In 1892, a pamphlet written by William Tebb was published which pointed out that vaccines induce cancer. Even at that time, “medical journals [we]re reluctant to give currency to suggestions which throw discredit on certain dogmas of the orthodox medical church.”

Several of Tebb’s friends and acquaintances had succumbed to cancer, and incidences were “increasing at an alarming rate.” 

“Cancer is reported to be increasing not only in England and the Continent, but in all parts of the world where vaccination is practised,” Tebb said.

The 19th-Century Doctors Recognised That Cancer Was Caused By Vaccines – William Tebb

By Sasha Latypova, 9 September 2026

This is Part 2 of the Cancer Causation series. Part 1 is HERE.

In this post, I am republishing a booklet written in 1892. Mass vaccination, especially of children and women, and laws mandating vaccines had begun in earnest in the mid-1800s. By the end of the century, it was recognised, at least by some doctors, that vaccines induce cancer, which had already begun its unstoppable rise in “civilised” populations, in perfect correlation with increasing “access to modern medicine”. The booklet is as follows.

The Increase of Cancer

(Reprinted from The TOSCIN, of March 12th, 1892.)

By William Tebb, Printed By Wertheimer, Lea & Co., Circus Place, London Wall, I892

SIR,—As the medical journals are reluctant to give currency to suggestions which, throw discredit on certain dogmas of the orthodox medical church, I venture to ask permission, in the interest of the public health, to address your readers on a subject of admitted public importance, the causation of the remarkable and mysterious recrudescence of cancer during the past 30 years. And surely, sir, the study of the sources of any malady, particularly one of so grave and destructive a character, is as well deserving of consideration as the multitudinous but abortive attempts to effect a cure.

I may mention, as an inspiring motive for this communication to the impartial columns of THE TOSCIN, that several of my friends and acquaintances have, after acute and protracted suffering, succumbed to cancer, the origin of which their friends declare to be unaccountable except on the theory below, so that I hardly need an apology for bringing the matter before the attention of those of your readers who are interested in the public health. Cancer, like leprosy, is an incurable disease; and none of the vaunted remedies have stood the test of experience. It can be disseminated like leprosy, and is increasing at an alarming rate. The deaths from cancer in England and Wales are returned by the Registrar-General, thus :— Or per million living.

Cancer is reported to be increasing not only in England and the Continent, but in all parts of the world where vaccination is practised.

Dr. H. McAul Alston, Acting Resident Surgeon, Colonial Hospital, Port of Spain, Trinidad, in the Annual Report to the Surgeon General, dated 5th of April, 1887, says (p. 7):—

“A noticeable feature of the diseases of patients admitted is the increasing number of the cases of cancer.”

Sir James Paget observes:—

“The richest and poorest alike seem to be subject to it; so do the worst and best fed; those that are living in the best conditions of the atmosphere, and those that are immured in the worst; those that are cleanly, and those that are foul; those of all temperaments and of all occupations; those that appear healthy, and those that are diseased. We can hardly lay our hands upon any of the various circumstances of life in the various orders of society in this country, to which we can refer as rendering one more or less liable than another to the acquirement of the cancerous constitution.”

It is claimed that cancer is hereditary and is occasionally due to local injury, but is it not obvious that there must be some antecedent constitutional taint or diathesis to give rise to the development of the disease? To what, then, is this condition really due? Sir James Paget also says cancer is due to a morbid condition of the blood, and some of your readers will have little difficulty in pointing out one cause of the morbidity. It is allowed by physicians that cancer may be caused by impregnating the blood with impure matter.

Dr. Joseph Jones, President of the Louisiana Board of Health, a well-known pathologist, says that this disease is inoculable; that cancer may be propagated by inoculation, or by the injection of cancerous matter into the veins. He adds:

“We will have accomplished our purpose in recording these facts if we succeed in directing the attention of the profession to the necessity of greater attention to the condition of the subjects selected for the propagation of the vaccine disease.”

Drs. Von Bergman and E. Hahn have demonstrated this by the recent notoriously inhuman experiments at the Berlin Hospital. The Medical Press, December 5th, 1888, quotes Dr. Hahn as:

“Disposed to believe that, in many cases of recurrence, it is quite probable that the disease has developed anew, as the result of accidental inoculation.”

In The British Medical Journal, June 29th, 1889, Mr. Jonathan Hutchison, F.R.C.S., says that, with due care in the transplantation of a bit of living tissue, cancer may be transferred.

There is probably no method by which inoculation is practised on so large a scale as in vaccination and re-vaccination. It is not now denied by the medical profession that vaccination is an exciting cause of infantile syphilis, and, according to the Registrar-General’s returns, Vaccination Mortality, No. 433, dated 1877, and Infant Mortality, No. 392, dated 1880, the increase in Infantile Syphilis, since vaccination has been compulsory, is fourfold.

Mr. Hibbert, formerly Secretary to the Local Government Board, said in July, 1880, that this terrible increase was one of the most unsatisfactory features of the Vaccination Acts, and a reason why further legislation was needed. Dr. William Forbes Laurie, late medical director of a metropolitan cancer hospital, was thoroughly convinced that the increase of cancer was due to vaccination, and he wrote to Members of Parliament, inviting them to visit the hospital, and witness the terrible result of the vaccine operation. He says this increase of cancer is attributed by some medical men to the large amount of syphilitic disease with which vaccine lymph is impregnated, and by others to the direct impregnation “of healthy persons with lymph imbued with scrofulous and cancerous matter.”

And the late Dr. Dennis Turnbull, who made cancer his particular study for thirty years, declared in the public press his conviction that vaccination and re-vaccination is the most prolific cause of this disease. Mr. Keuchenius, late Colonial Secretary to the Holland Government, called the attention of the Second Chamber to the alarming spread of cancer in the Netherlands, which was coincident with the spread of vaccination, and (as he believed) due to poison conveyed in the vaccine virus.

The British Medical Journal for May 19th, 1885, in a leading article on the increasing fatality of cancer, says:—

“Our negligence in dealing effectually with other diseases may also favour its dissemination, for if syphilitic inflammation. may become cancerous, it is clear that the spread of syphilis has scattered throughout the population innumerable possible seeds of cancerous degeneration.”

Some time ago the Hospital Gazelle reported that fifty infants had been admitted into one hospital suffering from syphilitic disease, and that from some of these infants vaccine lymph had been taken. Assuming that the theory of the British Medical Journal is correct, this is an indication how the cancer spreading virus may be distributed.

In his recent work on cancer (Churchill, 1891), Dr. Herbert Snow calls attention to the fact that cancer is:

“Almost absent in the savage, while rapidly increasing in prevalence among the civilised.”

The savage it may be noted will not allow his blood to be poisoned with vaccine virus, hence he escapes that morbidity under which cancerous tumours find nutriment. Where the system has become thoroughly infected with this morbid tendency, cure by extirpation or otherwise is admitted to be impossible, and the suffering caused by the apprehension of being the victim of so dreadful an affliction may well engage the attention of your benevolent and thoughtful readers. Dr. Aitken says:

“The normal course of cancerous tumours we now know to be that of steady increase, a steady and certain progress towards death.”

It would, however, be unbecoming in me to dogmatise upon a subject which is admitted to be a puzzle to the medical profession, but I venture to hope that medical practitioners who have had the opportunity which clinical observation affords will no longer keep silence, but in the interests of the public health say whether the suggestion I have ventured to make is borne out by facts within their own experience.

Yours faithfully,

WILLIAM TEBB. Devonshire Club, St. James’, London.

An illustration from the 19th century. The fruits of vaccination were understood very well back then:

Source: https://expose-news.com/2026/09/11/1892-pamphlet-vaccines-cause-cancer/

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

HopeGirl Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@hopegirlblog
HopeGirl Telegram Channel Chat and Groups: https://t.me/Hopegirl587 
Get Our Free EMF Survival Guide : https://bit.ly/FTWEMF
10 Percent Off our EMF Protection Products with this Link: https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/tenoff

The post 1892 pamphlet: Vaccines cause cancer appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are a leading cause of the “chronic disease pandemic” linked to diet, with food firms putting profit above all else, global experts have warned.

Writing in The Lancet medical journal, 43 scientists and researchers joined forces to argue that UPFs are “displacing” fresh foods and meals, worsening diet quality, and are linked to multiple chronic diseases.

They said, “The key driver of the global rise in UPFs is the growing economic and political power of the UPF industry, and its restructuring of food systems for profitability above all else.

“The industry comprises UPF manufacturers at its core, but also a broader network of co-dependent actors who collectively drive the production, marketing and consumption of UPFs.”

UPFs have been linked to poor health, including an increased risk of obesity, heart disease, cancer and early death.

Examples of UPFs include ice cream, processed meats, crisps, mass-produced bread, some breakfast cereals, biscuits, many ready meals and fizzy drinks.

UPFs often contain high levels of saturated fat, salt, sugar and additives, which experts say leaves less room in people’s diets for more nutritious foods.

UPFs also tend to include additives and ingredients that are not used when people cook from scratch, such as preservatives, emulsifiers and artificial colors and flavors.

Policy responses and industry influence

Writing in The Lancet, the global team said that, although some countries have brought in rules to reformulate foods and control UPFs, “the global public health response is still nascent, akin to where the tobacco control movement was decades ago.”

They said government policy, including in high income countries like the UK, has done little to change the “commercial and structural determinants of the problem,” instead focusing on consumer responsibility, industry partnerships, and voluntary self-regulation in industry, such as when companies replace sugar in some foods with sweeteners, or reduce fat.

“This policy inertia reflects the co-ordinated efforts of the industry to skew decision making, frame policy debates in their interest, and manufacture the appearance of scientific doubt,” they said.

