Explosive new evidence recovered from the remote New Mexico mountains where nuclear scientist Melissa Casias was found dead is raising fresh questions about the official narrative surrounding her suspicious death.

Investigators have found previously undiscovered evidence that suggests Casias was moved to the location where her remains were found after she died.

An independent search team hired by Casias’ family uncovered multiple items that authorities failed to recover after previously clearing the scene, fueling suspicions that critical evidence may have been overlooked.

Casias, a 53-year-old Los Alamos National Laboratory employee, disappeared from her Ranchos de Taos home on June 26, 2025.

She left behind her purse, keys, wallet, and both of her cell phones, which were later found inside the house after being factory-reset and wiped of all data.

Surveillance footage captured her walking alone along State Road 518 shortly after 2:20 p.m.

A drop of blood was also discovered inside her home.

Nearly eleven months later, on May 28, 2026, a hiker discovered her skeletal remains in the McGaffey Ridge area of Carson National Forest beside a handgun that her family says did not belong to her.

Missed Evidence Raises New Questions

Initial CT scans reportedly found no gunshot wound and no projectile inside Casias’ skull.

Investigators also recovered no shell casing from the scene.

The location itself has also drawn scrutiny because of its rugged terrain, requiring a demanding hike with multiple rest stops and sufficient water.

Now, an independent search conducted after law enforcement had already processed the area has uncovered additional evidence that should never have been left behind.

According to family attorney David Adams of Parnall and Adams Law, investigators recovered bones, torn and bloodied clothing, orange peels, strands of horse hair, shredded paper that may contain Casias’ handwriting, and a tobacco pouch.

Investigators believe the evidence indicates that Casias’ body was taken to the remote location by an unidentified individual on horseback.

“The family really wasn’t expecting to find any additional information… it certainly turned out to be something much, much more,” Adams said.

Adams questioned how the evidence could have been missed and highlighted the possible significance of the apparent horse hair.

“In my mind, when you see that, you kind of go, okay, well, I could see that you would need a horse to get her up there if you were moving a body, for instance, because how you would otherwise do that,” he said.

He also noted that Casias did not use tobacco.

Adams noted that the tobacco pouch was either used by a possible suspect or it reflects poor evidence handling.

“There becomes a question of a chain of custody,” Adams said.

“Could law enforcement have spat a tobacco pouch in the crime scene?

“I mean, certainly possible.

“I mean, that would be an example of just poor training.”

Family Rejects “Suicide” Theory

Casias’ family has consistently rejected suggestions that she intentionally disappeared or took her own life.

Earlier reporting revealed that she left home carrying only her toothbrush and thyroid medication.

One investigator previously described those items as “things that might indicate you’re planning to stay alive.”

Adams said the family retained independent legal counsel after identifying multiple red flags in the investigation.

The newly recovered evidence has now been turned over to authorities.

The Office of the Medical Investigator has still not determined an official cause of death nearly two months after Casias’ remains were identified.

However, the accepted media narrative has suggested that Casias took her own life.

According to Adams, the FBI has not contacted the family despite being directed to examine possible links between Casias’ case and other incidents.

Growing Pattern of Mysterious Deaths

Former FBI agent Ben Hansen has publicly assessed the Casias case as being roughly “80 percent foul play.”

Hansen has also raised the possibility that advanced technologies, including directed-energy weapons or voice-to-skull systems, should not be ruled out because they could potentially influence behavior without leaving conventional ballistic evidence.

Casias’ death has become part of a broader series of unusual disappearances and deaths involving individuals connected to New Mexico’s nuclear and advanced technology sectors.

The pattern first drew widespread attention after retired Air Force Maj. Gen. William Neil McCasland disappeared from his Albuquerque home on February 27, 2026, days after President Donald Trump ordered the release of classified UFO and UAP records.

Subsequent cases have included a NASA nuclear propulsion expert found dead inside a burned Tesla, a NASA-linked aerospace engineer and his family killed in a plane crash, the death of anti-gravity researcher Amy Eskridge after she reported alleged directed-energy harassment, the disappearance of JPL rocket scientist Monica Reza, and the disappearance of nuclear contractor Steven Garcia, who reportedly held top-level security clearance.

By mid-April, the documented total had reached at least eleven cases.

Former FBI Assistant Director Chris Swecker previously noted that administrative personnel at high-security laboratories often possess extensive knowledge of sensitive programs.

“It wouldn’t be the first time their administrative assistant has been targeted,” Swecker said.

Trump Administration Faces Mounting Pressure

Since the series of cases began attracting national attention, the Trump administration has released two major batches of previously classified UFO and UAP records.

President Trump has publicly addressed the deaths and disappearances, saying there is “not much of a connection” between many of the cases while pledging that a full report will be produced.

The newly recovered evidence from the Casias scene is likely to intensify calls for a more comprehensive investigation.

While officials continue examining each case individually, families and independent investigators argue that the growing number of unanswered questions and the repeated discovery of evidence outside official investigations deserve far greater scrutiny.

Source: https://slaynews.com/missing-nuclear-scientists-death-staged-suicide-new-evidence-suggests/

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

HopeGirl Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@hopegirlblog
HopeGirl Telegram Channel Chat and Groups: https://t.me/Hopegirl587 
Get Our Free EMF Survival Guide : https://bit.ly/FTWEMF
10 Percent Off our EMF Protection Products with this Link: https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/tenoff

The post Missing Nuclear Scientist’s Death Staged to Look Like Suicide, New Evidence Suggests appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Jessie Bertran, investigator and expert on directed energy weapons, joins the program to break down the reality behind nanotechnology findings reported in humans around the world—what is known, what is misunderstood, and what evidence actually exists.
–
Bertran is the technical lead of Mind Nexus, an organization dedicated to uncovering hidden technologies, documenting tangible and verifiable evidence, and supporting individuals affected by directed energy exposure and Havana Syndrome / AHI-related phenomena.
–
In this conversation, we explore the technical mechanisms behind these claims, how directed energy research has evolved, what legitimate concerns exist, and where speculation diverges from provable data. Bertran also shares details about Mind Nexus’s upcoming documentary and their ongoing investigative work.

Source: https://rumble.com/v73vw0m-verifiable-evidence-nanotech-found-inside-human-bodies-jessie-bertran.html?e9s=src_v1_cmd%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Verifiable Evidence: Nanotech Found Inside Human Bodies | Jesse Beltran appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Retired attorney and author Matthew McWhorter joins the program to discuss his new book, Canon Crossfire, which documents his investigation into the hidden biblical writings.

Approaching the topic like a legal case, McWhorter applies an unbiased, evidence-based analysis of the Christian biblical canon—an inquiry that began in skepticism and led to an unexpected conversion.

Source:  https://rumble.com/v70tvk8-hidden-biblical-writings-evidence-based-investigation-worlds-first-collecti.html?e9s=src_v3_sa_o%2Csrc_v1_sa%2Csrc_v1_ucp_a

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Hidden Biblical Writings: Evidence Based Investigation, Worlds First Collection w/ Matthew McWhorter appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Ulrike Granögger is a researcher and lecturer passionate about the convergence of science with spirituality. Ulrike’s background is as a linguist, however, she has been one of the foremost exponents of ‘alternative’ or ‘future’ science. With the attitude of a noble journalist, she has met, interviewed and understood the work of many scientists at the fringe of their profession.

This has allowed her to explore ideas of quantum biology and the holographic nature of genetic material. Ulrike also contributes to Catherine Austin Fitts’ Solari Report, where she regularly writes and speaks about topics under the umbrella of ‘future science’.

Source:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZjsW-NuZaEk

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Ulrike Granögger: Evidence For The Wave Genome appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Richard Gage AIA and 40-year structural engineer Kamal Obeid return to SGT Report to expose the forensic evidence regarding the controlled demolitions of world trade centers 1 and 2, and therefore the premeditated mass murder of the poor souls who were trapped in those buildings on 9/11/01.

Source:  https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/financial-rebellion-with-catherine-austin-fitts/doge-hijacks-the-us-treasury-payment-system-show-page/

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post FORENSIC EVIDENCE: 9/11 PREMEDITATED MASS MURDER — Gage & Obeid appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) has introduced a federal bill that would criminalize the deliberate alteration of the Earth’s atmosphere through weather modification and geoengineering. As Greene explains, evidence that chemtrails are poisoning the air, water and soil in the United States is now “undeniable.”

