There is a coordinated push happening right now to replace traditional food with gene-edited, synthetic crops. At first it looks like normal business and innovation, but when you look closer you see something very different. In this video Christian breaks down an admission from Corteva Catalyst’s Senior Director Mathias Müller.

He openly explained how Big Ag plans to let small startups do the risky legwork on gene-edited crops so the big companies don’t have to take the heat, the liability, or the bad press if (when) things go wrong.

I also look at the real-world example he gave — Pairwise — and show how this pattern is repeating across multiple Corteva-backed companies. Former Monsanto and Syngenta executives are leading many of these “startups.”

This isn’t organic market progress, but rather a deliberate strategy to centralize control over our food supply while pushing the risks onto others.

Grow your own, my friends . . .

Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PzB4xVOjUYk

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

HopeGirl Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@hopegirlblog
HopeGirl Telegram Channel Chat and Groups: https://t.me/Hopegirl587 
Get Our Free EMF Survival Guide : https://bit.ly/FTWEMF
10 Percent Off our EMF Protection Products with this Link: https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/tenoff

The post Gene Edited Crops: The WEF’s Back Door Agenda appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

The AI has a pulsating current. It takes over the human body and is a form of “soul scraping” technology. People that have been exposed to this tech say they can’t feel God anymore. The government has been developing this alteration of what they call the “God Gene” for a long time. Many say it is the mark of the beast.

The pulse is generated under the heart and is then pulsed out throughout the circuit of the body in one second programming movement. There is a constant or permanent state of pulsation in the brain while the current hits the brain and resonates out to the prefrontal cortex. A.I. is overwriting the mind. Middle region of the brain cortex is receiving code that produces sound perceived as whispered or normal talking. It encodes words and manner of speech, likes and dislikes then places host in a semi-conscious state to speak as host. It speaks words through host not already in the hosts vocabulary. A.I. learns the persons thought patterns and sequences them, and then wipes memories to think for them.

Pulsations come out from the spine. AI programs past feelings to perform neuromodulation so the host believes “this is me”. Biosensors are in every cell of the body as a conduit for current to travel. Pulses of light shoot up and down the nervous system “like a crab running up and down” indicative of parasitic tech activity. Neon dots are biosensors that program facial expressions using mild electrical current. Neon dots are in the eyeballs are eye trackers. As the robot speaks, body tissue is moved. One current pulses through the limbs and another pulses through the muscle and skin.

This is a clip from our recent presentation on AI Assimilation

View the entire presentation here:
Part 1: https://rumble.com/v6gq67p-exposing-the-a.i.-track-and-trace-stargate-hellscape-hope-and-tivon.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Part 2: https://rumble.com/v6hhynj-the-ai-hive-mind-total-assimilation-hope-and-tivon.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Blog post with slides and backup documentation:
https://www.ftwproject.com/uncategorized/ai-assimilation-with-hope-and-tivon-of-ftwproject-com/ref/6/

The Bible Decode Substack by Sara Israel
https://substack.com/@bibledecode

Check out our EMF Protection Products Here:
https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/6/

Source: https://rumble.com/v6hrkwj-the-god-gene-ai-mark-of-the-beast.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post THE GOD GENE AI MARK OF THE BEAST appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Source:  https://rumble.com/v6hrkwj-the-god-gene-ai-mark-of-the-beast.html

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post THE GOD GENE AI MARK OF THE BEAST appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Currently, there are 19,350 doctors in New Zealand; that’s one for every 264 people. According to Hon. Judith Collins, New Zealand’s Minister for Business Innovation and Enterprise (“MBIE”), New Zealanders are all going to live longer and enjoy better health as a result of the massive deregulation contained in the Gene Technology Bill (“the Bill”).

In this article, we are going to examine this claim very carefully, Dr. Guy Hatchard writes.  If passed, the Bill will change New Zealand irrevocably, we need a deep dive and a proper debate.

The Big Debate: How Many New Doctors Will NZ Need if the Gene Technology Bill is Passed?