They argue that the main barrier to policies to protect health is “industry’s corporate political activities, coordinated transnationally through a global network of front groups, multi-stakeholder initiatives, and research partners, to counter opposition and block regulation.”

These activities include direct lobbying, “infiltrating government agencies,” and filing lawsuits, they added.

Calls for action and further research

The experts argue that the “continuing rise of UPFs in human diets is not inevitable” and, while research into their effects continues, this should not delay policies aimed at promoting diets based on whole foods.

The dietary share of UPFs remains below 25% in countries such as Italy, Cyprus, Greece, Portugal and across Asia, but it is 50% in the US and UK, the research said.

Action is needed now to tackle UPFs directly rather than relying on current measures, it added.

Professor Chris Van Tulleken, from University College London, one of the authors, told a press briefing there had been a “three-decade history of reformulation by the food industry.”

He added, “We took the fat out first, then we took the sugar out. We replaced the sugar with the sweeteners, the fats with gums. These products have been extensively reformulated and we have seen obesity, particularly obesity in childhood, and other rates of diet-related disease persistently go up in line with reformulation.

“This is not a product level discussion. The entire diet is being ultra-processed.

“And remember that built into the definition of ultra-processed food is its purpose. Its purpose is for profit. And so, as long as you’re reformulating, if your purpose is still profit, you’re unlikely to cause positive health outcomes.”

Expert opinions on evidence and causation

Several experts commenting on The Lancet papers called for more, better quality research into the impact of UPFs, adding that current studies have shown a link with poor health but not a direct cause.

Kevin McConway, emeritus professor of applied statistics at the Open University, said “it seems to me likely that at least some UPFs could cause increases in the risk of some chronic diseases (certainly not all—there’s little evidence of an increase in cancer risk, for instance).

“But this certainly doesn’t establish that all UPFs increase disease risk.

“There’s still room for doubt and for clarification from further research.”

He said he was not advocating that no public health action about UPFs is taken until all the research gaps have been filled, but said there was a need for “transparency” about “what we have good evidence for and what we don’t.”

Professor Jules Griffin, from the University of Aberdeen, said the authors had shown “a wide range of chronic diseases are associated with increased consumption of ultra-processed foods” but “association may not be causation, as the authors freely admit.”

Source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2025-12-ultra-foods-chronic-disease-pandemic.html

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Ultra-processed foods: Leading cause of ‘chronic disease pandemic,’ scientists warn appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

A senior medical advisor at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has just blown the whistle to warn the public about the deadly impact of Covid mRNA “vaccines.”

Dr. Steven Hatfill raised the alarm about the injections in an explosive new interview with Dana Parish.

Hatfill is a world-renowned virologist and biodefense expert.

He is currently serving as a special advisor in the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) under HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Hatfill, who served in President Donald Trump’s first administration, was appointed to the ASPR role early this month and is already making waves.

He has seen the cover-ups firsthand, and he’s now warning the American people that the mRNA “vaccines” are a dangerous experiment.

Specifically, Hatfill is raising the alarm about the presence of the cancer-causing SV40 enhancer in Covid mRNA injections.

SV40 is an abbreviation for simian vacuolating virus 40 or simian virus 40, a polyomavirus that is found in both monkeys and humans.

The oncogenic capacity of SV40 infections has been well established.

Hatfill warns that SV40 serves as a genetic “afterburner” that supercharges gene expression.

The mRNA “vaccines” also contain plasmid DNA.

Human cells’ LINE-1 mechanism grabs this foreign DNA, incorporating it into the chromosomes.

These “jumping genes” can land next to cancer-related genes, triggering chaos.

Dr. Hatfill warns that the SV40 enhancer is amplifying genes that can turn the bodies of the Covid-vaccinated into tumor factories.

Random insertions disrupt proto-oncogenes, leading to cancer.

Studies show spike protein from the “vaccine”—not the virus—in tumors, months after the injection.

“We’re not seeing a dramatic cancer association with just the virus,” Hatfill says.

“But we are with the vaccinated people.”

WATCH:

The warning from Hatfill comes as evidence continues to emerge showing that the mRNA injections cause cancer.

As Slay News previously reported, a major investigation by a group of renowned German researchers has confirmed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccines” are laced with dangerous levels of DNA contaminants.

While the presence of DNA contamination in Covid injections is not a new discovery, this latest study uses advanced techniques for more reliable quantification, making it the most significant investigation to date.

Leading scientists have been warning for some time that surges in deadly cancers among the Covid-vaccinated were caused by DNA fragments in the mRNA injections.

Those warnings have now been confirmed in a bombshell study conducted in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) own laboratory.

The FDA recently made the explosive admission that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are spiked with contaminants that triggered a global surge in cancers.

The federal agency made the admission after an FDA study confirmed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” contains dangerous levels of excess DNA contamination.

Tests conducted at the FDA’s White Oak Campus in Maryland found shocking levels of DNA contamination in the “vaccines.”

The residual DNA levels exceeded regulatory safety limits by up to 470 times.

Source:  https://slaynews.com/news/top-hhs-medical-advisor-blows-whistle-mrna-vaccines-cause-cancer/

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Top HHS Medical Advisor Blows Whistle: mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Cause Cancer appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

A group of scientists has just provided further confirmation that Covid mRNA “vaccines” cause vaccine-acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (VAIDS), also referred to as “vaccine-induced AIDS.”

The team of leading Polish medical researchers confirmed recent findings from a major study by the world-renowned Yale University School of Medicine.

As Slay News reported, Yale researchers published the findings of their bombshell study last month.

They found that mRNA injections alter human biology to create long-term spike protein production that increases over time.

The scientists warn that the Covid mRNA vaccines alter T cell immunophenotypes which triggers VAIDS.

Two of the Yale study’s co-senior authors, Harlan Krumholz and Akiko Iwasaki, have been leaders in investigating mRNA shots’ links to so-called “Long Covid,” which they believe should be renamed “Long Vax.”

The condition is being referred to as “post-vaccination syndrome” (PVS).

However, PVS is identical to the condition that experts have been warning about for some time – VAIDS.

I don’t use the term VAIDS (vaccine-induced AIDS), but I’m not sure how else to describe the T-cell changes the Yale team is finding. https://t.co/LBb9nZFJDn

— Alex Berenson (@AlexBerenson) February 19, 2025

Now, a major new study in Poland has just confirmed the findings from Yale.

Dr. Jolanta Smykiewicz led a team of researchers from the Casimir Pulaski University of Radom and the Medical University of Lodz,  both in Poland.

The study was published in the peer-reviewed Medical Research Journal.

The researchers scrutinize the impact of mRNA “vaccination” on multiple organ systems, with particular emphasis on autoimmune disorders, cardiovascular complications, and the onset of diabetes.

The study found that mRNA “vaccines” contribute to long-term systemic effects, including vascular damage, thromboembolic events, neurological dysfunction, and metabolic disorders.

This hypothesis aligns with emerging concerns that “vaccines” trigger unintended immune and inflammatory responses in a subset of recipients.

The researchers analyzed peer-reviewed studies, case reports, and registry data to present a cohesive narrative on post-vaccine syndromes.

The study found that Covid injections trigger neurological and autoimmune effects, including encephalitis, cognitive dysfunction, and autoimmune diseases (VAIDS, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus).

They also found that the “vaccines” cause vascular and cardiopulmonary issues, such as endothelial damage, thromboembolism, myocarditis, and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS).

In addition, they noted that mRNA shots trigger metabolic dysregulation, namely an increased incidence of diabetes and insulin resistance, raising concerns about the diabetogenic effects of mRNA vaccines.

The findings add to the significant concerns about long-term health implications previously raised by the Yale University team.

Dr. Krumholz and Harold H. Hines, Jr. Professor of Medicine at Yale, said:

“It’s clear that some individuals are experiencing significant challenges after vaccination.

“Our responsibility as scientists and clinicians is to listen to their experiences, rigorously investigate the underlying causes, and seek ways to help.”

Both studies provide compelling evidence of immune dysregulation in individuals with chronic illness post-Covid vaccination, including altered T cell populations, EBV reactivation, autoantibody production, and persistent spike antigenemia.

Their findings have sent shockwaves through the medical and scientific communities by confirming that Covid mRNA shots have caused a global surge in cases of VAIDS.

The studies have also debunked claims from the corporate media and so-called “fact-checkers” that previously dismissed reports of VAIDS as “conspiracy theories.”

Renowned American cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough, M.D., MPH, is among the leading experts who have been warning about the links between Covid “vaccines” and VAIDS.

In a post on X, McCullough said:

“COVID-19 mRNA injections are associated with an increased risk of developing certain autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus, erythematosus, alopecia areata, psoriasis and rheumatoid arthritis.”

Meanwhile, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has just made the explosive admission that Covid mRNA “vaccines” are spiked with contaminations that triggered a global surge in cancers.

The federal agency made the admission after an FDA study confirmed that Pfizer’s Covid mRNA “vaccine” contains dangerous levels of excess DNA contamination.

Source: https://slaynews.com/news/another-major-study-confirms-covid-vaccines-cause-vaids/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Another Major Study Confirms Covid ‘Vaccines’ Cause VAIDS appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

A new vaccine which is being offered to millions of pensioners and pregnant women could trigger a serious neurological condition, according to officials.

Source:  https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/health-chiefs-warn-vaccine-rolled-out-to-millions-may-cause-serious-neurological-illness/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Health Chiefs Warn Vaccine Rolled Out To Millions ‘May Cause Serious Neurological Illness’ appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Fake “meat” products such as Bill Gates’s lab-grown “beef” are linked to cardiovascular diseases and heart failure-related deaths, a new study has found.