Greene announced the legislation on X, stating it “prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity.” The bill would make such actions a felony offense.

“I have been researching weather modification and working with the legislative counsel for months writing this bill,” Greene wrote. “It will be similar to Florida’s Senate Bill 56. We must end the dangerous and deadly practice of weather modification and geoengineering.”

I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity. It will be a felony offense.

I have been researching weather…

— Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸 (@RepMTG) July 5, 2025

The bill comes amid a wave of state-level legislation aimed at restricting or outright banning atmospheric manipulation. Florida, under Governor Ron DeSantis, signed SB 56 into law this spring, which went into effect July 1.

The law makes it a third-degree felony to engage in weather modification without state authorization, with penalties of up to five years in prison and a $100,000 fine.

Greene’s proposal mirrors the Florida bill, which was spearheaded by State Senator Ileana Garcia. Supporters argue it addresses a growing public outcry over unexplained atmospheric phenomena and fears that secretive weather-altering programs may already be underway.

“We’re seeing a surge in legislation because people are waking up,” said environmental policy analyst Greg Mitchell. “There’s growing concern about solar geoengineering, cloud seeding, and atmospheric spraying that hasn’t been properly disclosed or debated.”

At least eight U.S. states, including Texas, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Arizona, are considering similar measures. Some bills focus on halting weather modification, while others aim to increase transparency and public oversight.

The push for federal regulation follows years of official denial and media skepticism. The term “chemtrails” has long been dismissed as a conspiracy theory, despite declassified documents and public projects—such as the U.S. military’s historical cloud seeding experiments and Harvard’s solar geoengineering research—demonstrating that weather modification has been studied and, in some cases, implemented.

Critics of Greene’s bill argue that it legitimizes unfounded fears and could hinder legitimate scientific research. The Associated Press referred to similar state-level efforts as being rooted in “unsubstantiated conspiracy theories.”

Greene and her supporters reject that characterization.

“This isn’t about fringe beliefs—it’s about protecting the environment, our food supply, and public health from potentially harmful experiments that no one voted for,” she said. “We need accountability, not denial.”

The bill is expected to face steep resistance in Congress but marks a growing movement to bring what was once a taboo topic into the legislative spotlight.

With public trust in institutions at a historic low, many see Greene’s legislation not as an alarmist stunt, but as a long-overdue response to an issue that has remained hidden in plain sight.

As weather patterns grow more erratic and atmospheric anomalies continue to spark speculation, Greene’s bill may be the first of many efforts to bring geoengineering and atmospheric intervention under legal scrutiny. Whether the mainstream media acknowledges it or not, the conversation is shifting—and fast.

Source:  https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/mtg-introduces-chemtrails-bill-to-criminalize-weather-modification-the-evidence-is-undeniable/

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post MTG Introduces Chemtrails Bill to Criminalize Weather Modification: ‘The Evidence Is Undeniable’ appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Source:  https://rumble.com/v6rn70d-cancer-is-parasites-the-scientific-evidence-and-what-to-do-about-it.-sound-.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Cancer is Parasites, the Scientific Evidence, and What to Do About it. appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Funeral director John O’Looney keeps finding white fibrous clots in the blood vessels of deceased Covid Vaccine recipients. In addition, he shares about his professional insight, experiences & observations concerning sudden death & excess mortality, turbo cancer, corruption, financial incentives, medical malpractice throughout the Covid- Pandemic and up to this day as well as medical professionals, politicians and people in power covering these crimes.

Source:  https://www.brighteon.com/b12c6f29-ec53-44ea-a64f-dde4abe171ea

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Evidence in the Blood – A Visit with Funeral Director John O’Looney appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Prepare yourself for a journey into the heart of darkness, where science fiction becomes reality, and the true horrors of nanotechnology are revealed.

In this bone-chilling exposé, we expose the malevolent truth behind graphene nano bots lurking within COVID-19 vaccines.

Brace yourself as we navigate through the treacherous waters of unknown risks, uncovering the potential dangers that lie within this minuscule technology.

Join us as we delve into the sinister world of manipulation, control, and dystopian consequences that await those who dare to scratch beneath the surface of the mainstream narrative.

The Enigma of Graphene NanoBots:

Hidden within the depths of COVID-19 vaccines, an enigma awaits discovery: graphene nanobots. These microscopic entities, composed of graphene oxide, possess a dark agenda that threatens human health and autonomy.

In the vast landscape of scientific advancements, one enigma stands out: graphene nanobots. These microscopic entities, crafted from the extraordinary material known as graphene, have captivated the imaginations of researchers and innovators worldwide. Yet, behind their seemingly miraculous potential lies a disturbing and ominous reality—one that could shape the future of humanity in unforeseen and treacherous ways.

Graphene, a single layer of carbon atoms arranged in a two-dimensional lattice, possesses remarkable properties that have paved the way for revolutionary breakthroughs in various fields. Its strength, flexibility, and conductivity make it a coveted material for applications ranging from electronics to medicine. However, the integration of graphene into nanobots takes this technological marvel to a whole new level.

These minuscule robots, driven by the power of nanotechnology, possess the ability to navigate the intricate terrain of our bodies with unprecedented precision. Their potential applications appear endless: targeted drug delivery, tissue repair, disease detection, and even neural interfaces. But as with any profound technological advancement, questions arise about the potential risks and unintended consequences that may accompany these seemingly remarkable creations.

One concerning aspect of graphene nanobots lies in their potential for infiltration and manipulation. As they navigate through our bloodstream, these microscopic agents have the capacity to interact with our cells, tissues, and even our DNA. The prospect of intentional manipulation or unintended side effects raises alarms about the invasion of our bodily autonomy and the potential for irreversible harm.

Furthermore, the implications of the widespread deployment and utilization of graphene nanobots in society are shrouded in ambiguity. The possibility of surreptitious surveillance, tracking, or alteration of our physical and cognitive functions becomes a disconcerting reality. As these nanobots become more integrated into our daily lives, the line between human agency and technological control blurs, giving rise to a dystopian world where our very essence is manipulated and exploited.

The enigma of graphene nanobots deepens as questions emerge about who holds the power to create and control these microscopic entities. Are they solely in the hands of benevolent scientists and innovators striving for the betterment of humanity?

Or do hidden agendas lurk behind closed doors, driven by the thirst for control and domination? Unravelling this mystery requires a critical examination of the forces at play and the underlying power dynamics that shape the development and deployment of graphene nanobots.

In our pursuit of scientific progress, we must tread cautiously and ethically. Transparency, accountability, and open dialogue become crucial to ensure that the potential dangers of graphene nanobots are acknowledged, addressed, and mitigated. Safeguards must be implemented to protect individual rights, privacy, and bodily autonomy in a world increasingly entwined with advanced technologies.

As we navigate the enigma of graphene nanobots, we must remain vigilant, questioning the motives and consequences of their existence. In the pursuit of a better future, we must weigh the benefits against the potential risks and tread the path of progress with wisdom and discernment.

Sources:

1. Li, X., et al. (2020). Graphene-based nanobots for biomedical applications: A review. Nanoscale, 12(18), 9708-9720.
2. Rajendran, V. (2021). Ethical Implications of Nanotechnology and Its Applications. Frontiers in Nanotechnology, 2, 631984.
3. Chen, X., et al. (2021). Recent Advances in Graphene-Based Nanobots for Biomedical Applications. Small, 17(9), 2005497.
4. Liu, Y., et al. (2020). Design Strategies and Applications of Graphene-Based Nanomaterials for Biomedical Applications. Small Methods, 4(5), 1900817.

Unmasking the Silent Destroyers:

As our investigation intensifies, startling evidence emerges, linking graphene nanobots to a range of nightmarish consequences.

But how does graphene end up in COVID-19 vaccines in the first place?

It is through the secretive manufacturing process, shrouded in layers of deception.

The confirmation can be found in a document submitted to the FDA by Pfizer to gain Emergency Use Authorization (EUA). A document that the FDA did not want to release for a minimum of 75 years, but were thankfully forced to by a federal judge.

The document confirms it is perfectly possible for toxic Graphene Oxide to end up in the Covid-19 vaccines due to the manufacturing process.

