9/11, DHS, TSA, the Covid boogeyman virus, Lockdowns, “mandatory” vaccines with pay to play bribes, the murder of Charlie Kirk and the war with Iran. WHY does America have such an obsession with FEAR? A nation and a people guided by fear is no more free than an elephant in a zoo. NYTimes best-selling author John Leake joins me to talk about “official” narratives, knee benders, the murder of Charlie Kirk and his new book MIND VIRUSES. Thank you for tuning in.

Source: https://rumble.com/v7ex792-the-death-of-reason-and-the-hobgoblin-of-fear-john-leake-part-1.html?e9s=src_v1_sa%2Csrc_v3_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_ucp_f

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

HopeGirl Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@hopegirlblog
HopeGirl Telegram Channel Chat and Groups: https://t.me/Hopegirl587 
Get Our Free EMF Survival Guide : https://bit.ly/FTWEMF
10 Percent Off our EMF Protection Products with this Link: https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/tenoff

The post THE DEATH of REASON & THE HOBGOBLIN of FEAR — John Leake [PART 1] appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Corporate media is creating fear around a hantavirus outbreak, following a familiar pattern of creating fear before providing context, similar to previous “outbreaks” like covid, monkeypox (MPOX) and bird flu.

Hantaviruses are a class of viruses that can infect humans, typically through inhalation of aerosolised rodent urine, faeces or saliva, with human-to-human spread being very rare.

Despite the low number of cases and deaths worldwide over decades, there are already 13 documented hantavirus vaccines and gene therapy programmes in active development.

Once again, it’s the Hegelian dialectic: problem, reaction, solution.

Hantavirus: Have We Learned Nothing?

By Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

Watching the headlines unfold this week feels like watching a rerun of a movie we’ve seen multiple times before:

• A virus outbreak on a cruise ship.
• Emergency evacuations. Hospital escorts.
• Contact tracing across multiple countries.
• Media outlets flood the public with alarming updates before most people even know what hantavirus is.

The images, the language and the emotional conditioning are familiar because we have seen this exact pattern before. It always begins the same way: create fear first, provide context later, and by the time the facts catch up, the public has already been pushed into a state of panic and vaccinated. It seems every 2 years we get a new viral scare from the media, as the very expensive and intrusive Biosecurity Agenda gets built out. Remember this?:

• 2020: Covid
• 2022: Monkeypox
• 2024: Bird Flu
• 2026: Hantavirus

What is a Hantavirus?

Hantaviruses are a large class of enveloped, single-stranded RNA viruses. Today, scientists recognise more than 50 hantavirus species worldwide, with approximately two dozen known to infect humans. Most infections occur through inhalation of aerosolised rodent urine, faeces or saliva (how unclean was that cruise ship?). Human-to-human spread is considered very rare, although the Andes virus in South America has shown limited evidence of person-to-person transmission. For the last 50 years, rodents have been the primary hosts of hantaviruses. However, recent discoveries have shown that hantaviruses also infect bats, moles and shrews.

Before the 1993 outbreak in the Four Corners region of the Southwest (where Arizona, New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah meet), only 31 hantavirus cases had ever been reported. The initial outbreak affected 24 previously healthy young adults who suddenly developed fever, muscle aches and rapidly progressive respiratory failure, and within days, there were a few deaths. US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) investigators eventually identified a previously unknown hantavirus carried by the deer mouse. It was later named Sin Nombre virus. The deaths resulted from what became known as Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome (“HPS”). (Do you remember hysterically hearing about this from the CDC or local public health departments? I don’t either …)

After the 1993 outbreak, the CDC began national surveillance for hantavirus infections. As of the end of 2023 (30 years), 890 confirmed hantavirus disease cases had been reported nationwide, as HPS or non-pulmonary hantavirus infections. (A non-pulmonary case is one in which patients tested positive for hantavirus infection but never developed the classic pulmonary phase. Of these, 309 cases were classified as HPS with a case-fatality rate of approximately 35%, which is about 10 deaths per year.

