Source:  https://www.commondreams.org/news/privatizing-social-security

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Bessent Admits Trump Tax Scam Offers ‘Backdoor for Privatizing Social Security’ appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Israel Admits Stealing Human Organs from Gaza.

Source:  https://www.brighteon.com/f02aed3b-246a-4776-8df5-8e26a2c659ca

Bitchute: https://www.bi,tchut,e.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Israel Admits Stealing Human Organs from Gaza appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Pfizer has been forced to admit that expectant mothers who receive their COVID-19 mRNA jab are 400% more likely to give birth to a deformed baby.

Pfizer made the stunning admission in data released from their randomized clinical trial of the COVID shots on pregnant women entitled “To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of BNT162b2 Against COVID-19 in Healthy Pregnant Women 18 Years of Age and Older. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04754594.

Steve Kirsch reports: This prompted me to have a second look at these results which were first posted on July 14, 2023, over a year ago.

Did you know that the study showed that if you were assigned the vaccine, your child had a stunning 4.2X higher rate of AESIs such as MAJOR congenital abnormalities and developmental delays in just the first 6 months after birth?

Because the trial enrolled fewer women than planned, the effect size reached only the 90% level of significance. Based on just this trial, we are 90% certain that the vaccines made things worse. However, when you look at other data, the certainty approaches 100%.

4.2X is jaw dropping for an effect size for these types of major birth defect adverse events.

Was there a benefit? Nope. Moms in both groups got the same number of COVID infections (2 in each group). Vaccine efficacy estimated at a measly 3.8 (because the groups were different sizes). A perfect vaccine is 100. A vaccine which does nothing is 0. The 3.8 value was both tiny and NOT statistically significant. It’s entirely possible that the vaccine increased your risk of getting COVID. We can’t tell from the study.

This was all known more than 5 months ago when the results were first posted.

Why didn’t the CDC warn women that they were wrong?

This double-blinded placebo controlled trial which is considered to be the best evidence in medicine shows that it’s 90% likely it made things worse.

It’s Pfizer’s own data published on Clinical Trials.gov using gold-standard DB-RCT methodology. Anyone can analyze it. It’s in plain sight. Doesn’t get any better than this.

Today, more than 5 months after the lack of any COVID benefit was published on the NIH website (clinicaltrials.gov), the CDC is still silent on this.

Is the entire medical community blind, ignorant, or just corrupt? NOT A SINGLE MAINSTREAM doctor is speaking out. NOT ONE.

Dr. James Thorp got fired for speaking out about the vaccine harms to pregnant women so he’s not mainstream anymore since he’s out of the system. One of the few honest doctors and he gets fired. What does that tell you? His research which has been published in peer-reviewed journals, confirms the results of the Pfizer trial. In spades.

We have a very corrupt medical system where everyone is afraid to tell the truth.

About the Pfizer study on women getting the COVID shots during pregnancy

ClinicalTrials URL: NCT04754594
Start date: Feb 16, 2021
Announced date: February 18, 2021.
Planned enrollment: 4000
Actual enrollment: 683
First results posted: July 14, 2023
Results including COVID rates posted: June 24, 2024

Participants in the study were enrolled between 24 and 34 weeks of gestation, as part of the inclusion criteria. The trial specifically required healthy women with uncomplicated, singleton pregnancies within this range. 348 maternal participants were enrolled and randomized to receive either the vaccine or placebo. Blinded follow-up: From Day 1 to one month post-delivery. Unblinded follow-up: Extended up to 6 months post-delivery for participants initially vaccinated with BNT162b2.

Why they didn’t do the same for the people who got the placebo is a mystery to me. The reason usually given is that it’s unethical to withhold the COVID vaccine from those that got the placebo.

The study showed it’s 90% certain that the shots increased the rate of special interest adverse events like MAJOR congenital abnormalities and developmental delays in the first 6 months of life, most likely by a factor of 4.2X.

Read the description of AESI which I highlighted in purple for you:

Let’s do our own statistical analysis on these numbers using a Fisher exact test.

What this means is:

1. We are 90% certain that women who got the shots had higher AESIs than those getting the placebo
2. The most likely estimate of the magnitude of the effect is that it was 4.2X more likely in pregnant women who got Pfizer COVID shot

What mother wants that? MAJOR congenital abnormalities and developmental delays??!!