A full breakdown of the document can be viewed here.

But the document in question confirms it is perfectly possible for toxic Graphene Oxide to end up in the Covid-19 vaccines due to the manufacturing process.

In early January 2022, Federal Judge Mark Pittman ordered the FDA to release 55,000 pages per month of documents submitted by Pfizer, and since then, PHMPT has posted all of the documents on its website as they have been published.

Sadly, one of the most recent documents published by the FDA, saved as 125742_S1_M4_4.2.1 vr vtr 10741.pdf, confirms the use of Graphene Oxide in the manufacturing process of the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine. Proving that medicine regulators the mainstream media, Fact Checkers and Pfizer have all been lying to you.

The document is a description of a study carried out by Pfizer between April 7th 2020 and 19th August 2020, with the objective being “to express and characterize the vaccine antigen encoded by BNT162b2.”

In layman’s terms, the study was conducted to determine how the vaccine works. The study found that the vaccine used mRNA to instruct your cells to produce a protein (called P2 S), which is the Spike protein of the alleged Covd-19 virus.

The millions of spike proteins then bind to a receptor called ACE2 on the surface of your cells, inducing an immune system response.

But what is most concerning about the study is the confirmation on page 7 that Graphene Oxide is required to manufacture the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine.

Pfizer states on page 7 of the study in section 3.4 the following –

Therefore, during the manufacturing process, several factors could potentially introduce contaminants or foreign materials into the vaccine. This obviously includes the possibility of varying amounts of Graphene Oxide (GO) entering the final product.

In their relentless pursuit of control, the establishment has hidden the truth from the public. They have concealed the presence of graphene, a material with potentially grave implications, within the vaccine formulations.

This deliberate act of deception highlights the lengths to which the establishment will go to push its agenda while suppressing vital information that could threaten its power.

In the vast realm of scientific innovation, a silent menace lurks in the shadows: graphene nanobots. These inconspicuous agents, forged from the incredible material known as graphene, possess an insidious power that can wreak havoc on our very existence. As the world marvels at the promises of this revolutionary technology, it is imperative that we unmask the true nature of these microscopic entities and confront the chilling implications they hold for humanity.

Graphene, with its exceptional properties and incredible strength, has captivated the scientific community. But when this formidable material is harnessed to create nanobots, a sinister undercurrent emerges. These nanoscale machines, driven by the power of graphene, have the potential to infiltrate our bodies undetected, becoming a silent army of destroyers.

Once inside, graphene nanobots can unleash a cascade of devastation. They possess the ability to interact with our cells, tissues, and even our genetic makeup, effectively becoming malicious intruders within our very being. These tiny assassins can wreak havoc on our biological systems, causing unprecedented damage and irreparable harm.

One of the most horrifying aspects of graphene nanobots is their ability to manipulate and control our bodily functions. Imagine a scenario where these insidious agents override our natural systems, dictating our thoughts, emotions, and physical actions. Our autonomy is stripped away, we become mere puppets in the hands of these malevolent forces. The prospect of a dystopian world where our every move is orchestrated by these silent destroyers is a chilling thought indeed.

The ramifications of the widespread deployment of graphene nanobots extend far beyond individual autonomy. These microscopic entities can be programmed to carry out nefarious agendas, serving as covert agents of surveillance, control, and even annihilation. The potential for their misuse in the hands of those seeking power and domination is a terrifying reality that must not be ignored.

The manufacturing process of these graphene nanobots also raises profound concerns. Are these minuscule machines being injected into our bodies without our knowledge or consent? Is the public being misled about the true nature and purpose of these technological marvels? The veil of secrecy surrounding their production and distribution demands urgent scrutiny and demands transparency from the entities responsible for their creation.

As we peer into the abyss of graphene nanobots, it becomes clear that their emergence heralds a new era of profound existential threats. The dark underbelly of technological progress reveals itself, casting a shadow over the future of humanity. The power to manipulate, control, and destroy lies within the invisible hands of these microscopic foes, and it is up to us to rise and confront this terrifying reality.

Sources:

1. Chen, J., et al. (2021). Graphene-based nanobots for biomedical applications: From targeted drug delivery to cancer therapy. Nano Today, 38, 101148.
2. Zhang, Z., et al. (2020). Graphene-Based Nanobots: Theoretical Design and Fabrication. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 126.
3. Kostarelos, K., et al. (2017). Graphene-based materials for biomedical applications. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 56(33), 8745-8760.
4. Vabbina, P. K., et al. (2021). Graphene-based nanobots: A review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 141, 116268.

The Alarming Discoveries:

Renowned nanotechnology expert, Dr. Philippe van Welbergen, has made groundbreaking strides in uncovering the truth about graphene nanoparticles and their potential presence in COVID-19 vaccines.

Through meticulous analysis of vaccine samples, Dr. van Welbergen has detected disturbing indications of graphene’s involvement, raising concerns about its impact on human health.

His findings correlate the presence of graphene with the emergence of perplexing blood clotting disorders and the destruction of essential red blood cells. These revelations demand urgent attention and further investigation into the safety and long-term consequences of graphene-containing injections.

Below is an image of typical healthy red blood cells as seen with a microscope, what blood should look like. There is no coagulation or foreign objects in it.

Strange Blood Clots and Vascular Disturbances: One of the alarming discoveries surrounding graphene nanobots is their association with the formation of unusual blood clots and vascular disturbances.

Scientific investigations have revealed that these tiny agents, when introduced into the bloodstream, have the capacity to trigger abnormal clotting mechanisms, leading to potentially life-threatening complications.

The interaction between graphene and blood components can disrupt normal coagulation processes, jeopardizing cardiovascular health and increasing the risk of strokes, heart attacks, and other vascular disorders.

THe following is of a person who has been injected with the experimental Covid vaccine.

The blood is coagulated, and the misshapen red blood cells are clumped together. The cell encircled in the image is a healthy red blood cell, one of the few in the image, sitting alongside the graphene fibres.

You can see the size of the graphene fibres in relation to the size of a red blood cell. Fibres of this size will block capillaries. You can also see the graphene fibres are hollow and contain red blood cells.

Destruction of Red Blood Cells: Further research has uncovered the distressing capability of graphene nanobots to destroy red blood cells.

These vital carriers of oxygen are essential for maintaining overall health and well-being. However, when exposed to graphene nanobots, red blood cells may undergo significant damage, impairing their ability to transport oxygen efficiently.

This disruption can have far-reaching consequences, ranging from reduced energy levels and impaired cognitive function to compromised organ health and diminished overall vitality.

Transmission from the Vaccinated to the Unvaccinated: Recent studies have also raised concerns about the potential transmission of graphene nanobots from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated population.

While the primary purpose of vaccination is to confer protection against specific diseases, there have been unsettling reports suggesting that graphene nanobots, used in some vaccine manufacturing processes, could be inadvertently transmitted to individuals who have not received the vaccine.

This raises profound ethical questions about the dissemination of untested and potentially harmful nanomaterials within the population.

The image below is of a blood sample from a vaccine-free, or unvaccinated, three-year-old child.  It shows pieces or “shards” of graphene that “are the result of shedding,” in other words the graphene has been transmitted from “vaccinated” parents to their unvaccinated child.

Below is the image of a blood sample from an eight-year-old unvaccinated child whose blood has been contaminated and destroyed by the transmission of graphene from those around him/her who have had a Covid injection.  The child’s right arm and upper right leg are basically paralysed, the child is unable to lift his/her right arm and the thigh is not functioning properly.

The Elusive Dystopian Future: These alarming discoveries bring us face-to-face with the potential dystopian future that could unfold if the sinister capabilities of graphene nanobots go unchecked.

From their ability to manipulate biological processes and disrupt normal physiological functions to their potential for widespread transmission and long-term health consequences, the implications are deeply unsettling.

The unintended consequences of unregulated and inadequately tested nanotechnology could pave the way for a future where our bodies and well-being are subject to manipulation by unseen forces.

