canadian Archives - HopeGirl Blog

Canadian Government Euthanizes ‘Young and Healthy’ 26-Year-Old

Hope — Mon, 07 Sep 2026 14:00:00 +0000

The death certificate of a 26-year-old man who was euthanized by the Canadian government, despite being described by his doctor as “young and healthy,” has been released, revealing disturbing details about his final hours.

Ontario resident Kiano Vafaeian died under Canada’s taxpayer-funded Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program on December 30, 2025.

A copy of Vafaeian’s death certificate has now been obtained by author and anti-euthanasia activist Kelsi Sheren, revealing alarming new details about his “assisted suicide.”

Documents concerning Vafaeian’s death show that drugs used in the procedure were obtained through a Vancouver pharmacy before the euthanasia was carried out at a funeral home.

His mother, Margaret Marsilla, has fiercely opposed the decision to approve her son for MAiD.

After his death, Marsilla accused the doctor who approved the procedure of finding a “loophole” that allowed her son to be euthanized.

That doctor was prominent Canadian MAiD practitioner Dr. Ellen Wiebe.

Vafaeian traveled across the country to Vancouver, where Wiebe administered the lethal procedure.

Death Certificate Lists ‘MAiD’ as Cause of Death

Wiebe is a member of the Clinicians’ Advisory Council for the euthanasia advocacy organization Dying with Dignity Canada and a professor at the University of British Columbia.

She has become one of Canada’s most prominent practitioners of MAiD.

Right to Life UK reported in 2023 that Wiebe had administered MAiD to more than 400 patients.

In footage obtained by The New Atlantis, Wiebe described performing euthanasia as “the most rewarding work we’ve ever done.”

Before his death in December, Vafaeian filled several prescriptions at Macdonald’s Prescriptions Ltd. in Vancouver.

The drugs were subsequently used during his assisted death.

The prescriptions reportedly included “Midazolam injection, Propofol injection, Rocuronium bromide injection, Bupivacaine injection, a line item labeled ‘1 MAID’.”

The medications have conventional medical purposes but can be combined as part of Canada’s MAiD protocol.

“Midazolam is used to sedate,” Sheren explained.

“Propofol induces deep anesthesia.

“Rocuronium causes paralysis and respiratory arrest.

“Bupivacaine may be used in certain protocols.”

Vafaeian reportedly paid hundreds of dollars for the medications.

The documents therefore offer a stark look at the mechanics of Canada’s euthanasia system, where drugs involved in assisted deaths can be prescribed and dispensed through the pharmaceutical system.

But another detail revealed by the records is even more striking.

Vafaeian did not die in a hospital or Wiebe’s medical office.

He was euthanized at Koru Cremation, a funeral home in Vancouver.

He reportedly paid approximately $300 to $495 to use the facility.

His death certificate lists the cause of death simply as “MAiD.”

It also records underlying conditions including blindness and diabetes.

Kiano Vafaeian’s death certificate

Mother Had Previously Fought to Keep Son Alive

Vafaeian’s case had already attracted national attention years before his death.

In 2022, when he was just 23 years old, Vafaeian sought to end his life through MAiD.

At the time, he had diabetes and had lost sight in one eye.

According to reporting by the Free Press, the young man was struggling with his circumstances and had no job, girlfriend, or clear plans for his future.

Marsilla said her son was deeply unhappy.

She said losing his vision in one eye in April 2022 became a tipping point that led him to pursue euthanasia.

Vafaeian had been scheduled to undergo MAiD through Dr. Joshua Tepper, executive director of Toronto-based MAiDHouse.

However, the planned procedure was canceled following intense media attention surrounding the case.

Vafaeian survived for another three years.

By the end of 2025, however, he had found another path into Canada’s euthanasia system.

He traveled from Ontario to British Columbia, where Wiebe ultimately administered MAiD.

His mother has said her son was approved on grounds involving “mental illness.”