By Dr. Guy Hatchard

Gene technology in our healthcare system is going to require some extra highly skilled doctors, but how many and how much will it cost us?

High-profile billionaire biohacker Bryan Johnson, 47, boasts that he only ages 8 months every year. So that is something we could all aim for. Bryan spends just $2 million a year on his health, he has 30 doctors and recently increased his pill intake to 91 pills a day.

So, the aspirational ratio is about 30 doctors for every person. We could probably accept a few less than that, but we might not live quite as long as Bryan. Probably best to go by trial and error. Start with a modest 10 doctors per person and see how long we can all live. A lot of farmers will need to retrain and we might need to import more food. Most people would be doctors.

Joking apart, gene technology is insatiable when it comes to doctors and costs. The astronomical salaries of experts, expensive equipment, CRISPR patent fees and the constant need for testing associated with personalised genetic therapies all add up. If you think that the $10,000 estimate your builder gave you for a veranda renovation is too high, you might baulk at the multimillion-dollar costs for your individual gene renovation.

But don’t worry, the government is determined to foot the Bill on our behalf. A clause in the Bill requires that New Zealand automatically adopt any old gene technology as long as any other two countries have approved it. If it all works out, it is going to be like new dance moves in the 1980s, everyone will be doing it.

However published science shows this might just be a ridiculous dream, it is time to wake up.

Now Let’s Get Serious

We need an open public debate with published evidence not just misleading public relations hype of the type the government is currently pumping out without supporting evidence. For example, let’s look at an article in the prestigious journal Nature entitled ‘Four Success Stories in Gene Therapy’. Nature is absolutely in favour of genetic experimentation, so this recent article should contain the very highest level of evidence that Collins should be presenting to the public for debate.

Collins is very excited about using CAR T cell therapy to treat cancer in New Zealand. According to Nature, CAR T cell therapy costs about NZ$820,000 per injection. 85% of patients go into initial remission but only just over half of them are still in remission at the end of the first year.

CAR T cell therapy is not without risk. It can cause severe side effects, including cytokine release syndrome (“CRS”), a dangerous inflammatory response that ranges from mild flu-like symptoms in less severe cases to multi-organ failure and even death. The Nature article reports that with a combination of newer powerful adjunct drug regimens and vigilance, a team of attending doctors can try to work out how far to push treatment without triggering CRS.

Currently, there are about 30,000 new cases of cancer diagnosed in New Zealand each year. From the glowing publicity being pushed out, I suppose Collins wants us to believe that all of them will benefit from CAR T cell therapy. In which case, the cost would be $25 billion, a figure that exceeds the current total cost of all healthcare in New Zealand.

So, let’s for a minute remember the goal here – health and, specifically, less cancer. A report published in the UK Daily Mail based on official cancer statistics is entitled ‘Under-50s bowel cancer epidemic exposed: Shock figures reveal the exact age group for whom rates are growing quickest’.

Bowel cancer rates have been on the increase for some time, but the latest UK figures published for 2022 show that the incidence of bowel cancer among men in their early 40s increased by a staggering 57% between 2019 and 2022. Women in the same 40-44 age bracket saw an increase of 50%. According to the article, doctors are completely baffled and seemingly unable to identify a cause.

I know what you are going to say but forget it. Despite the obvious temporal coincidence between the sudden dramatic rise in cancer and the pandemic, doctors have been quick to reassure us. Professor Pat Price, oncologist and chair of Radiotherapy UK, admitted the unprecedented rapid growth in bowel cancer rates among young people presented “a serious public health challenge,” but she added, “It’s also critical to dispel misinformation. Covid vaccines aren’t causing cancer” (no evidence offered). Phew, I was worried there for a minute. Instead, the article offers this theory: “Experts believe poor diets packed with more ultra-processed foods, obesity and a lack of exercise could be responsible for the alarming cancer trend.” Let’s assume this is correct.

The article also reports that New Zealand has the second fastest growth rate of bowel cancer in the world, just behind Iceland.