Sources:

1. Zhang, Y., Ali, S. F., & Dervishi, E. (2021). Graphene-based nanomaterials and their potential toxicological effects: A review. Environmental Science: Nano, 8(3), 596-614.
2. Moein, M. M., Nejati-Koshki, K., & Akbarzadeh, A. (2021). Graphene oxide: A unique material for drug delivery applications. Nanotechnology Reviews, 10(1),
3. https://expose-news.com/2023/03/08/doctors-find-graphene-is-shedding-from-the-covid-vaccinated-to-the-unvaccinated-forming-blood-clots-decimating-blood-cells/

The Troubling Phenomenon of Graphene Transmission:

As the investigation unfolds, an even more chilling revelation emerges. Evidence suggests the potential transmission of graphene nanoparticles from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated, raising alarming questions about the unintended consequences of mass vaccination campaigns.

This phenomenon, if confirmed, holds significant implications for the unsuspecting unvaccinated population. It underscores the urgent need for comprehensive studies to determine the extent and consequences of graphene transmission, as well as the potential risks posed to vulnerable individuals.

Within the realm of graphene nanobots, a troubling phenomenon has emerged — the potential transmission of these microscopic agents from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated.

This revelation has profound implications for public health, raising concerns about the unintended consequences and ethical implications of widespread graphene exposure.

1. Transmission Mechanisms: Scientific investigations have uncovered several potential mechanisms through which graphene nanobots could be transmitted from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated population. These include:

• Respiratory Transmission: Inhalation of graphene-containing particles, whether through respiratory droplets or aerosols, can serve as a potential route of transmission. The microscopic size of graphene nanobots allows them to be easily dispersed in the air, raising concerns about the potential for inhalation exposure.
• Direct Contact: Close contact between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals can provide an opportunity for the transfer of graphene nanobots. Skin-to-skin contact or contact with contaminated surfaces may facilitate the transmission of these nanomaterials.

2. Ethical Concerns: The transmission of graphene nanobots from vaccinated individuals to the unvaccinated raises profound ethical concerns. Vaccination programs are primarily aimed at conferring protection against specific diseases, with the understanding that the benefits outweigh the risks.

   However, the inadvertent transmission of graphene nanobots introduces a new dimension to the ethical debate surrounding vaccination. The potential for untested and potentially harmful nanomaterials to be disseminated within the population without informed consent raises questions about transparency, accountability, and individual autonomy.

3. Health Implications: The health implications of graphene transmission are still being explored, but initial findings raise concerns about the potential risks involved. Graphene nanobots, if transmitted to the unvaccinated, could pose various health risks, including:

• Organ Dysfunction: The interaction between graphene nanobots and biological systems may disrupt normal organ function, potentially leading to organ dysfunction and long-term health consequences.
• Inflammatory Responses: Graphene nanobots have been shown to elicit inflammatory responses within the body, which can contribute to a range of health issues, including chronic inflammation and related diseases.
• Immune Dysregulation: The presence of graphene nanobots in the body may perturb the delicate balance of the immune system, potentially leading to immune dysregulation and increased susceptibility to infections or autoimmune disorders.

The troubling phenomenon of graphene transmission raises significant questions about the unintended consequences and ethical implications of nanotechnology deployment.

As we navigate the challenges posed by emerging technologies, it is crucial to prioritize thorough research, stringent safety assessments, and ethical considerations. Transparent communication, comprehensive risk assessments, and informed consent are essential to mitigate potential risks and ensure the responsible development and deployment of nanotechnologies.

By addressing the troubling phenomenon of graphene transmission, we can foster informed discussions, empower individuals, and advocate for the responsible implementation of nanotechnological advancements.

Sources:

1. Zhang, Y., Ali, S. F., & Dervishi, E. (2021). Graphene-based nanomaterials and their potential toxicological effects: A review. Environmental Science: Nano, 8(3), 596-614.
2. Liao, K. H., Lin, Y. S., Macosko, C. W., & Haynes, C. L. (2011). Cytotoxicity of graphene oxide and graphene in human erythrocytes and skin fibro

A Dystopian Future Unveiled:

The implications of graphene nanobots extend far beyond the realm of physical health. They hint at a dystopian future where individual autonomy is compromised, and control rests in the hands of those who deploy these microscopic spies.

The potential for surveillance, manipulation, and even societal subjugation looms large, eroding the very fabric of our free will.

In a world teetering on the edge of uncertainty, a chilling and dystopian reality emerges as the sinister intersection of graphene nanobots, mRNA technology, and nanotechnology comes into focus.

Deep within the shadows of scientific advancements, a dangerous path unfolds, threatening the very fabric of our existence. As we delve into the depths of this dark realm, the truth unravels before our eyes, exposing a web of manipulation, control, and potential catastrophe. Brace yourself as we embark on a journey into a dystopian future where the line between science fiction and reality becomes disturbingly blurred.

Graphene, a remarkable material with extraordinary properties, has captured the attention of researchers and scientists around the world. Its exceptional strength, electrical conductivity, and flexibility have paved the way for innovative applications across various industries. However, lurking beneath its seemingly limitless potential lies a potential for misuse and manipulation that could reshape the very essence of humanity.

The integration of graphene into nanotechnology opens a Pandora’s box of possibilities. Nanobots, tiny robotic devices engineered to perform specific tasks at the nanoscale, have emerged as a powerful tool in medicine, environmental remediation, and beyond.

With the incorporation of graphene, these nanobots gain enhanced capabilities, making them potentially more efficient and versatile. However, these advancements come at a grave cost, as the line between augmentation and control blurs, paving the way for a dystopian future where our bodies and minds become subject to manipulation and surveillance.

The convergence of graphene, mRNA technology, and nanotechnology in the realm of medicine presents a new frontier fraught with peril. mRNA technology, the backbone of the revolutionary COVID-19 vaccines, holds the promise of personalized medicine and targeted therapies.

However, when combined with graphene nanobots, a sinister potential emerges. These nanobots, capable of navigating through our bloodstream and even crossing the blood-brain barrier, could be manipulated to deliver not only beneficial treatments but also nefarious agents that alter our biology, control our thoughts, or compromise our very essence.

The implications of such a dystopian future are profound and alarming. Our personal autonomy, privacy, and freedom hang in the balance as powerful entities gain unprecedented control over our bodies and minds.

The potential for widespread surveillance, manipulation of emotions and thoughts, and the erosion of our individuality become hauntingly real. As we surrender ourselves to a world governed by technology and its masters, the question arises: Are we unwittingly trading our humanity for the illusion of progress?

In the face of this dark future, the need for vigilance, critical thinking, and ethical decision-making becomes paramount. We must question the motivations and intentions behind the integration of graphene nanobots, mRNA technology, and nanotechnology.

Transparency, accountability, and safeguards must be established to ensure that these powerful tools are used for the betterment of humanity rather than its subjugation.

As we confront this bleak reality, we must question the motives of those who champion this technology and demand transparency, accountability, and ethical considerations that prioritize the well-being and agency of individuals.

Sources:

1. Smith, J. A., & Anderson, K. L. (2020). Graphene Nanobots: A New Frontier in Medicine. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine, 28, 102210.
2. Sui, N., Wu, W., Ma, H., Zhang, Y., Gao, Y., Dong, X., & Yu, C. (2019). Graphene-Based Nanobots: Theoretical Design and Applications. Nanomaterials, 9(4), 592.
3. Rossi, S., & Ferrari, A. C. (2019). Graphene Nanobots: Buried Treasure or Pandora’s Box? ACS Nano, 13(8), 8919-8922.
4. National Nanotechnology Initiative. (n.d.). Applications. Retrieved from https://www.nano.gov/nanotech-101/special
5. The Guardian. (2021). Gene editing and ‘smart drugs’ will be big health issues in the next decade. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2021/jan/04/gene-editing-and-smart-drugs-will-be-big-health-issues-in-next-decade

Escaping the Clutches of Graphene Nanobots:

Finding an escape from the clutches of graphene nanobots becomes a paramount concern for those who yearn for freedom and bodily sovereignty.

While the path to liberation may not be clear-cut, there are steps one can take to minimize exposure and assist in the elimination of these insidious particles.

Detoxification protocols, such as heavy metal chelation, show promise in aiding the removal of graphene from the body. Embracing a holistic lifestyle supporting the body’s natural detoxification processes through nourishing foods, regular exercise, and stress reduction may also be beneficial.

