Poland has been rocked by an alarming scandal after a heinous abuse ring involving the nation’s powerful elite was exposed, with critics warning the fallout could topple the highest levels of the country’s political establishment.

The shocking criminal case, linking political heavyweights to a child sex abuse and animal cruelty ring, is sending shockwaves through Poland.

The so-called “Kłodzko scandal” has already resulted in lengthy prison sentences.

However, evidence is now emerging of deeper institutional rot tied to political networks.

Officials have described the chilling crimes as “anti-human actions against children” and “animals.”

Horrific Crimes Exposed in Lower Silesia

At the center of the case is Przemysław L., 45, who was sentenced to 25 years in prison.

He was convicted of a series of disturbing crimes involving underage girls, including sexual abuse, bestiality, and recording the acts.

His ex-wife, Kamila L., a former activist linked to the Civic Platform party, was sentenced to 6.5 years in prison for failing to protect her minor daughter and for complicity in animal abuse.

The child was among the many underage victims.

The details of the case have horrified the public and intensified scrutiny over how such crimes were allowed to continue.

Political Firestorm Erupts

Przemysław Czarnek, a leading opposition figure and candidate for prime minister, has warned that the scandal could have major political consequences.

“This is a very serious scandal that will, in my opinion, sink the Civic Platform,” Czarnek said.

He accused political figures tied to the party of enabling environments where such abuses could occur.

It is believed that political elites who covered up the abuse are also involved in the shocking crimes.

Czarnek is pointing to politicians, powerful bureaucrats, and taxpayer-funded organizations engaging in what he described as “dramatic, criminal, anti-human actions against children.”

“This is a community of people who really have a lot going for them, financing these kinds of communities that commit these kinds of shameless, dramatic, criminal, anti-human actions against children, and against animals as well,” he added.

Civic Coalition Scrambles to Contain Damage

Members of the ruling Civic Coalition have pushed back.

They are attempting to downplay the political implications of the case.

“It’s difficult to hold someone accountable; it’s a situation that can happen to anyone,” one lawmaker said.

Politicians caught up in the scandal are arguing that the crimes were the actions of individuals rather than evidence of systemic failure.

Others within the party described the scandal as a localized issue involving a low-level former activist.

They are insisting that law enforcement acted appropriately and brought those responsible to justice.

Still, reports indicate that pressure is mounting internally, particularly around figures who previously supported individuals connected to the case.

Growing Questions About Oversight and Accountability

The scandal has reignited broader concerns about oversight, public funding, and the role of political networks in enabling or failing to prevent abuse.

Critics argue the case highlights a deeper problem where institutions tasked with protecting the vulnerable instead failed at critical moments.

As the political fallout continues, the case is rapidly evolving from a local criminal matter into a national controversy.

Poland’s leadership now faces severe consequences as many expect the government to crumble under the scandal.

Whether it remains contained or escalates into a wider reckoning may depend on what further details emerge in the days ahead.

Source: https://slaynews.com/news/poland-government-faces-collapse-heinous-elite-abuse-ring-exposed/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Poland’s Government Faces Collapse After Heinous Elite Abuse Ring Exposed appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

Interdimensional beings, black magic covens, and a hidden hierarchy controlling every institution.

In this explosive clip, ritual abuse survivor and trauma therapist Max Lowen claims that “the entire world is basically run by a satanic cult”, a compartmentalized, patriarchal power structure she describes as parasitic and ultimately non-human.

Speaking with Seth Holehouse on Man in America, she connects her personal trauma history to sweeping allegations of institutional capture, spiritual “harvesting,” black magic covens, and trauma-based mind control shaping what she calls a coordinated “Hell on Earth” system.

Source: Sense Receptor

Ritual abuse survivor/trauma therapist Max Lowen: “The entire world is basically run by a satanic cult. They’re psychopaths, they’re pedophiles, they’re parasitic… [and] they harvest us physically, etherically, spiritually… But they’re not human… these are interdimensional beings that have come to this planet, that have taken it over. And they are dark, they are evil. And they are patriarchal. So they have created everything in that image.”

This clip of Lowen is taken from a conversation with Seth Holehouse posted to the Man in America Rumble channel on February 15, 2026.