Was there a benefit? Nope.

The trial also showed that the COVID vaccine did NOT work; both groups got EXACTLY the same number of COVID infections!

Here you go, right from the document:

In short, the number of cases (which they don’t actually disclose, just the person years in each group) was statistically identical in both arms.

Don’t take my word for it though. It’s right in their statistical analysis:

The VE estimated value was 3.8. Their VE is based on 100. So a perfect vaccine is 100. A vaccine which doesn’t do shit is 0. Their best estimate is 3.8 and the confidence intervals are so huge that it means that there was NO detectable efficacy. They could have had 100X more people and still it’s likely they wouldn’t have been able to find a signal.

There were other COVID infection incidence outcomes (see Outcomes 10 and 11) included in the results and those also were not statistically significant (2-Sided 95% CIs were -466.5 to 94.6 and -104.9 to 86.5, respectively).

It took over 3 years to tell us that there was no COVID infection rate difference!

The trial was announced on February 18, 2021.

The results were first published on clinicaltrials.gov on July 14, 2023, nearly 2.5 years later (see version 21), but many parts were not reported at the time. But the birth defects were reported (section 19) at that time. So we’ve known about the AESIs for 16 months now.

Section 9 (COVID incidence) was first reported in version 24 which was published on June 24, 2024 which was nearly one year later. So we’ve known it didn’t work for the last 5 months.

Notably, since the results were first published, it took almost a full year to count up the 2 COVID cases in each of the two groups (a total of 4 COVID cases) before they were reported. Why did that take so long?

This is truly the “speed of science” that they were able to do this in just over 3 years! Remarkable.

Bottom line: no difference in risk of COVID.

The Pfizer press release

They simply forgot to issue one!

So the mainstream media will not cover it.

They expect everyone to monitor clinicaltrials.gov and then read through gobs of pages to figure out what happened.

Fortunately, I don’t have a problem with reading through the data, because sometimes you stumble on stuff that they don’t want you to see.

Papers by Dr. James Thorp showing similar harms to vaccinated women

One doctor is speaking out. So they fired him.

COVID-19 Vaccines: The Impact on Pregnancy Outcomes and Menstrual Function
”When normalized by time-available, doses-given, or number of persons vaccinated, all COVID-19 vaccine AEs far exceed the safety signal on all recognized thresholds. These results necessitate a worldwide moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy.”

Are COVID-19 Vaccines in Pregnancy as Safe and Effective as the U.S. Government, Medical Organizations, and Pharmaceutical Industry Claim? Part I
“Compared to influenza and all other vaccine products, COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy have demonstrated unacceptable breaches in safety signals across all 37 AEs investigated, 27 antepartum and 10 postpartum/newborn. All 37 AEs breach CDC/FDA limits for safety and are consistent with the authors’ extensive clinical observations. Summary statistics for the deviation of safety signal breaches are described here: mean (n, range) of the PRR was 69.3 (46, 5.37 – 499), z statistic 9.64 (46, 3.29 – 27.0), and Chi-square was 74.7 (26, 28.9 – 148). The magnitude of these safety deviations is unparalleled given the CDC/FDA guidelines defining a PRR ≥ 2 or a Chi-square ≥ 4 as a cause for alarm. The z statistic is informative as it describes the standard deviation of AEs in the COVID-19 vaccines above other vaccines. Most p-values were in the range of one in a million or less.”

The final version of this paper was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and will be out soon. The new conclusion is at the start of this article. It is stunning to have this published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Increased risk of fetal loss after COVID-19 vaccination
“When normalized by time-available, doses-given, or number of persons vaccinated, all COVID-19 vaccine AEs far exceed the safety signal on all recognized thresholds. Specifically for miscarriage we found the global relative risk was 177 (95% CI 114.4–283.5) compared to influenza vaccination.”

Summary

The vaccine is a total shit show for pregnant women.