Historical surveillance has shown that approximately 96 per cent of US cases occurred west of the Mississippi River, reflecting the geographic range of the deer mouse and related rodent reservoirs. However, at least one case has been identified in nearly every state.

The CDC reports that hantaviruses are spread through exposure to infected rodent urine, droppings or saliva, especially when contaminated materials become aerosolised and inhaled. As previously stated, deer mice are considered the principal reservoir for Sin Nombre virus in North America. Hantaviruses found in the United States are not believed to spread from person to person.

Long-term CDC surveillance has demonstrated that hantavirus activity fluctuates with environmental conditions that influence rodent populations. Researchers studying deer mouse ecology in the Southwest have observed that fluctuations in infected rodent populations are closely linked to environmental conditions.

Hyping the Concern

The pre-summer hysteria is a readily recognised, predictable formula. Will we watch an entire global population stop, question and challenge this current “emergency,” or will people put on masks and socially distance because they were pre-conditioned to do so?

The same Hegelian principles are used repeatedly by “public health”: problem (a pathogen); reaction (cause hysteria); solution (a vaccine). Before the public even has time to understand what the concern is about, we learn that there are 13 documented hantavirus vaccine and gene therapy programmes in active development:

• 6 DNA “vaccines” (US Army / USAMRIID) – many of them “needle-free” jet-injector versions – this is a DNA gene-therapy.
• 3 mRNA “vaccines” (Moderna + Korea University, Chinese research team, VIDO Canada)
• 2 viral vector “vaccines” (UK institutions + VIDO Canada)
• 1 inactivated vaccine (Hantavax – already licensed and used in South Korea)
• 1 protein subunit vaccine (VIDO Canada)

What makes this so disturbing is how quickly the public is already asking panicked questions about hantavirus prevention and treatment protocols, even though the few cases that have occurred are thousands of miles away from where they live.

Why are we not talking first about rodent control, environmental hygiene and targeted risk awareness? Why are we so concerned about the hype? Why does Public Health so often leap past those fundamentals and head straight toward injections?

We no longer live in a world where a small outbreak is simply a local event. Today, a few infections can mobilise an entire international system of control overnight. Quarantines. Travel restrictions. Surveillance. Emergency authorisations. Expanded government power. We saw it happen in 2020; many people complied because they believed it was temporary, necessary and for the greater good. But temporary powers have a way of becoming permanent infrastructure, and once those systems are in place, they do not disappear when the headlines fade.

Fear sells, and during covid, those in power learned they could weaponise it into the most effective tool for controlling public behaviour. A frightened population can be managed and persuaded into accepting measures they would otherwise question or flat-out refuse. The greatest mistake people could make right now would be to respond emotionally before responding intelligently. Hantavirus warrants observation (there have been only 3 deaths!!), not hysteria.

However, images matter. The setting matters. Public memory matters. Cruise ships, quarantines, isolation, contact tracing – these are not neutral images. They trigger something in people because we have already lived through it once before. We all lost friends, family, employment and community. We can’t be forced to comply with these measures again.

If the covid years taught us anything, it should be that urgency is often used to rush us past scrutiny and critical thinking about what’s going on. The response to the hantavirus hysteria will be very telling: have we learned to ignore the fear-mongering media and the WHO, or will we once again cower and be compliant?

This is the moment to remember the pain of past pandemic rhetoric. The world cannot afford another panic-driven mistake, and neither can you.

The overwhelming scientific understanding of hantavirus has always centred on environmental exposure, not casual community spread. That distinction matters because, without context,every pathogen can be made to sound like a scary, civilisation-ending emergency.