The newly released death certificate now provides a chilling final record of what followed.

A 26-year-old man crossed Canada, obtained the drugs used in his assisted death through a pharmacy, and was euthanized by a taxpayer-funded doctor inside a funeral home.

And on the government document recording how his life ended, the cause of death is written plainly:

“MAiD.”

Source: https://slaynews.com/canadian-government-euthanizes-young-healthy-26-year-old/

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

HopeGirl Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/@hopegirlblog
HopeGirl Telegram Channel Chat and Groups: https://t.me/Hopegirl587
Get Our Free EMF Survival Guide : https://bit.ly/FTWEMF
10 Percent Off our EMF Protection Products with this Link: https://www.ftwproject.com/ref/tenoff

The post Canadian Government Euthanizes ‘Young and Healthy’ 26-Year-Old appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Canadian Doctors Renew Push to Euthanize Newborn Babies

Hope — Fri, 04 Sep 2026 14:00:00 +0000

Doctors in Canada are renewing a disturbing push for the globalist government to expand the nation’s already rapidly growing “assisted suicide” regime to begin euthanizing newborn babies.

The expansion would allow taxpayer-funded doctors to euthanize infants suffering from disabilities and medical conditions.

The Quebec College of Physicians has reaffirmed its position that so-called “medical assistance in dying” (MAID) should be available to parents seeking to have severely ill newborns euthanized.

The demand comes as Canada’s taxpayer-funded euthanasia system continues to expand, with assisted deaths now accounting for roughly one in every 20 deaths nationwide.

Canada legalized assisted dying in 2016, but eligibility has since been dramatically broadened beyond terminally ill patients.

Now, doctors are pushing the boundary even further by arguing that babies who cannot possibly consent to death should also be eligible.

Doctors Push Euthanasia for Babies

The Quebec College of Physicians first triggered outrage over the proposal in 2022 when Dr. Louis Roy appeared before Parliament’s Special Joint Committee on Medical Assistance in Dying.

Roy raised the prospect of euthanasia for “babies from birth to one year of age” suffering from severe medical conditions.

He specifically described infants “who are born with severe deformations, very grave and severe medical syndromes, whose life expectancy and level of suffering are such that it would make sense to ensure that they do not suffer.”

The medical organization has now reaffirmed that position.

“The CMQ reiterates that medical assistance in dying may be an appropriate treatment for babies suffering from extreme pain that cannot be relieved and who have severe malformations or serious polysymptomatic syndromes that destroy any prospect of survival,” the Quebec College of Physicians previously told the Daily Mail.

The CMQ believes that parents should have the opportunity to obtain this care for their infant under these well-defined circumstances.”

The proposal would mark a dramatic departure from Canada’s existing MAID framework because newborn babies cannot consent to being killed.

Parents already have the ability to withdraw or decline extraordinary treatment for babies suffering from devastating medical conditions.

However, euthanasia would involve deliberately administering drugs to accelerate the baby’s death.

The Netherlands already permits euthanasia of newborns in narrowly defined circumstances.

When the proposal emerged in Canada in 2022, then-Liberal Disabilities Minister Carla Qualtrough rejected it outright.

“There is no world where I would accept that,” Qualtrough said.

Canada’s Euthanasia System Keeps Expanding

The renewed push comes amid growing scrutiny of just how deeply euthanasia has become embedded in Canada’s healthcare system.

MAID now accounts for approximately five percent of all deaths in the country, according to The Atlantic.

Canadians no longer need to be terminally ill to qualify.

Canada is also scheduled to extend eligibility to people suffering solely from mental illness, while Parliament has previously recommended considering access for “mature minors.”

Some doctors have already personally euthanized hundreds of people.

Vancouver doctor Ellen Wiebe, a former abortion provider, has euthanized more than 430 patients in nine years.