The study found that the hyper-processed “foods” cause a greatly increased risk of cardiac arrest and strokes.

The results of the study are a major blow to the narrative that vegetarian and vegan diets help to lower the risk of cardiovascular diseases.

According to a new study by researchers at Imperial College London and Sao Paulo University, which analyzed the diets of more than 118,000 participants, scientists found that meat-free “foods” carry a huge risk of heart disease if they are ultra-processed.

The study, published in Lancet Regional Health – Europe, notes that this excludes natural produce such as fresh fruit and vegetables.

However, ultra-processed products that are plant-derived, insect-based, or lab-grown, carry an increased risk of heart failure and death.

Scientists found that ultra-processed food (UPF) products, such as lab-grown “beef” or insect-based “beetleburgers,” are linked with a 15 percent higher risk of suffering heart attacks and strokes.

The researchers found that these dangers are even present in plant-based UPFs, which have long been hailed as a “healthy” option to meat.

The research, which involved experts from Imperial College London, utilized data from more than 118,000 UK citizens.

The participants, aged 40 to 69 years, had their diets assessed over at least two days.

Scientists split food into plant-based products, such as fruit, vegetables, grains, and bread, as well as cakes and candy, and animal-based products such as fish, poultry, red meat, eggs, and dairy.

The two groups were then further divided into either ultra-processed food (UPF) or non-ultra-processed.

This data was then linked to hospital and mortality records to obtain information on cardiovascular diseases.

People who ate a lot of plant-based ultra-processed foods had a 7 percent greater risk of suffering conditions like blocked heart vessels.

They also had a 15 percent heightened risk of dying when compared to vegetarians whose diets had fewer UPFs.

Upping intake of non-processed vegetarian foods – such as fresh fruit and vegetables – by 10 percent was linked to an 8 percent lower risk of getting heart disease.

Deaths from heart disease fell by a fifth in vegetarians who consumed the least UPFs and 13 percent in cardiovascular disease overall.

The scientists noted that UPFs caused a build-up of fatty deposits inside the arteries.

Dr. Eszter Vamos, co-author of the study, from Imperial College London’s School of Public Health, said:

“Fresh plant-based foods such as fruits and vegetables, whole grains, and legumes are known to have important health and environmental benefits.

“While ultra-processed foods are often marketed as healthy foods, this large study suggests that plant-based ultra-processed foods do not seem to have protective health effects and are linked to poor health outcomes.”

Food additives and industrial contaminants present in these foods could cause oxidative stress and inflammation, the scientists suggest.

They added that nutritional guidelines promoting plant-based diets and cutting down on meat must also promote the importance of avoiding UPFs for good heart health.

Study author Dr. Fernanda Rauber, an expert in preventative medicine from the University of São Paulo in Brazil, said that it’s the first to show that fake “meat” products are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases.

“Despite being plant-based, these foods may contribute to risk factors such as dyslipidemia and hypertension due to their composition and processing methods,” she said.

“Food additives and industrial contaminants present in these foods might cause oxidative stress and inflammation, further aggravating the risks.

“Therefore, our results support the shift towards plant-based food choices that consider the degree of processing to improve cardiovascular health outcomes.”

The researchers noted that, while the products may appear to be healthy by claiming to be “meat-free,” plant-based,” or “lab-grown,” the fact that they are ultra-processed makes them a threat to public health.

The study comes amid a growing push for the general public to replace traditional meat and dairy products with fake “foods.”

However, a growing number of nutrition experts have been warning against fake “meat” products.

Nutritionist and “Sacred Cow: The Case for (Better Meat)” author Diana Rodgers says lab-grown meat, such as that sold by Bill Gates’s Upside Foods, is still not as healthy as McDonalds.

“I’d rather eat my shoe than lab-grown meat,” Rodgers stated.

British investigative food journalist Joanna Blythman has also warned against plant-based meat, which she says sometimes contains up to 30 artificial ingredients.

“Artificial plant-based proteins tend to be loaded with ‘anti-nutrients’ – compounds that make it harder for our guts to absorb beneficial macro and micronutrients,” Blythman wrote in an article for the Daily Mail.

Source:  https://slaynews.com/news/fake-meat-products-cause-heart-attacks-strokes-study-finds/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Fake ‘Meat’ Products Cause Heart Attacks and Strokes, Study Finds appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

By October 2022, there was a significant increase in fourteen different types of cancers across 44 countries, particularly among young people.

The American Cancer Society reported that cancer mortality in young people had doubled compared to pre-2020 levels.

Pfizer’s 2022 safety report on covid “vaccines” documented thousands of cancer cases following vaccinations, with 3,711 cases reported by June 2022.

UK oncologist Angus Dalgleish observed aggressive cancer relapses in patients who had received covid booster vaccines, suggesting a link between the vaccines and cancer.

Canadian oncologist William Makis noted unprecedented cases of stage four cancers in young adults, describing them as “turbo cancer” due to their aggressive nature and resistance to conventional treatments.

Pathologist Ryan Cole criticised covid injections for causing immune suppression, which impairs the body’s ability to fight cancer, and reported a significant increase in cancer cases post-vaccine rollout.  Cole estimated that 17 million people have died due to mRNA injections, describing the situation as a “silent holocaust” and criticising the medical establishment for denying these deaths.

“It is important to fully appreciate the spike protein burden in the vaccinated, in order to be able to find the best strategies to reverse the risk and the damage of this toxin … The better we understand these processes, the better we will be able to defend patients and the public against the imminent coming years of record-breaking cancer rates,” Dr. Coleen Huber wrote in a recent essay.

Over the years, The Exposé has frequently published articles about the risk of vaccine-induced cancers and the increase in cancer cases after the mass rollout of the covid so-called vaccines.  But many may have missed all the pieces in the puzzle, especially if they have not been following the real news as it was breaking.  Thankfully, Dr. Huber has gathered all the evidence into one essay for us which we have reproduced below.  In her essay, Dr. Huber explains:

– The mechanism of mRNA “vaccines” and the resulting spike protein production by people’s bodies after vaccination.

– The correlation between covid injections and certain cancers including lymphomas, glioblastomas, colorectal, ovarian and breast cancers.

– The global rise in cancer cases and mortality post-vaccination.  Globally, cancer diagnoses and excess deaths have risen following the covid vaccine rollout, with a notable acceleration after booster doses, particularly affecting younger age groups.  “The vulnerability is sufficient for all humans to be sure to avoid the covid vaccines,” Dr. Huber writes.

– The concerns and cautionary advice regarding vaccination for cancer patients.  People, who already face cancer as a leading cause of death, should avoid covid injections.

– The impact of covid injections on immune response and antibody production and the role of Type I interferon in immune function and cancer suppression.

– The mechanisms of cancer development and the role of spike protein.

– The impact of spike protein on DNA damage and repair.

– The suppression of tumour suppressor genes by spike protein.

– The spike protein’s role in cancer growth and angiogenesis.

– The immune evasion by cancer cells and the impact of vaccination.  The covid injections may weaken the immune system and allow cancer cells to evade immune detection.  Tumours can evade the immune system by disguising themselves as “self,” making it difficult for the immune system to target them.

– Enhancing immune vigilance and the role of vitamin A.  Vitamin A has been shown to help unmask hidden cancers, allowing the immune system to target them, and its deficiency is linked to camouflaged colorectal cancer.

– Metastasis, the spread of cancer cells to new locations in the body, and the importance of basement membrane integrity.

– The DNA contamination in covid injections (dubbed PlasmidGate) and its potential risks.

– N1-Methyl-pseudouridine, used in the mRNA of covid injections to stabilise the Spike Protein for immune recognition, and its potential link to cancer.  Other potential cancer risks from covid injections include contamination with the oncogenic SV40 virus, the presence of CD147 in the spike protein and microclots induced by spike proteins.

– Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment for covid and cancer.  Ivermectin has shown effectiveness against the spike protein, which is the main toxin in both covid infection and its vaccines.  Studies have shown that ivermectin can reduce tumours by 50% to 85% in cancers such as glioblastomas, colon and breast cancer, and it has shown effectiveness against a wider range of cancers in vitro.  Ivermectin was found to outperform the standard chemotherapy drug gemcitabine in treating pancreatic cancer.

Covid Shot-Cancer Links; Understand Them To Defeat Them

By Dr. Coleen Huber

Table of Contents

PART 1:  Statement of the Problem

By October 2022, mainstream media could no longer ignore the enormous rise in fourteen different types of cancers in 44 countries around the world and most remarkably in young people. ^{[1] [2] [3]}  The American Cancer Society acknowledged that cancer mortality has doubled in young people from pre-2020 levels. ^[4] Pfizer’s 2022 safety report on the covid-vaccines revealed thousands of cancers of hundreds of types following the injections. ^[5]  By June 2022, there were 3,711 cases reported by Pfizer under that heading.