We now know that Pfizer’s own study shows no infection benefit, but a stunning 4.2X higher rate of AESIs such as major congenital abnormalities and developmental delays in just the first 6 months after birth. From Pfizer’s study alone, we are 90% certain the vaccine is harmful. Dr. Thorp’s work cited above reduces the chance of error to close to zero. In his study, all p values were ≤ 0.001 with the majority being <0.000001.

With no benefit and clear harms, the medical community should immediately stop recommending these shots for pregnant women.

Since these results have been known for 5 months and the medical community is still pushing the shots on pregnant women, I believe I can confidently predict that we should expect no changes will happen.

What will Trump’s proposed Surgeon General say? Will anyone dare ask?

Source:  https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/pfizer-admits-jabbed-mothers-400-more-likely-to-have-deformed-babies/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Pfizer Admits Jabbed Mothers 400% More Likely To Have Deformed Babies appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

“I actually was the one who convinced the Mayor [De Blasio] to make it [Covid Vaccine] a mandate.”

The latest “Mug Club Undercover” report from Louder With Crowder features New York City’s former Covid “czar” Dr. Jay Varma admitting to locking down citizens and forcing them to get shots while secretly attending drug-fueled orgies and raves.

BREAKING: Former NYC Covid Czar Held Secret Drug-Fueled Sex Parties During Global Pandemic; Says New Yorkers Would Have Been “Pissed” If They Found Out Because He Was Running Entire Covid Response For City

Dr. Jay Varma, Former Senior Advisor for Public Health, NYC Mayor’s… pic.twitter.com/YrgniDUdFc

— Steven Crowder (@scrowder) September 19, 2024

Dr. Varma, who was the Senior Advisor for Public Health for Democrat NYC Mayor Bill De Blasio during the Covid pandemic, revealed to an undercover reporter he did not follow the same rules he helped create.

“I actually was the one who convinced the Mayor [De Blasio] to make it [Covid Vaccine] a mandate,” the doctor bragged during a dinner with the clandestine journalist.

He also boasted about forcing people to get the experimental Covid shots, saying, “What we do in public health is we make it very uncomfortable to be unvaccinated. I don’t expect your education to change your behavior. I’m just gonna make it really fucking hard for you to do your job. You can’t get a job, you can’t go to a restaurant, your kid can’t go to school. It’s like, ‘Fuck it, I’m just gonna get vaccinated.’ They [the public] didn’t get vaccinated because they heard it’s safe, they gave in because it was really hard.”

Regarding his behavior during the infamous and deadly lockdowns, Dr. Varma said he attended an “underground” dance party underneath a Wall Street bank where took ecstacy in an environment he described as “not Covid-friendly.”

Later, the former public health official discussed setting up an MDMA-fueled orgy with his wife and around “nine” friends at a hotel where “everyone had a blast” because they’d been “pent up” from the very Covid lockdowns he was responsible for.

This type of arrogant above-the-law behavior is par for the course when it comes to the bureaucrats running American into the ground.

Alex Jones wrote on X, “It was the same all over the world. The Covid terrorist locked everyone down and killed millions of people by refusing them care. Meanwhile, the bureaucrats celebrated like there was no tomorrow and disregarded all the fake rules they made for us.”

It was the same all over the world. The Covid terrorist locked everyone down and killed millions of people by refusing them care. Meanwhile, the bureaucrats celebrated like there was no tomorrow and disregarded all the fake rules they made for us. https://t.co/9k5TjaESiI

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) September 19, 2024

Source:  https://vigilantnews.com/post/shocking-video-ex-nyc-covid-czar-admits-to-hosting-secret-drug-fueled-sex-parties-during-lockdown/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post CAUGHT: Ex-NYC COVID Czar Admits to Hosting Secret, Drug-Fueled Sex Parties During Lockdown appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

The World Economic Forum quietly revealed that the covid pandemic was a test to gauge public compliance with Globalist agendas.

The admission was made in an article which is labelled as part of WEF’s invitation-only ‘Sustainable Development Impact Meetings’ held in New York.  Although the article was published two years ago, it shows what the intent has been for many years.

As one of the three significant developments “in last five to seven years … that could help realise ‘My Carbon’ initiatives for shaping the future towards smart and sustainable cities,” WEF noted that “covid-19 was the test of social responsibility.”  My Carbon initiatives refer to programmes that track people’s carbon footprints, i.e. personal carbon allowance programmes.