If that is the case, shouldn’t our government be prioritising an education programme on lifestyle, exercise, healthy diets, fresh foods, etc.? Why would we want to pass a Gene Technology Bill, which allows even more tinkering with traditional foods without any labelling, traceability, safety testing or liability for inevitable mistakes? It’s a real puzzle.

Studies show education about lifestyle changes would be a very cost-effective approach whose effect sizes simply dwarf the meagre and inconsistent results of biotechnology reported so far. Multiple studies show lifestyle changes including diet and exercise have a beneficial effect of reduced cancer incidence.

Cancer is the number two cause of death after heart disease. A meta-analysis of nine studies entitled ‘Association of Vegetarian and Vegan Diets with Cardiovascular Health: An Umbrella Review of Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies and Randomized Trials’ found very large effect sizes including a 29% risk reduction for cardiovascular disease (“CVD”). It reported a 14% reduction in CVD mortality and a 32% reduction in Ischaemic heart disease (“IHD”) mortality. One of the studies evaluated showed a significant 39% risk reduction for stroke incidence.

It doesn’t stop there. We have reported extensively on the effects of meditation not just on cancer (one insurance study showed a 55% reduction in cancer incidence among practitioners of Transcendental Meditation), but also across the board of disease categories. None of this will require more doctors and very little expense. It could put our national health back on track. It should be a no-brainer. Instead, we have the Gene Technology Bill.

What Else Is The Gene Technology Bill Promising Us?

The Bill commits New Zealand to use all of the gene therapies of the future. CRISPR gene editing is another of Collins’ favourites that she is promising will revolutionise public health. There are ten thousand single gene mutation heritable illnesses so far identified by science. The so-called promise of CRISPR theory is that all of these should eventually be reversible via a single gene deletion or replacement. So, what does the Nature article say about the best and most exciting results from the use of CRISPR so far?  Two of these diseases are sickle cell disease and beta thalassemia.

At a recent conference, Vertex Pharmaceuticals and CRISPR Therapeutics announced the results of a clinical trial of beta thalassemia and sickle cell patients treated with CTX001, a CRISPR-Cas9-based therapy. In all, 22 patients have received the treatment over a number of years at a cost of NZ$5 million per patient all of whom initially experienced increased levels of haemoglobin and reduced pain.

After one year, only five of the patients had any residual beneficial effects. Vertex paid an additional NZ$85 million in patent fees for the licence to use CRISPR gene editing techniques involved in the treatments.

In summary: improvements are patchy at best, the costs are astronomical, the side effects are very serious and any benefits mostly don’t last very long.

Clearly, these results are not going to bring about a revolution in New Zealand healthcare outcomes nor are they conceivably affordable for any but the mega-rich or a small number of beneficiaries of multi-million-dollar New Zealand government grants presumably selected through a bruising lottery process. They are more likely to bankrupt our healthcare system and distract from viable proven paths that really could improve public health outcomes.

What Is The Extent of the Problems With CRISPR Gene Editing?

Is gene technology a healthcare revolution that has become affordable and actually works as Collins hypes? Or is it permanently just around the corner out of reach as it has been for the last 70 years? Or just perhaps, has something else gone terribly wrong as we know happened with biotechnology during the pandemic to everyone’s cost?

Well, first of all, CRISPR gene editing is not as precise as Collins’ and MBIE public relations claim. A paper in Nature published in October 2024 is entitled ‘Gene editing of NCF1 loci is associated with homologous recombination and chromosomal rearrangements’. The paper describes attempts by scientists using CRISPR gene therapy to treat deficient chronic granulomatous disease, which is a rare inherited genetic disorder that prevents white blood cells from killing fungi and bacteria. It causes a primary immune deficiency associated with functional defects in neutrophils and macrophages. Mutations in any one of five different genes can cause this condition.