Oncologists Note Stark Difference In Cancers From Pre-2020 To The Present

UK clinical oncologist Angus Dalgleish, one of the leading oncology researchers in the United Kingdom, sees an alarming number of cancer patients, long in remission, who “ … subsequently present with very aggressive relapse when they should have stayed in remission.  Sadly, I have yet to find a case where the patients have not received a covid booster vaccine from their GP or hospital because they are ‘at risk’.” ^[6]  His comment on cancer mortality developments around the world is that “the covid vaccines are linked to cancer and death.” ^[7]

Canadian oncologist William Makis MD, who has diagnosed over 20,000 cancer patients over his career, says, “I’ve never seen anything like this … I’ve never seen stage four breast cancers presenting in women in their twenties.  I’ve never seen stage four colon cancers presenting in men and women in their twenties and thirties … These cancers would always present at stage four, and they would always kill them in a matter of a few months, and it was always less than a year … ‘Turbo cancer’ is a term that people came up with to describe the extremely aggressive nature of these cancers in the covid vaccinated, and these cancers behave extremely differently, unlike anything I’ve seen before in my career … And the other feature of these cancers is that they are very resistant to conventional treatment; they’re resistant to radiation therapy, they’re resistant to chemotherapy, and patients seem to be doing very poorly with conventional treatments.  Oncologists are really baffled, and they don’t know what to do.“ ^[8]

Pathologist Ryan Cole MD, formerly of Mayo Clinic, specialises in postmortem examination.  He has criticised covid vaccines for, among other dangers, the severe impairment of the immune system and impairment of the ability to fight cancer.  He says “People ask, ‘Do these shots cause cancer?’  Well, they cause immune suppression. They cause a disruption and a dysregulation of your immune system that is normally what would fight cancer.  So that’s what we’re up against … As I travel the world and talk to doctors … they are seeing cancers in age groups they have never seen before, and it happened after the rollout of the [covid injections]  … In 2021, there was about a 6% or 7% increase in cancer.  In 2022, there was a 35% increase above average in cancer … People who have been clear of their cancer, 2, 3, 5, 10 and even 20 years, where, after the shots, their cancer aggressively came back, and the estimates are of 17 million people who have died of these mRNA injections … This is a silent holocaust, and that’s what’s sad about this.  People were coerced into an experiment, and the deaths are being denied by the medical establishment.” ^[9]

Spike Protein Dosing From Pfizer and Moderna

The amount of mRNA dose in each Pfizer vaccine is 13 trillion mRNA molecules, and in Moderna is 40 trillion molecules, each enveloped in its own cationic lipid nanoparticle.  These figures were determined by molecular weight of each of the two vaccines. ^[10]  To put those numbers in perspective, there are about 30 trillion cells in the human body.  So, one can imagine the impact of a maximally ubiquitous distribution throughout the whole body, in a roughly one-to-one or one-to-three ratio of payload unit to human cell.

Each of those two vaccines encoded whole spike proteins and each of the trillions of lipid nanoparticle (“LNP”) enveloped mRNA codes for spike protein. ^[11]

The Pfizer vaccine was not studied for carcinogenicity or genotoxicity (DNA damage potential) by Pfizer prior to rollout, as we can see from Pfizer’s own documentation to the FDA: ^[12]

From very early on in the covid vaccine heyday, February 2021, there was already evidence that covid vaccines produced a vastly higher spike protein burden in the vaccinated people than after natural infection.  Even within three weeks post-vaccination, the antibodies to spike proteins measured up to 100 times higher in the covid-vaccinated than in the unvaccinated and previously covid-infected. ^[13]  While some may interpret these antibodies as a sign of a more intense immune response to spike protein, it also indicates a larger and/or more impactful presence in the body of this known toxin.

Therefore, it is important to fully appreciate the spike protein burden in the vaccinated, in order to be able to find the best strategies to reverse the risk and the damage of this toxin.  Toward this end, this article explores the mechanisms of cancer risk from the spike protein.  The better we understand these processes, the better we will be able to defend patients and the public against the imminent coming years of record-breaking cancer rates.

It should be noted that the spike protein rarely appears intact more than 20 days after covid virus infection, but the recombinant, that is, vaccine-generated, spike protein has been observed in the covid vaccinated, from 69 to 187 days following vaccination.  ^[14]  That particular study stopped at 187 days, rather than being the point at which no more spike protein was observed, which implies that there may be a longer time period of spike presence in the bodies of vaccinated people.  This persistence includes both the injected mRNA enveloped in liposomes as well as its derivative spike protein. ^[15]  This is plenty of time for the initiation of cancer-promoting pathways, and the inhibition of immune defences against cancer to begin.  And it is certainly enough time for cardiovascular and heart damage to have begun, as well as breach of the blood-brain barrier, as I discuss in other papers.  Peak uptake throughout the northern hemisphere was in the spring of 2021.  So that is quite a long time for spike protein to persist in the bodies of vaccinated people, whereas the fragile mRNA that initiated such spike protein production degrades in weeks, after the payload has been delivered.

Epidemiology of Cancer Risk Following the Covid Vaccines

covid vaccines are correlated with increased incidence of the following cancers.

Lymphomas are so closely correlated with mRNA injection that 45.7% of the studied lymphoma patients who were covid-vaccinated developed lymphoma within only 30 days post-injection, rather than later. ^[16]  It is not surprising that this is one of the main cancers seen post-covid vaccine because the T and B cells of the lymphatic system are not only quickly reproducing, but as waste-drainers, lymph nodes are among the earliest of the body’s tissues to take up spike proteins.

Glioblastomas are pernicious cancers due to their easy accessibility to surrounding brain tissue, and their shielding from most potential treatments behind the blood-brain barrier, among other challenges.  Pfizer reported hundreds of brain cancers and pre-cancerous conditions in their June 2022 update. ^[17]  Reduced Cytochrome C levels were found in glioma patients post-covid vaccine, which seemed to be due to impaired oxidative phosphorylation and consequent lower ATP in the mitochondria. ^[18]

Ovarian and breast cancers are also seen with increased incidence since covid vaccine rollout, probably due to their p53 impact, yet the covid vaccines have damaged this p53 gene, the “guardian of the genome” protector of DNA, which I discuss below.

Colorectal cancers have proliferated, and aggressively and among unprecedented young ages since the covid vaccines.  William Dahut is the chief scientific officer of the American Cancer Society.  He says, “Colorectal cancer are also presenting with more aggressive disease and larger tumours at diagnosis; it’s more difficult to treat.”   Regarding this steep increase in colorectal cancer in youth, Harvard medical professor Kimmie Ng comments that “the steepest rises are in the very youngest people, those in their 20s and 30s.” ^[19]

Although the above are some of the most prominently increased cancers, there is no type of common cancer that has been observed to stay flat in incidence since the rollout of the covid vaccines. All have been listed in the Pfizer documentation. ^[20]

The Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (“VAERS”), which is overseen by the US Centres for Disease Control (“CDC”) and the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), is a national surveillance system regarding adverse vaccine effects, for all vaccines given in the US, including the mRNA covid vaccines.  For all of the entries regarding cancers in the year 2021, the researchers found that 96% of all the entries for any of the search terms related to cancer were specific to the covid vaccines, and only 4% for all the other kinds of vaccines put together. ^[21]

Worldwide, cancer diagnoses and total excess deaths began to rise following the rollout of covid vaccines, and then to accelerate following the boosters.  The findings are most remarkable in younger ages than are typically affected by cancer. ^[22]

CDC data on cancer mortality summarised below by The Ethical Skeptic shows a sharp inflection point in vastly increased cancer mortality (those with cancer listed as the cause of death) in the United States beginning right at the time of the covid vaccines rollout, the last week of December 2020.  In the following graph of cancer mortality in 0 to 54-year-olds, the inflection point of when cancer began to increase beyond yearly averages is quite clear, beginning the week after 14 December 2020, when the vaccine first became available. ^[23]  Because this graph shows deviation from the trend rather than actual numbers, the curve is often below zero through 2018 – 2020, as cancer mortality was somewhat lower than prior rates then.  My other observation is that the first spike after the vaccine rollout likely reflects those who already had fulminant cancer, now worsened by the toxicity of the vaccines, in which case, cancer would have been the default cause of death listed on the death certificate.  However, the continuing trend upward of the cancer mortality trend from 2021 to the present is a very strong indicator that a nationwide health-impact event in late 2020-early 2021 caused that sharp increase, and for that we know of only one.  All of the following data is derived from CDC-reported data.

An enormous study of the entire Japanese population from national vital statistics showed that excess mortality was seen for all cancers examined, 20 types of cancer, each with over 95 or 99% of PI since the rollout of the covid vaccines. ^[24]  The paper’s politically incorrect findings, based on uncomfortable data, earned its retraction by the journal Cureus.  At least 80% of the Japanese population had had two doses of mRNA vaccines and 68% of the population had received a third dose.  In that study of the Japanese population, the main cancers to increase following the covid vaccine rollout were ovarian cancer, leukaemia, prostate, lip / oral / pharynx and pancreatic cancers.  Breast cancers dipped lower at first, and then shifted to excess mortality also, though the last without statistical significance.

Skyrocketing cases of cancer in the UK have been attributed to smoking, ^[25] although smoking has drastically decreased in the UK in recent decades, as in the rest of the world.  Thirteen new cancers are now being attributed to smoking by the corporate media, which is highly improbable.

Cancer’s attacks on the body are multi-faceted.  They are so complex that researchers Valdes and Perea write:  “This staggering intricacy [of cancer’s many effects] calls for caution when advising all people with cancer (or a previous history of cancer) to receive the covid-19 primary vaccine series plus additional booster doses.” ^[26]

To this I would add:  Are you a member of a species, such as humans, in which cancer was already the first or second cause of death every year before the covid vaccines?  In that case, the vulnerability is sufficient for allhumans to be sure to avoid the covid vaccines, as I will show in detail below.

PART 2: Mechanisms by Which the Covid Vaccines Induce Cancer and Natural Therapies That Reverse These

IgG4 is an antibody made in abundance by covid-vaccinated persons, many times higher than in the unvaccinated. ^[27] Antibodies such as the IgG type immunoglobulins are easy to test for by a blood lab, and they are easy to understand.  When some irritant – either a pathogenic microbe or allergen – enters the body, then we make reactive antibodies as newly generated soldier molecules to fight the intruders.  This is the role of the B-cell-generated immunoglobulin antibodies.  So, when researchers discovered the huge disparity between the covid vaccinated and the unvaccinated in IgG4 counts, people got excited, and journalists wrote of the stark discovery.

