A cancer-promoting genetic sequence—SV40 was found in mRNA vaccine vials in April 2023. It is doubtful that there was disclosure of the SV40 contamination within the Pfizer documents received by the FDA. This means that the mRNA COVID vaccines are adulterated and the manufacturers can now be sued for damages and the FDA is required to take the COVID vaccines off the market until the adulteration is fixed,” according to Steve Kirsch,

Kirsch explains, “The plasmid bioactive contaminant sequences were NOT pointed out to the regulatory authorities. This is considered adulteration. “When there is contamination, there is no immunity. It makes sense. Otherwise, they can add arsenic into the vaccines and not be liable.” explains Kirsch.

Breaking: You can now sue the mRNA COVID vaccine manufacturers for damages and the FDA is required to take the COVID vaccines off the market. Why? Adulteration. The plasmid bioactive contaminant sequences were NOT pointed out to the regulatory authorities. It’s considered…

— Steve Kirsch (@stkirsch) October 21, 2023

Important note. Experts from the World Council for Health (WCH) found that the cancer-promoting genetic sequence—SV40 was not present in the vials used for the approval studies but has been found in all vials of the BioNTech (Pfizer) vials disseminated for public use. These discoveries have been confirmed in several independent laboratories worldwide The discovery was originally made in April 2023 by Kevin McKernan at which point regulatory bodies were contacted. No official reply has been received.

Despite the adulteration being known about since April 2023 still “nobody has called for an investigation. Not even after Health Canada confirmed it. They didn’t even ask for an investigation!!” according to Kirsch.

However, now if the FDA does not take the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine off the market then they should face criminal prosecution for endangering the public, and not following the law. Kirsch argues, “The FDA is now at a crossroads. Either they admit that they knew about the plasma contamination and failed to disclose that to the public and to the outside committees, or they can claim that they didn’t know about it in which case Pfizer is liable.”

“There are so many vaccine injured. These people were normal healthy people, they took the vax, and shortly thereafter, they are a shell of their former selves. This was a dramatic change. This is not coincidence. This is not “bad luck.” Kirsch says, and “These people’s lives have been ruined by these vaccines. This is not going to end well for the authorities. There are simply way too many injured and dead people for them to keep pretending that “there is nothing to see here.”

I just got off the phone with attorney Warner Mendenhall. He confirmed I wrote is accurate and the litigation floodgates are now open.

Here is a list of 90 lawyers that you can contact if you want to sue the vaccine manufacturers: https://t.co/ZiJgjUszqL

— Steve Kirsch (@stkirsch) October 22, 2023

Experts Believe the Vaccine is Adulterated

In a 2 hour interview with Kevin McKernan, Byram Bridle, and Chris Martenson you can hear firsthand the evidence that they KNEW the SV40 promoter was in the vaccine, but they DELIBERATELY decided to conceal it from the regulators.

In this video, Steve Kirsch says. “you’ll learn for the first time;”

• Why these experts believe that the vaccine IS adulterated,
• Why they believe that the drug companies DELIBERATELY concealed the presence of the SV40 promoter sequence from the regulators,
• How they cleverly avoided violating the contamination specs by using two DIFFERENT measurement techniques depending on what was being measured
• How Health Canada did *NOTHING* to stop the vaccines after admitting the vaccines contain an active ingredient that they were never notified existed. and have no clue how damaging it is,
• How NO health authority in the world is even asking the drug companies any questions like “So, who removed the SV40 promoter label from the diagrams and why did they do it?”),
• That none of the regulators asked any questions as to “why is *THAT* in there” (the vaccine has lots of things that are in there to do medical research because it appears they used an off-the-shelf formulation used in research to rush to market faster),
• How the press is remaining silent,
• Why Congress isn’t asking any questions, what they think the FDA will do now, how they think Pfizer and Moderna will extricate themselves (or not),
• How serious the harms are,
• How many labs has Kevin McKernan shipped his testing kit to,
• What is the probability of IRREPARABLE harm,
• Why no health authority worldwide will fund the research as to whether or not this irreparably damages your DNA.
• Which media is covering this news?
• How this will end,?
• Why testing monocytes in blood is the best chance for finding a signal, and more!