Another Vancouver doctor, Stefanie Green, told The Atlantic that she refers to her MAID deaths as “deliveries” rather than “provisions,” the terminology commonly used for euthanasia procedures.

Green previously worked in maternity care.

She described her transition from helping bring babies into the world to euthanizing patients as “delivering life out.”

Other doctors interviewed by The Atlantic acknowledged being uncomfortable with euthanizing people who are not terminally ill.

Toronto cancer psychiatrist Madeline Li described the case of a man in his early 30s who arrived at an emergency room in pain and discovered he had cancer.

According to Li, the cancer carried a 65 percent chance of being cured.

The man rejected treatment and instead demanded euthanasia.

Meanwhile, Toronto physician Sandy Buchman recalled euthanizing a patient who was “all alone” on a mattress on the floor of an otherwise empty rental apartment.

Vulnerable Canadians Euthanized amid ‘Unmet Social Need’

Questions surrounding Canada’s euthanasia regime intensified following a 2024 report from Ontario’s chief coroner.

The review found cases where factors surrounding euthanasia included an “unmet social need.”

An Associated Press investigation also found that doctors and nurses had privately struggled with requests from vulnerable people whose suffering might have been alleviated through financial assistance, social support, or adequate housing.

One case involved an unemployed man in his 40s identified as “Mr A.”

He suffered from bowel disease and had a history of substance abuse and mental illness.

The man was described as “socially vulnerable and isolated.”

Members of an expert committee questioned whether enough had been done to alleviate his suffering before he was euthanized.

Some were also alarmed that a psychiatrist had raised euthanasia during a mental health assessment.

The healthcare professional who ultimately euthanized Mr A reportedly picked him up and drove him to the location where his life was ended.

Committee members warned that the conduct may have “created pressure and gave rise to a perception of hastening a person towards death.”

Another case involved a woman in her 50s identified as “Ms B,” who suffered from multiple chemical sensitivity syndrome and had a history of mental illness, including suicidality and post-traumatic stress disorder.

She was socially isolated and sought euthanasia largely because she could not obtain suitable housing, according to the report.

From Terminal Illness to Euthanizing Newborns

Canada’s euthanasia regime began after the country’s Supreme Court struck down the prohibition on assisted suicide in 2015.

The resulting 2016 legislation permitted euthanasia and assisted suicide for adults suffering from serious medical conditions whose natural deaths were reasonably foreseeable.

Those restrictions did not last.

The law was subsequently expanded to people who are not terminally ill, opening euthanasia to Canadians who could otherwise have decades left to live.

Any qualifying adult with a serious illness, disease, or disability can now seek a medically assisted death.

The system is poised to expand further when eligibility based solely on mental illness takes effect.

Against that backdrop, the renewed demand to euthanize newborn babies represents another extraordinary line Canada’s medical establishment is now openly asking the government to cross.

The Quebec College of Physicians is no longer merely discussing the possibility.

It is publicly reaffirming that deliberately ending the lives of severely disabled and sick babies can constitute “appropriate treatment,” even though those children can never consent to being killed.

Source: https://slaynews.com/canadian-doctors-renew-push-euthanize-newborn-babies/

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

The post Canadian Doctors Renew Push to Euthanize Newborn Babies appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

THE UNTHINKABLE: Canadian Doctors Propose Euthanizing Patients by Harvesting Their Organs

Hope — Mon, 03 Aug 2026 22:59:00 +0000

Could This Be Coming Soon to a Country Near You?

What was once unthinkable is now being openly proposed.

Three physicians have published a paper arguing that patients who voluntarily choose euthanasia should die through the surgical removal of their vital organs, making organ harvesting itself the direct cause of death.

For many people, this crosses a moral line that should never be crossed.

If accepted, it would legitimise killing patients for their organs under the banner of medicine and compassion, reducing one of society’s most sacred duties, the protection of human life, to a question of utility.