Partial transcription of clip

“The entire world is basically run by a satanic cult. They’re psychopaths, they’re pedophiles, they’re parasitic. So they use. They harvest us physically, etherically, spiritually.

“And so at the tippy top of the pyramid, and this is going to sound, you know, I mean, we’re already in crazy land for some people with what’s released in Epstein, so I’ll just go there. But they’re not human. Okay?

“So these are interdimensional beings that have come to this planet, that have taken it over. And they are dark, they are evil. And they are patriarchal. So they have created everything in that image. And then the whole hierarchy is completely compartmentalized. So different rungs have different tasks.

“And things that they do. And they have different amounts of the big picture. And right below that tippy top and still above all the things like the Vatican and Freemasons or whatever are covens, believe it or not. So, practitioners of black magic, that’s a big part of the control structure. But that’s basically the hierarchy.

“So every institution that we have on this planet, everything, has been either created or infiltrated by this cult. So that’s why no one’s getting arrested, because they control the military and the police and the justice system.

“And so, for example, the medical system, we used to have, you know, real healing, like herbs and energetic healing. And then the Rockefellers, which are one of the bloodline families, that’s a layer in that hierarchy as well. They created the allopathic medical system deliberately to slow. Poison us and slow. Kill us, profit off that process, and then shorten our lifespan, and kill us prematurely.

“So that entire system, this is hard for the human to grok because we’ve been taught to trust these people. We look at them as, like our parental figures, benevolent. And they’re not. They’re actually, as a good example, the medical and pharmaceutical system are designed to harm us by its inherent design.

“[And] everyone knows the food is toxic, the water’s fluoridated. They spray us with chemtrails. Like these people, they worship Lucifer. They worship dark, demonic entities. They are a death cult. They also need us because they’re parasitic. They have been cut off from the creator. What, God— You know, whatever you call that. The oneness. And because they’re cut off, they’re cut off from the life force. Their highest achievement is ego, right? Which is why they’re into power and fame and wealth and all those worldly things.

“So they, like many movies and TV shows, are revealing the truth. We’re their batteries, like Morpheus says to Neo in the Matrix, right? So they need us— They, they particularly like to prey on babies and children because of their purity, their essence. They’re a soul. They’ve just come in from God into a human body.

“So that energy is very rich to them and they, they harvest it etherically and then they harvest it physically in the form of blood and flesh eating as well, right? So they paradoxically hate us. They consider us cattle. They, you know, and they want to depopulate us, but to a point they have to keep some of us because we’re their, their energy, their fuel source, if you will.

“And we’re also co-creators with God, but they’re, they can’t create anything. They can only piggyback off existing creation. So what they do is they get us to create this, now that we see it clearly, hell on Earth reality. Now how do they do that? They use trauma-based mind control. So the same things they did to me, they do to the collective.”

Full Video

Source: https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/satanic-ritual-abuse-survivor-the

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Satanic Ritual Abuse Survivor: “The Entire World Is Basically Run by a Satanic Cult…THEY’RE NOT HUMAN” appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

“Prescribing Ritalin is, in my view, authorised child abuse on a massive, global scale,” Dr. Vernon Coleman wrote in 1996.  “And, sadly, things aren’t likely to change.”

By Dr. Vernon Coleman

NOTE: The following essay is taken from Vernon Coleman’s global bestselling book `How to stop your doctor killing you’. This essay was written in 1996.

Family doctors are these days frequently under pressure (usually from teachers and social workers who know nothing about drug therapy and probably understand nothing about the way the international drug industry operates) to prescribe the drug called Ritalin for children who are accused of behaving badly behaved, reported as not doing well at school and “diagnosed” as suffering from something called Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (known as ADHD).

For several decades now, Ritalin, and other amphetamine type drugs, have been prescribed for children diagnosed as suffering from various types of brain dysfunction and hyperactivity. (Other psychostimulants which have, at one time or another, been regarded as competitors to Ritalin have included Dexedrine.)

The first problem is that Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (and other variations on the hyperactivity theme) is a rather vague diagnosis which is often leapt upon by teachers, social workers and parents to excuse and explain any unacceptable or uncontrollable behaviour.