IgG4 is thought to be associated with tolerance of invading microbes, and it is thought that this distracts or shifts the focus of immune system surveillance away from the more inflammatory, combative, so to speak IgG1 and IgG3, and thereby away from important battles against invading pathogens or even cancer.  And IgG4 is specifically more tolerant of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein among other proteins and microbes that do not belong in the body, and that this complacent immune reaction to the spike protein can promote infection and replication by SARS-CoV-2 without opposition. ^[28]

But there is a problem with all those assumptions and all that attention.  IgG4 is a downstream effect, and a product of a vanishingly small component of immune system cells, that is a small fraction of the molecules made by B cells, which comprise only 0.005% = five of every 100,000 blood cells.

That is, IgG4 is unlikely to have as much effect on covid risk, other microbial risk or cancer risk.  But it may serve as a convenient marker on blood labs that gives clues of underlying immune system battles of more importance.

Rather, the most important discovery on covid vaccine-induced cancer risk is something completely different, which is the loss of Type I interferon, and the loss of interferon signalling, in the covid-vaccinated, which is a tragic loss of many downstream immune functions against cancer.  The difference in the importance of these two phenomena is that IgG4 is very rare and very far downstream, while Type I interferon is centrally coordinating of the entire immune system, ubiquitous in healthy people, and significantly reduced in the covid vaccinated.  And this is the central immunity injury that the covid-vaccinated are faced with.  Both of these phenomena are concerning to UK clinical oncologist Angus Dalgleish, who was co-discoverer of the CD-4 receptor.  While speaking with US Senator Ron Johnson, Dr. Dalgleish shares his concerns regarding the covid vaccines, with regard to cancer, is that the covid vaccine boosters suppress the immune system’s T-cell response, and immunoglobulins switched to tolerisation, as two mechanisms most concerning to him by which the covid vaccines induce or worsen cancer. ^[29]  The Pfizer covid vaccine specifically was found to significantly reduce Type I interferon, also known as interferon alpha. ^[30] This causes a tremendous downstream effect of multiple pathologies, both infectious disease and malignant cancer.

Type I interferon, the body’s most important cytokine, is not to be underestimated for its effect against cancer, and this is due to an enormous array of anti-cancer effects.  Some of those effects are arrest of the cell cycle, apoptosis, or natural cell death, as well as stimulation of our greatest warriors against cancer, namely the natural killer cells and the CD8+ cytotoxic (“killer”) T-cells.  So, when covid-vaccinated people display sharply reduced Type I interferon, compared with the unvaccinated, this is a staggering level of vulnerability with respect to cancer.

One of those very important functions is G-quadruplex influence over Type I interferon, which in turn affects transcript, replication and genomic stability.  The Seneff research team gets deep into the details of these mechanisms, ^[31] beyond the scope of this paper, and well worth studying as theirs is the most important analysis to date of the enormity of the covid vaccine assault on overall immune function.

Cancer Attacks the Body in Seven Major Ways

At the turn of the millennium, Hanahan and Weinberg identified six major “capabilities” of cancer to undergo changes to promote its own growth and immortality. ^[32] John Boik summarised the seven major categories of attack inflicted by cancer against the body. ^[33]  I discuss those peculiar features of cancer here, and the roles of vitamins D, C and A against most of those routes of attack. ^[34]  Those are damage or destabilisation of DNA, and resulting abnormality in gene expression, abnormal cell signalling and other cell-to-cell communication; angiogenesis, which is the formation of new blood vessels to feed a tumour; invasion and metastasis; as well as immune evasion/camouflage.

I will show throughout this paper that the spike protein carries out most of these functions, in promotion of cancer, and to the detriment of the person with a cancer risk or a cancer burden.

Let’s look at DNA damage first.

Spike Proteins Damage DNA, and That Is A Major Cancer Risk

When DNA is damaged, cancer is a risk. ^[35] Perhaps the most important cancer risk from the covid vaccines is damage to DNA.  The spike protein has been found by Jiang et al to localise to the cell nucleus, where they were found in abundance and to significantly damage DNA and to alter pathways for DNA repair. The cells most abundant in spike proteins showed the most DNA damage, including the DNA in T-cells and B-cells, showing impairment from this damage. ^[36]  The tragic effect of this is that when spike protein hangs around cells long enough, such as with the mRNA perpetually regenerated spike proteins, your cells’ protective mechanisms against cancer would come to a stop.  Not surprisingly, given the current political climate, and despite Jiang and Mei’s meticulously reported data, the Viruses journal retracted their paper, and those who retracted it had financial ties to both Moderna and Pfizer. ^[37]   What Jiang and Mei had proven was what pundits denied, but what Pfizer documentation had already proven: that the spike proteins do enter human cells, and cell nuclei, and do affect DNA.

The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein has been found to cause cells to fuse together to form syncytia, which are multi-nucleated, like cancer cells.  And this process has been known to cause cancer. ^[38]  This leads to aneuploidy in daughter cells, which is carcinogenic. Aneuploidy is a different number of chromosomes than the normal 46, either excess or deficient.  So, DNA is damaged in this way as well, on exposure to spike proteins. ^[39]

The problem is that DNA repair is essential for B and T cell immunity; it is the core of that adaptive immune system’s ability to defend the organism from both cancerous and infectious disease, ^[40] and DNA repair is essential to achieve the versatility needed by that adaptive immune system to be able to protect the person from the variety of infectious and cancerous assaults that each of us faces over the course of life. Indeed, these processes are so fundamental to capable immune surveillance that they are necessary for that ubiquitous and even omniscient monitoring ability of the immune system.  Both developing and mature B and T cells, as all cells, need to break and then to repair DNA in order to diversify and to be able to achieve the versatility to accomplish this difficult task.^[41] [42]  But the spike proteins interfere with this highly complex, evolution-trained and essential immune function.  All of these sub-cellular activities are highly organised.  Spike proteins throw a kind of microscopic shrapnel into that exquisite system.  The damage is so great that Pfizer scientists found that covid vaccine-injected people showed lymphocytopenia (lack of T and B cells) measured two weeks after injection of their second dose.  [43]

Cell Signalling Shutdown, With Auto-Stimulation and Immortality

That was a general view of the damage to DNA from spike protein.  Here are some of the specific genetic downstream effects from that damage.

Vaccine developers placed higher guanine-cytosine content in the covid vaccine RNA than is present in either the wild SARS-CoV-2 virus or in human RNA.  These tend to stack into dense formations of guanine bases, which form G-quadruplexes (four guanines stacked together).  In excess, this has been found to have downstream effects of dysregulating the G4-protein binding system, which among other diseases, has been found to lead to malignant cancers, by dysregulating human RNA. ^[44] [45]

The spike protein was found to suppress a p53-dependent gene, leading to tumorigenesis.  P53 has been named the “guardian of the genome,” because its well-appreciated function is to prevent cells that have mutated or damaged DNA from reproducing.  Of all the body’s proteins, p53 is the most effective suppressor of tumours.  P53 accomplishes this by influencing a large set of genes that carry out a variety of functions against cancer. ^[46] The three major functions of p53 are to stop growth, to repair DNA and to make sure that a cell dies a normal cell death at the end of its life, rather than gain immortality as cancer cells do. ^[47]  Loss of p53 removes these protective effects for the individual against rampant cancer growth, and nearly half of tumours contain mutated p53. ^[48]  Cancer cells that had high amounts of spike proteins had reduced p53 signalling and reduced p53 transcriptional activity, and after this damage, no controls on cancer cell multiplication were observed. ^[49] In this way, spike proteins removed an important protective feature against cancer, and then the brakes were released, so to speak, on the proliferation of cancer cells.

Of concern in breast cancer is that the spike protein interacts with BRCA, which is a long-recognized tumour suppressor protein.  That protein regulates genes that have effects against cancer. ^[50]  Cancers of the breast, uterus, ovaries and prostate are associated with altered BRCA1 activity.  BRCA2 mutations are primarily correlated with cancers of the prostate, pancreas as well as melanoma.

Nuclear factor-kappa B (NFκB) is the name of a group of proteins that cause cancer cells to grow and multiply while lending them immortality, which makes them a threat to surrounding organs.  Spike proteins were found to stimulate and to grow lung cancer by using this NFκB pathway. ^[51]

Angiogenesis

The NFκB proteins discussed in the previous paragraph create another problem that strengthens cancer to the detriment of the person, and that is that NFκB stimulates angiogenesis, ^[52] which is the formation of new blood vessels in the vicinity of the tumour; this is thought to be due to the tumour’s fast-paced metabolism demanding sugar and other fuels, as well as the blood vessel super-highways to satisfy all that demand for fuel, so to speak.

Copper is an essential micronutrient, but must be limited, because of its role in angiogenesis, which has been known since the 1960s. ^[53]  My clinic has long incorporated zinc in our treatments for cancer, and we have tried to limit copper as much as possible to not stimulate angiogenesis, or to act as an obstacle to it.  Zinc is a natural rival opponent of copper.

Immune System Evasion

Two issues arise with immune system effects of the covid vaccines.  That is, there is a weakening of the immune system, and there is camouflage or evasion of the immune system by the cancer.  Tumours have several mechanisms of camouflage or evasion of targeting by the immune system. ^[54]  The problem is that our immune systems exist to seek and destroy that which is “non-self,” and tumours disguise themselves, in their antigen display and antigen concealment, as “self.”