The intention of “sustainable” measures has always been a means of controlling individual freedoms and enforcing compliance. WEF’s proposed “smart” cities play a key role in this agenda. The agenda involves imposing restrictions and creating a permanent state of controlled living. The ultimate goal is to strengthen authoritarian control and break down public resistance.

WEF Admits Covid Was a “Test” of Public Obedience to New Globalist World Order

The following was written by Ethan Huff and originally published by Natural News.

The World Economic Forum (“WEF”) has quietly revealed that the Wuhan coronavirus (covid-19) “pandemic” was a “test” hatched by the Globalists to see how compliant and obedient the public is to globalist tyranny.

On the ‘My Carbon’ page of its website, the WEF makes a pitch for 15-minute “smart” cities as the solution to climate change. On that page, the WEF shows its hand about what covid was really designed to do.

“Covid-19 was the test of society responsibility,” the WEF openly admits. “A huge number of unimaginable restrictions for public health were adopted by billions of citizens across the world.”

“There were numerous examples globally of maintaining social distancing, wearing masks, mass vaccinations and acceptance of contact-tracing applications for public health, which demonstrated the core of individual social responsibility.”

In other words, the WEF was testing us all to see how we would respond to ridiculously pseudoscientific measures like avoiding other people and covering one’s breathing holes with cloth and plastic. This “new normal,” as they called it, was meant to ease the world into a more permanent state of restricted living.

“They wanted to see how many of us would give up our individual freedom and individual sovereignty by complying with a ‘new normal’ that consisted of restrictions bordering on the absurd,” Leo Hohmann writes on his Substack.

“Why, for instance, was it ‘safe’ to shop at Lowe’s or Home Depot but unsafe to shop at a small business or attend church? Why was it OK to go to strip clubs in Michigan but you couldn’t buy seeds for a garden?”

(Related: Once the government’s central bank digital currency [CBDC] is in place, it will be much easier for the deep state to control people during the next “pandemic.”)

“Sustainability” is About Forced Obedience to Tyranny

When they first started using the term “sustainability” to describe a future free from excess waste and planetary destruction, the Globalists had hoped that most people would simply buy in based on the name. Many people now realise, though, that sustainability is simply a code word for forced compliance with tyranny.

In the “sustainable” world of the future, Americans will no longer have the constitutionally protected freedom to speak up and question anything. The expectation will be that everyone complies at all times with the government’s orders without asking any questions, which is what we saw transpire during covid.

“Would we be obedient in the face of idiotic new laws and regulations, like wearing face diapers to stop what was said to be an aerosolised virus, and standing six feet apart in public, and submitting to a never-before-used, unlicensed mRNA gene-based injection?” Hohmann asks.

“They said it was good for you, so roll up your sleeve. Don’t ask questions. If you did, you could lose your job and be treated as a societal outcast. Many people lost friends or even close family members to this monstrous ‘test’ of our willingness to unquestioningly do what we’re told.”

It has been nearly five years since covid first appeared, and the WEF [has already confessed] to what many of us could see was the case all along: that covid was simply an exercise in tyranny designed to traumatise the public and break down any remaining public willpower to fight back against the authoritarian police state.

“They wanted to find out how many of us would prove our servitude to the lawless, fascistic beast system by complying with ‘unimaginable restrictions,’ many of which were created out of thin air with absolutely no scientific evidence to back them up as contributing anything to public health,” Hohmann says.

The latest news about the globalist plan to force everyone except for themselves into “sustainable” 15-minute “smart” cities can be found at Collapse.news.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/09/13/wef-admits-covid-was-a-test-of-public-obedience/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post WEF admits covid was a “test” of public obedience appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

For decades, parents of vaccine-injured children, vaccine-injured adults and others contested the claims that vaccines are the world’s most thoroughly safety-tested products in the world only to be shunned and attacked by the medical community and health agencies.

Now a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in the first week of July admits vaccines are not properly studied. “But let me provide context so nobody is fooled by what they are clearly up to,” Aaron Siri writes.