Parents of children whose behaviour is in any way regarded as different or unusual are often encouraged to believe that their child is suffering from a disease for two simple reasons. First, it is more socially acceptable to give a child a pseudoscientific label than to have to admit that he or she may simply be badly behaved.

Second, when a child has been given a label, it is possible to offer a treatment. Commonly it will be one, such as a drug, which takes away responsibility and offers someone a profit.

ADHD (aka Attention Deficit Disorder, or ADD, hyperkinetic child syndrome, minimal brain damage, minimal brain dysfunction in children, minimal cerebral dysfunction and psycho-organic syndrome in children) is a remarkably non-specific disorder. (I am always suspicious of diseases which have lots of names. Diabetes is diabetes. A broken leg is a broken leg.)

The symptoms which characterise ADHD (or whatever else it’s being known as) may include: a chronic history of a short attention span, distractibility, emotional lability, impulsivity, moderate to severe hyperactivity, minor neurological signs and abnormal EEG. Learning may or may not be impaired.

Read that rather nonsensical list of symptoms carefully and you’ll find that just about any child alive could probably be described as suffering from ADHD.

What child isn’t impulsive occasionally? What child doesn’t cry and laugh (that’s what emotional lability means)? What child cannot be distracted?

So, by this definition, Ritalin could be recommended for any child who seemed bored and restless or who exhibited unusual signs of intelligence or skill. Read the biographies of geniuses and you may wonder what we are doing to our current generation of most talented individuals.

“Is Ritalin a drug in search of a disease?” wrote one author, and it isn’t difficult to see why.

Ritalin has been recommended as a treatment for functional behaviour problems since the 1960s and by 1966, the “experts” had come up with a definition of the sort of child for whom Ritalin could usefully be prescribed.

Children suffering from Minimal Brain Dysfunction (“MBD”), the first syndrome for which Ritalin was recommended, were defined as: “children of near average, average or above average general intelligence with certain learning or behavioural disabilities ranging from mild to severe, which are associated with deviations of function of the central nervous system. These deviations may manifest themselves by various combinations of impairment in perception, conceptualisation, language, memory and control of attention, impulse or motor function.”

Other symptoms which children might exhibit and which could be ascribed to MBD included: being sweet and even tempered, being cooperative and friendly, being gullible and easily led, being a light sleeper, being a heavy sleeper and so on and on.

Given that sort of list to work with, I find it difficult to think of a child who wouldn’t (theoretically) benefit from Ritalin.

The bottom line is that it has become easy for social workers and teachers to define any children who misbehave or don’t learn “properly” as suffering from MBD or ADHD. It’s a convenient diagnosis which excuses parents, teachers and social workers from responsibility or any sense of guilt. How can the parents or the teacher be accused of failing when the child is ill and needs drug therapy?

Commercially, Ritalin and MBD became a huge success. By 1975, around a million children in the US were diagnosed as suffering from MBD. Half of these were being given drugs and half of those on drugs were on Ritalin.

(For the sake of completeness, I should point out that Ritalin has not always been used exclusively in the treatment of badly behaved children. When Dr Andrew Malleson wrote his book ‘Need Your Doctor Be So Useless’ in 1973, he reported that the CIBA Pharmaceutical Company had suggested to doctors the use of their habit-forming drug Ritalin for “environmental depression” caused by “noise: a new social problem.”)

Does Ritalin work?

Well, that’s a bit of a stinker of a question and I apologise for asking it, particularly since I can’t answer it. Actually, I honestly don’t think anyone else can answer it either. But the diagnosis (and the drug) are certainly popular. More than one in twenty children is said to be suffering from MBD (or ADHD or ADD or XYZ or whatever else anyone wants to call it) and over a million children are given Ritalin in the USA.

One five-year study of hyperactive children who were given Ritalin at Montreal Children’s Hospital found that the children did not differ in the long term from hyperactive children who were not given the drug. In Johannesburg, a study of 14 children is said to have produced a response in only 2 children. One child showed some deterioration and another showed marked deterioration.