Covid vaccination led to a loss of Type I interferon, which is the immune system’s most important non-nutrient biochemical, which initiates a necessary cascade of immune responses in the event of a pathogenic or cancerous attack.  As a result, there are downstream disturbances and failures in the regulation of cancer surveillance. ^[55]

This leads to increased PD-L1 protein expression on cells, which gives cancer a refuge from immune system surveillance, ^[56] and functions as a distraction to the immune system with regard to cancer.  The PD-L1 protein makes it so that cancer is not apprehended by cells of the immune system, due in part to the distraction of spike protein assault, as an invading pathogen that itself must be fought.  The PD-L1 protein has been found to be significantly increased in covid-vaccinated people. ^[57]

However, the other half of the immune system evasion resulting from decreased Type I interferon is this:   The immune system, under the influence of Type I interferon, and then major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class 1 antigen displayed on cancer cells, earmarks and targets cancer cells for the immune system to destroy them. ^[58] But alas, with the loss of type I interferon, there is a consequent loss of MHC antigen presentation by cancer cells, and thus cancer cells escape the immune system undetected.

The direct effects of Type I interferon against cancer include the above functions plus the following:  the arrest of the cell cycle (checking rampant growth), tendency toward differentiation (which is a benign rather than a malignant development), initiation of apoptosis (normal “on-time” cell death rather than cell immortality), stimulation of natural killer (“NK”) cells and cancer-killing (CD8+) T-cells activity. ^[59]

Also, inactivated covid vaccines have been correlated with the loss of the very important CD8+ T-cells. ^[60]  As Ryan Cole MD describes this problem, the covid vaccines “put your T-cells to sleep, in a manner that they can’t fight … because those T-cells have gone to sleep to a degree that they would normally fight off cancer, and now they’re not there to fight off cancer.” ^[61]  This also appears to be due to loss of Type I interferon.

In my work with cancer patients over the years, it has been an essential part of our work to keep the immune system vigilant to the presence of cancer and reactive against it.  This is very difficult to achieve pharmaceutically, because unlike an obviously foreign item such as a virus or pathogenic bacteria, cancer cells appear to be “self,” and are then too often tolerated without opposition by the immune system.  So, there is not likely to be a synthetic substance that can accomplish that enhancement of immune vigilance.  Vaccines, despite their three-century history, have never achieved such a feat.

Vitamin A, on the other hand, has been able to unmask, so to speak, previously hidden cancers from the immune system, and allow those cancer cells and tumours to be targeted for destruction.  On the other hand, it has been found that when vitamin A is deficient, colorectal cancer remained camouflaged from the immune system. ^[62]  This likely has been due primarily to vitamin A’s suppression of the pro-cancerous interleukin IL-6. ^[63]

The topic of IL-6 bears examination because there is evidence that CD-147, which is abundant on the spike protein, promotes TNF-alpha, which is highly carcinogenic, and that in turn strongly promotes IL-6. ^[64]

Vitamin A has been able to fight cancer on a number of molecular and cellular levels, beyond the scope of this discussion, ^[65]  but its usefulness against IL-6 alone has been worthwhile. For this reason, vitamin A has been an ever-present part of the cancer treatment protocols at our clinic since 2006, and at far higher doses than are discussed by the FDA.  I have often discussed anywhere from 50,000 to 300,000 units per day with patients, depending on the person and the aspects of their particular cancer.  The success of our clinic’s results against cancer is likely due not to any one of the treatments that we use, but to the synergy among well-tolerated and compatible nutrients that have complementary anti-cancer effects.

Metastasis: An Invasion of Tumours at Sites Near and Far From the Primary Tumour

When matched with an unexposed control group, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein was found to stimulate the migration of lung cancer cells through the blood, and subsequent invasion of the basement membrane in a new location in the body. ^[66] That process is known as metastasis.  Not only do cancer cells break off from a primary tumour to then travel in the bloodstream, but weak basement membranes of different bodily organs are fertile ground for a new secondary tumour to gain a foothold.  Think of this as, for example, an old ceramic coffee cup with a scratched surface in one area.  That area is where the coffee will seep into and stain more so than the resilient finish of the rest of the cup.  Similarly, the basement membranes that protect our cells are most vulnerable to a new metastasising cancer cell floating by in the blood at that weak area rather than where the basement membrane is intact and thereby more resilient to such penetration.

My clinic, since 2006, has fought against basement membrane weakness and friability; that is, our clinic has worked to strengthen our cancer patients’ basement membrane resilience against metastatic invasion.  Vitamin C is a necessity, not a luxury, for building collagen, which I describe to patients as the equivalent of the bricks and mortar that we are made of, because collagen is by far the most abundant of the proteins in the body.  This is never recognised as the reason for vitamin C’s good effect against cancer, but I think it is one of the most important of its mechanisms.  There are dozens of types of collagens.  Pro-collagen requires vitamin C together with the amino acids lysine and proline.  Therefore, we prepare IV nutrient treatments for cancer patients that include these three ingredients.

Other Mechanisms of the Covid Vaccines That Promote Cancer

The above mechanisms of the covid vaccines against cancer are those with the most available evidence, and historically established as known cancer-promoting pathways.  However, there is also accumulating evidence of additional cancer-causing factors that are new and peculiar to these novel injections.

DNA plasmid contamination of the covid vaccines

Foreign DNA, which derives from amplification in the bacteria E. coli, contaminates both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.  This is a different but related problem than the problem of damage to human DNA that I describe above.

Dr. Phillip Buckhaults is a cancer genomics expert.  He testified, in a video that is no longer viewable on YouTube, to the South Carolina Senate on this DNA contamination found in covid vaccines.  He testified:  “The Pfizer vaccine is contaminated with DNA.  It’s not just mRNA.  I’m kind of alarmed about the possible consequences of this … It could be causing some of the rare but serious side effects like death from cardiac arrest.  This DNA can and likely will integrate into the genomic DNA of cells that got transfected with the vaccine mix.  It’s different from RNA because it can be permanent.  It could cause theoretically a sustained autoimmune attack toward that tissue.  It’s also a very real theoretical risk of future cancer in some people.   There’s probably about 200 billion pieces of this plasmid DNA in each dose of the vaccine . . . This is a bad idea.” ^[67]

Kevin McKernan was the first to discover and to write about this problem of plasmid DNA contamination of the covid vaccines. ^[68]  This was confirmed by Speicher and Rose. [69]

“Why does that matter?” asks pathologist Ryan Cole.  “That matters because that [E coli derived plasmid] DNA can park itself in the nucleus of your cell next to your own DNA, and piggy-back a ride into the next generation of cell, into the next generation of cell, etc. So, can it become part of the next generation that’s born?  It could … And this did happen in mouse studies up to four litters of mice.” ^[70]

Methyl-pseudouridine

N1-Methyl-pseudouridine (M1Ψ) was inserted into the manufactured mRNA used in the covid vaccines, which produced a genetically modified RNA, in order to stabilise the spike protein long enough to display it to the immune system, for recognition as a foreign antigen, so that the immune system could make antibodies against the spike proteins.  However, this creates new problems, including for cancer risk.  It turned out that the M1Ψ actually stimulated both cancer growth and metastasis in melanoma. ^[71]  Nevertheless, N1-methyl pseudouridine is naturally occurring in human RNA, comprising 1.4% of all bases in our RNA, and is necessary for our protein synthesis. ^[72]  So I doubt that this is a major cause of cancer, except by the indirect route of giving shelter from immune attack to spike protein production.

Other possible mechanisms of the increased rates of cancer being seen are an alleged contamination of the covid vaccines by the oncogenic SV40 virus, the CD147 presence in the spike protein favouring the carcinogenic TNF-alpha, ^[73] as well as possible contribution to cancerous processes by microclots induced by the spike proteins.

PART 3: Ivermectin’s Roles Against Covid Vaccine-Induced Cancers

Ivermectin is one of the safest drugs in existence.  Prior to the covid era, four billion doses had been given around the world in the half-century since its discovery, mostly in equatorial Africa, as ivermectin has excellent effects against tropical parasites.  However, it has been crucially important in the covid era, because spike protein is the main toxin in both naturally acquired covid infection as well as in the covid vaccines.  In the latter case, those full-length spike proteins are produced by the mRNA template.  I cited studies back in 2021, in my book ‘The Defeat of covid’, in which several teams of researchers had each shown that ivermectin effectively blocks the troublesome ends of the spike protein, both S1 moieties as well as S2, and that humanity would be fortunate if ivermectin blocked even one of those, let alone the much better effect of blocking all three.

Since that time, many more effects of ivermectin against spike protein have been found.  Clinical oncologist William Makis MD summarises fifteen of those. ^[74]

Essentially, ivermectin is able to not only block most of the worst effects of the mRNA vaccines, but it inhibits tumour growth and arrests the cell cycle of cancer, and in the very well-tolerated dose of 2 mg/kg body weight, which is roughly 136 mg dosing for a 150-lb person or 182 mg for a 200-lb person, and is compatible with both conventional chemotherapy as well as nutritional cancer therapies.

Remarkably, ivermectin was shown to oppose cancer stem cells. ^[75]  Those stem cells are what enable cancer to grow and later to recur.  I say that it is remarkable because previously, only vitamin C had been known to kill cancer stem cells, ^[76] [77] while being harmless to normal cells. ^[78]

Even at lower doses, studies summarised in the Makis paper have shown tumour reductions of 50% to 85% in some of the most devastating cancers caused by the covid vaccines, namely glioblastomas, and cancers of the colon and breast.  In vitro studies found ivermectin’s effect against a wider range of cancers, including the aforementioned, as well as pancreatic, ovarian, prostate and melanoma.