And Like That, The Claim Vaccines Are The World’s Best Studied Product Dies

By Aaron Siri

Wow. After decades of Dr. Stanley Plotkin and his vaccinologist disciples insisting vaccines are the most well-studied products on the planet, they just penned an article admitting precisely the opposite.

They just admitted vaccines are not properly studied – neither pre-licensure nor post-licensure. They admitted, for example, “prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes [and] follow-up durations” and that “there are not resources earmarked for post-authorisation safety studies.”

That is an incredible reversal. But let me provide context so nobody is fooled by what they are clearly up to.

For decades, the medical community insisted vaccines are the most thoroughly studied product ever; for example, Dr. Paul Offit said, “I think we should be proud of vaccines as arguably the safest, best-tested things we put in our body.”

For decades, parents of vaccine-injured children, vaccine-injured adults, and other stakeholders contested these claims only to be shunned and attacked by the medical community and health agencies.

In 2018, I had the unprecedented opportunity to depose the architect of our vaccination programme and the Godfather of Vaccinology, Dr. Plotkin, and lay bare the evidence that showed what these authors are now finally admitting about the utter lack of vaccine safety trials and studies. See ‘The Deposition Of Stanley Plotkin’.

After this deposition is made public, Dr. Plotkin goes on a tirade, making demands that FDA add “missing information on safety and efficacy” in vaccine package inserts and that CDC excludes harms from its vaccine information sheets, “lobbying the Gates Foundation to support pro-vaccine organisations,” working to have WHO list vaccine hesitancy as a global threat, lobbying AAP, IDSA and PIDS to “support training of witnesses” to support vaccine safety, etc. See ‘Dr. Stanley Plotkin, The “Godfather Of Vaccines,” Reaction To Being Questioned’.

The problem is, it doesn’t work. It doesn’t work because, at the bottom, there are no proper safety studies. So, there is no safety data to add to the FDA package inserts, and hiding harms by removing them from CDC inserts doesn’t make them go away. Parents and other adults don’t simply stop believing what they have seen with their own eyes because the CDC, WHO, the Gates Foundation, etc., won’t acknowledge them, or worse, they attack them.

That brings us to the present in which Plotkin and his disciples realise they can’t cast voodoo on the public. They can’t hide the truth. So, their only option is to try and co-op the truth they have lied about for decades by now admitting that the studies to show vaccines are safe do not exist. But in making that admission, they conveniently fail to admit that for decades they lied, gaslit, defrauded (and I don’t use that word lightly) the public by claiming that vaccines are probably the most thoroughly safety tested products on the planet and that people should rest assured, no stone on vaccine safety was left unturned.

Thus, in their article just published, they pretend they never lied about vaccine safety. They pretend they are now just pointing out that vaccine safety has never really been conducted, as if that was not known to them before.

Don’t be fooled. Their real agenda is plain, and it is not to study vaccine safety but rather to confirm that which they already believe. This is crystal clear from the fact that while their article admits the studies have not been done, they write in the same breath that serious vaccine harms are “rare.” But if the studies have not been done, how do they know that? The answer is, they don’t, and they don’t care to know the truth. Their goal is to protect the products they have spent their careers defending and worshipping and that have brought them fame and riches.

They also ignore the mountain of studies and data that already exist which clearly show serious vaccine harms. Just take a moment to review the large body of science around one of the adjuvants used in vaccines which multiple studies show can cause serious harm. See ‘A reactogenic “placebo” and the ethics of informed consent in Gardasil HPV vaccine clinical trials: A case study from Denmark’.

Finally, just look at their proposed solution. After making the a priori conclusion that harms are “rare,” ignoring all the existing studies showing harm, these folk have the audacity to want to raid the federal vaccine injury compensation fund to presumably pay themselves and their compatriots hundreds of millions of dollars to conduct the studies that would, no doubt, seek to confirm their prior conclusion that vaccine harms are “rare,” while ignoring the studies that already show serious harm.

So, with that in mind, and sorry for the long wind-up, here are the things they admit in this article for maybe the very first time.

“[T]he widespread vaccine hesitancy observed during the covid-19 pandemic suggests that the public is no longer satisfied with the traditional safety goal of simply detecting and quantifying the associated risks after a vaccine has been authorised for use.”