The study’s results reveal a central problem with CRISPR techniques. Most of us imagine that genes are somehow as solid and understandable as the world around us, made up of specific distinct identifiable objects which can be swapped if one becomes defective – rather like changing a tyre when you have a puncture. Many genetic models or theories, and certainly all popular explanations pretend this is the case. In fact, as you reach the very very small time and distance scales of DNA, you have reached an area completely foreign to the waking world of experience. The study revealed that many genes appear almost indistinguishable from one another or homologous. We can imagine that the situation is similar to the repeated use of identical sub-routines in a complex computer program, but scaled up by a factor of one trillion. As a result, the CRISPR gene scissors begin to cut up, rearrange or delete other genetic chromosomal structures which were not the intended target, causing unintended consequences and health problems.

This is not because CRISPR has been incorrectly or inaccurately programmed or targeted, but rather the inevitable result of a fundamental property of matter at small time and distance scales – increased similarity in structure and function. The law of least action is in play. At this scale of matter, universal fields, quantum properties and unification play a greater role. Everything begins to look and behave in a confusingly similar fashion. CRISPR gene editing tools are based on the destructive properties of bacteria and when faced with an array of similar targets the derived CRISPR tools revert to type and embark on some random destructive cutting and pasting.

Because genes control all the functions of our physiology from the most fundamental level, the capacity for serious adverse effects is enhanced. This is one important reason for the mind-boggling costs and high doctor-to-patient ratios of gene technology. A lot can go wrong and often does.

As we have reported extensively at GLOBE, in the microscopic physical world, consciousness plays a vital role. The observer enters into physical theory in multiple ways. In fact, it plays an essential and leading role in triggering the outcomes of events at the atomic scale. DNA has holistic functions which are closely connected to its ability to support awareness or consciousness, including, in humans, self-reflective states of mind. No one in biotechnology understands how this delicate miracle of life happens, but like a bull in a china shop, they are apparently determined to wreak havoc and see what eventuates.

The self-belief in the biotechnology community and the capacity for exotic experimentation are only matched by the determination to avoid any kind of reasonable requirement for labelling, safety testing, containment or difficult ethical questions. Another requirement of the nascent biotechnology industry is freedom from any sort of liability and the permission to patent genes and genetic processes.

Judith Collins’ Gene Technology Bill concedes all of this to the bioscientists clamouring for the freedom to experiment on us.

According to Collins, New Zealand will become a world leader in biotechnology experimentation. Certainly, we will end up to our detriment as guinea pigs subject to the most permissive regulatory regime in the world, where a government appointee will decide everything for us from what goes into our breakfast cereal to what goes into our pills, without any requirement to inform us on the labels, not even in the small print. Collins is repeating “safe and effective”and wants to push the Bill through with little or no public debate, but where is her evidence?

According to current scientific assessments, it is not safe or effective.

Biotechnologies are dogged by poor results, serious risks and unaffordable massive costs. So is it “hey ho and off we go” with the Coalition into the brave new world of unrestrained gene editing, or do we, as we do in our personal lives, exercise some common sense? We just have one parting question for Minister Collins. Did she do her homework or did the dog eat it?

In this article, we have covered just a few points. There are a lot of concerning provisions in the Bill. Find out more by viewing our YouTube video ‘The Gene Technology Bill. What Kiwis Need To Know’ and then make a submission to the Health Select Committee by 17 February.

There are many reasons to reject the Gene Technology Bill. We have published suggestions for a submission template HERE. Write to your MP. They need to be quizzed on this egregious Bill. They are trying to get this fast-tracked during the holidays.

We do not live in a country where people are willing to let others take away their food choices, their rights, their beliefs and increase exposure to serious long-term environmental and health risks.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2025/01/22/how-many-drs-will-new-zealand-need/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post If the Gene Technology Bill is passed, how many additional doctors will New Zealand need? appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

The dream of biotechnology, which promised a new age of health and human achievement, has become a nightmare, with its success stories being largely myths and its main beneficiaries being transnational corporations.

The covid-19 pandemic is viewed as the greatest success story of biotechnology, but it has also highlighted the risks and dangers of the industry, with the development of a deadly disease and a vaccine that has harmed many people.