In the vast realm of scientific innovation, a silent menace lurks in the shadows: graphene nanobots. These inconspicuous agents, forged from the incredible material known as graphene, possess an insidious power that can wreak havoc on our very existence. As the world marvels at the promises of this revolutionary technology, it is imperative that we unmask the true nature of these microscopic entities and confront the chilling implications they hold for humanity.

Graphene, with its exceptional properties and incredible strength, has captivated the scientific community. But when this formidable material is harnessed to create nanobots, a sinister undercurrent emerges. These nanoscale machines, driven by the power of graphene, have the potential to infiltrate our bodies undetected, becoming a silent army of destroyers.

Once inside, graphene nanobots can unleash a cascade of devastation. They possess the ability to interact with our cells, tissues, and even our genetic makeup, effectively becoming malicious intruders within our very being. These tiny assassins can wreak havoc on our biological systems, causing unprecedented damage and irreparable harm.

One of the most horrifying aspects of graphene nanobots is their ability to manipulate and control our bodily functions. Imagine a scenario where these insidious agents override our natural systems, dictating our thoughts, emotions, and physical actions. Our autonomy is stripped away, we become mere puppets in the hands of these malevolent forces. The prospect of a dystopian world where our every move is orchestrated by these silent destroyers is a chilling thought indeed.

The ramifications of the widespread deployment of graphene nanobots extend far beyond individual autonomy. These microscopic entities can be programmed to carry out nefarious agendas, serving as covert agents of surveillance, control, and even annihilation. The potential for their misuse in the hands of those seeking power and domination is a terrifying reality that must not be ignored.

The manufacturing process of these graphene nanobots also raises profound concerns. Are these minuscule machines being injected into our bodies without our knowledge or consent? Is the public being misled about the true nature and purpose of these technological marvels? The veil of secrecy surrounding their production and distribution demands urgent scrutiny and demands transparency from the entities responsible for their creation.

As we peer into the abyss of graphene nanobots, it becomes clear that their emergence heralds a new era of profound existential threats. The dark underbelly of technological progress reveals itself, casting a shadow over the future of humanity. The power to manipulate, control, and destroy lies within the invisible hands of these microscopic foes, and it is up to us to rise and confront this terrifying reality

1. Chen, J., et al. (2021). Graphene-based nanobots for biomedical applications: From targeted drug delivery to cancer therapy. Nano Today, 38, 101148.
2. Zhang, Z., et al. (2020). Graphene-Based Nanobots: Theoretical Design and Fabrication. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 7, 126.
3. Kostarelos, K., et al. (2017). Graphene-based materials for biomedical applications. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 56(33), 8745-8760.
4. Vabbina, P. K., et al. (2021). Graphene-based nanobots: A review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 141, 116268.

Detoxification Strategies: Safely Eliminating Graphene from the Body

In an era marked by the infiltration of graphene nanomaterials into various aspects of our lives, concerns over their potential health implications have grown. The inadvertent exposure to graphene and its potential accumulation in the body has raised questions about how to effectively remove this powerful material. I

Here we delve into the strategies and approaches that can aid in the safe and efficient elimination of graphene from the body.

By understanding these methods, individuals can take proactive steps to protect their well-being and reduce the potential long-term effects of graphene exposure.

1. Enhanced Detoxification Pathways: One of the primary approaches to facilitate the removal of graphene from the body is to support the natural detoxification pathways. Several techniques can be employed to optimize the functioning of organs involved in detoxification, such as the liver, kidneys, and lymphatic system. These include:

• Hydration: Drinking an adequate amount of water supports kidney function and promotes the elimination of toxins, including graphene particles, through urine.
• Liver Support: Consuming foods rich in antioxidants, such as berries and leafy greens, can aid in liver function and enhance the detoxification process.
• Sweating: Engaging in activities that induce sweating, such as exercise or sauna sessions, can help eliminate toxins through the skin.

2. Dietary Interventions: Certain dietary strategies can assist in the removal of graphene from the body. These include:

• High-Fiber Diet: Consuming a fiber-rich diet aids in regular bowel movements and facilitates the elimination of toxins, including graphene, through the digestive system.
• Detoxifying Foods: Incorporating foods with natural detoxifying properties, such as garlic, cilantro, and cruciferous vegetables like broccoli and Brussels sprouts, can support the body’s ability to eliminate harmful substances.

3. Chelation Therapy: Chelation therapy involves the administration of chelating agents that bind to heavy metals and other toxins, facilitating their removal from the body. While research specifically on chelation therapy for graphene removal is limited, certain chelators, such as EDTA (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid), have shown potential in removing various heavy metals from the body.
4. Supportive Supplements: Certain supplements may help support the body’s natural detoxification processes and promote the elimination of graphene particles. These include:

• Glutathione: Known as the body’s master antioxidant, glutathione plays a crucial role in detoxification. Supplementing with glutathione or its precursors, such as N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), may support the body’s ability to remove toxins.
• Vitamin C: As a potent antioxidant, vitamin C can help neutralize oxidative stress caused by graphene exposure and support overall detoxification processes.

5. Seeking Professional Guidance: Given the limited research on specific methods to remove graphene from the body, it is advisable to consult with healthcare professionals knowledgeable in environmental toxicology or detoxification. They can provide personalized guidance based on individual circumstances and recommend appropriate strategies for graphene detoxification.

As the prevalence of graphene nanomaterials continues to increase, understanding how to safely remove them from the body becomes crucial.

While research on specific detoxification protocols for graphene is still emerging, supporting natural detoxification pathways, adopting a healthy diet, considering chelation therapy, and incorporating supportive supplements can aid in the elimination of graphene particles.

However, it is important to approach graphene detoxification with caution and seek guidance from healthcare professionals with expertise in the field.

By taking proactive steps to mitigate the potential effects of graphene exposure, individuals can strive for optimal well-being in an increasingly graphene-infused world.

The Call for Vigilance and Action:

In the face of this dystopian nightmare, it is essential for individuals to remain vigilant, informed, and engaged. Our collective power lies in demanding transparency, independent research, and rigorous scrutiny of emerging technologies.

We must resist complacency and challenge the forces that seek to subjugate us under the guise of progress. By harnessing the power of knowledge, critical thinking, and unity, we can forge a future that prioritizes human well-being, and individual freedoms, and safeguards against the insidious grasp of graphene nanobots.

As the encroachment of graphene nanobots continues, the urgent need for vigilance and action becomes increasingly apparent. This silent invasion demands a steadfast response from individuals, communities, and global institutions alike. The battle to protect ourselves and preserve our future hinges on our ability to recognize the threat, mobilize resources, and implement strategic measures.

To heed the call for vigilance, we must first delve into the depths of graphene nanobots’ nefarious capabilities. These tiny agents, propelled by the remarkable properties of graphene, possess the potential to infiltrate our bodies through various means, including injection, inhalation, or ingestion. Once inside, they exploit their graphene-driven mechanisms to propagate, evade detection, and wreak havoc on our biological systems.

The consequences of complacency in the face of this existential threat are dire. Graphene nanobots have been linked to a range of adverse health effects, from debilitating inflammation and organ dysfunction to cellular damage and systemic imbalances. Their ability to manipulate our physiology, evade immune responses, and propagate within our bodies poses a grave risk to our well-being.

To confront this onslaught, a multi-faceted approach is necessary. Education and awareness form the cornerstone of our defence. By disseminating accurate information about graphene nanobots, their potential sources, and the health risks they pose, we empower individuals to make informed decisions and take proactive measures to safeguard their well-being.

Research and development efforts must be accelerated to understand the mechanisms of graphene nanobots and devise countermeasures. Robust scientific investigations, conducted independently of corporate influence, are vital in unraveling the complexities of this technological menace. Collaborative initiatives between academia, regulatory bodies, and health organizations are essential to foster innovation and create effective strategies for detection, elimination, and protection.

Moreover, regulatory oversight and accountability must be strengthened to prevent the infiltration of graphene nanobots into consumer products. Stricter regulations and monitoring mechanisms should be implemented to ensure the safety of medical devices, food packaging, personal care products, and other potentially contaminated items. Transparency and rigorous testing protocols become paramount in mitigating the risks associated with these microscopic intruders.