Comment: The parents of vaccine-injured children, vaccine-injured adults, and others were never “satisfied” with seeking to assess “risks aftera vaccine has been authorised.”

“Post-authorisation studies are needed to fully characterise the safety profile of a new vaccine, since prelicensure clinical trials have limited sample sizes, follow-up durations, and population heterogeneity.”

Comment: Let me translate – the clinical trials relied upon to license childhood vaccines are useless with regard to safety since they virtually never have a placebo control, typically review safety for days or weeks after injection, and often have far too few participants to measure anything of value, just see ‘None of the vaccine doses the CDC recommends for routine injection into children were licensed by the FDA based on a long-term placebo-controlled trial’; amazingly, I just had a dispute with a Plotkin disciple not long ago in which they were clearly still not ready to admit the above truth:

Dr. Offit, your revised definition of “placebo” as “immunologically inert” would focus on testing efficacy, not safety, which is precisely the substantive concern raised by @RobertKennedyJr and others when explaining that childhood vaccines are virtually never licensed based on… https://t.co/6b8Bu7F6R4

— Aaron Siri (@AaronSiriSG) June 27, 2023

“It is critical to examine adverse events following immunisation (“AEFIs”) that have not been detected in clinical trials, to ascertain whether they are causally or coincidentally related to vaccination.”

Comment: No sh** and you have been claiming for decades this was being done!

“When they are caused by vaccines (vaccine adverse reactions), the risk attributable to vaccination and the biologic mechanism must be ascertained. That science becomes the basis for developing safer vaccines, if possible, and for determining contraindications to vaccination and the compensation that should be offered for AEFIs.”

Comment: Again, no sh**, and you have also been claiming for decades this was being done!

“Currently in the United States, when the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP) recommends a new routine vaccine, the only automatic statutory resource allocations that follow are for vaccine procurement by Vaccines for Children (VFC) and for the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). Although the ACIP acknowledges the need, there are currently no resources earmarked for post-authorisation safety studies beyond annual appropriations, which must be approved by Congress each year.”

Comment: Again, no sh**! But nice of you to finally admit it after decades of gaslighting.

“Progress in vaccine-safety science has understandably been slow – often depending on epidemiologic evidence that is delayed or is inadequate to support causal conclusions and on an understanding of biologic mechanisms that is incomplete – which has adversely affected vaccine acceptance.”

Comment: More gaslighting because had a proper clinical trial been conducted pre-licensure, we would know the safety before it is unleashed on babies and we wouldn’t need to rely on confounded-biased-conflicted-post-authorisation “epidemiological” studies you now want to conduct which you make clear you only suggest because you want to avoid “public concern and consequent decreases in immunisation coverage,” not because you actually care about safety.

“In 234 reviews of various vaccines and health outcomes conducted from 1991 to 2012, the IOM found inadequate evidence to prove or disprove causation in 179 (76%) of the relationships it explored, illustrating the need for more rigorous science.”

Comment: Again, no sh**, and I would appreciate if you would please properly cite to the ICAN white paper from 2017 from which you have plainly lifted this point ‘VACCINE SAFETY: Introduction to Vaccine Safety Science & Policy in the United States’.

“Identifying the biologic mechanisms of adverse reactions – how and in whom they occur – is critical for developing safer vaccines, preventing adverse reactions by expanding contraindications, and equitably compensating vaccinees for true adverse reactions.”

Comment: Shameless to pretend you have not for decades ignored or attacked those calling for these studies while pretending a mountain of such studies showing the foregoing don’t already exist.

“[T]he budget for vaccine-safety monitoring at the CDC (which is responsible for the majority of US federal efforts) has remained stagnant … at about $20 million per year” which they write is an “inadequate level of funding.”

Comment: Again, shameless to pretend parent groups have not been yelling about this issue for decades only to be ignored and attacked.

“The public [now] also wants public health authorities to mitigate and prevent rare but serious adverse events – which no longer seem rare when vaccines are given to millions or billions of people.”

Comment: They have always been given to millions or billions of people, and the studies showing the harms they cause are not rare and they already exist, but you don’t really care about that reality as vaccine safety is not really the goal.