Source: https://theexposenews.com/2026/05/10/hantavirus-the-fear-machine-is-starting-again/

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

HopeGirl Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@hopegirlblog
HopeGirl Telegram Channel Chat and Groups: https://t.me/Hopegirl587 
Get Our Free EMF Survival Guide : https://bit.ly/FTWEMF
10 Percent Off our EMF Protection Products with this Link: https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/tenoff

The post Hantavirus: The fear machine is starting again; this time, you should recognise it, Dr. Sherri Tenpenny says appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

As this chat started, I was pleasantly surprised to find that, in some ways, myself and Jeff have run parallel lives in terms of our awakenings.

Jeff’s focus was on the financial system, which led to him founding the excellent Dollar Vigilante and Crypto Vigilante, which I highly recommend. You can take a look at them here:

Dollar Vigilante: https://tmas.tv/dollarvigilante

Source:  https://diaryofaconspiracytheorist.substack.com/p/theres-never-anything-to-fear-whatsoever?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post “There’s Never Anything to Fear. Whatsoever.” – Jeff Berwick appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

In this inspiring Escape Zone Podcast episode, Tina Blanco chats with Shannon Joy, veteran podcaster, independent broadcaster, and passionate advocate for liberty and personal sovereignty. 🗽✨ Together they dive deep into emergency preparedness, health freedom, satellite communications, 5G dangers, and how to protect yourself and your family in a rapidly changing world. 🛡️🌎

Source:  https://rumble.com/v6rg313-empowering-preparedness-with-shannon-joy-and-tina-blanco.html?e9s=src_v1_wh&playlist_id=watch-history

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Fighting Fear with Preparedness: Communication, Health & Independence with Shannon Joy appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Stew Peters & Dr. Bryan Ardis: Hospital KILLS Child with Measles Jab to Kick-Start Measles Fear Campaign!

Source:  https://rumble.com/v6qth5c-stew-peters-and-dr.-bryan-ardis.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Stew Peters & Dr. Bryan Ardis: Hospital KILLS Child with Measles Jab to Kick-Start Measles Fear Campaign! appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

The Dual Reality (fear, decision-making & authority) w/Jamie Winship

Source:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m4VhRW4rHc&t

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post The Dual Reality (fear, decision-making & authority) w/Jamie Winship appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

There is nothing new about fear-mongering propaganda being disseminated by politicians and corporate media, but they are now joined by “scientists.”

A fair amount of catastrophic climate change propaganda has made its way into the scientific method and perhaps in no venue more clearly than the Planetary Boundaries framework, Dr. Jessica Weinkle writes and explains where it comes from and what is driving the narrative.

Last month we published an article that brought attention to the Food and Agriculture Organisation’s (“FAO’s”) roadmap to achieve its “global commitment to transform agrifood systems.”  The FAO is an agency of the United Nations.

To publicise this scheme, in January, FAO chief economist Maximo Torero Cullen said a roadmap is necessary because “we are violating six of the nine planetary boundaries.”

In September, 20 scientists funded by the European Research Council, the German government, the Carlsberg Foundation and the Volkswagen Foundation published a paper “establishing” 9 planetary boundaries. They determined that 6 of their 9 boundaries had been “crossed.”

As we read Dr. Weinkle’s article below about what is behind the Planetary Boundaries narrative, we should bear in mind that she also writes for The Breakthrough Institute, whose funders include some of the usual suspects driving the false climate change crisis narrative, such as Profiteer Bill Gates (see ‘About the Author’). Why is this relevant? For one thing, while people may feel free to expose nefarious actors, there is the possibility that this freedom might be limited to those who do not fund them.

How Planetary Boundaries Captured Science, Health, and Finance: The Technological Façade Hiding a Normative Empire

By Dr. Jessica Weinkle, 14 June 2024

From his perch overlooking the global community, UN Secretary-General António Guterres has warned that the world is on the “highway to climate hell.” The president of the United States has likewise threatened that denying the impacts of climate change means condemning Americans to “a dangerous future.” Former Secretary of State John Kerry has scorned unnamed demagogues slowing the process of decarbonisation.

