year. Yet the silence is deafening, and any attempt to discuss alternatives is shouted down by defenders of a failing socialised model.

As the system collapses, Prime Minister Mark Carney ships billions of dollars overseas to fund other nations’ healthcare systems. That’s not leadership – it’s political malpractice on a grand scale, says John Bolton.

Socialised healthcare, where the government fully funds and operates healthcare services through taxation, is implemented in several countries, though the extent of government control varies.

The United Kingdom and Cuba are often cited as examples of countries with truly socialised medicine, where the government owns hospitals and employs medical professionals.

Canada is also described as socialised medicine but includes an element of private provision. The country has a publicly funded system where the government pays for services, but providers are often privately owned; this is considered a single-payer system rather than full socialisation, such as in the UK.

Read more: Countries with Socialised Medicine – 11 Countries with Universal Healthcare, Allied Health Programmes, 28 June 2022

Socialised medicine systems, while aiming to provide universal access to healthcare, face several pitfalls. One is the potential for long wait times for medical procedures and specialist appointments. These delays are inevitable in such a system due to funding limitations and the strain on resources caused by balancing public health needs with taxpayer financing.

Another significant issue is the risk of healthcare rationing. Governments may limit access to certain treatments based on cost-effectiveness or severity of condition, which can lead to denied care or restricted access, even for serious conditions.  This can result in patients receiving care based on administrative decisions rather than medical need.

Additionally, the centralised nature of socialised systems can reduce competition within the medical industry.  There are also concerns about the quality of care. Reports from the UK’s National Health Service have highlighted serious issues such as neglect, incorrect medication administration and inadequate end-of-life care, with some cases described as “appalling.”

Furthermore, the system may lead to reduced patient and provider autonomy, as people have less choice in selecting physicians or treatment options, and healthcare providers face increased bureaucratic oversight.

The financial burden on taxpayers is another major drawback. Socialised medicine requires substantial increases in tax revenues to fund public healthcare, which can strain national budgets.

Further reading:

• Socialised medicine a global failure, Pacific Research, 4 January 2016
• 13 Profound Socialised Medicine Pros and Cons, Vittana, 28 January 2018
• Socialised Medicine, Springer Nature Link, 8 August 2022

In a podcast published earlier today, John Bolton speaks about Canada’s healthcare system, raising some of the common drawbacks of socialised medicine that Canada, like the UK, is experiencing.

“This is a story that really should infuriate you,” Bolton begins, “because tens of thousands of your fellow Canadians are dying every year and nobody is discussing this.”

The story Bolton is talking about is the broken socialised healthcare system in Canada.  “It is inefficient” and “costs way too much,” he said.

As “the self-righteous Canadians that we are … we don’t want to do anything about our healthcare system,” he said.  “And how does the Carney government deal with health care in Canada? They give $1 billion for health care in Africa to developing nations.”

Quoting from an article published by True North Wire, Bolton said, “taxpayers are on the hook for over a billion [Canadian] dollars after Prime Minister Mark Carney pledged new funding to a global health fund ahead of the G20 summit in South Africa.”

Although Bolton didn’t mention it, the UK pledged £850 million (US$1.112 billion) to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria ahead of the G20 summit.  The Fund is a public-private partnership with The Gates Foundation pledging US$912 million.  In total, US$11.34 billion was pledged to the Fund, which was co-hosted by the government of South Africa and the UK on the margins of the G20 Leaders’ Summit held last weekend.

Read more: Global Fund receives USD 11.3b commitment to fight AIDS, TB, others, Medical Buyer, 24 November 2025

“The $1.02 billion pledge aligns with Canada’s historical support for global health efforts, but comes as inflation, housing costs and spending restraint remain key domestic political concerns,” Bolton pointed out.  We’ve “got people standing in food lines here, people dying on the streets from drug addiction. We’ve got crime issues in this country. and our government spending a billion dollars overseas on healthcare.  Meanwhile, our healthcare is languishing.”

It is the same in the UK, with the added impact of mass immigration which is costing the taxpayers a fortune and straining public resources.

If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it on Rumble HERE.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2025/11/24/canadas-healthcare-system-collapses-while/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Canada’s healthcare system collapses while Carney gives a billion dollars to healthcare in other nations appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Dancing nurses were never about the morale of healthcare workers or stress relief. They were a test, a sorting mechanism, revealing who would accept the contradictions and who would resist them. These videos on TikTok, which appeared simultaneously across all continents while governments declared medical emergencies, represented something unprecedented in the history of propaganda: the authorities showed that they could make populations accept two mutually exclusive realities at the same time. [Hospitals were “overwhelmed” and yet doctors and nurses spent hours rehearsing dance routines.]

Dancing nurses were never about the morale of healthcare workers or stress relief. They were a test, a sorting mechanism, revealing who would accept the contradictions and who would resist them. These videos on TikTok, which appeared simultaneously across all continents while… pic.twitter.com/m9ZOMuMLeC

— “Sudden And Unexpected” (@toobaffled) October 15, 2025

Source:  https://x.com/toobaffled/status/1978283652686688561

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Dancing nurses were never about the morale of healthcare workers or stress relief appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Healthcare is becoming more about predicting illness rather than treating it. From genome-based insurance pricing to AI-generated risk scores, supporters say predictive medicine promises a health revolution — but critics are warning us that it’s nothing more than a preemptive profit engine.

What Is Predictive Medicine?

Using algorithms, genetic markers, and biometric data, predictive medicine forecasts who might develop illnesses before symptoms even appear. At first glance, it sounds like a leap towards keeping people healthier for longer by catching problems early, improving care, and reducing costs.