It is difficult not to be reminded of the darkest chapters of recent history, when vulnerable and “undesirable” lives were deemed less worthy of protection and human beings were valued for what could be taken from them rather than for their inherent dignity.

History teaches us that great evils are not normalised overnight.

They begin with small moral compromises, are wrapped in the language of compassion and progress, and slowly become accepted as both necessary and humane.

When society begins to decide that some lives are more useful dead than alive, history has already shown us where that path can lead, and we know how it ends.

Slay News reports:

Three physicians have sparked outrage after publishing a paper in one of the world’s most prestigious medical journals advocating a radical new form of euthanasia in which patients would be killed by having their vital organs surgically removed.

The proposal calls the practice “death by organ donation” and argues that patients seeking “assisted suicide” should be euthanized through organ harvesting rather than by lethal injection or a fatal drug overdose.

The authors contend that the potential increase in transplantable organs justifies rethinking long-standing ethical and legal barriers that prohibit removing vital organs from living patients.

The proposal has ignited alarm among pro-life advocates and medical ethicists, who warn it represents another step down a dangerous path as euthanasia continues to expand.

Doctors Seek to Rewrite Longstanding Medical Ethics

The paper, titled “Contextualizing the Dead Donor Rule in an Era of Voluntary Euthanasia,” was published earlier this month in The New England Journal of Medicine.

It was authored by Dr. Ian Ball, Dr. Carter Winberg, and Dr. Robert Truog.

“In death by organ donation, the patient’s authorization, experience, and outcome are not altered by whether death occurs moments before or during organ retrieval,” the physicians wrote.

The paper argues that legal euthanasia has fundamentally changed the ethical framework surrounding organ donation.

“Voluntary euthanasia creates a new ethical context, complicating the DDR and established approaches to organ donation: patients are not yet dead, but their death is imminent and results directly from voluntary medical intervention,” the doctors wrote.

“The current legal reality of voluntary euthanasia provides a new context for interpreting the Don’t Kill Rule,” they continued, arguing that euthanasia already “circumvents” the traditional prohibition on physicians intentionally causing death.

“In this landscape, the moral significance of strict temporal sequencing (post, not pre-mortem retrieval) is diminished,” the paper states.

The authors concluded that “ethical focus should therefore shift away from identifying a precise moment of biologic death and toward respecting patients’ autonomous decisions, ensuring that safeguards against coercion and exploitation are robust and advocating for a transparent and publicly accountable process.”

Under current law in Canada and most Western nations, healthy organs may only be removed after a patient has been declared clinically dead.

The proposal would reverse that longstanding principle by making the organ removal itself the direct cause of death.

Proposal Sparks Fierce Backlash

The paper was swiftly condemned by Conservative Member of Parliament Leslyn Lewis, who warned that the proposal threatens vulnerable patients and further erodes respect for human life.

“Reports of proposals to retrieve organs from MAiD patients before death raise profound ethical questions that Canadians should not dismiss,” Lewis wrote on X.

“These discussions underscore the importance of maintaining clear safeguards and ensuring that organ donation never compromises the value we place on human life.”

Lewis said Canadians “deserve thoughtful, transparent debate on these issues.”

“We must protect the vulnerable, uphold informed consent, and ensure that compassion and human dignity remain at the heart of our healthcare system,” she added.

Even supporters of Canada’s medical establishment expressed concern.

University of Toronto bioethicist Kerry Bowman described the proposal as “very problematic.”

“There’s a lot of deep religious concern that if the cause of death is actually organ donation, from a religious point of view, it would be considered very problematic,” Bowman said.

He added that many people outside religious communities also find the proposal deeply disturbing.

“We have enough challenges in this country right now with (MAiD),” Bowman said.

“I would argue this is an unnecessary distraction at a difficult time.”

Canada’s Expanding Euthanasia Regime Faces Growing Scrutiny

Canada legalized euthanasia in 2016 under its Medical Assistance in Dying (MAiD) program.