If they are really interested in the truth about what injuries vaccines cause and the rate at which these injuries occur, then they should welcome convening a bipartisan panel that could first review all the very concerning studies and hard data that already exist on this topic (often by scientists not on pharma’s dole) and we could design additional studies together and have them run in the open so everybody has to live with the result.

(Among other reasons to demand the study be conducted in the open is that I have witnessed firsthand what happens when a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children in large multi-million person datasets, using historical insurance data, showed vaccinated children had multiple times the rate of numerous chronic diseases – the study gets buried hence the need to do it in the open.)

Plotkin and company should welcome studies that can show vaccines have not contributed to the rise in chronic childhood disease (many of which are immune-mediated diseases) from 12% of children in the early 1980s (when CDC recommended 7 routine childhood injections) to over 50% of children now (when CDC recommends over 90 routine childhood injections).

And I think they do welcome such studies if they can assure that the outcome would show vaccines do not cause these harms. Alas, the reality is that (as they know) studies showing vaccines contribute to this rise already exist. But their goal, in any event, is not to really study safety. Rather it is to prove their prior assumption that vaccines are safe and harms are “rare.” This approach is how they designed VAERS, V-SAFE, VSD, and every other “safety” system.

As is transparent from their article, the only reason they even pretend to care about vaccine safety is that they want to avoid a reduction in vaccine uptake – not actually assure safety.

That all said, if they are really well-meaning, I would welcome collaborating. To be fair, I will email all four of them to request a meeting to review existing science and design studies mutually agreed upon. If they are really interested in vaccine safety, they should welcome that (I have no hard feelings despite their attacks on me and I hope they can rise above any hard feelings they have for the sake of protecting children). Most importantly, I’m willing to live with the results of those studies. Are they?

Source: https://expose-news.com/2024/07/15/after-decades-of-gaslighting-the-public/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post After decades of gaslighting the public, a new study admits that vaccine safety studies are not conducted before or after use on the public appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Encryption, a security measure that makes data impossible to read without a secure code or password, has become an increasingly contentious subject for government agencies and private companies. While the likes of Apple, Android, and other technology companies maintain it is vital, the federal government has forcefully resisted. On Thursday, however, NSA Director Mike Rogers expressed his support for the security feature, drawing a clear line in the sand between federal intelligence and law enforcement.

On Thursday, Rogers told the Atlantic Council think tank, “encryption is foundational to the future.” Though surveillance officials don’t often champion privacy, Rogers emphasized the importance of encryption and the need to incorporate it into security practices.

“Concerns about privacy have never been higher. Trying to get all those things right, to realize that — it isn’t about one or the other,” he said. Though he maintained that privacy should not be the dominant concern, he also rejected the belief that “security is the imperative and that ought to drive everything,” adding, “We’ve got to meet these two imperatives. We’ve got some challenging times ahead of us, folks.”

Rogers cited the recent Office of Personnel Management hack of over 20 million users as a reason to increase encryption rather than scale it back. “What you saw at OPM, you’re going to see a whole lot more of,” he said, referring to the massive hack that compromised the personal data about 20 million people who obtained background checks.

Rogers’ comments, while forward-thinking, signify an about face in his stance on encryption. In February 2015, he said he “shares [FBI] Director [James] Comey’s concern” about cell phone companies’ decision to add encryption features to their products. Comey has been one loudest critics of encryption.

However, Rogers’ comments on Thursday now directly conflict with Comey’s stated position. The FBI director has publicly chastised encryption, as well as the companies that provide it. In 2014, he claimed Apple’s then-new encryption feature could lead the world to “a very dark place.” At a Department of Justice hearing in November, Comey testified that “Increasingly, the shadow that is ‘going dark’ is falling across more and more of our work.” Though he claimed, “We support encryption,” he insisted “we have a problem that encryption is crashing into public safety and we have to figure out, as people who care about both, to resolve it. So, I think the conversation’s in a healthier place.”

At the same hearing, Comey and Attorney General Loretta Lynch declined to comment on whether they had proof the Paris attackers used encryption. Even so, Comey recently lobbied for tech companies to do away with end-to-end encryption.

However, his crusade has fallen on unsympathetic ears, both from the private companies he seeks to control — and from the NSA. Prior to Rogers’ statements in support of encryption Thursday, former NSA chief Michael Hayden said, “I disagree with Jim Comey. I actually think end-to-end encryption is good for America.”