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2023/10/23/you-can-now-sue-the-mrna-covid-vaccine-manufacturers-for-damages-says-steve-kirsch/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post “You Can Now Sue the mRNA COVID Vaccine Manufacturers For Damages,” says Steve Kirsch appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

The EPA banned PCBs in 1979

Last week, a St. Louis Circuit Court jury awarded $46.5 million to 3 plaintiffs who alleged that PCBs made by Monsanto caused cancer. The plaintiffs alleged in the suit that Monsanto and the other defendants – Solutia, Pharmacia, and Pfizer – were negligent in their handling of PCBs.

PCB stands for polychlorinated biphenyls, a highly toxic and carcinogenic group of chemicals. Decades ago, PCBs were used in many different products, including electrical equipment, surface coatings, inks, adhesives, flame-retardants, and paints. Before morphing into the agritech giant it is today, Monsanto was the sole manufacturer of PCBs from 1935 to 1997.

The EPA banned PCBs in 1979, after the compound was linked to birth defects and cancer in laboratory animals. PCBs can affect the skin and liver in humans. It can also linger in the environment for decades.

The case involved just 3 of nearly 100 plaintiffs who alleged that exposure to PCBs caused them non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Some died and their claims were made by surviving relatives.

Steven Kherkher, the plaintiffs’ lawyer, said:

“The man from Oklahoma died at the age of 58 and had no health problems at all. He wasn’t a smoker or a drinker and he exercised, but his body was filled with Monsanto’s PCBs. He grew up in Michigan and Monsanto polluted the waters of Michigan and he suffered and died.

A lot people just don’t know that Monsanto’s PCBs are in the orange juice you drank this morning and the pizza you’ll eat tonight. The air that you’re breathing has PCBs in it. Monsanto has discounted it, saying it’s only parts per billion or parts per trillion, but it adds up.” [3]

The 3 individuals alleged that Monsanto knew decades ago that PCBs put people’s health at risk, but lied to the public, saying that the compounds were safe, and continued to sell them until the 1970’s.

EcoWatch reports that internal documents have surfaced showing the company knew about the health risks of PCBs years before they were banned by the EPA. One document, dated Sept. 20, 1955, stated:

“We know Aroclors [PCBs] are toxic but the actual limit has not been precisely defined.” [3]

To this day, some rivers, streams, and foods that humans consume still contain levels of PCBs.

Kherkher said the win means that Monsanto can no longer cover its tracks when it comes to the damage it has done to human life and the environment:

“This is the future. People don’t know that PCBs cause cancer and that Monsanto has been suppressing it.” [1]

Kherkher added that the win is a rare one, but only because nobody had the money to fight the massive corporation until his law firm, William Kherkher, and other law firms worked together, combining their resources, to propel the case forward.

He said such wins are “not going to be rare anymore,” noting that his law firm has accumulated about 1,000 plaintiffs with PCB claims.

A Los Angeles jury rejected a claim against Monsanto last month over non-Hodgkin lymphoma. And in July of 2015, a jury in St. Louis County, Missouri, found Monsanto was not liable in deaths and illnesses suffered by people who were exposed to PCBs. Americans began to wonder if Monsanto was untouchable.

A similar lawsuit was filed by the city of Spokane, Washington, last year, and in January, Seattle sued Monsanto over the costs of PCB cleanup. Both cases are pending.

To access the full article, use source link below.

By Julie Fidler

Julie is a freelance writer, legal blogger, and the author of Adventures in Holy Matrimony: For Better or the Absolute Worst. She lives in Pennsylvania with her husband and two ridiculously spoiled cats. She occasionally pontificates on her blog.

(Source:  naturalsociety.com; June 1, 2016; http://tinyurl.com/zjsgnwr)

The post Monsanto must pay $46.5 million in damages in PCB-Lymphoma Case appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.