The country is now scheduled to expand eligibility in 2027 to include people suffering solely from mental illness under Bill C-7 unless the Liberal government intervenes.

The proposal comes as Canada’s euthanasia regime faces mounting criticism over cases in which vulnerable patients have claimed they were steered toward assisted suicide instead of receiving medical treatment or long-term care.

Canada’s Catholic bishops recently marked the tenth anniversary of legalized euthanasia by urging Canadians to reject what they described as growing complacency toward the practice.

The bishops said euthanasia can “never” be morally acceptable and called for renewed respect for the sanctity of human life.

Critics have also pointed to cases in which hospitals allegedly promoted MAiD to seriously ill patients, while others have described feeling pressured toward assisted suicide after struggling to obtain adequate healthcare.

Among them is disabled Canadian Roger Foley, who suffers from a degenerative neurological disease and has repeatedly said he is being pressured into accepting “assisted suicide” rather than receiving the care he needs to continue living.

Foley is pleading for help to continue living while Canada’s socialized healthcare system pushes to euthanize him for the “greater good.”

The latest proposal to make organ harvesting the mechanism of euthanasia is likely to intensify concerns that Canada’s assisted suicide program continues to move beyond the limits originally presented to the public.

Source: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/the-unthinkable-canadian-doctors

Fight the Censorship Join the Hopegirl Mailing List and get my free AudioBook: The QEG Chronicles Free Energy Full Disclosure: https://bit.ly/HGQEGBook

The post THE UNTHINKABLE: Canadian Doctors Propose Euthanizing Patients by Harvesting Their Organs appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Canadian Doctors Push Chilling Plan to Euthanize Patients by Harvesting Their Organs

Hope — Wed, 29 Jul 2026 17:00:00 +0000

The authors contend that the potential increase in transplantable organs justifies rethinking long-standing ethical and legal barriers that prohibit removing vital organs from living patients.

The proposal has ignited alarm among pro-life advocates and medical ethicists, who warn it represents another step down a dangerous path as euthanasia continues to expand.

Doctors Seek to Rewrite Longstanding Medical Ethics

The paper, titled “Contextualizing the Dead Donor Rule in an Era of Voluntary Euthanasia,” was published earlier this month in The New England Journal of Medicine.

It was authored by Dr. Ian Ball, Dr. Carter Winberg, and Dr. Robert Truog.

“In death by organ donation, the patient’s authorization, experience, and outcome are not altered by whether death occurs moments before or during organ retrieval,” the physicians wrote.

The paper argues that legal euthanasia has fundamentally changed the ethical framework surrounding organ donation.

“In this landscape, the moral significance of strict temporal sequencing (post, not pre-mortem retrieval) is diminished,” the paper states.

Under current law in Canada and most Western nations, healthy organs may only be removed after a patient has been declared clinically dead.

The proposal would reverse that longstanding principle by making the organ removal itself the direct cause of death.

Proposal Sparks Fierce Backlash

The paper was swiftly condemned by Conservative Member of Parliament Leslyn Lewis, who warned that the proposal threatens vulnerable patients and further erodes respect for human life.

“Reports of proposals to retrieve organs from MAiD patients before death raise profound ethical questions that Canadians should not dismiss,” Lewis wrote on X.

“These discussions underscore the importance of maintaining clear safeguards and ensuring that organ donation never compromises the value we place on human life.”

Lewis said Canadians “deserve thoughtful, transparent debate on these issues.”

“We must protect the vulnerable, uphold informed consent, and ensure that compassion and human dignity remain at the heart of our healthcare system,” she added.

Reports of proposals to retrieve organs from MAiD patients before death raise profound ethical questions that Canadians should not dismiss.

These discussions underscore the importance of maintaining clear safeguards and ensuring that organ donation never compromises the value… pic.twitter.com/iXVdU9gX5B
— Dr. Leslyn Lewis (@LeslynLewis) July 23, 2026