At least one investigator has reported that drugs like Ritalin may produce a deterioration in learning new skills at school, and parents have reported that the symptoms of MBD have miraculously disappeared during school holidays.

However, the picture is confused by the fact that there may be a short-term improvement in behaviour among children given Ritalin. But is this a real improvement? Or is the child simply drugged and therefore less likely to do anything which might upset parents, social workers or teachers? Amphetamine type drugs reduce the variety of behaviour exhibited by children. A child taking Ritalin might be less disruptive and I can see that being popular in schools. But is the drug really helping the child? And should we give a child a powerful and potentially hazardous drug because it keeps him quiet?

There is evidence suggesting that children who are genuinely hyperactive may have been poisoned by food additives or by lead breathed in from air polluted by petrol fumes. If this is so, then is giving another potentially toxic drug really the answer to this problem?

The next problem is that I believe that Ritalin can reasonably be described as potentially toxic. Ritalin has been described as “very safe” but for the record here is a list of some of the possible side effects which may be associated with Ritalin: nervousness, insomnia, decreased appetite, headache, drowsiness, dizziness, dyskinesia, blurring of vision, convulsions, muscle cramps, tics, Tourette’s syndrome, toxic psychosis (some with visual and tactile hallucinations), transient depressed mood, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, dry mouth, tachycardia, palpitations, arrhythmias, changes in blood pressure and heart rate, angina pectoris, rash, pruritus, urticaria, fever, arthralgia, alopecia, thrombocytopenia purpura, exfoliative dermatitis, erythema multiforme, leucopenia, anaemia and minor retardation of growth during prolonged therapy in children.

Doctors who prescribe Ritalin, and who have the time and the inclination to read the warnings issued with the drug, will discover that Ritalin should not be given to patients suffering from marked anxiety, agitation or tension since it may aggravate these symptoms.

Ritalin is contraindicated in patients with tics, tics in siblings or a family history or diagnosis of Tourette’s syndrome. It is also contraindicated in patients with severe angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmias, glaucoma, thyrotoxicosis, or known sensitivity to methylphenidate, and it should be used cautiously in patients with hypertension (blood pressure should be monitored at appropriate intervals).

Ritalin should not be used in children under six years of age, should not be used as treatment for severe depression of either exogenous or endogenous origin and may exacerbate symptoms of behavioural disturbance and thought disorder if given to psychotic children.

It is claimed that taking Ritalin during childhood does not increase the likelihood of addiction but chronic abuse of Ritalin can lead to marked tolerance and psychic dependence with varying degrees of abnormal behaviour.

Ritalin, it is warned, should be employed with caution in emotionally unstable patients, such as those with a history of drug dependence or alcoholism, because such patients may increase the dosage on their own initiative.

Ritalin should also be used with caution in patients with epilepsy since there may be an increase in seizure frequency.

And height and weight should be carefully monitored in children, as prolonged therapy may result in growth retardation. (A child might lose several inches in possible height – though if treatment is stopped, there is generally a growth spurt). It is perhaps worth mentioning here my view that if a drug is powerful enough to retard growth, it does not seem entirely unreasonable to suspect that the chances are high that it may be having other powerful effects upon and within the body.

Doctors are also warned that careful supervision is required during drug withdrawal, since depression as well as renewed overactivity can be unmasked. Long-term follow-up may be needed for some patients.

There have also been reports that children have committed suicide after drug withdrawal. And one study has shown that children who are treated with stimulants alone had higher arrest records and were more likely to be institutionalised.

Long-term use of Ritalin has been said to cause irritability and hyperactivity (these are, you may remember, the problems for which the drug is often prescribed). In a study published in Psychiatric Research and entitled ‘Cortical Atrophy in Young Adults With A History of Hyperactivity’ brain atrophy was reported in more than half of 24 adults treated with psychostimulants (though I don’t think anyone can say for sure whether or not the psychostimulants caused the brain atrophy, the possible link should make prescribers, teachers and parents who are fans of Ritalin stop and think for a moment).

As an aside, there has been some research done on mice.

When early safety tests were done on mice, researchers found that the drug caused an increase in hepatocellular adenomas and, in male mice only, an increase in hepatoblastomas (described as “a relatively rare rodent malignant tumour type”).