Regarding pancreatic cancer, ivermectin was found to be compatible with, and to outperform, the standard pancreatic chemotherapy drug gemcitabine, in its effect against that cancer. ^[79]

(I look forward to observing more and writing more as time goes on about the life-saving effects of ivermectin and other harmless interventions against not only covid but against the most common cancers of our time, especially those that have proliferated since the rollout of the covid vaccines.)

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/10/23/how-covid-injections-cause-cancer/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post How covid injections cause cancer and how to defeat it appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

A bombshell new study has confirmed that surging cases of several once-rare forms of “debilitating neurological disorders” are being caused by Covid mRNA shots.

The discovery was made by an international group of neurology-focused researchers.

The team, made up of leading researchers in the United States and Kenya, sought to investigate the links between Covid mRNA injections and recent spikes in reports of autoimmune encephalitis (AE), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD).

All three are described as “complex and debilitating neurological disorders.”

For the study, the researchers used data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

VAERS has recorded surging reports of AE, NMOSD, and MOGAD since the Covid mRNA injections were rolled out for public use in early 2021.

As part of this investigation, the authors sought to better understand any potential relationship between vaccinations and the incidence of NMOSD, AE, and MOGAD—mindful of possible risk factors, the authors used multivariate logistic regressions applying to age, sex, type of vaccine, and previous history of autoimmune diseases.

The study team was led by Professors Maria Garcia-Dominguez and Bahadar S. Srichawla, both at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Department of Neurology.

The study’s paper was published in the MedRxiv medical journal.

The researchers concluded from this study that a majority of the vaccine-induced NMOSD, AE, and MOGAD cases were caused by Covid mRNA injections.

Most of the cases analyzed during the study resulted in hospitalization, the researchers note.

The authors of this study were affiliated with the following:

• University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
• William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine
• College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi
• Faculty of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University College of Health Sciences
• University of California, Berkeley

For the study, the researchers analyzed a total of 161 cases of neurological disorders that had been reported to VAERS.

Out of 161 cases, the authors found the following:

• 72 cases of NMOSD
• 82 cases of AE
• 7 cases of MOGAD

Of the cases analyzed by the study, the researchers found that an alarming number were found to have been caused by the Covid shots.

For NMOSD, 19 out of the 72 cases were caused by mRNA injections or 26.3% of the reports.

The study found that Covid shots caused 43 out of the 82 cases of AE, equal to 52.4%.

The injections were responsible for 6 out of the 7 cases of MOGAD, or 85.7%.

According to the researchers, Covid mRNA shots were significantly associated with hospitalization for those with NMOSD.

The Covid shots have been implicated in the triggering of various autoimmune conditions with and without central nervous system involvement, the researchers note.

In the study’s paper, the researchers explain that adjuvants in vaccines are supposed to enhance autoimmune responses by creating a more robust immune activation.

However, while these adjuvants are meant to help bolster response, the neurologist authors acknowledge they can “inadvertently escalate autoimmunity risks in genetically susceptible individuals.”

They warn that the evidence shows that Covid mRNA injections appeared to be initiating or exacerbating autoimmune processes such as NMOSD and AE.

The neurologists offer some examples: with “NMOSD, disrupted Tregs could not control autoimmunity against aquaporin 4, leading to demyelination and neurological symptoms, while in AE, insufficient Treg activity could allow unchecked inflammation within the central nervous system, resulting in encephalitic symptoms.”

According to the findings of the study, “the complex interaction between vaccine components and the immune system” can create a situation where the Covid shots “potentially initiate neurological autoimmune disorders.”

This troubling study comes after a group of prominent Italian scientists recently raised the alarm after discovering a new “neurological emergency” that is emerging among those who have been “vaccinated” with Covid mRNA shots.

The warning was issued by scientists at the University of Chieti-Pescara in Chieti, Italy, as Slay News reported last week.

They report that two cases of deadly Status Epilepticus (SE) have now been confirmed to have been caused by Covid mRNA injections.

In a peer-reviewed study, published in the European Journal of Epilepsy, the scientists revealed that SE, a dangerous condition in which epileptic fits follow one another without recovery of consciousness between them, has a mortality rate of 20 percent.

They note that cases of SE have surged since February 2021, when the worldwide vaccination campaign was launched to supposedly tackle the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Italian authors of this study have identified several possible vaccine-related adverse events, including neurological manifestations.

Moreover, SE emerges in the literature as an emergent condition in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals.

The authors of the study’s paper confirm that both cases of SE that they analyzed were caused by Covid mRNA shots.

They are now calling for more research to better understand the link between Covid injections and status epilepticus.

Source: https://slaynews.com/news/covid-shots-cause-debilitating-neurological-disorders-study-warns/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Covid Shots Cause ‘Debilitating Neurological Disorders,’ Study Warns appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

A bombshell new study has confirmed that surging cases of several once-rare forms of “debilitating neurological disorders” are being caused by Covid mRNA shots.

The discovery was made by an international group of neurology-focused researchers.

The team, made up of leading researchers in the United States and Kenya, sought to investigate the links between Covid mRNA injections and recent spikes in reports of autoimmune encephalitis (AE), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD).

All three are described as “complex and debilitating neurological disorders.”

For the study, the researchers used data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

VAERS has recorded surging reports of AE, NMOSD, and MOGAD since the Covid mRNA injections were rolled out for public use in early 2021.

As part of this investigation, the authors sought to better understand any potential relationship between vaccinations and the incidence of NMOSD, AE, and MOGAD—mindful of possible risk factors, the authors used multivariate logistic regressions applying to age, sex, type of vaccine, and previous history of autoimmune diseases.

The study team was led by Professors Maria Garcia-Dominguez and Bahadar S. Srichawla, both at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Department of Neurology.

The study’s paper was published in the MedRxiv medical journal.

The researchers concluded from this study that a majority of the vaccine-induced NMOSD, AE, and MOGAD cases were caused by Covid mRNA injections.

Most of the cases analyzed during the study resulted in hospitalization, the researchers note.

The authors of this study were affiliated with the following:

• University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
• William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine
• College of Health Sciences, University of Nairobi
• Faculty of Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University College of Health Sciences
• University of California, Berkeley

For the study, the researchers analyzed a total of 161 cases of neurological disorders that had been reported to VAERS.

Out of 161 cases, the authors found the following:

• 72 cases of NMOSD
• 82 cases of AE
• 7 cases of MOGAD

Of the cases analyzed by the study, the researchers found that an alarming number were found to have been caused by the Covid shots.

For NMOSD, 19 out of the 72 cases were caused by mRNA injections or 26.3% of the reports.

The study found that Covid shots caused 43 out of the 82 cases of AE, equal to 52.4%.

The injections were responsible for 6 out of the 7 cases of MOGAD, or 85.7%.

According to the researchers, Covid mRNA shots were significantly associated with hospitalization for those with NMOSD.

The Covid shots have been implicated in the triggering of various autoimmune conditions with and without central nervous system involvement, the researchers note.

In the study’s paper, the researchers explain that adjuvants in vaccines are supposed to enhance autoimmune responses by creating a more robust immune activation.

However, while these adjuvants are meant to help bolster response, the neurologist authors acknowledge they can “inadvertently escalate autoimmunity risks in genetically susceptible individuals.”

They warn that the evidence shows that Covid mRNA injections appeared to be initiating or exacerbating autoimmune processes such as NMOSD and AE.

The neurologists offer some examples: with “NMOSD, disrupted Tregs could not control autoimmunity against aquaporin 4, leading to demyelination and neurological symptoms, while in AE, insufficient Treg activity could allow unchecked inflammation within the central nervous system, resulting in encephalitic symptoms.”

According to the findings of the study, “the complex interaction between vaccine components and the immune system” can create a situation where the Covid shots “potentially initiate neurological autoimmune disorders.”

This troubling study comes after a group of prominent Italian scientists recently raised the alarm after discovering a new “neurological emergency” that is emerging among those who have been “vaccinated” with Covid mRNA shots.

The warning was issued by scientists at the University of Chieti-Pescara in Chieti, Italy, as Slay News reported last week.

They report that two cases of deadly Status Epilepticus (SE) have now been confirmed to have been caused by Covid mRNA injections.

In a peer-reviewed study, published in the European Journal of Epilepsy, the scientists revealed that SE, a dangerous condition in which epileptic fits follow one another without recovery of consciousness between them, has a mortality rate of 20 percent.

They note that cases of SE have surged since February 2021, when the worldwide vaccination campaign was launched to supposedly tackle the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Italian authors of this study have identified several possible vaccine-related adverse events, including neurological manifestations.

Moreover, SE emerges in the literature as an emergent condition in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals.

The authors of the study’s paper confirm that both cases of SE that they analyzed were caused by Covid mRNA shots.

They are now calling for more research to better understand the link between Covid injections and status epilepticus.

Source: https://slaynews.com/news/covid-shots-cause-debilitating-neurological-disorders-study-warns/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Covid Shots Cause ‘Debilitating Neurological Disorders,’ Study Warns appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

There is ample evidence to show that routine childhood vaccines cause sudden infant death syndrome, or SIDS, and have done so for decades.  Yet that evidence is ignored or suppressed.

In 2011, Dr. Raymond Obomsawin gave a lecture during which he provided several scientific studies to show the harm, including sudden death, that childhood vaccines are causing.

Dr. Obomsawin believed that most cases of shaken baby syndrome are also caused by childhood vaccines. “We see this epidemic of accusations against parents, and there are large numbers of people now in prison, in which they’re claiming they shook their babies and killed them.  Most of these parents loved their children and I believe didn’t do it,” he said.