The call for action extends beyond individual efforts. Collaboration at a societal and global level is essential to combat the pervasive threat of graphene nanobots. The establishment of international frameworks for sharing knowledge, coordinating research, and implementing unified strategies is critical in the face of this global challenge. Governments, industry leaders, and scientific communities must join forces to pool resources, fund research initiatives, and drive meaningful change.

The fight against graphene nanobots requires not only reactive measures but also proactive steps to prevent their proliferation. Ethical considerations and responsible innovation in the development and use of nanotechnology become imperative. Strict adherence to safety protocols, ethical guidelines, and comprehensive risk assessments should underpin the advancement of this technology, ensuring its alignment with human well-being and societal benefit.

As we stand on the precipice of a dystopian future, the call for vigilance and action resonates louder than ever. It is a rallying cry for each individual to become a guardian of their own health, a defender of truth, and an advocate for change. By remaining vigilant, demanding accountability, and taking collective action, we can safeguard our future and preserve the sanctity of humanity.

Conclusion:

The presence of graphene in COVID vaccines due to the manufacturing process raises serious concerns about the potential toxic effects on the human body.

The alarming discoveries surrounding the use of graphene nanobots in vaccines and their potential transmission from the vaccinated to the unvaccinated demand immediate attention.

As we navigate this complex landscape, it is imperative to address the risks associated with graphene exposure and understand how to safely remove it from the body.

The inadvertent presence of graphene in COVID vaccines highlights the need for transparency and rigorous safety assessments in the manufacturing process. The public deserves accurate information regarding the potential risks and benefits of nanomaterials in vaccines, allowing individuals to make informed decisions about their health.

The toxic effects of graphene on the body cannot be ignored. From the formation of abnormal blood clots and vascular disturbances to the destruction of red blood cells, graphene poses significant health risks that require thorough investigation.

The potential transmission of graphene nanobots from vaccinated to unvaccinated individuals adds another layer of concern, prompting critical ethical discussions about informed consent and the unintended consequences of vaccination programs.

To address these pressing issues, it is essential to prioritize research and develop comprehensive strategies for the removal of graphene from the body. While specific methods for safely eliminating graphene are still emerging, enhancing natural detoxification pathways, adopting a healthy diet, and considering chelation therapy are potential avenues worth exploring.

Seeking professional guidance from experts in environmental toxicology or detoxification can provide valuable insights and personalized recommendations.

As we strive for a better future, it is crucial to advocate for transparency, accountability, and responsible innovation. Robust regulations and independent oversight are necessary to ensure the safety of nanomaterials used in vaccine manufacturing and other consumer products.

By fostering a climate of open dialogue, promoting scientific integrity, and respecting individual autonomy, we can navigate the challenges posed by graphene exposure and work towards a healthier, more informed society.

In conclusion, the presence of graphene in COVID vaccines raises critical concerns about its potentially toxic effects and the ethical implications of its use.

As we continue to uncover the full extent of the risks associated with graphene exposure, it is crucial to prioritize research, safety assessments, and informed decision-making.

By addressing the challenges head-on, we can strive for a future where scientific progress aligns with human well-being, ensuring that the potential benefits of nanotechnology are realized while minimizing potential harm.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/09/28/graphene-nanobots-in-covid-shots-shocking-evidence-shows-theyre-infecting-even-the-unvaccinated/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post “Graphene Nanobots in Covid Shots? Shocking Evidence Shows They’re Infecting Even the Unvaccinated!” appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

After years of researching mRNA injections and documenting adverse events, we are just beginning to scratch the surface of the depth of corruption in the marketing, manufacturing and militarisation of the covid injections.

Scientists and doctors, journalists and elected officials, parents and students – people from all walks of life, of all ages and with all differing levels of education are joining in on the fight to find out what was pushed on the public, who was behind it and its impact on public health – both now and into the future.

Two years ago, Australian journalist Rebekah Barnett is one of those who joined in the fight.  For a year she has been communicating with the Therapeutic Goods Administration on the DNA contamination found in covid injections. But until now, they had neither confirmed nor denied the presence of high levels of DNA contamination.

Yesterday, journalist Rebekah Barnett joined immunologist Dr. Jessica Rose on CHD TV to discuss the DNA contamination of the covid injections.

“I’m not inclined to drop this topic,” Barnett said, “because this is the 100-day vaccine platform now.  Everything going forward, obviously there’s going to be exceptions to that, but really the future is mRNA vaccines.”

“I’m concerned with: well, if you’re not admitting the problems with 1.0, then what happens once you make everything mRNA,” she added.

The 100-day vaccine mission aims to develop safe and effective vaccines against emerging infectious diseases within 100 days of identification. This ambitious goal was first proposed by the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations (“CEPI”) and has been endorsed by governments worldwide, including the UK government, which designated it as the “100 Days Mission”.

At the time of writing, Dr. Rose and Barnett’s discussion, which was being aired live, had not yet concluded so instead of writing about it, we have republished an article Barnett published yesterday, shortly before she joined Dr. Rose.  You can watch the discussion between the two ladies below.

If you are unable to watch the video above on Rumble, you can watch it on the CHD TV website HERE.

Australian Drug Regulator Goes on Record: Pfizer mRNA Shots “Not Contaminated”

By Rebekah Barnett, 24 July 2024

The Therapeutic Goods Administration (“TGA”) denies that the Pfizer mRNA covid vaccine is contaminated, as at least four independent labs around the world claim to have detected plasmid DNA contamination in vials of the mRNA Pfizer and Moderna injections, most well over regulatory limits.

I have been communicating with the TGA about the contamination findings since last year, when I first wrote about ‘Covid vaccines and your DNA – what the science tells us (and what it doesn’t)’, for Umbrella News.

Until now, the TGA had neither confirmed nor denied the presence of high levels of DNA contamination. But in a recent email communication to me, a spokesperson for Australia’s drug regulator finally stated unequivocally: “The Pfizer covid vaccine is not contaminated.”

The denial comes as several new studies of DNA contamination in the mRNA injections are due to be released within the month.

Dr. Jessica Rose, a Canadian researcher who worked with molecular virologist Dr. David Speicher (Courageous Truth) on a study of 27 mRNA Covid vaccine vials from 12 lots of Moderna and Pfizer vaccines said that there’s no question the mRNA covid vaccines are contaminated.

She told me, “Of the 54 vials tested in Germany, the US and Canada, all were found to contain DNA in levels that exceed the commercial acceptance criterion level of <330 ng DNA/mg RNA.”

That Canadian study detected “billions to hundreds of billions of DNA molecules per dose,” from primary series and booster lots, as well as lots for children.

Genomics scientist Kevin McKernan (Anandamide), who made the initial discovery of DNA contamination in the mRNA injections and a gene therapy sequence called the SV40 enhancer/promoter in the Pfizer vaccine back in April 2023, found contamination at qPCR cycles much lower than what is used to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

It’s “a million times more than what you might call someone for having a virus in their nose,” said McKernan, who is the founder and Chief Scientific Officer of Medicinal Genomics, and previously managed research and development for the Human Genome Project at Whitehead Institute/MIT. “They’re injecting a million times more contaminant in every shot,” he said. “So, it’s not a small amount.”

Dr. Speicher suggested that it’s also a matter of wording. One could say “the vaccine is not contaminated” because the “residual plasmid DNA” is a process-related impurity, he said. Either way, Dr. Speicher’s research turned up much higher levels of residual DNA in the mRNA shots than is supposed to be there.

Another Study Finds High Levels of Residual DNA in Pfizer Injections

The TGA’s email response to me was in relation to a peer-reviewed study by German scientists Brigitte König and Jürgen Kirchner in May of this year which claimed to show very high amounts of DNA contamination in the Pfizer mRNA vaccine, “ranging from 360 to 534 times the permissible DNA limit.”

König and Kirchner used a method called fluorescence spectrometry (also called fluorometry) to measure levels of residual DNA in the Pfizer vaccine, which is allowed by regulators in amounts of up to 10 nanograms (ng) per dose at sizes of up to 200 base pairs (bp) in length, based on a maximum dose of 30 micrograms (μg) of RNA.

The DNA is a remnant of the mRNA vaccine production method, which involves using E. coli bacteria to make copies of DNA plasmids, from which the vaccine mRNA is then produced. Any residual DNA is then supposed to be purified out of the mRNA end product.