“The significance of these results to humans is unknown,” we are told.

Here, once again, is yet more proof of the total worthlessness of animal experiments and the ruthless and cynical attitude shown by drug companies and those government departments which allegedly exist to protect the public from unsafe drugs.

I have frequently argued that when drug companies perform pre-clinical tests on animals they do so knowing that if the tests show that a drug doesn’t cause any problems when given to animals, they can use the results to help convince the authorities that the drug is safe.

On the other hand, when a drug does cause a problem when given to animals, the results can be ignored on the grounds that “the significance of these results to humans is unknown.”

The question here is a very simple one: if the experiments on mice which showed that Ritalin causes cancer were of value, why is the drug still available on prescription for children? And if the experiments can safely be ignored (on the grounds that animals are so different to human beings that the results are irrelevant), why were the tests done in the first place?

I don’t expect any answers. I just like asking the questions.

Whenever I write about Ritalin I am inundated with letters, faxes and emails from parents, teachers and social workers insisting that Ritalin is “very safe.” I suspect these optimistic folk must either be unable to read or too lazy to do any research into the safety of a product which they are recommending with such enthusiasm. Years of experience mean that I am not in the slightest bit surprised to find such crass stupidity exhibited by social workers. I am, however, surprised to find so many school teachers showing such a potent mixture of ignorance and misplaced trust.

Sadly, it seems it is partly through the enthusiasm of teachers and social workers that Ritalin is now so widely prescribed.

In theory, Ritalin should not be prescribed for any child unless a doctor has performed a thorough evaluation. However, despite this, when a team of researchers from the United Nations International Narcotics Control Board examined the records of nearly 400 paediatricians who had prescribed Ritalin, they found that half the children who had been diagnosed as suffering from MBD (or ADD or whatever) had not been given psychological or educational testing before being given the drug. The United Nations concluded that frustrated parents, teachers and doctors were too quick to stick a label of ADD onto children with behavioural problems (or, to be more accurate, to children whose behaviour was annoying the parents, teachers and doctors).

I am less than enthusiastic about this drug. In my view, the world would be a healthier place if all supplies of the damned stuff were wrapped in concrete and buried. I wouldn’t prescribe Ritalin for anyone – for anything.

But other doctors clearly don’t agree with me. Some observers have described Ritalin as a drug that can unlock a child’s potential. And although estimates about the number of children taking Ritalin vary, it has been claimed that in the USA alone, up to 12 % of all American boys aged between 6 and 14 are being prescribed Ritalin to treat various behavioural disorders. It is now not unknown for schools to arrange for children to be treated with Ritalin without obtaining parental permission.

I’ve been told that in some cases boys have been given Ritalin because they ran around the playground making a noise. They ran around the playground making a noise for heaven’s sake!

It is worth remembering that although doctors, parents and teachers have for over forty years now been enthusiastically recommending the use of Ritalin (and similar drugs) in the treatment of MBD, there are still a number of unanswered questions.

I don’t believe anyone definitely knows whether the drug works or whether it causes any permanent long-term damage. I don’t believe anyone knows for certain whether the drug does more harm than good. And, perhaps most astonishing of all, despite the fact that millions of children have been diagnosed as suffering from ADHD, ADD or MBD, and treated with powerful drugs, I don’t believe we even know whether any of these conditions really exist.

Back in 1970, the Committee on Government Operations of the US House of Representatives studied the use of behaviour modification drugs on children. At that time, around 200,000 to 300,000 children a year in the US were being given these drugs. The point was made that hyperactivity was considered a disease because it made it difficult for schools to be run “like maximum security prisons, for the comfort and the convenience of the teachers and administrators who work in them …”

Since then, the only thing that has changed is that the popularity of Ritalin has continued to rise and rise and rise inexorably.

Prescribing Ritalin is, in my view, authorised child abuse on a massive, global scale.

And, sadly, things aren’t likely to change.

When I wrote a paper expressing my doubts about Ritalin (a paper which encouraged several major newspapers to question the wisdom of prescribing this drug so widely), I received an avalanche of angry mail from furious parents, teachers and social workers.