But beneath the surface, it feels like an opportunity to monetise the data-driven findings, and raises vital questions about fairness and consent. Who’s at risk, and who really benefits?

AI-Driven Diagnoses

The NHS, United Health Group, and Kaiser Permanente are just a few of the major healthcare providers using AI to determine patient eligibility, prioritise care, and flag high-risk patients.

• A recent report from the Brookings Institution highlighted concerns that predictive tools are being implemented without sufficient oversight by regulators, making the systems less transparent and more immune to public accountability [Source: Brookings]
• A 2022 BMJ study warned that AI tools for predicting health patterns may rely on flawed or incomplete data sets, perpetuating racial and/or socioeconomic bias [Source: BMJ]
• In 2023, the NHS started using machine learning in pilot programs to fast-track identification of cancer patients deemed at risk, deprioritising those with lower projected benefit [Source: Gov.uk]
• AMA reports that AI tools tell insurance companies to deny treatment for up to 16 times more patients than if they were subject to human review, and warns AI must be used under strict supervision [Source: AMA]

Profit: A Key Motivator

Amidst the potentially far-reaching positive outcomes of predictive medicine, there is a lucrative, booming economy based around preempting health issues:

• AI health start-ups (like Babylon, Deep Genomics, Tempus) are attracting billions in funding
• Genetic testing firms are partnering with insurers, offering preemptive pricing models and creating risk scores
• Private insurers use prediction tools to reject policies or increase premiums

Analysts say the predictive health industry in the U.S. alone will be worth approximately $50 billion by 2030, growing at a rate of 32.5% per year from the current valuation of $11.6 billion. With the inevitable influx of dividends and data for corporations, are patients losing autonomy over their own bodies?

Real World Impact

Can you imagine a world in which you’re denied treatment not because you’re sick, but because an AI-generated model has predicted you might not respond well? Or being secretly overcharged for insurance premiums simply because of your genetic profile — something totally out of your control?

A 2023 survey by the European Commission found that an alarming 68% of people were unaware that their health data was being used to train AI tools. Yet more than 50% of NHS trusts are now piloting AI-based risk assessments and triage systems in every day care, despite a 2024 King’s College London report warning of a “risk caste” system, classifying and filtering patients without ever telling them how the decisions were made.

How Hospitals Are Changing

Predictive medicine is already changing the culture of hospitals and healthcare practices worldwide:

• In the U.K., some NHS trusts are piloting risk-based triage systems, where patients’ algorithmic profiles are influencing whether they are fast-tracked or added to a waitlist [Source: NHS Confederation]
• UnitedHealth were sued in 2023 for “deploying an AI model known by the company to have a 90% error rate, overriding determinations made by the patients’ physicians that the expenses were medically necessary” leading to excessive deaths in the elderly [Source: CBS]
• Reportedly, some private U.S. hospitals are using AI not just to diagnose patients, but to determine who gets admitted in periods of overcapacity

Healthcare workers have voiced concerns that these AI systems — which, in theory, can be used for good — are turning doctors into interpreters of automated forecasts, rather than key decision makers.

Secret Shifts in Policy

Have you ever been asked how you feel about the future of your healthcare systems? The public is rarely, if ever, consulted when predictive frameworks are introduced, but behind the scenes, it’s all quietly changing:

• The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has funded AI triage systems despite calls for transparency from watchdogs like ACLU and EPIC [Source: U.S. DoHHS]
• The E.U. AI Act explicitly warns against opaque medical algorithms operating without human review, yet usage is already growing across the continent
• The UK’s Genome UK Strategy outlines plans to integrate genomic risk data into GP services by 2030 [Source: Gov.uk]
• The World Health Organisation reported in 2023 that predictive tools must be accompanied by robust ethical frameworks, but enforcement currently looks weak [Source: WHO]

These changes are being framed as progress, but critics argue that they quietly introduce risk-based discrimination and apply gate-kept criteria to make key decisions about our health without us knowing — and we don’t even get a say.

The Age of Prediction is an Insurer’s Dream

Actuarial tables are being replaced by real-time data, behavioural tracking, and DNA scans. We’re seeing discounts offered for individuals with wearable health devices, tracking sleep, exercise, and heart rate, which also work against the sick or genetically predisposed. Whistleblower reports are surfacing about more UnitedHealth care denials to vulnerable nursing home patients, indicating that the use of AI is less about preventing illness, and more about pricing risk and shifting liability. [Source: Whistlebloweraid]

Some U.S. states are introducing legislation to prevent the use of genetic data in deciding premiums for customers, but enforcement is spotty and opaque. And in the U.K., the Association of British Insurers have determined that the use of predictive genetic test results is voluntary rather than legally binding — with critics determining that there’ll be no meaningful restrictions in their usage.

Final Thought

Predictive medicine is being sold as innovation. But when profit incentives, bio-surveillance, and opaque algorithms come together, the line between care and control begins to blur.

Is this a way to prevent illness, or to accurately predict the profitability of it?

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2025/07/17/predictive-medicine-how-ai-now-controls-your-healthcare/

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Predictive Medicine: How AI Now Controls Your Healthcare appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

This in-depth interview with Sasha Latypova is one that viewers won’t want to miss! She details the corruption in clinical trials and vaccine manufacturing as well as their relationship to product manufacturer recalls and legal frameworks for regulatory agencies and countermeasures programs. Listen to ‘The Defender’ with RFK, Jr. and Sasha on CHD.TV!

Source Link: https://rumble.com/v2df7hg-militarized-healthcare.html

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Militarized Healthcare appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.