König and Kirchner criticised regulators’ “methodologically inadequate” protocols for testing DNA levels in the covid vaccines, which would result in a “massive under-detection of DNA impurities.”

While regulators allow manufacturers to use fluorometry to measure levels of mRNA in covid vaccines, a different technique, qPCR, is used to measure DNA levels. But the qPCR method, the authors explain, checks less than 1% of the original template, with the other 99% being extrapolated mathematically.

König and Kirchner were also concerned that the qPCR method does not pick up very small DNA fragments and that DNA at the particular region of the plasmid that Pfizer measures is susceptible to being “masked,” by the enzyme used in the qPCR measurement process, making it less detectable.

Therefore, König and Kirchner set out to measure all of the residual DNA in the Pfizer covid vaccine. First, they used a detergent to disintegrate the LNPs to release the mRNA and any DNA encased within them. They then measured DNA levels through fluorometry, which resulted in the detection of such high levels of contamination.

McKernan discussed the limitations of König and Kirchner’s study on Substack, writing that their estimate is likely to be a 10-fold overestimation. But, “even if you discount this inflation, their lots will still be over the limit.”

“We are no longer debating whether the shots are contaminated,” McKernan said in a recent interview. “We’re just debating whether they are 10-fold or 100-fold over the limit and how much they vary from lot to lot.”

Scientists Question Regulator Protocols for Measuring DNA Levels

The TGA said that König and Kirchner’s findings are invalid because:

“The experimental technique applied in the paper referenced is not the approved method.

“Routine fluorescence measurement of residual DNA is not a feasible approach, as residual DNA is present in very low levels against a background of high levels of RNA.

“Current fluorescence detection systems do not offer sufficient specificity to permit detection of DNA without interference from RNA. This crosstalk in the fluorescent dye will return an overestimation of DNA. rDNA levels are monitored by manufacturers and regulators using more sensitive and specific PCR techniques.”

McKernan agrees that König and Kirchner’s methods produced an overestimate of the DNA levels present in the vials, which he suggested could be addressed by using an enzyme called RNase A to erase the RNA – this would eliminate interference from RNA when measuring the DNA, giving a more accurate reading. Dr Speicher confirmed that he uses RNase A as a control in his tests with fluorometry.

However, McKernan said that König and Kirchner, “correctly point out that the RNA and DNA should both be measured at the same endpoint in manufacturing using the SAME tool.”

“What König et al. highlighted is that the RNA quantity is using fluorometry as an end measurement and they are using qPCR to measure DNA at an earlier step,” he explained further in an email.

“Either use fluorometry for both measurements or qPCR for both measurements. The fact that you allow them to cherry-pick methods to meet the guidelines demonstrates the guidelines are rigged and not sound methodology.”

Dr. Speicher and Dr. Rose agree that the approved qPCR method for measuring residual DNA will underestimate the true amount and that the same method should be used for measuring both mRNA and DNA.

Nevertheless, both McKernan and Dr. Buckhaults found amounts of residual DNA in the mRNA vaccines above regulatory limits using qPCR.¹

In Dr. Speicher’s study of 27 vials, all vaccines exceeded regulatory guidelines for residual DNA when measured with fluorometry (using the RNase A control), but were below guideline limits when measured using qPCR, emphasising “the importance of methodological clarity and consistency when interpreting quantitative guidelines.”

Use of Traditional Vaccine DNA Limits a ‘Serious Regulatory Oversight’

Scientists are not just disputing whether the mRNA vaccines are compliant with regulatory limits on residual DNA levels. They also say that the current limits should not apply to new modified RNA vaccine products.

This is because the risk of naked residual DNA, which has a short half-life in the body, is not the same as the risk of DNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (“LNPs”), which ferry their contents to all major organs in the body, where they transfect and dump their contents into cells.

Cancer genomics scientist, Dr. Phillip Buckaults of the University of South Carolina, called the application of standard DNA limits to the mRNA products a “serious regulatory oversight” during his testimony to a state Senate hearing in September last year.

“They inappropriately applied that [traditional] regulatory limit to this new kind of vaccine where everything is encapsulated in this lipid nanoparticle,” he told Senators, warning that “there is a very real hazard” of DNA fragments integrating with a person’s genome and causing rare but serious side effects.

Professor Wafik El-Deiry, Director of the Cancer Centre at Brown University, echoed Dr. Buckhaults’ concerns, stating on X that if the LNPs carrying contaminant DNA get into cells, “they can integrate into the genome which is permanent, heritable and has a theoretical risk of causing cancer depending on where in the genome they integrate.”

But a TGA spokesperson rejected these concerns, stating: “There is no significance to minute amounts of residual DNA being encapsulated in the LNPs.”

And: “There is no accepted science that shows any alteration of the human genome.“

The TGA also highlighted that the technology used to produce the mRNA from DNA plasmids is not new stating:

“The use of plasmids in cells such as E. coli (and others) is a technology that has been around for many decades. The first pharmaceuticals manufactured using these techniques were approved back in the 1980s. Experts, manufacturers and regulators have been discussing residual DNA safety since then and the guidelines on testing and limits are a result of accepted scientific consensus.”

It is true that biologics made with DNA plasmids are not new. But the LNP casing of these elements rolled out in vaccines en masse is new, and the science around the potential concerns related to this is emerging.

The LNPs have been praised as the technology that allowed the mRNA vaccines to work because they protect the mRNA from degrading as soon as it’s injected into the body.

But, “these LNPs protect the DNA just as much as they protect the RNA,” said McKernan, thereby changing the risk profile of any residual DNA compared to that found in traditional vaccines.

Producing mRNA drugs with DNA plasmids at a mass scale is also new, posing new challenges for the DNA purification process, said König and Kirchner in their paper. Ordinarily, DNA purification is “rarely a problem,” because genetically engineered drugs are predominantly proteins, and these are fairly easily separated out from residual DNA due to their chemical differences.

However, in the mRNA vaccines, contaminating DNA and the active ingredient mRNA are both nucleic acids, meaning they are more chemically similar and therefore more difficult to separate in the purification process, said the authors. This challenge would not have been identified in the Pfizer clinical trial, for which a different, cleaner process was used to produce the mRNA.

Dr. Rose also highlighted that, “It has recently been discovered in a scientific preprint that 40% of plasmids used in gene therapy and for biotech purposes carry mutations, and this raises serious alarm bells with regard to plasmid fidelity.”

Dr. Buckhaults, an mRNA platform enthusiast said on X that, given the “low but non-zero risk for insertional mutagenesis” and cancers, “the mRNA vaccination platform will be at its best when it is completely devoid of plasmid DNA pieces.” Dr. Buckhaults has now begun a study to find out if DNA fragments from the covid vaccines are integrating into peoples’ genomes and causing cancers.²

Regulator Taking Pfizer’s Word For It

Regardless, given that there is qPCR evidence of DNA in the covid injections at levels above the limits allowed by the TGA, how did the TGA arrive at the conclusion that the injections are within the 10ng (amount) and 200bp (size) limit?

It appears that the TGA is mostly taking the manufacturers’ word for it.

Explaining how the mRNA Covid vaccines are “tightly controlled,” a TGA spokesperson stated:

“The test for residual DNA is already part of the agreed required testing specifications for this product and each batch of COMIRNATY released in Australia has passed the test.

“In other words, TGA assesses the suitability and validation of the test during the evaluation process, then once approved Pfizer conducts the test on every batch, regulators (TGA and overseas) review the testing for batch release and TGA has conducted independent tests to verify their results.”

This means that covid vaccine batches are all tested by the manufacturer according to an agreed protocol, with the exception of spot testing conducted by the TGA.

Having Pfizer test its own product for compliance presents a “conflict of interest,” said Dr. Rose. “A non-conflicted party or laboratory must be measuring DNA levels in these vials – not the manufacturer,” she said.

McKernan has previously highlighted the relatively low cost of DNA sequencing, stating that there’s “no excuse” for regulators or an independent party to not sequence every vaccine lot.

Trusting Pfizer to make full disclosure seems counter-intuitive given recent allegations that the pharmaceutical giant deliberately did not inform regulators that its covid vaccine contained the SV40 enhancer/promoter DNA sequence (not to be confused with the whole SV40 virus, which is not present).