Overblown rhetoric from the political class is nothing new. But now, the politicians have a fresh cheering section: a cohort of scientists who have set aside rational deliberation about methodology and findings in favour of empathic allyship with advocate researchers. A leading climate psychologist, for example, has argued that those not afflicted with climate anxiety must be in denial, leaning on faulty “rationalisations against existential terror of annihilation.”

Such arguments suggest that a fair amount of propaganda has made its way into the scientific method – and perhaps in no venue more clearly than the Planetary Boundaries framework.

Advocates have positioned the framework as a functional approach to organising society within the (perceived) limits of Earth’s ecology and human ingenuity. Although wrapped in a façade of technical exercise, the framework is scaffolded by the values and assumptions of the model creators. More than an impartial application of science, it serves as a vehicle for political messaging while maintaining an air of objectivity.  By understanding where it came from, we can see the path back to scientific integrity and rational deliberation.

The Planetary Boundaries Enterprise

On the surface, Planetary Boundaries and its various derivatives seem scientific. They appear in notable scientifically-oriented journal outlets like Nature and Science, and they tend to involve lots of complicated calculations and formulas.

The framework posits nine thresholds under which “humanity can operate safely.” These range from climate change to ocean acidification to rates of biodiversity loss. If any of the boundaries (or perhaps some of the boundaries) are transgressed (for some unknown amount of time) the Earth will no longer be safe (at some unknown point in the future).

There is some logic here, but the framework is inherently arbitrary. It conflates regional and global scales, which artificially constrains policy options and presents in technocratic form a moral philosophy for social and economic development. Planetary boundaries embed the ideas of tipping points, tipping elements and tipping cascades, which also suffer from muddle; indeed, there is “no rapidly approaching planetary cliff.”

The idea of Planetary Boundaries first appeared in 2009 in the journal Ecology & Society as a “proof of concept paper.” The paper’s lead author, Johan Rockström, had joint association with the Stockholm Resilience Centre at Stockholm University and the Stockholm Environment Institute (“SEI”) supported by the Swedish government.

The framework follows an “overshoot and collapse” trajectory. This means that a variable of interest – say pollution – increases beyond some limit in a system’s capacity, at which point the whole system collapses. In this way, Planetary Boundaries is a re-statement of neo-Malthusian ideas of physical limits to the growth of humanity. In fact, the author team explicitly situated its framework as a follow-on to the ‘Limits to Growth’ modelling exercise developed in the late 1960s and early 1970s for the Club of Rome, a group of elite entrepreneurs and scientists concerned that population growth would necessarily lead to ecological problems.

Yet framing population as a problem has never gone well for society. The publication of the Limits to Growth report in 1972 and broader efforts by the neo-Malthusian community on both sides of the Atlantic helped fuel fears that population growth would lead to catastrophe and set the stage for various population control measures around the world, including forced sterilisation.

More recently, the Club of Rome – with the Stockholm Resilience Centre and a few others – took up the Planetary Boundaries cause in an explicit campaign, called Earth4All, to transform the global economic system to provide an “equitable future on a finite planet” through wealth redistribution, “stabilising the world’s population,” and degrowth. Meanwhile, another body, the Earth Commission, which Rockström co-directs, has busied itself with developing ever more boundaries humans should not cross.

And it is this morally vexed storyline at the heart of the rallying cry for a safe and just planet that has inspired crowds to march.

Cascades of Capture

Despite the chilling relationship between Planetary Boundaries, neo-Malthusianism, and population control, the concept has been happily taken up by a range of groups working to transform institutions like health, banking and finance towards the Earth’s Commission’s ideals.

These institutions tend to zero in on one of the two forces neo-Malthusians have seen as sources of impending doom: population and economy.

I’ll start with concerns about population growth which underpins the concept of “planetary health.”