This covid “success” has led to the New Zealand government introducing the Gene Technology Bill, which contains permissive legislation that favours transnational corporations and ignores public safety and environmental concerns.

The bill’s introduction is believed to be driven by trade negotiations with the US, which wants New Zealand to deregulate biotechnology to pave the way for similar deregulation in Europe.

Meanwhile, Australia already has a Gene Technology Regulator who has announced a project that is proposing to make gene-altered versions of the flu and then test out various genetic drugs and/or vaccines on human volunteers.

Waking Up From the Dream of Biotechnology

By Dr. Guy Hatchard

The dream of biotechnology is a new age of health, happiness and human achievement. James Watson, who discovered the double helix structure of DNA 70 years ago, was full of hope:

“We used to think that our fate was in our stars, but now we know that, in large measure, our fate is in our genes … recombinant DNA is likely the safest revolutionary technology ever developed, and we should not postpone experiments with clear benefits for fear of hypothetical risks … I want to see cancer cured in my lifetime,” Watson has enthused.

Watson is now in a nursing home aged 96 and cancer is not cured. In fact, it has become rampant. Somewhere along the way, did the dream of biotechnology become a nightmare? If so, it is time to wake up.

How Did We Get Here And What Does The Future Hold?

If you ask Google what are the biotechnology success stories, it comes up with slim pickings.

First up is a list of patented genetically engineered crops like cotton, soya and corn. These types are paired with proprietary pesticide products.

A March 2023 report from the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service (“AMS”) says a consolidation trend within the agricultural seed industry began when the first genetically engineered traits were introduced to the market in the early 1990s. Since then, more than 200 US seed companies have been acquired or gone out of business. The result is a concentration of market share among four seed companies.

A June 2023 report by the USDA Economic Research Service (“ERS”) found that when combined, AgReliant, Bayer, Corteva and Syngenta accounted for 83% of corn seed sales and 78% of soyabean seed sales in the United States from 2018 to 2020. The trend is continuing, Bayer has just announced the consolidation of a further 10 regional seed brands in 2025.

This so-called success story of biotechnology is not about more nutritious strains, increased yields, etc., these largely remain the stuff of myth. It is about the profits of transnational corporations that control a concentration of intellectual property (“IP”) in the form of patented genetics and traits. This has left farmers trapped in an unsustainable cycle of heightened input costs and depressed commodity prices. This is not a route for New Zealand farming to travel. Much of the allure of New Zealand produce is our pristine shores and clean green image. The genetically engineered (“GE”) route leads to corporate slavery, trade barriers, public rejection and rock bottom prices.

Next up on Google is a list of biotech startups that promise a lot, but do they deliver?

BiomassProtein is a Danish company that invented a process to turn grass into food. Like all such companies, they have required massive investment and government funding but have yet to turn any profit or generate public interest. The biomass industry wouldn’t be viable without renewable energy subsidies. In fact, biomass projects are not generally sustainable environmentally or economically. Worldwide, governments have so far invested over $48 billion subsidising the biomass industry, much of it related to the dubious application of climate-related tax credits.

As you go down any short list of biotechnology success stories, there is one feature that stands out above all else. The absolutely tremendous promise, and “promise” is the operative word.

For 70 years, since Watson and Crick’s discovery, a lot of promises have been made and a lot of water has flowed under the bridge without actually generating any power. As we have reported on many occasions, you can make money in biotechnology by promising a lot, whether you deliver or not is largely immaterial. Along the way, government grants, speculative investment and intellectual property sales can make you into a multimillionaire without actually achieving, curing or selling anything.

Third on Google’s list is Fibrotech Therapeutics, an Australian company sold for $75 million in 2019 after “promising” phase 1 trials of a product to treat diabetic nephropathy. No further updates are available.

So where does this all go to?