“I’m not going to read your report,” wrote one father of a child on Ritalin. “I know it’s rubbish.”

Most worrying of all is the fact that parents who are reluctant to give their children Ritalin have been told that if they don’t give in and cooperate, their children will be taken away from them. This will, of course, not be the first example of “compulsory medication.” In some countries (notably parts of the USA), parents who do not have their children vaccinated are liable to arrest. And, of course, the fluoridation of drinking water is also common in many parts of the world.

Note: The essay above is taken from `How to stop your doctor killing you’ by Vernon Coleman, which was first published in 1996. You can purchase a copy of the book from the bookshop on his website.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2025/10/02/ritalin-child-abuse-on-prescription/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

The post Ritalin: Child Abuse On Prescription? appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.

During the covid crisis, nudging emerged as one of the primary psyops tools used by globalists, governments, non-government organisations (“NGOs”), and “security” (intelligence) forces against us.

In the following article, Dr. Robert Malone highlights some of the peer-reviewed papers which document just how effective the fear nudge has become.

For example, one study stated: “The nudging interventions such as mandatory PCR testing and small group seminars helped raise the rate of covid-19 vaccination; the most effective one is mandatory PCR.”

“This study took place in Turkey, but a physical intervention (mandatory PCR testing) was performed to coerce people into being vaccinated against their will,” Dr. Robert Malone writes.

Adding, “We all know, having lived through the covid crisis, that this intervention was performed informally throughout the Western world. These scientists just documented what governments and hospitals were doing to people worldwide.”

The Dark Arts: Fear Nudging

By Dr. Robert Malone

During the covid crisis, nudging emerged as one of the primary psyops tools used by globalists, governments, non-government organisations (“NGOs”), and “security” (intelligence) forces against us ordinary folk.

Recently, a number of peer-reviewed papers have come to light, exposing just how pervasive and damaging the use of nudges was during covid-19. They also reveal how nudging, including fear nudging, is being used to control people and populations on matters such as health, climate change, meat-eating, tobacco use, alcohol use, weight control, electoral candidates, political campaigns and more.

The PsyWar Campaign continues to work to control our hearts and minds on all matters of statecraft.

For those that need reminding, nudging is a form of psychological manipulation that is often used in psyops and psywar campaigns.

A nudge is a technique for modifying people’s behaviour in a predictable way by influencing people to behave in a desired outcome. Nudging is usually performed covertly, although that is not considered a criterion of the nudge. A nudge can be described as: “any aspects of the choice architecture that predictably alters people’s behaviour without forbidding any options or significantly changing their economic incentives.”

Nudging alters the environment, triggering automatic cognitive processes to favour the desired outcome. Nudging makes it more likely that a person will make a particular choice or behave in a particular way.

Fear nudging involves using nudges that utilise a fear component to drive behaviour, opinions or decision-making. While this is a particularly effective form of nudging, it is absolutely unethical, in my opinion, and that of others.

The peer-reviewed papers below document just how effective the fear nudge has become and how globalists and governments alike routinely use this technique to control populations.

Abstract

Internet users are inundated with attempts to persuade, including digital nudges like defaults, friction and reinforcement.

When these nudges fail to be transparent, optional and beneficial, they can become ‘dark patterns,’ categorised here under the acronym FORCES (Frame, Obstruct, Ruse, Compel, Entangle, Seduce). 

Elsewhere, psychological principles like negativity bias, the curiosity gap, and fluency are exploited to make social content viral, while more covert tactics including astroturfing, meta-nudging, and inoculation are used to manufacture consensus. 

The power of these techniques is set to increase in line with technological advances such as predictive algorithms, generative AI, and virtual reality. 

Digital nudges can be used for altruistic purposes including protection against manipulation, but behavioural interventions have mixed effects at best.

Tactics of FORCES (Frame, Obstruct, Ruse, Compel, Entangle, Seduce), which are being used by governments, globalists, and NGOs to control populations

The above graphics are from the paper listed HERE.

Abstract

Nudging, a controversial technique for modifying people’s behaviour in a predictable way, is claimed to preserve freedom of choice while simultaneously influencing it.