The original use of the term “planetary health” is attributed to Friends of the Earth in 1980, who amended the World Health Organisation’s 1946 definition of health so that that “health is a state of complete physical, mental, social and ecological well-being and not merely the absence of disease – that personal health involves planetary health.”

The term then became popularised in 2015 by a joint project between The Lancet, an elite health science publication, and the Rockefeller Foundation. The project asserts that “we have been mortgaging the health of future generations to realise economic and development gains” – an idea also explicitly included in the Planetary Boundaries framework.

Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of The Lancet, has since made it his mission to “develop the idea of planetary health – the health of human civilizations and the ecosystems on which they depend.” His ideas are embodied in The Lancet Planetary Health journal, which aims to support “radical civilisational transformation” and create a “safe and just space for humanity, respecting planetary boundaries.”

Horton celebrates the work of Extinction Rebellion (“XR”) in calling on medical professionals to join the cause and “inject moral force into the political debate on climate action.”  In writing about an influential journal article on ocean circulation, XR’s Roger Hallam said “repressed scientist” who say that the planetary situation “‘kind of scary’” are “like saying Auschwitz was ‘kind of unpleasant’.”

The problem in the simile should be apparent. The Holocaust produced millions of deaths of documented deaths at the hands of a formal genocide government policy. The research Hallam was critiquing used a computer model to estimate ocean cycling 2,800 “model years” into the future to say something about tipping in the present. But Hallam’s extreme view is supported by a science-like narrative of an earth on the brink of collapse that is legitimised by The Lancet’s advocacy-oriented editor.

If you think the problem is just academic journals and advocates, think again. In an Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (“IPCC”) report from 2022, the authors used the term to describe the result of resilient development.

The IPCC’s footnotes demonstrate, however, the term’s ambiguity.

• Planetary health is defined as “a concept based on the understanding that human health and human civilisation depend on ecosystem health and the wise stewardship of ecosystems.”
• Ecosystem health is defined as “a metaphor used to describe the condition of an ecosystem, by analogy with human health.”

That is, “planetary health” is what results from the kind of development that writers of the IPCC report like and what they like is the Planetary Boundaries worldview.

Planetary Boundaries Used in Banking and Finance

Now, to banking and finance – important institutions in economic growth.

The Network for Greening the Financial System (“NGFS”) is a coalition of central banks that pressures the banking sector and its regulators into meeting Paris Agreement goals. NGFS  directly invokes the idea of Planetary Boundaries in its development of scenarios for use in bank stress testing.

The NGFS scenario narratives (below left) get their names from an article by the Planetary Boundaries authors that appeared in PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America) in 2018. The article has one of the highest attention scores – that is, it was mentioned a lot in the news, blogs, and policy documents – in all of science.In the article, the authorsset out two trajectories for humanity: a stabilised Earth and the Hothouse Earth which is “likely to be uncontrollable and dangerous to many.” It poses severe risks, the authors continue, “for health, economies, political stability (especially for the most climate vulnerable), and ultimately, the habitability of the planet for humans.” An image from the PNAS article (below right) was used in the NGFS scenario’s technical documentation illustrating the fingerprints of Planetary Boundaries in the development of the scenarios (I added the pink circles in the images below).  NGFS also uses the planetary boundary framework in the development of scenarios central banks can run to assess nature-related economic and financial risk.

Planetary Boundaries is also the guiding framework for the Science Based Targets Network – an initiative combining the Earth Commission with the founders of the Science Based Target Initiative (“SBTi”). The latter, SBTi, is itself wrapped up in a complicated network of coalitions that have been the source of much ire for US legislators concerned with potential antitrust violations occurring in environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) and sustainable investing activities.

And so, it is from here that we find leading advocacy organizations promulgating ideas of systemic financial risk caused by climate change and policy entrepreneurs under the auspices of the Financial Stability Board building a case for corporate disclosure on the foundation of Planetary Boundaries.