Still another former NSA chair has criticized calls for backdoor access to information. In October, Mike McConnell told a panel at an encryption summit that the United States is “better served by stronger encryption, rather than baking in weaker encryption.” Former Department of Homeland Security chief, Michael Chertoff, has also spoken out against government being able to bypass encryption.

Regardless of these individual defenses of encryption, the Intercept explained why these statements may be irrelevant:

“Left unsaid is the fact that the FBI and NSA have the ability to circumvent encryption and get to the content too — by hacking. Hacking allows law enforcement to plant malicious code on someone’s computer in order to gain access to the photos, messages, and text before they were ever encrypted in the first place, and after they’ve been decrypted. The NSA has an entire team of advanced hackers, possibly as many as 600, camped out at Fort Meade.”

Rogers statements, of course, are not a full-fledged endorsement of privacy, nor can the NSA be expected to make it a priority. Even so, his new stance denotes a growing awareness within the government that Americans are not comfortable with the State’s grip on their data.

“So spending time arguing about ‘hey, encryption is bad and we ought to do away with it’ … that’s a waste of time to me,” Rogers said Thursday. “So what we’ve got to ask ourselves is, with that foundation, what’s the best way for us to deal with it? And how do we meet those very legitimate concerns from multiple perspectives?”

By Carey Wedler

(Source:  activistpost.com; January 21, 2016; http://tinyurl.com/hzn353g)

The post NSA director finally admits encryption is needed to protect public’s privacy appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Dr. Udo Ulfakatte is a top German journalist and editor and has been for more than two decades, so you can bet he knows a thing or two about mainstream media and what really happens behind the scenes. Recently, Dr. Ulfakatte went on public television stating that he was forced to publish the works of intelligence agents under his own name, also adding that noncompliance with these orders would result in him losing his job. He recently made an appearance on RT news to share these facts:

I’ve been a journalist for about 25 years, and I was educated to lie, to betray, and not to tell the truth to the public. But seeing right now within the last months how the German and American media tries to bring war to the people in Europe, to bring war to Russia — this is a point of no return and I’m going to stand up and say it is not right what I have done in the past, to manipulate people, to make propaganda against Russia, and it is not right what my colleagues do and have done in the past because they are bribed to betray the people, not only in Germany, all over Europe.

It’s important to keep in mind that Dr. Ulfakatte is not the only person making these claims; multiple reporters have done the same and this kind of truthfulness is something the world needs more of. One (out of many) great examples of a whistleblowing reporter is investigative journalist and former CBC News reporter Sharyl Attkisson. She delivered a hard-hitting TEDx talk showing how fake grassroots movements funded by political, corporate, or other special interests very effectively manipulate and distort media messages.

Another great example is Amber Lyon, a three-time Emmy award winning journalist at CC, who said that they are routinely paid by the US government and foreign governments to selectively report and even distort information on certain events. She has also indicated that the government has editorial control over content.

Ever since Operation Mockingbird, a CIA-based initiative to control mainstream media, more and more people are expressing their concern that what we see in the media is nothing short of brainwashing. This is also evident by blatant lies that continue to spam the TV screen, especially when it comes to topics such as health, food, war (‘terrorism‘), poverty, and more.

Things have not changed, in fact, when in comes to mainstream media distorting information and telling lies. They have gotten much worse in recent years, in fact, so it is highly encouraging that more people are starting to see through these lies, even without the help of whistleblowers like Dr. Ulfakatte. One great example is the supposed ‘war on terror,’ or ‘false flag terrorism.’ There are even Wikileaks documents alluding to the fact that the United States government planned to “retaliate and cause pain” to countries refusing GMOs. Mainstream media’s continual support of GMOs rages on, despite the fact that a number of countries are now banning these products.

The list of lies goes on and on. It’s time to turn off your T.V. and do your own research if you are curious about what is happening on our planet. It’s time to wake up.

By Arjun Walia

(Source:  collective-evolution.com; December 3, 2015; http://tinyurl.com/pehrmj9)

The post World class journalist spills the beans and admits mainstream media is completely fake appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.