Nudging had been largely confined to situations such as promoting healthy eating choices but has been employed in the coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) crisis in a shift towards measures that involve significantly less choice, such as shoves and behavioural prods. 

Shared decision making (SDM), a method for direct involvement and autonomy, is an alternative approach to communicate risk.

Predominantly peer-reviewed scientific publications from standard literature databases like PubMed, PsycInfo, and Psyndex were evaluated in a narrative review.

The so-called fear nudges, as well as the dissemination of strongly emotionalising or moralising messages can lead to intense psycho-physical stress. 

The use of these nudges by specialised units during the covid-19 pandemic generated a societal atmosphere of fear that precipitated a deterioration of the mental and physical health of the population. 

Major recommendations of the German Covid-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) study, which are based on elements of nudging and coercive measures, do not comply with ethical principles, basic psychological principles or evidence-based data. 

(Shared decision-making) SDM was misused in the covid-19 crisis, which helped to achieve one-sided goals of governments. 

The emphasis on utilitarian thinking is criticised and the unethical behaviour of decision makers is explained by both using the concept of moral disengagement and the maturity level of coping strategies. 

There should be a return to an open-ended, democratic and pluralistic scientific debate without using nudges. It is therefore necessary to return to the origins of SDM.

The link to the full paper is HERE.

The dark nudge is an incredibly effective fear-based tool that governments, political candidates, companies, NGOs, the security state and others use to control thought and action at the individual and population level. This psyops tool has been, is and will be utilised against ordinary people.

• A search on “covid-19 vaccine and hesitancy” in PubMed pulls up 5,550 results.
• A search on “vaccine and hesitancy” in PubMed pulls up 7,981 results.

The use of the nudge is a key strategy that many organisations resort to in order to “overcome” vaccine hesitancy.

The peer-reviewed paper below established that some hospitals used psychological torture and even physical discomfort to induce people to accept covid-19 vaccination.

The link to the full paper is HERE.  From the paper:

Abstract

Methods

We conducted an explanatory sequential designed observational mixed-methods study, including quantitative and qualitative sections consecutively in two different pandemic hospitals between 15 September 2021 and 1 April 2022. The characteristics of vaccinated and unvaccinated (vaccination of healthcare workers) HCWs were compared.

The vaccine hesitancy scales were applied, and the effect of nudging, such as mandatory PCR and education, were evaluated. In-depth interviews were performed to investigate the covid-19 vaccine hesitancy among HCWs according to the Health Belief Model.

Results

… After the mandatory weekly PCR request nudge, 83.33 % (130/156) vaccine-hesitant HCWs were vaccinated, and 8.3 % (13/156) after the small group seminars and mandatory PCR every two days.

Conclusions

The nudging interventions such as mandatory PCR testing and small group seminars helped raise the rate of covid-19 vaccination; the most effective one is mandatory PCR.

This study took place in Turkey, but a physical intervention (mandatory PCR testing) was performed to coerce people into being vaccinated against their will.

We all know, having lived through the covid crisis, that this intervention was performed informally throughout the Western world. These scientists just documented what governments and hospitals were doing to people worldwide.

The truth is that “the machine” (the system) did this to us. This goes beyond some small unethical breach, as using PCR testing to harass and cause physical discomfort of the unvaccinated was performed worldwide. Hence, fear nudging that applied physical discomfort and even pain was performed on millions of people worldwide.

The number of peer-reviewed papers documenting and encouraging the use of dark nudges is astounding. Often, these organisations don’t even know the name of this technique – they just do it because it is effective.

It is time that legislative action be considered to control the abuse of this psyops technique that can border on psychological and even physical torture.

Source:  https://expose-news.com/2024/07/27/legislation-should-be-passed-to-control-the-abuse-of-nudging/

Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YBM3rvf5ydDM/

Gab: https://gab.com/hopegirl

Telegram: https://t.me/Hopegirl587

EMF Protection Products: www.ftwproject.com

QEG Clean Energy Academy: www.cleanenergyacademy.com

Forbidden Tech Book: www.forbiddentech.website

The post Legislation should be passed to control the abuse of “nudging” techniques that can border on psychological and even physical torture appeared first on HopeGirl Blog.