This is a sequence that is used in gene therapies to “drive DNA into the nucleus,” and could pose an oncogenic risk due to its effect on tumour suppressor gene p53, said McKernan.

In emails released under FoI in Canada, a senior Health Canada (“HC”) official, Dr. Dean Smith, wrote about the SV40 sequence:

“Pfizer has communicated to us recently, that they apparently chose not to mention this information to EMA, FDA or HC at the time of their initial or subsequent submissions.”

HC had initially been unaware of the gene therapy DNA sequence in Pfizer’s covid injection, claiming that Pfizer did not identify it on the residual DNA plasmid map. Emails from the same Freedom of Information (“FoI”) tranche show that the US Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and European Medicines Agency (“EMA”) are aware of the SV40 sequence and co-ordinated with HC to come up with “an aligned position.”³

The emails also call into question regulators’ claims that the size of residual DNA in the Pfizer vaccine is within the 200bp limit, since Pfizer told HC in August last year that no regulators had asked for this information and it had not yet been generated.

In a response to HC’s request that Pfizer provide data on the size distribution of the residual DNA, both fragments and intact plasmids, Pfizer replied:

“…The data are not readily available and will require time to generate. Please note that to date, Pfizer and BioNTech have not been requested to provide these characterisation data across global markets for Original or Omicron drug substances.”

This might explain why Dr. Speicher was able to detect DNA fragments of up to 3.5kb in length (1 bp is 1,000 times smaller than a kb) in the mRNA covid vaccines.

The TGA also took Pfizer’s word for it on its covid vaccine trial results, never having seen or requested patient-level data from Pfizer before approving the COMIRNATY product, according to a Freedom Of Information (“FoI”) response. This is highly relevant given allegations of research fraud (summarised in this audit brief) in the covid vaccine trial levelled at Pfizer.

Just as the TGA appears to place high trust in Pfizer’s word, Australians are supposed to simply trust the TGA when it says that residual DNA is within acceptable limits. When the regulator was asked under FoI to release the results of its spot testing on covid vaccine lots, it ‘released’ 74 fully redacted black pages.

No Evidence for TGA’s Claims

I asked the TGA to provide scientific studies proving that insertional mutagenesis (alteration of the genome) is not occurring with contaminant DNA from the mRNA covid vaccines, but the TGA provided none.

The TGA has also previously advised that the modified RNA cannot affect the human genome either, telling me (for Umbrella News): “Covid-19 vaccines do not alter a person’s DNA. The mRNA in the vaccines does not enter the nucleus of cells and is not integrated into the human genome.”

As evidence for this claim, the TGA provided a Mayo Clinic fact page with no links to studies or scientific evidence of any sort.

Instead, we are supposed to take on face value the TGA’s claim that there is “no accepted science” that shows integration of covid vaccine elements into the human genome.

The word “accepted” is doing a lot of the work here.

In March of this year, I reported on an in vitro (lab dish) experiment (Kämmerer & McKernan) which showed that DNA contamination from the Pfizer vaccine successfully enters human cells, and putative evidence of human DNA integration.

Other studies suggest that the modified RNA used in the covid vaccines have the capacity to genomically integrate. A peer-reviewed study has demonstrated that the Pfizer covid vaccine mRNA can enter the human liver cell line and reverse transcribe into DNA, in vitro.

Another study detected the presence of spike protein mRNA in the nucleus of human cells.  And another found that acquired immune traits pass down to the offspring of mice pre-exposed to the covid vaccine mRNA-LNP platform.

None of this is proof of genomic integration. Rather, it is suggestive that DNA integration is possible and should be looked for.

Even without the above-mentioned studies, alteration of the human genome is a known risk of residual DNA, with implications for cancer formation (oncogenic risk).

As stated in the Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”) industry guidance (emphasis mine):

“Residual DNA might be a risk to your final product because of oncogenic and/or infectivity potential. There are several potential mechanisms by which residual DNA could be oncogenic, including the integration and expression of encoded oncogenes or insertional mutagenesis following DNA integration. Residual DNA also might be capable of transmitting viral infections if retroviral proviruses, integrated copies of DNA viruses, or extrachromosomal genomes are present.”

One of Moderna’s patents also points to the integration risk of residual DNA packaged in LNPs. It states (emphasis mine):

“There are multiple problems with prior methodologies of delivering pharmaceutical compositions in order to achieve effective protein expression for both therapeutics and bio-processing applications. For example, introduced DNA can integrate into host cell genomic DNA at some frequency, resulting in alterations and/or damage to the host cell genomic DNA. Alternatively, the heterologous deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) introduced into a cell can be inherited by daughter cells (whether or not heterologous DNA has integrated into the chromosome) or by offspring.”

The same patent details the oncogenic risk of not adequately removing residual DNA:

“The DNA template used in the mRNA manufacturing process must be removed to ensure the efficacy of therapeutics and safety because residual DNA in drug products may induce activation of the innate response and has the potential to be oncogenic in-patient populations.”

While my email exchange with the TGA focussed on the risk of DNA integration, which in turn can pose a cancer risk, Dr. Rose also noted that, according to recent studies, cancer pathways can be initiated simply by the introduction of foreign DNA into the cytoplasm (i.e., inside the cell). That is to say, genomic integration is not required for residual DNA that enters cells to be hazardous.

This is why there are regulatory limits on the amount and size of DNA allowed in vaccines. Regulatory limits that scientists say need to be updated to factor in the effect of LNPs.

Regulator Conflicts and Ineptitude?

The question of whether the TGA can independently regulate drug products without conflicts of interest (“CoI”) remains open. According to a British Medical Journal (BMJ) investigation by Australian investigative journalist Maryanne Demasi, PhD, the TGA receives 96% of its drug regulation funding from industry, more than any other regulator.

The TGA denies that this arrangement presents any CoIs. However, the BMJ report noted that five out of ten committee members responsible for independently advising the TGA and Health Minister on issues related to the safety, quality and efficacy of the expedited covid vaccines declared a financial CoI. This information had to be uncovered, as it is not published on the TGA’s website, and Demasi reported that committee members did not respond to questions on the matter either.

Moreover, the TGA approved more than nine out of every ten applications for new drugs in 2020-2021, more than any other regulator except for the UK’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (“MHRA”).

The report also identified a problem with the regulator-industry ‘revolving door,’ whereby agency officials end up working or consulting for the companies they previously regulated. A high-profile example is the appointment of former TGA boss Professor John Skerritt to the board of Medicines Australia, Australia’s peak body representing the pharmaceutical industry, less than a year after his resignation from the TGA.

Sociologist Donald Light of Rowan University in New Jersey, US, an expert in drug regulation, told the BMJ that in light of the potential for regulatory capture, regulators need their own independent watchdog. “Countries have independent safety boards for airlines and their passengers. Why not for drugs and patients too?” he said.

A lawsuit challenging the legality of Pfizer and Moderna’s covid vaccine registration in Australia may provide another clue as to why the apparent oversights discussed in this article have occurred on the TGA’s watch.

The case, brought by Victorian GP and pharmacist Dr. Julian Fidge, alleges that the mRNA vaccines contain genetically modified organisms (“GMOs”) in the form of both the LNP-mod-RNA complexes and the contaminant DNA. If that were true, then the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (“OGTR”) would be required to conduct an assessment of the mRNA vaccines to determine safety – something that the TGA is not equipped to do because it does not regulate GMOs.

The OGTR denies that the mRNA vaccines contain GMOs, however this will ultimately be decided in the courts if the case gets a full hearing. I say if because the lawsuit was dismissed on the technicality of “standing” several months ago by a judge who allegedly did not disclose that she had previously provided legal counsel to Pfizer on at least five occasions. Dr. Fidge’s lawyers are currently seeking to have the dismissal voided, and have also turned to the parliament for intervention.

To build their case, Dr. Fidge’s legal team commissioned a study of residual DNA levels in Australian mRNA Pfizer and Moderna covid vaccine vials. The study, conducted by Dr. Speicher, uses both qPCR and fluorometry to measure the amount of DNA.

“My findings will be released in coming days and will greatly question TGA’s response,” said Dr. Speicher earlier today [24 July].

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/07/25/tga-denies-dna-contamination/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Despite the evidence, the Australian drug regulator denies DNA contamination in covid injections appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.