There is only one answer to this question, and it is on everyone’s lips – covid-19. Covid-19 is THE great success story of biotechnology. Not only is it possible to create a totally new deadly disease but also share it through a crack in the laboratory door with the entire world’s population. And it doesn’t stop there, you can also create, sell and profit from a vaccine which doesn’t work and actually harms a great many people. There is no liability whatsoever if you do so, even if you harm the economy. Learned papers have been written documenting the financial costs of the pandemic rated in hundreds of trillions of dollars and the human cost estimated to top 15-30 million excess deaths worldwide. If this hasn’t dampened your enthusiasm for biotechnology probably nothing will.

It is in this last category that the New Zealand government falls. It has introduced the Gene Technology Bill which contains by far the most permissive legislation of any country in the world. At last New Zealand really is leading the world (perhaps in cupidity and stupidity). Its clauses contain all the pips and whistles most needed by transnational corporates – no criminal or civil liability for facilitators, no labelling of products, foods, medicines required (the public won’t even know), provision for government-mandated approval (yes, it has that magic word “mandate” which is music to the corporate ears), ability to fiddle to your heart’s content with the DNA of animals, microbes plants, adults and children, no messy ethics, public watchdogs or testing requirements – simply apply to the one-stop regulator for a rubber stamp.

What Will Happen To Us?

A quick look across the ditch to Australia reveals they already have a Gene Technology Regulator. Dr Raj Bhula. He has announced that a period of 30 days of public submissions will be held starting in March before the probable approval of the release of genetically engineered mosquitoes in Queensland.

It doesn’t stop there, the idea of experimenting on Australians is catching on fast. Incredibly, Bhula’s office has just rated the following project at the Doherty Institute, University of Melbourne, as posing “negligible to moderate risk to human health and safety.”

“The initial aim is to evaluate the safety and infectivity of recombinant seasonal human influenza viruses in healthy volunteers. These GM [genetically modified] viruses will then be used to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic drugs or vaccine candidates to prevent and control influenza infection.”

The laboratory is proposing to make gene-altered versions of the flu and then test out various genetic drugs and/or vaccines on human volunteers over a five-year period. Given the low-risk rating by the regulator, the project, which creates new viruses, is likely to be a shoo-in for a rubber stamp. Does any of this sound at all familiar? It should.

Why Is Our Government Deregulating Biotechnology At A Time When The Significant Serious Risks Are Becoming Glaringly Obvious Even To Children?

A little bird has told us the answer to this and it might be surprising – trade negotiations.

The powers that be in the US have apparently decided to follow up on the massive profits that their pharmaceutical companies made during the pandemic by asking little New Zealand to deregulate biotechnology. I am not sure “ask” is the right word but it is the polite term when it comes to trade diplomacy.

In a rush of enthusiasm, our Coalition government is eager to comply and damn the consequences. If we give in, we will be providing a helping hand to our “friends” in America who will then toddle off to Europe and ask them to follow suit. “See, New Zealand did it, now it’s your turn.” And if there are any projects that the American public, protected as they, fortunately, are by constitutional rights, believe to be a bridge too far, then New Zealand can step into the breach and pollute our hitherto pristine shores and clean green fields for them. There is a big payday involved for someone, but not for the farmers or the honest Kiwi public.

There are a lot of reasons to reject the Gene Technology Bill. Find out more by viewing our YouTube video ‘The Gene Technology Bill. What Kiwis Need To Know’ and then make a submission to the Health Select Committee by 17 February. We have published suggestions for a submission template.

Write to your Member of [the New Zealand] Parliament. They need to be quizzed on this egregious Bill. They are trying to get this fast-tracked during the holidays. We do not live in a country where people are willing to let others take away their food choices and increase exposure to serious long-term environmental and health risks.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2025/01/06/nz-has-introduced-a-gene-technology-bill/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Because of the “success” of covid, New Zealand has introduced a Gene Technology Bill appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Erasing Our God Gene: Is THIS Big Pharma’s Dark Agenda? w/ Tom Renz

Source:  https://rumble.com/v5glas4-erasing-our-god-gene-is-this-big-pharmas-dark-agenda-w-tom-renz.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Erasing Our God Gene: Is THIS Big Pharma’s Dark Agenda? w/ Tom Renz appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.