Raymond Obomsawin (1950-2021) was a dedicated researcher who held an MSc and a PhD with a focus on health science and human ecology.  He unearthed many of the harms from the widespread vaccination programs such as Canada’s vaccine program in Thailand increasing death and disability for those vaccinated, which was of course never published.  You can read more about Dr. Obomsawin’s work HERE.

In a presentation titled ‘Historical & Scientific Perspectives: Immunity, Infectious Disease & Vaccination’ given to the Life Science Seminars International in August 2011, Dr. Obomsawin gave a historical overview of human attempts to create immunity artificially via vaccination; explored the issues surrounding these artificial attempts to protect human health; showed the real causes of some of the more recent health issues; and, how vaccines, among other artificial chemicals and pharmaceutics, cause harmful and, oftentimes, lifelong health damage. He showed, using statistical and historical facts, that vaccines have no positive impact on the decline of disease.

“We will have quite a bit of interesting history to look at. And the history you’re going to be exposed to is very different from what you’ll read in a mainstream textbook because it‘s not talked about.  It’s ignored or it’s suppressed,” he said.

Dr. Obomsawin began by speaking about the work carried out by Australian doctor Archie Kalokerinos who authored the book ‘Every Second Child’. Dr. Kalokerinos titled his book ‘Every Second Child’ because when he first became the Director of the Collarenebri Health Centre in the Northern Territory, Australia, the death rate among infants and small children was at about 50%; every second child was dying.

“Over a period of months, he began to investigate why this was happening,” Dr. Obomsawin said.  “Finally, after several months of inquiry, he was shocked to discover that the reason behind these deaths was the fact that these malnourished, immune system-deficient children were receiving these mass vaccine campaign programmes sponsored by the government.  And if the parents didn’t want to do it, they would force the parents to [make their child] take it.”

Toward the end of his presentation, Dr. Obomsawin spoke more about vaccine harm to babies and children.  He began with sudden infant death syndrome (“SIDS”).  We have embedded the video below to begin at this point.

In October 2009, autopsy reports of infants in the Austin, Texas, morgue listed as SIDS were examined by two researchers. They wanted to know if there was a correlation between the timing of deaths and prior vaccination.

They found a “highly, disproportionate amount of sudden deaths were occurring at 2, 4 and 6 months [old], the very same time when infants were being routinely vaccinated,” Dr. Obomsawin said.

The researchers concluded that if the vaccines were not causing the infant deaths, then the deaths should have been occurring randomly, spread out throughout the first six months of life.  But because the deaths were clustered around the specific ages when vaccinations were given then the vaccines should be considered as the cause of death.

Next, Dr. Obomsawin spoke about a study published in December 2004 authored by Australian Dr. Viera Scheibner..  Using an instrument developed by her husband that monitors stress in an infant’s breathing patterns, she observed that for as long as 21 days after receiving a vaccine, infants would go through periodic stress episodes.

“[She] showed that when they go through these stress breathing episodes, it’s very dangerous because they can actually stop breathing and die,” Dr. Obomsawin said. “[Dr. Scheibner] concluded that these, they call it the non-specific stress syndrome, can be a critical factor in infant deaths. And it was all, they believe, related to the previous administration of the vaccines.”

Dr. Obomsawin then spoke about a paper Dr. Scheibner published in 2001 titled ‘Shaken Baby Syndrome Diagnosis On Shaky Ground’. Dr. Scheibner, in addition to several other doctors such as Dr. Kalokerinos, found that the symptoms of shaken baby syndrome are identical to what happens with vaccines in these infants’ bodies, Dr. Obomsawin said.

“We see this epidemic of accusations against parents, and there are large numbers of people now in prison, in which they’re claiming they shook their babies and killed them.  Most of these parents loved their children and I believe didn’t do it,” he added.

“It’s in particular infants who have been delivered with forceps.  Because what happens after, a lot of these babies who are delivered with forceps, there is brain damage, slight brain damage and bleeding on the top of their brain as a result of that.  And when they receive the vaccine, it causes a much greater release of blood in the brain area which can precipitate death,” Dr. Obomsawin explained.

He then spoke about a book published in 2008 authored by Janine Roberts titled ‘Fear of the Invisible’.  Chapter 7 of the book is headed ‘The dangerous impurities of vaccines’.

Roberts met with regulatory scientists in the US National Institute of Health in 1999 to look at the safety of vaccine manufacturing methods, Dr. Obomsawin said and briefly described what Chapter 7 detailed:

“She was shocked at what they found: that there was the chicken leukosis virus in the MMR vaccine when it shouldn’t have been there; that the polio vaccine sometimes contained more monkey viruses than polioviruses; and, there were grave concerns also about foreign residual DNA and RNA [contaminating] these vaccines.

“There was a fear that could be causing autoimmune disorders and cancers … Also, DNA contamination could possibly be linked to the incidence of autism and other serious disorders.”

For the section on SIDS, he ended with a study that was published in 2011 which examined data for 30 countries on infant mortality and vaccine doses.  The researchers found that infant mortality rates reduced, or regressed, with fewer vaccine doses that were routinely given.

You can find the slides for Dr. Obomsawin’s presentation HERE.  If the video above is removed from YouTube, you can watch it on Amazing Discoveries HERE.  It is the first episode in a series of seven titled ‘Science of Life’.  You can find all 7 episodes HERE.

Sharing the video above, the Vaccination Information Network provided links to information in support of Dr. Obomsawin’s presentation. The links are no longer available.  However, we were able to find archived copies which we have also shown below:

• Supplemental material (graphs) HERE, archived on Wayback Machine HERE. We were also able to find a copy of the supplemental material on SlideShare HERE.
• SOURCE, archived on Wayback Machine HERE.

Last year, Canadian emergency room doctor Daniel Nagase wrote about his personal experience regarding the link between vaccination and SIDS in a Substack article.  We’ve reproduced Dr. Nagase’s article below as it compliments Dr. Obomsawin’s presentation.

History: Babies, Vaccines and Sudden Death

By Daniel Nagase MD

About 20 years ago, when I was in medical school I remember attending a paediatrics lecture at Dalhousie Medical School. What I remember from then was the professor mentioning 3 factors being associated with sudden infant death syndrome (“SIDS”) in North America.

1. Poverty.
2. Smokers in the household.
3. Recent vaccination.

At that time, “Back to Sleep” (making infants sleep on their back), was all there was to prevent sudden infant death syndrome, or so we were taught. Making sure babies had firm bedding and nothing nearby that could smother them was the “best” medical advice of the time. Little did we know that 25 years earlier, Japanese authorities reduced the sudden deaths following vaccination by 90%, by raising the age of vaccination from 3 months to 2 years ^[1]. In medical school, I had the mistaken belief that protecting our youngest and most fragile patients was the number one priority for doctors and researchers around the world. After the lecture, I believed the link between childhood vaccination and sudden deaths was something that medical science would soon have answers to. I believed until now.

Continuing Medical Education – Not What You Think It Is

One of the means by which medical colleges all over North America maintain control of doctors is through “Continuing Medical Education” or CME. Ostensibly CME is to ensure quality of patient care, a way to keep licensed medical doctors “up to date” and only give patients the most current treatments.

Only “approved” educational programmes are eligible for credit towards a physician’s “Medical Education” requirement for maintaining their licence. So, a physician taking time to read medical research does not necessarily count towards confirmation of continued “medical competence,” unless it is part of an “approved activity” as defined by his local medical board.

In a typical doctor’s life, time is already in short supply, and the effect of having to earn credits to keep one’s licence makes physicians judicious in how they use their time. Four hours spent reading journals versus four hours in an “approved” medical activity has the effect of biasing a physician’s time towards “board approved” education over independent research. Effectively this captures a physician’s ongoing acquisition of knowledge and limits it to medical board “approved” information.

The Betrayal of Society

During my career and almost two decades of approved “Continuing Medical Education,” I never again heard the link between vaccination and sudden infant deaths mentioned.

After that one lecture in medical school, I trusted that the experts, the paediatricians and public health researchers would soon find an answer for us. While I learned about the latest emergency medicine research, how to reduce blood loss in trauma, hypothermia to prevent brain damage, emergency C-sections to save critical pregnant patients, and maintaining and extending my expertise in emergencies, I believed my fellow experts in the paediatric societies and public health would apply their knowledge to get to the bottom of sudden deaths in the most important patient population in society. My expertise in saving their lives if they were dying from trauma, exchanged for their expertise on how to stop dead babies from showing up in my emergency room. That was the social contract, or so I thought.

In my belief, it would have been impossible for two decades of Continuing Medical Education to miss over half a century of data about unexpected deaths following vaccination.

And then I read this:

This landmark research paper was not a part of any medical college-approved “learning activity.” This article actually came across my eyes courtesy of Citizenfreepress.com, a mostly social and political news aggregator. Had the knowledge within this paper been applied 20 years ago, while I was still in medical school, or 50 years ago when the problem with vaccines and sudden infant deaths first became widely known around the world, how many infant lives could have been saved?

Had North America done what Japan had done in 1975, how many parents would have been spared the grief of finding their infant dead in the week following vaccination?

The social contract has been broken. My expertise is no longer there to save lives in the emergency department thanks to the suspension of my licence by the British Columbia and Alberta Colleges. Perhaps the consequences of one less emergency room doctor may reach those who have perpetrated over half a century of harm. But many innocents have suffered and will suffer as well. Deaths in the waiting room, long emergency department wait times, and emergency room closures – this has all happened in the province of Alberta where I used to work. The unnecessary loss of life can only be stopped with truth, please share.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/07/12/vaccines-cause-sudden-infant-death-syndrome-sids/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Routine childhood vaccines cause sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.