Concentrated power

In 2018 Rockström became a co-director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (“PIK”), taking over for another Planetary Boundaries co-author, Hans Joachim Schellnhuber, who founded PIK shortly after the fall of the Berlin Wall. Schellnhuber is now a director of IIASA in Austria.

This is not just an administrative detail or notch on some researcher’s CV. It highlights the formidable power in how the world has come to understand climate change and paths to mitigation. PIK and IIASA are tightly knit groups, and IIASA’s founding is bound up in the founding of the Club of Rome, with the same leading figure working to establish both in the 1970s.

On its website, PIK explains that everything the institution does is guided by “the integration of Planetary Boundaries and Global Commons.” This work includes the development of “transformation pathways” for climate protection and sustainable development. Planetary boundaries, though, are misleading and tied up in various histories of social control. Yet the narrative has not moved on.

The difficulty in doing so is in no doubt partly due to the conflicts of interest in the organisation of climate change science. The same people are prioritising scenarios for the international research community, writing government science assessments, working in advocacy and consulting with industry. I have discussed such conflicts at the bottleneck of global climate change science research, where those prioritising climate scenarios for use in the research community are also involved with creating scenarios for the financial sector.

Indeed, the NGFS scenarios creation team included those at PIK and IIASA.  If everything PIK does is guided by Planetary Boundaries, then what they create for NGFS is as well. Telling is that the team embedded the damage functions created by PIK researchers into the NGFS scenarios and at the heart of the damage function is the notoriously extreme emission scenario developed by IIASA.

What the Planetary Boundaries framework thus represents is more than an appeal for environmental protection. It is a play for political power over social, economic, and governing systems. Many have observed that because models engage assumptions, they are inherently linked to the cultures and interests of the institutions that build them. As one early critique of the IIASA model put it, “Models are more symbolic vehicles for gaining authority than objective technical frameworks.”

It is possible to be both deeply desirous of better protections for the Earth’s ecological systems and biodiversity and extremely turned off by systems of power masquerading as science.

I certainly am.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/06/26/planetary-boundaries-to-stabilise-population-growth/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post The climate fear-mongering enterprise behind the Planetary Boundaries to stabilise population growth appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

‘Disease X’ Fear Campaign Begins: WHO Preparing New Pandemic To Oppress World With More Tyranny

Dr. William Makis is here to talk about the world health oligarchs and how they are planning the next pandemic to get people to continue taking mRNA death shots.

Source:  https://rumble.com/v4ceikl-disease-x-fear-campaign-begins-who-preparing-new-pandemic-to-oppress-world-.html

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post ‘Disease X’ Fear Campaign Begins: WHO Preparing New Pandemic To Oppress World With More Tyranny appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

It is very unnerving that our own governments have committed mass genocide against us, that they crashed the global economy and that they are dismantling the institutions that once protected our rights, while calling everyday people “domestic terrorists” and while shoving this diabolical pedophile, bug-eating, anti-human agenda down our throats and are now threatening us with an imminent biological attack of organ-melting Marburg virus disease.

Despite the fact that the global monetary system of the US dollar as the world reserve currency is coming to an end and despite the fact that the majority of the world’s nations are joining the BRICS alliance in order to reject the the US dollar and although we are teetering on the precipice of nuclear war with Russia, we are also witnessing the collapse of the Globalists’ entire Beast system.

All of these terrifying things that we’re seeing are the signs that we’re moving into a new era, on the order of the shift from the antediluvian to the modern, from the Pleistocene to the Holocene and from the Piscean to the Aquarian ages.

As Jim Willie was saying the other day, although the Globalists are trying to bring humanity to its knees, they’re not ready for the rise of all the alternative energy technologies that they’ve been suppressing for the past century; the Tesla intellectual properties, the hydrogen cars, etc, etc.

This latest piece from Greg Reese is so true. The only thing we have to fear is fear, itself.

Source Link: https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/fear-is-the-mind-killer/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Fear Is the Mind-Killer appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.